Rick,
I don't believe you have a security issue. It has been a while, but I tend to
remember having to use OWNER with no operand in order to see all the jobs
on the system (not just my own) when running SDSF in batch. Please feed
that into ISFIN on in.1 with DA on in.2 and in.0 set to 2. Let
Ituriel,
You may want to include the processing of 0205 User Group Connect Detail
Records. By relying solely on 0102 records, you will miss any connections to
Global groups.
Perhaps what you could do is process the 0205 records first to create the
group connects followed by the 0102 records to
Bill Cochran wrote:
Can anyone tell me if this new function is worth using? Also, I found the note
at the bottom about using this new function with Large Block Interface. We
don't currently use LBI, but were wondering which of these functions is more
beneficial since you can't use both per the
Hank,
I tried this...
in.2 = DA
in.1 = OWNER
in.0 = 2
execio * diskw isfin (STEM IN. finis)
address linkmvs SDSF
execio * diskr isfout (STEM SDSF. finis)
FREE F(ISFIN ISFOUT)
And got the same output.
Thanks for the response. Any other ideas?
Hank Medler wrote:
Rick,
I don't believe you
1. Issue the OWNER command before the DA command
2. Issue the WHO command. This will tell you many settings, and might help
explain the problem.
Gadi
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rich
Smrcina
Sent: Tuesday, March 25,
On Mon, 2008-03-24 at 23:01 -0500, Joel C. Ewing wrote:
the backup dataset itself doesn't get deleted until
you exit normally from EDIT. If your TSO/ISPF session terminates
abnormally (like a timeout) while EDIT is in this state, the backup
dataset is not deleted and becomes orphaned.
You should also add the PREFIX command before the DA command.
Adding the SET DISPLAY command is also a good idea. It will show you the
settings of the OWNER. PREFIX and SYSNAME parameters.
Gadi
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
It is. in.1 is the first command issued 'OWNER', in.2 is the second
command issued 'DA'.
גדי בן אבי wrote:
1. Issue the OWNER command before the DA command
2. Issue the WHO command. This will tell you many settings, and might help explain the problem.
Gadi
-Original Message-
From:
Your previous response also asked for the WHO output, here it is.
USERID=P390,PROC=BATCH,TERMINAL=BATCH,GRPINDEX=3,GRPNAME=ISFUSER,MVS=z/OS
01.04
RMF/DA=NOTACC,SERVER=YES,SERVERNAME=SDSF,JESNAME=JES2,MEMBER=SYS1,SYSNAME=P390,
Are PREFIX and SET DISPLAY commands entered by themselves (like
What safety guards are there on z9bc hardware to prevent over-heating?
(Such as when the building's coolers are inoperable.)Are there messages
to console to prompt for shutdown?I searched for white paper, flash,
archives, etc.
Thanks,
Joel M Ivey
University of SC
Yes,
The PREFIX and SET DISPLAY command are entered by themselves
I thing the PREFIX command is the actual command your are missing.
Gadi
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rich
Smrcina
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 2:47 PM
On Mon, 24 Mar 2008 16:41:38 -0700, Skip Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I dug into the doc once again for more info on Mark's reference to
'striping'. I find this comment in Diagnosis: Tools and Service Aids:
Extended format data sets are supported by z/OS V1R6 and later releases.
Extended
Google IBM z9 cooling. Also check out
http://www.research.ibm.com/journal/rd/511/harrer.pdf. The z9 has a MRU,
modular refrigeration unit.
Joel M Ivey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What safety guards are there on z9bc
hardware to prevent over-heating?
(Such as when the building's coolers are
On 24 Mar 2008 14:03:15 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gerhard Adam)
wrote:
What's much harder for both data processing and for users is to figure
out how to collect and use data that might give us that competitive
advantage - without spending more than the return.
Agreed. But that's a question
On 24 Mar 2008 16:02:53 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Patrick
O'Keefe) wrote:
That depends on who defines competetive advantage.
In most businesses there must be protection of confidential or
proprietary information.
I've heard ads for a company that provides Sales Leads.
Of course, that
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Joel C. Ewing
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2008 11:02 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: ISPF Backup Files
Also look at prior discussion on this list for ispf edit recovery from
May 2007:
For
From desktops to mainframes and all flavors of servers in between lies a
vast ocean of opportunities for IT folks.
In my daily non-work life I run into people who buy a computer but can't
set it up even following the pictures.
I run into people who don't understand why an undersized PC won't
I tried PREFIX and I get COMMAND NOT AUTHORIZED.
גדי בן אבי wrote:
Yes,
The PREFIX and SET DISPLAY command are entered by themselves
I thing the PREFIX command is the actual command your are missing.
Gadi
--
Rich Smrcina
VM Assist, Inc.
Phone: 414-491-6001
Ans Service: 360-715-2467
On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 10:25:01 -0500, Rugen, Len [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm doing some planning for a end-of-life for the mainframe conversion
project, as in the 9th year of our 5 year plan to get off this system.
We have View Direct / Mobius report viewer. It has 100,000's of HSM
Thanks, Patrick.
The link, btw, is harrer.html .
On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 06:14:16 -0700, Patrick Falcone
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Google IBM z9 cooling. Also check out
http://www.research.ibm.com/journal/rd/511/harrer.pdf. The z9 has a MRU,
modular refrigeration unit.
Joel M Ivey [EMAIL
The you have to change your security settings either is ISFPARMS or RACF.
Gadi
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rich
Smrcina
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 3:35 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: More SDSF security
No, my mistake. It's either pdf or html.
On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 08:45:11 -0500, Joel M Ivey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, Patrick.
The link, btw, is harrer.html .
On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 06:14:16 -0700, Patrick Falcone
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Google IBM z9 cooling. Also check out
In [EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 03/21/2008
at 09:26 AM, Peter Relson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
You have no way of knowing what intricate ramifications there might be
for bits that are not programming interfaces that you happen to think do
what you want. And we have no reason to avoid making changes in
Anyone have a link to the list of the current user requirements that have been
submitted to IBM (requirements in the context of Share Requirements)?
Thanks,
Cal
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
Anyone using this new facility,looking for any feedback-positive or negative.
We are going to ZOS 1.9 and are considering using this new facility.
Bill Shelaga
Mainframe,Technical Specialist
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff
That was actually part of the original post.
I added:
ILPROC(BATCH),
to:
GROUP NAME(ISFSPROG), in ISFPRM00. I also have this entry below:
NTBL NAME(BATCH)
NTBLENT STRING(BATCH),OFFSET(1)
To catch the PROC name BATCH when my job runs and authorize it as a
ISFSPROG TSO User instead of
There is a message about the temperature threshold posted to the HMC
under hardware messages.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Joel M Ivey
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 8:46 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: z9
Unless I previously missed it, I think this is the first time volume 6 has
been available.
Volume 6: Introduction to security, RACF® , Digital certificates and
PKI, Kerberos, cryptography and z990 integrated cryptography,
zSeries® firewall technologies, LDAP, Enterprise identity mapping (EIM),
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Zelden
Unless I previously missed it, I think this is the first time
volume 6 has been available.
Volume 6: Introduction to security, RACF(r) , Digital
certificates and PKI, Kerberos, cryptography and z990
I am no performance expert and I am basically mostly using Cheryl Watson
quickstart (or whatever it is called). We are only using one service class
for TSO users. For the most part it works fine but during batch window we
have times when the operators let a bunch of stuff run in high priority
And see if the PREFIX is set to * for all names.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of ??? ?? ???
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 7:07 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: More SDSF security questions
1. Issue the OWNER command
Look in the archives for the past 2-3 weeks, particularly for posts by Sam
Knutson, Skip Robinson, Mark Zelden, Ed Jaffe and Peter Relson. My feeling
is that the support will benefit huge shops that have hit a slowdown due to
the limitations of the MANx dataset issues, but it will require (at
QDF (quick dirty fix) is to set TSO period 2 to importance 3.
This should change things from intolerable to manageable G
If you want no further calls for ever and ever, Set TSO period 2 to
importance 2. This will place TSO ahead of PRODHI. (be careful!).
RMF SYSRPTS(WLMGL) provides a wealth of
I have 3 periods, adjusted to your imp's, they would be something like
this:
# Duration Imp Goal description
- - -
1 1500 280% 2 sec
2 5000 380% 15 sec
3 4vel+IO ? 10%
I suspect your
Evidently not, this appears to be the output from SET DISPLAY (it's hard
to tell):
PREFIX=P390* DEST=(ALL) OWNER=* SYSNAME=
Dennis Trojak wrote:
And see if the PREFIX is set to * for all names.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
in.2 = DA OJOB
perhaps?
Regards,
Ulrich Krueger
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Rich Smrcina
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 04:44
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: More SDSF security questions
Hank,
I tried this...
in.2
It depends on your CPU speed and characteristics of TSO usage. If your
users run lots of long transactions like searches, CLISTs, foreground
things, they could suffer. Most TSO activity (in my experience) is of
the short variety, so as you see below I'm not shy about making 1st
period imp=1, but
I've got lots of these things lying
about, and a number of users who logoff by clicking that little X at the
upper right corner of their emulator sessions.
In that case, I'd recommend setting up the following DASD space management
rule:
If this type of dataset goes unused for 7 days, delete it.
On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 10:00:39 -0500, Aimee Houghton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am no performance expert and I am basically mostly using Cheryl Watson
quickstart (or whatever it is called). We are only using one service class
for TSO users. For the most part it works fine but during batch window
Thanks for the quick and informative response. I will look into your
suggestions. I am a little leery about putting TSO above hot batch as well.
Part of the problem is that the operators pretty much open the flood gates
at about 10 pm and let all the batch compete. That is a whole different
Now I don't even appear on the list (the list is empty). :(
Ulrich Krueger wrote:
in.2 = DA OJOB
perhaps?
Regards,
Ulrich Krueger
--
Rich Smrcina
VM Assist, Inc.
Phone: 414-491-6001
Ans Service: 360-715-2467
rich.smrcina at vmassist.com
http://www.linkedin.com/in/richsmrcina
Catch the
On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 10:20 -0500, Rugen, Len wrote:
1 1500 280% 2 sec
2 5000 380% 15 sec
3 4vel+IO ? 10%
On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 11:24 -0400, Dave Thorn wrote:
Duration Imp. Description
If the operators are opening the floodgates, have you considered using
WLM managed initiators? That will let WLM initiate only whatever it
believes it can handle.
As for your TSO vs. Prod batch issue, how many TSO users are competing
with the batch, what are they doing that's running so long
Wayne Driscoll wrote:
Look in the archives for the past 2-3 weeks, particularly for posts by Sam
Knutson, Skip Robinson, Mark Zelden, Ed Jaffe and Peter Relson. My feeling
is that the support will benefit huge shops that have hit a slowdown due to
the limitations of the MANx dataset [...]
In your case, the correct solution would be to set up SDSF command security
to prevent the operators from changing the service classes. Of course this
will probably become a management political hot potato. As a carrot I
would also sit down with operators and determine what changes could be made
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 03/21/2008
at 08:39 AM, Jim Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
They are offering Enterprise Extender.
Isn't it easier to configure your VTAM's to use enterprise extender and
forget ATT?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on
03/21/2008
at 05:20 PM, Kirk Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
This distinction has no analog in modern operating
systems, where interfaces are expressed *entirely* by APIs and service
routines, and not by skipping through PSA-ASCB-etc.etc.
That's certainly the preference
If they are running batch that is causing resource contentions with
itself, it's not good. If their batch is done in time to have 4 idle
hours at the end of their shift, you don't have a performance problem.
If you are paying measured usage rates on a high-cpu value that happens
AT NIGHT, it's
Yes, WLM managed initiators can be your best friend. When the machine gets
saturated, WLM will bring the work under control.
Also a good starting point would be to back off the goals for batch. It's
better if the work is over-achieving rather than under-achieving.
On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 10:38:59
Here is my service class for TSO:
Base goal:
CPU Critical flag: NO
# Duration Imp Goal description
- - -
1 800280% complete within 00:00:00.300
2 4Execution velocity of 40
Unless you're
On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 16:40:31 +0100, R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wayne Driscoll wrote:
Look in the archives for the past 2-3 weeks, particularly for posts by Sam
Knutson, Skip Robinson, Mark Zelden, Ed Jaffe and Peter Relson. My feeling
is that the support will benefit huge shops that have
On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 11:38:23 -0400, David Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1 100199% complete within 00:00:00.300
2 14000 190% complete within 00:00:02.000
3 3Execution velocity of 10
100 service units for P1 and 99% complete?!What percentage
of your
David Andrews wrote:
Guess I'll contribute my $.02. Tiny (2096-G01) uniprocessor.
1 100199% complete within 00:00:00.300
2 14000 190% complete within 00:00:02.000
3 3Execution velocity of 10
Hey! This is fun! (2096-L03)
# Duration Imp Goal
Service routines that take structure pointers aren't a problem so long as
the structure is part of the interface and not the actual kernel
implementation structure.
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 7:35 AM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on
03/21/2008
at
On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 10:59 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote:
100 service units for P1 and 99% complete?!What percentage
of your transactions actually fall into P1?
00.00.00.150 98.6
00.00.00.180 98.9
00.00.00.210 99.0
00.00.00.240 99.2
00.00.00.270 99.3
00.00.00.300 99.4
00.00.00.330 99.4
Hi folks
Has anyone managed to successfully import into RACF a self-signed server
certificate generated by Sterling Commerce's Windows-based Certificate
Wizard?
I've been sent one by one of our customers; they use it on their Windows-based
C:D server, apparently quite successfully on their
--snip---
Unless I previously missed it, I think this is the first time
volume 6 has been available.
Volume 6: Introduction to security, RACF(r) , Digital
certificates and PKI, Kerberos, cryptography and z990
integrated cryptography, zSeries(r) firewall
-snip---
Thanks for the quick and informative response. I will look into your
suggestions. I am a little leery about putting TSO above hot batch as well.
Part of the problem is that the operators pretty much open the flood gates
at about 10 pm and let all the batch
-snip---
In your case, the correct solution would be to set up SDSF command security
to prevent the operators from changing the service classes. Of course this
will probably become a management political hot potato. As a carrot I
would also sit down
On 25 Mar 2008 06:37:16 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
(Message-ID:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rich Smrcina) wrote:
I tried PREFIX and I get COMMAND NOT AUTHORIZED.
You had given us the output of the WHO command in
batch, but you never showed us the output from what you
On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 11:47:07 -0500, Arthur T. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Many years back I found out that the userid used to
search the SDSF tables is *not* the RACF userid when done
from batch. Instead, it's the
jobname-minus-last-character. I had opened a PMR; I forget
details of the
On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 12:08:37 -0500, Mark Zelden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 11:47:07 -0500, Arthur T. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Many years back I found out that the userid used to
search the SDSF tables is *not* the RACF userid when done
from batch. Instead, it's the
Matthew Stitt wrote:
In your case, the correct solution would be to set up SDSF command security
to prevent the operators from changing the service classes. Of course this
will probably become a management political hot potato. As a carrot I
would also sit down with operators and determine
Mark Zelden wrote:
[...]
As mentioned... lots in the archives about this (even before the recent
threads).
1) Speed of offloading (being able to keep up with records being written).
IMHO I can live with it (YMMV). In case of SMF (expected accepted)
flood I can use more MANx datasets as a
WOW. I REALLY appreciate all the feedback. I signed up for this listserv
quite a long time ago and then promptly forgot about it for the most part.
Not a lot happening in our shop mainframe-wise and I haven't had to think
about much for awhile. This WLM thing has been an intermittent problem
I would like to write a console exit. I have an example for msg IEE362A, but
it is a single line message. The message I want to trap and process is
IEE391A which is a multiple line message. Can anyone point me at the manual
that describes exits for the console?
--
Mark Pace
Mainline
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Pace
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 12:35 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Console exits
I would like to write a console exit. I have an example for
msg IEE362A, but
it is a
Hi Brian,
could you send the RACDCERT command you used?
Cheers
Wolfgang
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 5:19 PM
Subject: Import Connect:Direct self-signed certificate into RACF?
Hi
Hi Brian,
the following once worked for me:
//?? EXEC PGM=IKJEFT01??? ?
//SYSTSPRT DD SYSOUT=*??? ?
//SYSABEND DD SYSOUT=*??? ?
//SYSTSIN DD
Thanks, John.
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 1:40 PM, McKown, John [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
MPF exits:
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/iea2e481/2.11
--
John McKown
Senior Systems Programmer
HealthMarkets
Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage
Administrative
Hi Wolfgang
I used the following (real names changed)
RACDCERT -
ID(CDTASK) -
ADD('SSCROOT.CER') -
TRUST -
WITHLABEL('My WindowsCD Partner')
RACDCERT -
ID(CDTASK) -
CONNECT(ID(CDTASK) LABEL('My WindowsCD Partner') -
When attempting to use this tool I get the error;
MSG 004: SYSTEM ERROR: Target Zone Not Valid
Report Level:1.04.4 Last Update:2005/08/17
For target zone PZOS17A
MSG 004: SYSTEM ERROR: Target Zone Not Valid
An smpe list for zone PZOS17A is
Matt Dazzo wrote:
When attempting to use this tool I get the error;
MSG 004: SYSTEM ERROR: Target Zone Not Valid
Report Level:1.04.4 Last Update:2005/08/17
For target zone PZOS17A
MSG 004: SYSTEM ERROR: Target Zone Not Valid
Your
One more question. Are the durations cumulative or per period? i.e. if I
setup as follows, does a transaction fall to period three after 5000 service
units or 7500? I looked in the redbook System Programmer's Guide to:
Workload Manager but couldn't find the answer.
Thanks again.
Aimee
You may get that error if you are in the SMP Dialog while running the
EPSPT tool in batch.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark Jacobs
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 2:49 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN]
As a carrot I would also sit down with operators and determine what changes
could be made with the batch service classes to keep them from moving things
around.
Considering that operators tend to look only at the near term and not always
realise that their 'helpful' changes usually cause more
IIRC the durations are cumulative (and inclusive).
e.g. Per 1 dur 1000
per 2 dur 1 (includes the previous 1000)
per 3 (unending)
IOW, PER 1 (and associated characteristics will last for the 1st 1000
SU's
PER 2 (and associated characteristics will last for the next
On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 12:26:10 -0500, Aimee Houghton wrote:
We have talked a little bit about WLM managed initiators and may wind up
doing that.
It's really easy to do. And if you have problems, it's just as easy to go
back.
One consequence is that you can't see what's happening on the SDSF
---snip--
As a carrot I would also sit down with operators and determine what changes
could be made with the batch service classes to keep them from moving things around.
Considering that operators tend to look only at the near term and not always
just realized I never put in the as follows stuff.
One more question. Are the durations cumulative or per period? i.e. if I
setup as follows, does a transaction fall to period three after 5000 service
units or 7500? I looked in the redbook System Programmer's Guide to:
Workload Manager but
After 5000..
snip
One more question. Are the durations cumulative or per period? i.e. if
I
setup as follows, does a transaction fall to period three after 5000
service
units or 7500? I looked in the redbook System Programmer's Guide to:
Workload Manager but couldn't find the answer.
#
On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 13:50:16 -0500, Aimee Houghton wrote:
One more question. Are the durations cumulative or per period?
From Planning:Workload Management:
Duration is the amount of service that period should consume before going on
the next goal.
--
Tom Marchant
I don't know that it is.
You will get re-entered for each line, and will need to keep track of
the msgid as you can't be sure the lines will be presented consecutively
for the same message for the same address space. A real problem if you
have the potential for more than one address space to issue
In a message dated 3/24/2008 2:10:15 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Even if the z10 offered a Translate Extended instruction, the OP couldn't
count on it being there on every Customer's machine for quite a while.
The OP can use dual paths. If executing on
On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 14:13:48 -0500, Staller, Allan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
After 5000..
snip
One more question. Are the durations cumulative or per period? i.e. if
I
setup as follows, does a transaction fall to period three after 5000
service
units or 7500? I looked in the redbook System
On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 13:56:53 -0500, Staller, Allan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
IIRC the durations are cumulative (and inclusive).
e.g. Per 1 dur 1000
per 2 dur 1 (includes the previous 1000)
per 3 (unending)
That is not correct. It may not be in the Redbook, but it says this in
Thanks for the update
SNIP
snip
One more question. Are the durations cumulative or per period? i.e.
if
I
setup as follows, does a transaction fall to period three after 5000
service
units or 7500? I looked in the redbook System Programmer's Guide to:
Workload Manager but couldn't find the
On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 14:42:46 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote:
... This is really easy to test.
Define a batch service class with 3 periods. P1 with a DUR of 2 and
P2 with a DUR of 20001. Then submit a job that you know will run for at least
a few minutes. You should be able to see via SDSF that
Actually, I think that I've found the problem. There appears to be a
firewall between the mainframe and the Windows box. The ftp which is
failing is large (small ftps succeed!) and my estimate is that it is
taking just a bit over 2 minutes to complete the data transfer. I
think the firewall
In TSO, I get this from the WHO command on the P390 user:
USERID=P390,PROC=DBSPROC,TERMINAL=LCL701,GRPINDEX=2,GRPNAME=ISFOPER,
MVS=z/OS 01.04.00,JES2=z/OS 1.4,SDSF=HQX7707,ISPF=5.2,RMF/DA=NOTACC,
and from batch:
USERID=P390,PROC=BATCH,TERMINAL=BATCH,GRPINDEX=3,GRPNAME=ISFUSER,MVS=z/OS
01.04
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of gah
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 3:15 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Convert EBCDIC to ASCII in batch?
Actually, I think that I've found the problem. There
appears to be
Add ILPROC=BATCH to your ISFOPER group name parameters in ISFGRP and it
should let you run batch jobs with your ISFOPER definitions for
userid=P390.
Dennis
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rich Smrcina
Sent: Tuesday, March 25,
I'm trying to override an existing definition. can I not do that? Do I
need to create my own?
Mark Zelden wrote:
The biggest problem I have found with batch is that many shops have
SDSF security set up (from the default/sample parms) based on TSO
authorities (JCL, OPER, ACCT) and TSOAUTH is
Yep - I had one setup and working. Then I changed the name of my MANx
datasets, and then the message number changed!
Changed from using SYS1.MANx datasets to SYS1.MISZOS.MANx it appears that
the dump message has changed!?!?!
From:
*IEE362A SMF ENTER DUMP FOR SYS1.MAN2 ON PCAT01
To:
*IEE391A SMF
On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 11:41:29 -0700 (PDT), in bit.listserv.ibm-main you
wrote:
Pete Dashwood wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.zdnet.com/projectfailures/?p=666
(Not from where I'm standing - but I might not be standing the right
place)
I
Mark Pace wrote:
Yep - I had one setup and working. Then I changed the name of my MANx
datasets, and then the message number changed!
Changed from using SYS1.MANx datasets to SYS1.MISZOS.MANx it appears that
the dump message has changed!?!?!
From:
*IEE362A SMF ENTER DUMP FOR SYS1.MAN2 ON
Use IEFU29 - the one in SAMPLIB has code to handle either. Minor
modifications to get it working.
Shane ...
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu wrote on 26/03/2008
06:45:11 AM:
Yep - I had one setup and working. Then I changed the name of my MANx
datasets, and then the
That estimate may be vastly overstated. A large number of in-house COBOL
systems and packages written in COBOL have been replace by things like SAP.
I disagree with that, but there is no (recent) evidence to support it either
way.
The last studies I saw were for Y2K, and there was still a lot
Thanks, Bob. That makes sense. They used to use OPC/A on this LPAR.
I can drop this exit in the bit bucket.
Bill
Bob Shannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED].
..
I show it as OPC/A dialog user. Probably communicating with a
scheduling package.
Bob Shannon
I'm not sure I understand the question. If you are using parms similar to
hlq.SISFJCL(ISFPRM00) and want to do something in batch based on userid,
then you will have to add the group prior to the groups defined in those
parms (or at least prior to the ISFUSER group) since the first match is what
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
