Have you checked the dump?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Stewart, David James
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 9:48 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: DD DUMMY allocate any BUFFERS?
Hi
I cannot find this information on
Hi
I cannot find this information on IBM
Does DD DUMMY cause any QSAM BUFFERS to be allocated for QSAM files? ie.
The default value of 5?
I'm trying to find out why we getting a S878 on a job with REGION=0M on
the jobcard.
There is several other possible reasons but I want to elimin
"Richard Pinion" wrote in message
news:...
I recently upgraded from z/OS 1.10 to 1.12. I am receiving the following
messages when running tape jobs. This didn't happen on 1.10. I've looked
through the RMM 1.12 manuals and the migration documentation. I don't
understand why this is happening.
You could fake the point & shoot by simply adding code in the )Proc
section..
pseudo proc section code (I forget the syntax right now)...
If .cursor = "yourvar"
yourvar = 1
Dan
-Original Message-
From: Micheal Butz
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 10:02 PM Newsgroups: bit.li
Have you thought about using a TYPE(PS) field that could be clicked to assign a
value to the input/output field? For example:
Confirm Delete ===> _ _ _ Yes or No
'Yes' and 'No' would be defined as TYPE(PS), and the user would click either of
these fields to set the contents of the Confirm
Type(PS). Are text type fields I am looking for a field that is input/
output
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 21, 2011, at 9:58 AM, DanD wrote:
How about trying ...
@ TYPE(PS)
Dan
-Original Message- From: michealbutz
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2011 6:27 PM Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-
המקום ינחם אתכם בתוך שאר אבלי ציון וירושלים
HaMaqom y'nahem etchem b'toch shaar avelei Tziyon v'Yrushalayim.
May the Omnipresent one comfort you among the mourners of Zion and
Jerusalem.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
> Beha
On 3/21/2011 1:21 PM, John McKown wrote:
Interesting code. I don't know that I like using C functions to OPEN and
READ the file in COBOL. It seems to bypass some of the normal COBOL
functionality that COBOL programmers would want.
Huh? What sort of functionality can't be used here?
I'd likely
I know it's off topic, but I'll pray for his soul.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Shai Hess
Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2011 8:52 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: my father passed away
March 19, 2011
To all my friends i
IBM has a free Adobe plugin that provides Bookie-like searches of PDF files,
provided that the proper indexes have been created by the PDF publisher.
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg27018852
In my experience, not all IBM manuals have been indexed.
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 13:10,
>Will upgrading to z/OS 1.11 from 1.9 add more utilization to the CPU?
>IF so, how much?
>We are two LPARs...one test and one production.
IBM (Canada) used to promise that CPU usage would not go up (and, maybe would
go down) if you did not exploit any new function when you upgraded products.
But
Interesting code. I don't know that I like using C functions to OPEN and
READ the file in COBOL. It seems to bypass some of the normal COBOL
functionality that COBOL programmers would want. I'd likely use "environment
variable" facility in the ASSIGN clause as documented:
http://publibz.boulder.ib
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 12:23:27 +0200 Matan Cohen
wrote:
:>Hi,
:>One of my lpar is is suffering from
:>*IEA061E REPLACEMENT ASID SHORTAGE HAS BEEN DETECTED
:>I notices that the DB2 STC are ended with :
:>IEF352I ADDRESS SPACE UNAVAILABLE
:>I'm familiar with the option to start AS with REUSASID=YES b
Will upgrading to z/OS 1.11 from 1.9 add more utilization to the CPU? IF
so, how much? We are two LPARs...one test and one production.
John Norgauer
Senior Systems Programmer
Mainframe Technical Support Services
University of California Davis Medical Center
2315 Stockton Blvd
ASB 1300
Sacrament
I'm not understanding what is happening that you are questioning. Are you
saying that volume 050011 is *not* a scratch tape, and you are wondering why
RMM thinks it is? And that something similar is happening to every master tape
you try to mod onto?
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-O
Thank you, Dave.
That did the trick.
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Dave Salt wrote:
> Use the NEWAPPL(REV) parm to launch REVIEW, and then it will use the
> REVPROF profile.
>
> Dave Salt
>
> SimpList(tm) - try it; you'll get it!
>
> http://www.mackinney.com/products/program-development/simpl
I have no absolute answer readily at hand.
I suspect that the SETSYS TAPEDELETION is set such that tapes freed up by
recycle are reused automatically, thus I would add the additional volumes as
backup.
However, RTFM for confirmation.
We have no choice in this matter. We inherited the clien
Use the NEWAPPL(REV) parm to launch REVIEW, and then it will use the REVPROF
profile.
Dave Salt
SimpList(tm) - try it; you'll get it!
http://www.mackinney.com/products/program-development/simplist.html
> Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 13:50:15 -0400
> From: pacemainl...@gmail.com
> Subject: R
Allan,
We have no choice in this matter. We inherited the client and they had pooling
set up already. My question about adding volumes to the pool do I need to add
it as BACKUP or SPILL?
--- On Mon, 3/21/11, Staller, Allan wrote:
From: Staller, Allan
Subject: Re: FUZZY ABOUT SPILL VOLUME
It's
RV,'CMD(REVIEW)'
Which made me look and find that there is an ALIAS REV, so I tried
RV,'CMD(REV)'
That didn't make it use the REVPROF either.
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Dave Salt wrote:
> Does REVIEW run under an applid called REV? For example, do you start it by
> doing something l
Daniel,
"Forest, meet trees". :-)
If there's anybody on this list who won't admit to having done something
similar, they either haven't been doing system work, or they're lying!
I don't want to read a bunch of horror stories about others who have "oopsed",
just wanted to say "glad you got it
Does REVIEW run under an applid called REV? For example, do you start it by
doing something like this:
SELECT CMD(%REVIEW) NEWAPPL(REV)
If so, it should use REVPROF as the profile.
Dave Salt
SimpList(tm) - try it; you'll get it!
http://www.mackinney.com/products/program-development/simpl
Hi John,
Any Program in CICS defined as Threadsafe will run on the OPEN TCBs (L8/L9
TCB). If the program makes a DB2 Call then it will run on the L8 TCB as the
CICS/DB2 Exit is defined as CICSKey. If the Program makes a File Control call
then it will run on the L9 TCB.
The switching of TCBs
The initial capping is what sets a "hardcap" which will prevent the LPAR
from going beyound that weight. The weight is calculated based on your
active LPARs settings...not always 100% For example, if you have one
LPAR weighted at 10 and the other at 1, then for the LPAR with 10 it would
b
Works great, but it is slow when there are many/large PDFs in the directory.
Is there some way to create a search index?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Barry Merrill
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2011 4:06 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua
Will upgrading to z/OS 1.11 from 1.9 add more utilization to the CPU? We
are two LPARs...one test and one production.
John Norgauer
Senior Systems Programmer
Mainframe Technical Support Services
University of California Davis Medical Center
2315 Stockton Blvd
ASB 1300
Sacramento, Ca 95817
916-7
I recently upgraded from z/OS 1.10 to 1.12. I am receiving the following
messages when running tape jobs. This didn't happen on 1.10. I've looked
through the RMM 1.12 manuals and the migration documentation. I don't
understand why this is happening. To get around the volume being
rejected
Hmm. REVIEW must do something weird. I move REVPROF into a library in the
ISPTLIB search chain. Start REVIEW and it does not find the REVPROF. I did
a DDLIST and MEMBER REVPROF and it does find it in the library in the
ISPTLIB chain. I moved REVPROF into the users ISPF.ISPPROF and it works
per
The yolk's on me (egg on my face)
Grabbed an old RACF copy job and made the assumption it was current. It
wasn't. Found right database and re-ran. Violas and cellos...we are there.
(Slinking away)
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
thanks Rob,
I familiar with stoping the RRS .
we have a weekly process which shutdown the DB2 subsystem for the DFDSS DASD
backup. there is no work done on the DB2 so it's not consider as a down time
for us.
beside this weekly backup we are also face (from time to time) reasons which
force us to st
Yes, these are the only 2 LPARs running and we limit the MSUs to save on
software costs.
If we remove the Initial Capping, will the LPARs still be able to go beyond
the Defined Capacity without WLM trying to enforce the 4HRA?
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion Lis
Over on the mvs-oe list there was a thread about how
to run a program under the z/OS UNIX shell. I was
never quite clear what the OP was trying to accomplish
so I finally just posted a COBOL program and how to
run it.
I was kinda' proud of the code because I think you'll
find most COBOL programme
Put a copy of REVPROF in any of the data sets attached to ISPTLIB. When a new
user goes into REVIEW for the first time, ISPF sees they don't have a member
called REVPROF in their ISPPROF data set, and so it searches for REVPROF in the
ISPTLIB data sets. If it finds it, it copies it from there. I
How about trying ...
@ TYPE(PS)
Dan
-Original Message-
From: michealbutz
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2011 6:27 PM Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Subject: ISPF Point and Shoot
I can't seem to get Point and shoot right
The attribute field that is defined needs to have PAS(ON)
So f
What populates the default userid.ISPF.ISPPROF? I've installed REVIEW and
part of the directions are to copy REVPROF into your ISPPROF. I may have to
do this for each existing user, but where can I add this so that any new
users will have it automatically?
--
Mark D Pace
Senior Systems Engineer
MEMDSENQMGMT and S99DASUP are independent, as you say. S99DASUP allows
an authorized caller to suppress some of the accounting overhead
associated with Allocation. It is intended for use with VSAM data sets,
since VSAM records more information in its SMF records than Allocation
and SMF, which
IMO, dfHSM pooling of tapes is a *BAD* idea(ADDVOL) . If you really need to
segregate dfHSM tapes from the "other" tapes, use your tape management system
to provide the appropriate scratch pool support. Check the values for SETSYS
TAPEDELETION and SETSYS SELECTVOLUME. There will be several o
There is only one way to "compromise" the OTP tokens and that is to get the
seed used to generate the OTP codes. The compromise is permanent, for the
entire lifetime of the token, as one can generate any OTP code.
First of all, RSA should not have kept the seeds after the delivery of the
tokens
Very true about the automatic switch to the QR TCB for a non-threadsafe CICS
function. I guess I should have said that doing that switch is relatively
expensive and so really needs to be avoided as much as possible. And I cannot
remember exactly when the code switches back to the L8/L9 TCB from
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 06:09:31 -0500, John McKown
wrote:
>I'm not a expert, but I'd look at two possibilities.
Neither am I, but I did a few experiments a couple of years ago.
>Another possibility, but more difficult to implement, is to continue to
>use your UNIX code. This can be done in CICS,
>No DU-AL?
There is a DU-AL, just not one that is associated with the work unit that
was interrupted, and this one does not have ALET=2 set up.
>Then SSAR to home and ALET 1 (hardware) will do the job.
Yes it will. Is that easier than SAC 768 ... SAC 0 if your code is in
common storage?
Peter
Martin Packer pisze:
Rob, I was going to ask the same question: About the necessity of
(probably daily) restarting of DB2. There was a time - ten years or so ago
- when a substantial minority DID restart DB2 nightly. Even with the
Virtual Storage crunches going on it seemed a not-so-good idea.
Rob, I was going to ask the same question: About the necessity of
(probably daily) restarting of DB2. There was a time - ten years or so ago
- when a substantial minority DID restart DB2 nightly. Even with the
Virtual Storage crunches going on it seemed a not-so-good idea. An example
of why wou
The most common reason for DB2 address spaces to be marked non-reusable these
days is that they have a cross-memory bind to the RRS address space. You
*could* probably relieve the shortage by stopping and re-starting the RRS
address space - however there are implications to doing this while you
or this...
)PROC
&VAR1 = &ZCMD
...
)PNTS
FIELD(ZPS1) VAR(ZCMD) VAL(1)
Regards,
John K
From:
michealbutz
To:
IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date:
03/19/2011 09:45 PM
Subject:
Re: ISPF Point and Shoot
Tried that doesn't seem to work
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion Li
Hi,
One of my lpar is is suffering from
*IEA061E REPLACEMENT ASID SHORTAGE HAS BEEN DETECTED
I notices that the DB2 STC are ended with :
IEF352I ADDRESS SPACE UNAVAILABLE
I'm familiar with the option to start AS with REUSASID=YES but DB2 isn't
start with the 'start' command and i don't know how to
46 matches
Mail list logo
