Hi,
"Perhaps if you could be kind to state WHY you want to stop it? Perhaps
there
is something we all missed... ". During IPL it happened.
it was just part of IPL and it was our sandbox region.
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Elardus Engelbrecht <
elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za> wrote:
> jaga
jagadishan perumal wrote:
>>3) force tso,arm,a=ASID - No luck
Do D A,TSO and check that you correctly used A= in the FORCE
command.
As documented, take note that issuing a FORCE command may result in an IPL.
Also check your identifier of TSO.
Perhaps this example shows you the identifier TCAS
Hi,
D R,R = No outstanding messages,
D TS,L - zero under TS USERS
D NET,MAJNODES - vtam not active , but when i do /D A,VTAM = vtam address
space is still active.
I am issuing all this commands from console.
Regards,
Jags
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Elardus Engelbrecht <
elardus.eng
jagadishan perumal wrote:
>I tried Purging the tso but it was not coming down. The commands used to
stop tso was :
>1) stop tso - No luck
>2) force tso,arm - No luck
>3) force tso,arm,a=ASID - No luck
>I even tried looking for any outstanding message in console but there were
no outstanding messa
> The values I know of, with their "old" definitions are:
This is exactly the information I am looking for - many thanks!
> The Use Keys came into use somewhere in the late 1960s.
That would explain why my original example for the 2540 had no S, but
the equivalent manuals for other S/360 era mac
Are you running any product on this LPAR. Also try 3270 address space
and then recycle TSO .
Regards
Saurabh
On 6/13/2011 10:32 AM, jagadishan perumal wrote:
Hi,
I did D TS,L and there are no active TSO users.
Regards,
Jags
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:22 AM, saurabh khandelwal
mailto:saurabh.
Hi,
I did D TS,L and there are no active TSO users.
Regards,
Jags
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:22 AM, saurabh khandelwal <
saurabh.khandel...@oracle.com> wrote:
> Can you confirm if any of your TSO users are still logged on to System. If
> yes, then cancel that user id and then try to stop TSO wi
Can you confirm if any of your TSO users are still logged on to System.
If yes, then cancel that user id and then try to stop TSO with P TSO
command.
Regards
Saurabh
On 6/13/2011 10:19 AM, jagadishan perumal wrote:
Hi,
When I give P TSO - Non- cancelable task - issue force arm
Then,
I gave :
Hi,
When I give P TSO - Non- cancelable task - issue force arm
Then,
I gave : force tso,arm - command accepted. When I do D A,TSO - still the tso
address space is up.
then,
I gave : force tso,arm,A=asid, but still the tso task is up.
Regards,
Jags
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:17 AM, saurabh kh
Can you please see, if you are getting any messages, while issuing this
command.
Regards
Saurabh
On 6/13/2011 10:16 AM, jagadishan perumal wrote:
Hi,
I tried with P TSO too but no luck.
Regards,
Jags
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:14 AM, saurabh khandelwal
mailto:saurabh.khandel...@oracle.com>>
Hi,
I tried with P TSO too but no luck.
Regards,
Jags
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:14 AM, saurabh khandelwal <
saurabh.khandel...@oracle.com> wrote:
> I think you can try P TSO command, which will make your TSO down.
>
> Regards
> Saurabh
>
>
> On 6/13/2011 10:10 AM, jagadishan perumal wrote:
>
I think you can try P TSO command, which will make your TSO down.
Regards
Saurabh
On 6/13/2011 10:10 AM, jagadishan perumal wrote:
Hi,
I tried Purging the tso but it was not coming down. The commands used to
stop tso was :
1) stop tso - No luck
2) force tso,arm - No luck
3) force tso,arm,a=A
Hi,
I tried Purging the tso but it was not coming down. The commands used to
stop tso was :
1) stop tso - No luck
2) force tso,arm - No luck
3) force tso,arm,a=ASID - No luck
I even tried looking for any outstanding message in console but there were
no outstanding messages at all. Could anyone p
On 12 June 2011 16:06, William Donzelli wrote:
> So when filing these things away on the shelf, would it be safe to
> assume that the initial S or G or whatever the first letter of a four
> character alphanumeric prefix is, can be ignored? For example, would:
>
> S100-1234-0
> G100-1234-1
> S101-
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 17:46:31 -0500, John McKown wrote:
>
>Personally, if I want to do this sort of thing, I use Co:Z from Dovetailed
>Technologies to run under z/OS UNIX using its piping. It is possible to run
>normal batch work via a UNIX shell. It is just a bit more difficulty to
>allocate the d
The SHARE MVSE project is reviewing some older requirements and this one
came as a surprise to me. It's requirement SSSHARE012987 and was
submitted on 11/01/1994:
"We run and maintain MVS in tw
At 10:01 +0300 on 06/12/2011, Binyamin Dissen wrote about Re: DCBs
and DCBEs - Could IBM have done it any worse?:
:>I have a vague memory of cases where an operation returns a success
:>RC but also a subcode that indicates that the classification of
:>success was due to some requests not being
If you have seriously large quantities of data to process in a short amount of
time, it works wonders. used it back when it was new, had 5 jobs reading multi
tape volumes feeding the rest of the 20 batch jobs running various sorts & appl
programs. works great when all goes well, a real bear wh
I agree. Also our programmers would most likely declare it too complicated
to use.
Personally, if I want to do this sort of thing, I use Co:Z from Dovetailed
Technologies to run under z/OS UNIX using its piping. It is possible to run
normal batch work via a UNIX shell. It is just a bit more diff
MIM is pretty good but I am bias, worked for Legent
Scott J Ford
From: John McKown
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Sat, June 11, 2011 5:19:36 PM
Subject: Re: retraction ...
I think CA-7 is fairly decent, but quite complicated.
OT: I'm in the acute care ho
On 13/06/2011 02:24 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
It hasn't changed a whole lot; it's still way easy to get Sx13 ABENDs:
READY
allocate dd(sysin) shr reuse dsn('sys1.maclib(nonesuch)')
READY
call *(iebgener)
DATA SET UTILITY - GENERATE PAGE 0001
IEC141
On 6/12/2011 3:00 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
That just shows it's inconsistent. Sometimes RC<>0; sometimes Sx13.
I suspect (with no evidence whatever) the utility checks for a DDNAME
allocation (but why bother?) If it's absent, exit with return code;
if it's present, attempt the OPEN which may A
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 14:33:39 -0700, Edward Jaffe wrote:
>On 6/12/2011 9:24 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>> allocate dd(sysin) shr reuse dsn('sys1.maclib(nonesuch)')
>> READY
>> call *(iebgener)
>> DATA SET UTILITY - GENERATE PAGE
>> 0001
>> IEC141I
>> 0
On 6/12/2011 9:24 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
allocate dd(sysin) shr reuse dsn('sys1.maclib(nonesuch)')
READY
call *(iebgener)
DATA SET UTILITY - GENERATE PAGE 0001
IEC141I 013-18,IGG0191B,user,$STCTSO1,SYSIN,4140,MVS3RS,SYS1.MACLIB(NONESUCH)
IKJ56641
If I correctly understand the functioning of Batchpipes in that document, ISTM
that it has the disadvantage that if one end of the pipe fails for any reason,
then *both* ends would have to be rerun. That can be more disruptive and
batch-window-time-consuming than just needing to rerun one of th
I remember (years ago), when I was working for a Canadian Insurance company,
the local IBM rep told us we should be filing ignoring the first letter.
But, I explained to him that our admins (secretaries - not sysprogs) didn't
know the secret handshake.
So, imo, I don't think it matters.
Pick a s
> Hardware manuals were provided when you installed the hardware, regardless
> of any prefix value. IIRC,
> most of the S/360-related hardware books were "G" prefixed.
Thanks so far, the pair of you.
So when filing these things away on the shelf, would it be safe to
assume that the initial S or G
Bernard,
No, the original writer was duquesne(sp?) systems out of Pittsburgh. If memory
serves me it was written for my company by them. They had also written QCM a
performance management system. They also wrote PMO (iirc LLA put them out) I
think they also wrote Quickfetch which was also supers
Is anyone using this product? Is it worth the price (somewhere between $300-
$2000/month)? Would you use it if it came as part of z/OS?
I've searched the IBM-Main archives and found one question in each of the last
four years, but I found that IBM documentation is missing in action. I'm
thinking
Duquesne ? -> Legent ? -> CA
Jay Campbell
IBM OS Support Section
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Gerhard Postpischil
Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2011 2:23 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: retraction ...
On 6/11/20
On 6/11/2011 2:00 PM, Ed Gould wrote:
Of course you are correct. MIM was originally written by
dusquene systems ( pittsburg). Both enq and tape parts
anyway. When you called you actually talked with a code
writer and could seem to see issues in the code as you went
through the debugging process.
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 10:01:14 +0300, Binyamin Dissen wrote:
>
>At one time OPEN non-VSAM did not have return codes. You had to check DCBOFOPN
>to see if it did its job. Seems like that has changed.
>
It hasn't changed a whole lot; it's still way easy to get Sx13 ABENDs:
READY
allocate dd(sysin) sh
So I am working at cataloging my collection of older IBM documents,
and came across:
2540 Card Read Punch Parts Catalog (121-0545-3)
Picky question - can I assume that there should be an S prefixing the
document number, as in S12
Not sure about the 121 prefix, but ISTR that "S" in front of a manual number
usually meant "for sale by IBM", i.e., they didn't give it to you free for the
asking, you had to pay them to get a copy. "G" as the initial letter was for
the "free" documentation and later "L" was for "Licensed" docu
On Sun, Jun 12th, 2011 at 8:42 PM, Azim Syed wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> Please can some one help in this, we have 2 z9 BC machines . We want to
> install STP 1021 (Sysplex Timer Protocol) but SBM (IBM Rep) in our
> region
> saying its withdrawn from Marketing since June 2010.
>
> Can any third party Ven
Hi ,
Please can some one help in this, we have 2 z9 BC machines . We want to
install STP 1021 (Sysplex Timer Protocol) but SBM (IBM Rep) in our region
saying its withdrawn from Marketing since June 2010.
Can any third party Vendor still selling this STP and Maintaining it.
Thanks for your usual
To map each user into a user catalog, perform the following when the user is
logged off. Use the Access Method Services manual as reference.
1 - REPRO MERGECAT all datasets with the user's high level qualifier from
the master catalog to the desired user catalog.
2 - DEFINE ALIAS to relat
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 20:42:22 -0400 "Robert A. Rosenberg"
wrote:
:>At 22:44 +0300 on 06/11/2011, Binyamin Dissen wrote about Re: DCBs
:>and DCBEs - Could IBM have done it any worse?:
:>
:>>The only thing that I can think of is that IBM was trying to be "user
:>>friendly" and was concerned that pr
38 matches
Mail list logo
