At 08:33 -0500 on 11/08/2011, Bonno, Tuco wrote about Re: units (was:
Out damn'd GMT ...):
my query ( . do any of the ) was purely rhetorical; I
do know what they (aces of spades) were used for in vietnam; but
the link
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M%26M%27s#1970s_and_1980s
Ed Gould ps2...@yahoo.com wrote in message
news:1320768102.42684.yahoomailmob...@web161404.mail.bf1.yahoo.com...
After listening to all the controversy about DST how about just
adding 30 minutes and stay at the that time year around? That would make
everybody happy, no?
Ed
What I missed in
-- Forwarded message --
From: Shai Hess mfnetd...@mfnetdisk.com
Date: Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 11:08 AM
Subject: MFNetDisk dramatic improvement in CPU utilization for all
emulation.
To: shai.h...@gmail.com
**
HI,
I uploaded MFNetDisk new code (this fix is the MF load file) which
Hi,
Below is my JCL where I want to compile my MAP load module at RMODE-24 and
AMODE - 24, but the Load module is getting created with AMODE-31,RMODE-ANY.
TRNR007.LOADLIB
//MAPCOMP JOB MSGCLASS=X,MSGLEVEL=(1,1),CLASS=B,
// REGION=5M,NOTIFY=SYSUID
Just use HCD to refine a new one with an appropriate HLQ that goes to the
mastercatalog, as a copy of whatever current you want to use as the
template. Then use HCD to delete the one you don't want.
Doug Fuerst
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Hi,
Below is my JCL where I want to compile my MAP load module at RMODE-24 and
AMODE - 24, but the Load module is getting created with
AMODE-31,RMODE-ANY.
You may wish to post on the CICS newsgroup and see if a BMS map can be 24
and how to do that. They should be able to help.
Also see
I included AMODE(24) RMODE(24) at the step LKED and it was getting compiled
with AMODE as 24 and RMODE as 24. Unfortunately the Job ended with Severity
of 04 saying the ESD AMODE 31 CONFLICTS WITH USER-SPECIFIED AMODE 24 FOR
ENTRY POINT TRNM007. Let me post this question to CICS newsgroup
Jags
Hi,
The easiest solution is to put into the assembler source the following (In
column 10)
AMODE 24
RMODE 24
Good luck,
David Lesser
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
UserKey 9 can write into CICSKey 8? that cannot be correct
as all DFH modules would be up for overwriting. Where
would integrity be?
FWIW, system integrity is not a factor since in the CICS case the key 9
user has permission to get into key 8 and do whatever a key 8 user can do.
Reliability
I love following these discussions, though I don't use this stuff at all in my
line of work.
I have a list of all the subpools (tacked to my wall, of course), but where do
I find the documentation that explains these keys and what they do?
Kind regards,
Lindy
-Original Message-
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/IEA2B190/6.2
Why you would want BMS maps living below the 16MB line is beyond me
-jc-
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of jagadishan perumal
Sent:
On Tue, 8 Nov 2011 20:38:04 -0800, Ed Gould wrote:
I was not suggesting this be done worldwide but
anyplace that wants to not deal with daylight savings
time issue.
IMO (and it is only my *opinion*) that is even worse.
If, for example, Indiana didn't want to change their clocks
twice a year,
Lindy
My own reference list for key assignments :
0 Supervisor
1 JES
2 Reserved* (used to be VSPC)
3 Reserved*
4 Reserved*
5 Data management (eg DFP)
6 VTAM and TCAM
7 IMS, DB2 and MQ
On Tue, 8 Nov 2011 22:45:55 -0600, John McKown wrote:
The IODF does not need to be in the master catalog in order to be used
for IPL.
Right. In fact, it does not need to be cataloged at all. In fact, until
the IODF is loaded there is no way to access the master catalog.
In fact, the IODF is
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Lindy Mayfield
Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2011 6:47 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: How to enable Storage Protection Override?
I love following these discussions, though
So to answer the ops original question. One way of bypassing normal catalog
rules is by running DFDSS and using the catalog parm. This will bypass and use
whatever catalog is specified. I would say some did some DFDSS function and
that is how the dataset ended up in your master catalog. You
Sure they do, they are owned by EMC, so Powerlink it is. If the Value Added
Reseller included firmware support in the contract, or we (not me) insisted on
support in our purchase contract. Please don't get me started with VARs.
On Tue, 8 Nov 2011 16:14:58 -0500, Ed Finnell efinnel...@aol.com
Severity 4 is just a warning. In this case, you can ignore it. It's just
telling you that it found an AMODE=31 directive in the source and you
are now overriding it. If you fix the source, you'll get rid of the LKED
note. Or you can specify COMPAT=LKED to get rid of the message.
jagadishan
... arguments in the discussion (children coming home in the dark v.s. during
daylight) ...
I missed this earlier in the discussion, however, I've always thought this was
a bit of a red herring.
Children coming and going in the dark is a consequence of the winter months, a
period when
hi all,
I get the following error within a rexx trying to allocate a file to the
internal reader:
SYSOUT DATA SET NOT ALLOCATED, USER NOT AUTHORIZED FOR FUNCTION SPECIFIED
rexx:
ADDRESS TSO
ALLOC FI(JCL) SYSOUT(A) WRITER(INTRDR) REU
rexx
CICS will log the map above the line not matter what the attributes are.
Chip Grantham | Ameritas | Sr. IT Consultant | cgrant...@ameritas.com
5900 O Street, Lincoln NE 68510 | p: 402-467-7382 | c: 402-429-3579 | f:
402-325-4030
jagadishan perumal jagadish...@gmail.com
Sent by: IBM
On Wed, 9 Nov 2011 17:01:03 +0100, Dr. Stephen Fedtke
max_mainframe_...@fedtke.com wrote:
hi all,
I get the following error within a rexx trying to allocate a file to the
internal reader:
SYSOUT DATA SET NOT ALLOCATED, USER NOT AUTHORIZED FOR FUNCTION SPECIFIED
rexx:
ADDRESS TSO
ALLOC
We are using Innovation's PAS to move DASD volumes from an older IBM
DS8100 to an EMC VMAX. We've used PAS many times in the past for these
migrations, but we did not use PAS in the last migration for CA-View
Deliver as we wanted the databases moved from mod-3's to mod-27's. This
time the
To be fair, in regards to my crack about response typical of CA,
I should have listed CA1 support as the exception to the rule.
dd keller
/
We are using Innovation's PAS to move DASD volumes from an older IBM
DS8100 to an EMC VMAX. We've used PAS
Tom,
I live a few miles from INDIANA and the states split between eastern and
central tz and it gets pretty bad for the people there. The zig zag of the
state and the people there that I have talked to hate it.
Ed
--
For
JAGS,
If you print out the entre assembly output, I would bet that within the listig
tree are amide statement.
Ed
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the
Look at the DFHMSD macro. It will generate CSECT, AMODE and RMODE statements
if no CSECT has been defined. There is no option to set the AMODE and RMODE
values.
If you want AMODE=24 and RMODE=24 in your assembly, then code
mapname CSECT
mapname AMODE=24
mapname RMODE=24
in your map source
As a former CA-View support person, if you are doing a physical copy to
like geometry, all should be ok.
By like geometry, I mean if the original file is on 3390-3, the new
file will need to be in the 1st 1/9th of a mod 27 *AND* at the same
track addresses.
Any kind of logical copy will need to
On Wed, 9 Nov 2011 17:01:03 +0100, Dr. Stephen Fedtke
max_mainframe_...@fedtke.com wrote:
I get the following error within a rexx trying to allocate a file to the
internal reader:
SYSOUT DATA SET NOT ALLOCATED, USER NOT AUTHORIZED FOR FUNCTION SPECIFIED
rexx:
ADDRESS TSO
ALLOC FI(JCL)
In 2009170103.ga10...@mail03d.hostcenter.com, on 11/09/2011
at 05:01 PM, Dr. Stephen Fedtke max_mainframe_...@fedtke.com
said:
SYSOUT DATA SET NOT ALLOCATED, USER NOT AUTHORIZED FOR FUNCTION
SPECIFIED
Try issuing PROFILE MSGID first, then look up the message. Also check
for ICH messages.
In
295ed806ab479944b1217cc84a173de012a69...@nwt-s-mbx1.rocketsoftware.com,
on 11/09/2011
at 01:30 PM, Rob Scott rsc...@rocketsoftware.com said:
6 VTAM and TCAM
TIOC and VTIOC for TSO.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see
In
CAMThvFs9b3qwU=nzi6dn7owj06xp6udcwcjhyh11pbo3ufh...@mail.gmail.com,
on 11/09/2011
at 09:27 AM, saurabh khandelwal sourabhkhandelwal...@gmail.com
said:
dumps in the System Log
Dumps don't go to the log. Presumably you mean messages.
Can you please suggest me any pointer to resolve this
Texas Instruments SVA has an open z/OS Systems Programming position in Santa
Clara, CA.
This contract position would be in be the 6-12 month range with the possibility
of expanding to 24 months.
Environment: z/OS V1R9 executing on z10 - 2098.O02 with CA business products:
IDMS
In your posting you say you contacted CA support. It wouldn't be a bad idea
to contact Innovation support as well.
Stephen Mednick
Computer Supervisory Services
Sydney, Australia
Asia/Pacific representatives for:
Innovation Data Processing, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
From my original note:
We also reviewed the PAS manual and contacted Innovation directly.
They have nothing in their database pointing out any issues with these
products - which led me to think of contacting the 'real world' to check
for other's experiences.
thanks - ddk
Indiana had the worst idea of all. Some eastern counties had ET (EST
/ EDT), some central counties had EST all year, and some western
counties had CT (CST / CDT).
Arizona has a bad spot too. Most of the state is MST all year (too
have an extra hour in the morning with cool temperatures), but
On 9 November 2011 08:30, Rob Scott rsc...@rocketsoftware.com wrote:
My own reference list for key assignments :
0 Supervisor
1 JES
2 Reserved* (used to be VSPC)
3 Reserved*
4 Reserved*
5 Data management (eg
Could this be done somehow when z/OS is running as a z/VM guest?
-Original Message-
On older hardware consoles it was easy to configure a display of CPU activity
by key. On really old hardware (370/168 and the like), one could turn a knob to
one of 17 positions, and see total usage,
Is this supposed to work this way? I've just spent a bit of time in the
Init Tuning Reference, and nothing in there indicates what I'm seeing. On a
z/OS 1.12 system, if the SMFPRM member has NOACTIVE set, my IEFACTRT exit is
not invoked. When I set it to ACTIVE, it is. Only change I
On Wed, 9 Nov 2011 12:50:59 -0500, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net wrote:
In 2009170103.ga10...@mail03d.hostcenter.com, on 11/09/2011
at 05:01 PM, Dr. Stephen Fedtke max_mainframe_...@fedtke.com
said:
SYSOUT DATA SET NOT ALLOCATED, USER NOT AUTHORIZED FOR FUNCTION
HI Dave,
A little futher down in the same member look at the SYS parm. You can code TYPE
or NOTYPE. You might try coding it this way, along with any other parms you
need.
SYS(NOTYPE(0:255),EXITS(xyz) etc...
HTH,
Linda
- Original Message -
From: Dave Day
Tony,
This brings back old memories, it is also interesting, IMO. Way back just
before MVS came out. We were looking into getting performance numbers. If you
can remember back in MVT days each job ran in it#39;s own protect key (1-15 if
memory serves me). we had purchased a hardware monitor
When you specify NOACTIVE, the system does not record any SMF data,
therefor it does not call any exits related to those records.
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Dave Day david...@consolidated.net wrote:
Is this supposed to work this way? I've just spent a bit of time in
the Init Tuning
Hi,
I am looking for a overall information on Connect Direct Tool(Product From
sterling Commerce). This research is just to know about the efficiency of
the tool on various aspects and its overall maintenance Support .Could
anyone please share some information about Connect Direct Tool as i am
Sterling Commerce was bought by IBM a few years ago.
-
Ted MacNEIL
eamacn...@yahoo.ca
Twitter: @TedMacNEIL
-Original Message-
From: jagadishan perumal jagadish...@gmail.com
Sender: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 09:15:48
To:
Hi,
I have added a new STORCLASS definition and STRAGE GROUP ~ translation,
validation went on successful. When I tried activating the
SYS1.DFSMS.SCDS using the option IS.8 I get a message as IGD049I
ACTIVATE FAILED - SCDS SYS1.DFSMS.SCDS IS AN INVALID CONFIGURATION. Though
I have defined the new
It appears that the activation procedure is correct. Assuming that your
validation was successful for that SCDS (you should check that the SCDS name
was correct) then it appears that the SCDS may look like an ACDS. The IGD049
message is pretty explicit.
Doug Fuerst
-Original Message-
Ted MacNeil writes:
Sterling Commerce was bought by IBM a few years ago.
Only last year (2010).
There's lots of information on IBM Sterling Connect:Direct available here:
http://www.ibm.com/software/commerce/managed-file-transfer/products/connect-direct/
Jagadishan,
If you're looking for an Enterprise Data Transport solution, you should
evaluate Connect:Direct together with XCOM from CA Technologies. Both of
these are being used in the Banks at this region.
http://www.ca.com/us/products/detail/CA-XCOM-Data-Transport.aspx
IBM Unites Mainframe, Windows SystemsIBM opens zEnterprise mainframes to the
world of Windows apps. Until now, IBM only supported Linux or AIX-based blades
on zEnterprise.
By Paul McDougall InformationWeek
November 07, 2011 10:15 AM
Slideshow: 100 Years Of IBM: 25 Historic Milestones(click
50 matches
Mail list logo
