Hi,
If the Lib is a pdse you can verify that sys1.parmlib(igdsms00) is set
to PDSESHARING(EXTENDED) this should allow deleting in this case. This
permits member level access.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
An additional option is to use ispf 3.4 for the file(s) and then enter the cmd
SAVE MYFILE and this will create a file 'userdi.myfile.datasets' that
contains all the info you need.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Not sure, but it might be helpful to insure system parmlib member igdsms00 is
set to PDSESHARING(EXTENDED) on all systems. The default used to be
PDSESHARING(NORMAL).
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Mary Anne Matyaz
We have used IEHPROGM to SCRATCH(delete) members in rare cases where other
utilities fail. Also, used for rare case of uncatlg for a bad file name - ex:
UNCATLG DSNAME=XXX.CBSYYY2.AB.AUDIT.HISTORY .G0005V00 NSCR
David L. Mingee
Principal Systems Administrator
Indianapolis Production
One option is BMC's Batch Optimizer. They offer an advanced or standard
edition. The move vsam files you have the greater the improvements you will
see.
David L. Mingee
Principal Systems Administrator
Indianapolis Production Control
Data Center Operations / Operations Technical Support
Correction - the more vsam not the move vsam
One option is BMC's Batch Optimizer. They offer an advanced or standard
edition. The move vsam files you have the greater the improvements you will
see.
David L. Mingee
Principal Systems Administrator
Indianapolis Production Control
Data Center
/T 3590 or virtual? I think hardware support is needed.
db
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Mingee, David
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 1:50 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: LBI Performance?
-Original Message
Hi Ralph, We have been using PDSESHARING (EXTENDED) FOR 5 YEARS with only 1
minor blip and it was fixed by adding the below statements to IGDSMS00:
PDSE_MONITOR(YES,60,30)
PDSESHARING(EXTENDED)
PDSE_RESTARTABLE_AS(YES)
PDSE1_MONITOR(YES)
PDSE1_LRUCYCLES(15)
PDSE1_LRUTIME(60)
, and a lot less blocks on the 20th large block
tape since more data should have been stored on the large block tapes.)
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Mingee, David david.min...@libertymutual.com
wrote:
Hello All,
Anyone had success with performance gains in run time and fewer
tapes
Hi, One option is to do an ISPF 3.4 dslist and then enter - SAVE MYFILE
on the command line. This will create a disk file named
'userid.myfile.datasets' that contains all the info and can be edited and
sorted as needed. Or try:
//STEP1 EXEC PGM=IKJEFT01,DYNAMNBR=20
Hello All,
Anyone had success with performance gains in run time and fewer tapes
being created when using z/OS Large Block Interface(LBI)? We are on R1.11 and
have created tapes with blksize of 256k(262144) and the block count is reduced
by a factor of 8, but we do not see any
Hi John, Do the VSAM files show COMP-FORMT and
USER-DATA-SIZE--9636537000
COMP-USER-DATA-SIZE-2831001090 in the listcat(s)? This
verifies the SMS compression is on. Also, you could try SMS utility ADRDSSU
for backup speed. Lastly, if SMS compress is on,
Ed, Not that I know of. BTW, what is #39,t mean? I see it frequently, is
it encrypted cursing? hahaha
David L. Mingee
Principal Systems Administrator
Indianapolis Production Control
Data Center Operations / Operations Technical Support
Work Ext 782-6460
Work Direct Dial 317 581-6460
Have you tried using FBS vs. FB ? This is for fixed block standard and
recognizes the last block can be shorter and not a full block.
David L. Mingee
Principal Systems Administrator
Indianapolis Production Control
Data Center Operations / Operations Technical Support
Work Ext 782-6460
I am sure there are many definitions. Here is one from
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/zos/basics/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.zos.zconcepts/zconcepts_159.htm
Multiple Virtual Storage (MVS). An earlier form of the z/OS operating system.
In current usage, the term MVS refers to those
Thanks for the valuable information. I plan to use the MODE C cmd in selected
(10 or 20) z/os, or ZOS, or Z/OS R 1.12. IBM Mainframe(z196) batch jobs.
These FTP's currently have an Elapse Time of 20 minutes to 3 hours using BLOCK
Mode. With MODE C they use 6 minutes to 90 minutes. I never
Could they add FREE=CLOSE to the dd statement(s) in the earlier steps?
David L. Mingee
Principal Systems Administrator
Indianapolis Production Control
Data Center Operations / Operations Technical Support
Work Ext 782-6460
Work Direct Dial 317 581-6460
Home 317 598-0919 / Cell 317
Hello Experts,
I am asking for opinions on the ramifications or value of using the MODE C
(compress) command within generic ZOS batch FTP. I am not a SYSPROG and do not
have full access to SMF and RMF. My brief testing showed 3 to 10 times faster
run time when using MODE C before the PUT or
Sorry, I forgot to change the subject.
Hello Experts,
I am asking for opinions on the ramifications or value of using the MODE C
(compress) command within generic ZOS batch FTP. I am not a SYSPROG and do not
have full access to SMF and RMF. My brief testing showed 3 to 10 times faster
run
Hi, If you have PDS85 or PDS86 utility from the CBT tape - it can repair the
file. What does 3.4 show for all the dcb values?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
esmie moo
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 1:42 PM
To:
Also, RECFM could have been changed to RECFM=U vs. FB if an inappropriate
task was executed against this file.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Roach, Dennis (N-GHG CORP.)
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 1:49 PM
To:
Hello All,
A slick little SDSF command for newbies or those that may have forgot
it follows:
Enter ST+ with prefix * and owner * then browse some of the files. If
your system has been used somewhat normally, you should see output from months
and probably years in the past.
Hello,
We still have no solution. We checked the MCL and it was good.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Miklos Szigetvari
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2011 9:01 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Z196 Cobol pgm
Hi, Maybe use DSNTYPE=LARGE. Or change the space to cyl 3000 and use
unit=(disk,10)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Adams, Tracy
Sent: Friday, July 15, 2011 12:11 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Allocations greater
Yes, I think the number than causes the failure is cyl 4104? The math is too
hard for me.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Adams, Tracy
Sent: Friday, July 15, 2011 3:28 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Allocations
25 matches
Mail list logo
