is addressed
correctly ...
Ron Hawkins ron.hawkins1...@sbcglobal.net
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
22/03/2010 04:54 PM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
To
IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
cc
Subject
Re: Comparing - ISPF (3.12 and 3.13
and
then destroy it.
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Galambos, Robert
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 11:26 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Comparing - ISPF (3.12 and 3.13) with Comparex
yet ISV are not allowed to see anything including
] On
Behalf Of
Mark Zelden
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 7:15 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] Comparing - ISPF (3.12 and 3.13) with Comparex
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:29:59 -0500, Galambos, Robert
robert.galam...@compuware.com wrote:
1) there is NO one with the last name
From: Peter Nuttall peter.nutt...@euroclear.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Fri, March 12, 2010 6:49:37 AM
Subject: Re: Comparing - ISPF (3.12 and 3.13) with Comparex
quote
Simone obviously feels strongly about File-Aid. Rightly so, as it has been
a market
of it. :-)
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Galambos, Robert
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 11:26 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Comparing - ISPF (3.12 and 3.13) with Comparex
yet ISV are not allowed to see
quote
Simone obviously feels strongly about File-Aid. Rightly so, as it has been
a market leader and best of breed. I appreciate passion in this industry.
We need more of it. :-)
/quote
Hear Hear It's just a shame there aren't more decision making
managers with the same passion Or am
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Richards, Robert B.
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 6:56 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Comparing - ISPF (3.12 and 3.13) with Comparex
Snipped
As an aside, anyone that has
In a message dated 3/12/2010 5:57:09 A.M. Central Standard Time,
robert.richa...@opm.gov writes:
a subscriber to ISVCOSTS, I have *NEVER* seen John sell or recommend an
IBM solution over another ISV. John has taken his non-partisan role *very
seriously*. He facilitates discussion, he
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:29:59 -0500, Galambos, Robert
robert.galam...@compuware.com wrote:
1) there is NO one with the last name of redstock in the compuware directory.
Of course. *IF* someone wanted to remain anonymous, they wouldn't
use their real name (again, not saying that is the case).
9, 2010 12:20 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Comparing - ISPF (3.12 and 3.13) with Comparex
Has anybody looked at replacing Comparex with the ISPF compare (SUPERC
and
SUPERCE - 3.12 and 3.13)?
What are the specific product features for and against ISPF vs
Comparex
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:43:44 +, simone redstock
sredst...@googlemail.com wrote:
We got rid of Comparex as well. File/AID has given us a way of pinpointing
our compares so that our output reports a more focused. The formatted (using
data maps or copybooks) output makes the report easy to use
In a message dated 3/11/2010 2:07:35 P.M. Central Standard Time,
mzel...@flash.net writes:
That coupled with the fact that you are posting from a personal email
address but you including a company tag line that appears to me
like it is there to give your posts credibility, but no company
ou détruire toutes les copies du présent message.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Mark Zelden
Sent: March 11, 2010 3:06 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Comparing - ISPF (3.12 and 3.13) with Comparex
Simone
Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Ed Finnell
Sent: March 11, 2010 3:30 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Comparing - ISPF (3.12 and 3.13) with Comparex
In a message dated 3/11/2010 2:07:35 P.M. Central Standard Time,
mzel...@flash.net writes
John Anderson runs a listserv that does not accept ISV input true.
BUT john Anderson works for IBM. Sounds a little self serving as IBM is its
itself a Software vendor.
It's not as bad as you think, actually.
IBM employees are not allowed to post, either.
At least that was the case when I
: Re: Comparing - ISPF (3.12 and 3.13) with Comparex
John Anderson runs a listserv that does not accept ISV input true.
BUT john Anderson works for IBM. Sounds a little self serving as IBM is its
itself a Software vendor.
It's not as bad as you think, actually.
IBM employees are not allowed
yet ISV are not allowed to see anything including expurgated digests.
enough said
I'm not coming to anybody's defence, but nobody else is running one.
It may be 'wrong', but it's not copyrighted.
Anybody else could run a similar forum, but they don't.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
Sent: February 9, 2010 12:20 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Comparing - ISPF (3.12 and 3.13) with Comparex
Has anybody looked at replacing Comparex with the ISPF compare (SUPERC
and
SUPERCE - 3.12 and 3.13)?
What are the specific product features for and against ISPF vs
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Greg Grimm
Sent: February 9, 2010 12:20 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Comparing - ISPF (3.12 and 3.13) with Comparex
Has anybody looked at replacing Comparex with the ISPF compare (SUPERC
and
SUPERCE - 3.12 and 3.13)?
What are the specific product
Has anybody looked at replacing Comparex with the ISPF compare (SUPERC and
SUPERCE - 3.12 and 3.13)?
What are the specific product features for and against ISPF vs Comparex?
Thanks in advance.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff
to their customers.
HTH
Peter
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Greg Grimm
Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 12:20 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Comparing - ISPF (3.12 and 3.13) with Comparex
Has anybody looked at replacing
On Tue, 9 Feb 2010 12:40:06 -0500, Farley, Peter x23353 wrote:
... It cannot compare PDSE members. ...
???
I just tried it. Works fine.
IIRC, I've even used it to compare HFS files. (Strangely, it won't
write its delta to an HFS file. Go figger.)
-- gil
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 12:59 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Comparing - ISPF (3.12 and 3.13) with Comparex
On Tue, 9 Feb 2010 12:40:06 -0500, Farley, Peter
23 matches
Mail list logo
