Peter you have the code in front of you
So I can'nt argue but changing the storage Location of the ECB worked
for me
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 18, 2009, at 8:26 AM, Peter Relson wrote:
The ECB storage has to have been obtained from the TCB
where the wait is taking place
Not true.
Peter
>The ECB storage has to have been obtained from the TCB
>where the wait is taking place
Not true.
Peter Relson
z/OS Core Technology Design
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists..
Subject: Re: SYSTEM COMPLETION CODE=102 REASON CODE=000C
But it has to be HOME addressable to the waiting task.
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 05:05:34 -0500 Rob Scott >
wrote:
:>Joe
:>
:>This is no such restriction about which TCB owns the storage of an
ECB, in fact it is quite common fo
Behalf Of
Binyamin Dissen
Sent: 18 December 2009 10:14
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: SYSTEM COMPLETION CODE=102 REASON CODE=000C
But it has to be HOME addressable to the waiting task.
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 05:05:34 -0500 Rob Scott
wrote:
:>Joe
:>
:>This is no such restrict
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Rob Scott
Sent: 18 December 2009 10:06
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: SYSTEM COMPLETION CODE=102 REASON CODE=000C
Joe
This is no such restriction about which TCB owns the storage of an
t [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Joe Reichman
:>Sent: 17 December 2009 23:32
:>To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
:>Subject: Re: SYSTEM COMPLETION CODE=102 REASON CODE=000C
:>
:>I declared FULL WORD in WS sp=0
:>
:>And its pointer to an area in CSA and it worked the POST
614.2305
Email: rsc...@rs.com
Web: www.rocketsoftware.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Joe Reichman
Sent: 17 December 2009 23:32
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: SYSTEM COMPLETION CODE=102 REASON CODE=000C
I declare
,ECBKEY=8
And waiting program gets posted
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Rob Scott
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 2:16 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: SYSTEM COMPLETION CODE=102 REASON CODE=000C
>The
essage-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Joe Reichman
Sent: 17 December 2009 18:13
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: SYSTEM COMPLETION CODE=102 REASON CODE=000C
The ECB storage has to have been obtained from the TCB where the wait is taking
The ECB storage has to have been obtained from the TCB where the wait
is taking place
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 17, 2009, at 9:46 AM, Peter Relson wrote:
You issued cross-memory post.
The system was able to gain access synchronously to the target space.
An attempt to reference or update th
Do you have a typo in your code? What are
these two instructions supposed to do?
> LA RY,CSA_KEY8_ECB
> L RY,0(,RY)
> Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 22:08:57 -0500
> From: joereich...@optonline.net
> Subject: Re: SYSTEM COMPLETION CODE=102 REASON CODE=000C
> To: IBM-MAIN@
You issued cross-memory post.
The system was able to gain access synchronously to the target space.
An attempt to reference or update the ECB using the supplied key failed.
What did you mean by
"As the message in the DUMP following is
PRIMARY NOT EQUAL TO HOME"?
POST could not care less if an EC
are.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Joe Reichman
Sent: 17 December 2009 09:59
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: FW: SYSTEM COMPLETION CODE=102 REASON CODE=000C.. ECB != -> Task
storage
-Origina
-Original Message-
From: Joe Reichman [mailto:joereich...@optonline.net]
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 10:53 PM
To: 'IBM Mainframe Discussion List'
Subject: RE: SYSTEM COMPLETION CODE=102 REASON CODE=000C.. ECB != ->
Task storage
I just started thinking
ilto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Joe Reichman
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 10:09 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: SYSTEM COMPLETION CODE=102 REASON CODE=000C
I finally got it working
Apparently IEAVPST does like an ECB in CSA or CSA key=8
When I pointed the ECB to WS_DSE
Reichman
Sent: 16 December 2009 18:54
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: SYSTEM COMPLETION CODE=102 REASON CODE=000C
Thankx for the reply as a side note I appreciate all of your help re:
TCP/IP
1) I have verified PASN = HASN
By looking at PSAAOLD and control register 4 for that CPU
2) I
18:54
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: SYSTEM COMPLETION CODE=102 REASON CODE=000C
Thankx for the reply as a side note I appreciate all of your help re:
TCP/IP
1) I have verified PASN = HASN
By looking at PSAAOLD and control register 4 for that CPU
2) I save the traget ASCB in CSA
using
: SYSTEM COMPLETION CODE=102 REASON CODE=000C
Joe Reichman
to:
IBM-MAIN
12/16/2009 01:28 PM
Sent by:
IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Please respond to IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Thankx for the reply to my desprate call for help
Anyway just browsed sys1.maclib POST and didn't n
Joe,
Make sure the ECB is on a fullword boundary.
Brian
IBM Mainframe Discussion List wrote on 12/16/2009
01:27:13 PM:
> [image removed]
>
> Re: SYSTEM COMPLETION CODE=102 REASON CODE=000C
>
> Joe Reichman
>
> to:
>
> IBM-MAIN
>
> 12/16/2009 01:28
ssage-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Joe Reichman
Sent: 16 December 2009 13:47
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: SYSTEM COMPLETION CODE=102 REASON CODE=000C
Hi,
I have been spending days try to resolve this message originally I
though
Thankx for the reply to my desprate call for help
Anyway just browsed sys1.maclib POST and didn't notice special code
genaration for AR e.g a LAM instruction
but it's worth a shot (setting SYSSTATE ASCENV=P )
As my test program seems to work
Thankx again
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 16, 2009,
COMPLETION CODE=102 REASON CODE=000C
Hi,
I have been spending days try to resolve this message originally I thought it
was something I had done in a PC rtn following this message
As the message in the DUMP following is
PRIMARY NOT EQUAL TO HOME
But now I am convinced that its
Hi
In my old PC routine, I have a SAC 0 (SYSSTATE ASCENV=P) before the
XMPost
Joe Reichman wrote:
Hi,
I have been spending days try to resolve this message originally I thought
it was something I had done in a PC rtn following this message
As the message in the DUMP following is
Hi,
I have been spending days try to resolve this message originally I thought
it was something I had done in a PC rtn following this message
As the message in the DUMP following is
PRIMARY NOT EQUAL TO HOME
But now I am convinced that its IEAVPST that is going cross memory that
c
24 matches
Mail list logo
