On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 16:32:02 -0400, Mark Pace wrote:
>I can't seem to find VTAMAPPL. Where is this program located?
>
That is an ADCD program.I have something on my web site and CBT file 434
called "ACBCHECK". It's not the same as VTAMAPPL, but can serve a similar
purpose.
***
I'll have to search my LINKLIST, when we ran a FLEX it came from the ADCD libs.
I'll get back unless other posters know the origin.
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 6:32 AM, Mark Pace wrote:
> I can't seem to find VTAMAPPL. Where is this program located?
>
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 12:08 AM, Wayne Bick
I can't seem to find VTAMAPPL. Where is this program located?
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 12:08 AM, Wayne Bickerdike wrote:
> There is VTAMAPPL.
>
> We use that, it has PAUSE nn etc.
>
> Use it to start all our STCs and put appropriate PAUSEs in the commands.
>
> Also used to automate shutdown.
>
>
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 22:55:01 -0500, Brian Westerman
wrote:
>Sorry for the blatant plug, but there also is SyzCmdZ which contains all of
>the features of each of the command scripting products mentioned and many
>more.
>
>Info at WWW.SyzygyInc.NET
>
>Brian
>
>---
Sorry for the blatant plug, but there also is SyzCmdZ which contains all of
the features of each of the command scripting products mentioned and many
more.
Info at WWW.SyzygyInc.NET
Brian
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
wrote:
> From: Mark Zelden
> Subject: Re: Startup of All STCs After IPL
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Date: Wednesday, September 9, 2009, 9:42 AM
> On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 22:30:35 -0400,
> Robert A. Rosenberg
> wrote:
>
>
> >
> >My question is why waste the time/ef
M-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Startup of All STCs After IPL
>There is VTAMAPPL.
>
>We use that, it has PAUSE nn etc.
>
>Use it to start all our STCs and put appropriate PAU
There is VTAMAPPL.
We use that, it has PAUSE nn etc.
Use it to start all our STCs and put appropriate PAUSEs in the commands.
Also used to automate shutdown.
-
We alway
- Original Message
From: George Rodriguez
> The only problem with this method is that I sometimes need a wait
> between commands... Is there anyone else using this method? If not, are
> you willing to share whatever you use?
For startup, as well as shutdown, we use the AUTOIPL package
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 22:30:35 -0400, Robert A. Rosenberg
wrote:
>
>My question is why waste the time/effort to go to from v1.4 to v1.7
>only to get one year of support when going to v1.8 would seem to be
>the same time/effort and would result in a number of years of
>support. It is not as if v1.8
A-Rated Urban District For Five Consecutive Years
- Original Message -
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Tue Sep 08 22:30:35 2009
Subject: Re: Startup of All STCs After IPL
At 14:13 -0500 on 09/08/2009, Mark Zelden wrote about Re: Startup of
All STCs After IP
There is VTAMAPPL.
We use that, it has PAUSE nn etc.
Use it to start all our STCs and put appropriate PAUSEs in the commands.
Also used to automate shutdown.
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 2:03 AM, George
Rodriguez wrote:
> Hi Listeners,
>
>
>
> Presently we use the following procedure (IVPRDR) to issu
At 14:13 -0500 on 09/08/2009, Mark Zelden wrote about Re: Startup of
All STCs After IPL:
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 11:35:28 -0700, Edward Jaffe
wrote:
George Rodriguez wrote:
The truth is that we just got off of v1.4... Not because of the system
work that was required, but because of the
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 11:35:28 -0700, Edward Jaffe
wrote:
>George Rodriguez wrote:
>> The truth is that we just got off of v1.4... Not because of the system
>> work that was required, but because of the testing that needed to be
>> done by application support. There was a great deal of changes that
2:35 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Startup of All STCs After IPL
George Rodriguez wrote:
> The truth is that we just got off of v1.4... Not because of the system
> work that was required, but because of the testing that needed to be
> done by application support. There was a great de
Mainframe Discussion List
|[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] Em nome de John Kelly
|Enviada em: terça-feira, 8 de setembro de 2009 13:49
|Para: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
|Assunto: Re: Startup of All STCs After IPL
|
|
|Presently we use the following procedure (IVPRDR) to issue the
|start command for the STCs
Edward Jaffe wrote:
I'm just concerned that you're spending valuable time upgrading from
an unsupported release to a release that becomes unsupported exactly
three weeks from tomorrow...
Mea Culpa! I mis-read the chart. You still have another year! Sorry... :-[
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Softw
George Rodriguez wrote:
The truth is that we just got off of v1.4... Not because of the system
work that was required, but because of the testing that needed to be
done by application support. There was a great deal of changes that were
needed to go to v1.7 and to eliminate a double billing situa
George,
Out of curiosity, what was the version of ADABAS/NATURAL you were running when
faced with issues? and what version did you roll back to?
Natarajan
>>> George Rodriguez 9/8/2009 11:15 AM >>>
Hi Edward,
The truth is that we just got off of v1.4... Not because of the system
work that was
Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 1:43 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Startup of All STCs After IPL
George Rodriguez wrote:
> Nope..On v1.7...Working on 1.9...
>
Did you purchase the z/OS 1.7 Lifecycle Ex
Edouard (OCTO)
Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 12:16 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Startup of All STCs After IPL
We use a product called ALEXCMD and I think it's on the share tape, It
allows waits and also responds to messages.
Edouard A. Myers
Senior Information Technology Speci
George Rodriguez wrote:
Nope..On v1.7...Working on 1.9...
Did you purchase the z/OS 1.7 Lifecycle Extension? Or are you simply
running unsupported? If the latter, why limit your upgrade to within the
"supported" three-year migration window? BTW, I'm not judging. I'm just
asking...
--
Ed
y A-Rated Urban District For Five Consecutive Years
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of John Kelly
Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 12:49 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Startup of All STCs After IPL
Presently we use the
Presently we use the following procedure (IVPRDR) to issue the start
command for the STCs. The PROC was originally from IPO1.PROCLIB and here's
it content:
If you're 1.9+, the System REXX (AXR) might do it too.
Jack Kelly
202-502-2390 (Office)
--
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 12:03:10 -0400, George Rodriguez
wrote:
>Presently we use the following procedure (IVPRDR) to issue the start
>command for the STCs. The PROC was originally from IPO1.PROCLIB and
>here's it content:
>The only problem with this method is that I sometimes need a wait
>betwee
bject: Startup of All STCs After IPL
Hi Listeners,
Presently we use the following procedure (IVPRDR) to issue the start
command for the STCs. The PROC was originally from IPO1.PROCLIB and
here's it content:
//IVPRDR PROC CLASS='X', DEFAULT SYSOUT CLASS IS A
//
Hi Listeners,
Presently we use the following procedure (IVPRDR) to issue the start
command for the STCs. The PROC was originally from IPO1.PROCLIB and
here's it content:
//IVPRDR PROC CLASS='X', DEFAULT SYSOUT CLASS IS A
// M=DUMMY DEFAULT ME
27 matches
Mail list logo
