Hi Robert.
I tried this exact scenario and it worked perfectly under PCOMM.
As was suggested, what keys are defined? Did you try it with the DOWN
command?
Dan
-Original Message-
From: Itschak Mugzach
Look like pf7 is not defined as up. Type KEYS to see it's value
בתאריך 9 במרץ
Hi Lizette,
Use DD statements and you can control the enqueue yourself ...
REPRO IFILE(INPUT) OFILE(OUTPUT) REUSE
IDCAMS always uses DISP=OLD for it's allocations.
Dan
-Original Message-
From: Lizette Koehler
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2013 2:20 PM Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
On 2013-03-09 16:51, Itschak Mugzach wrote:
בתאריך 9 במרץ 2013 12:02, מאת Robert Prins robert.ah.pr...@gmail.com:
I've got a weird problem with the ISPF editor disabling scrolling when
there are hidden excluded lines.
The problem occurs both on z/OS 1.10 and z/OS 1.6, and both with Tom
On 2013-03-09 17:09, DanD wrote:
-Original Message- From: Itschak Mugzach
Look like pf7 is not defined as up. Type KEYS to see it's value
בתאריך 9 במרץ 2013 12:02, מאת Robert Prins
I've got a weird problem with the ISPF editor disabling scrolling when
there are hidden excluded lines.
On 3/9/2013 1:30 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
Likewise, I'd prefer:
//SYSUT42 DD DISP=OLD,CONFLICT={SILENT|REPORT},...
That option should likewise be available on SVC 99, and on
the ENQ macro itself.
I know; it would be the hard way. But it would also be the
right way.
FSVO right
I
Hello,
It's been a some time (semi-retired), but I have a cobol program which has many
sub-programs.
The problem I'm having is both includes have same sub-program one old and newer.
The sub-program is not defined as an csect in either programs, when attempting
to change / replace in IEWL
Something is missing. Since the INCLUDE statement species the DD statement for
the library in which the routine resides, you cannot have two of them with the
same name in that library. I also can't think of any circumstance where a
program exists that isn't a CSECT.
This would suggest that
On Sat, 9 Mar 2013 13:10:16 -0500, Gerhard Postpischil wrote:
//SYSUT42 DD DISP=OLD,CONFLICT={SILENT|REPORT},...
That option should likewise be available on SVC 99, and on
the ENQ macro itself.
I could just as easily see an implementation that supported an integer,
with the extreme
On Sat, 9 Mar 2013 18:31:15 +, Robert Prins robert.ah.pr...@gmail.com
wrote:
DOWN works without problems.
If the penultimate line of the logical screen has an underlined sequence
number,
indicating that it's followed by hidden excluded lines, and the cursor is on
the
very last line of
Like others I don't fully understand the question, but I can say that I think a
CSECT is the smallest chunk of stuff that the link editor can manage. I don't
think it can ever replace part of a CSECT.
All, perhaps what he is saying is this?
He includes module A with entry points X and Y
He
Gil,
Sounds like it is just being Windows compatible - File is in use by another
user - right down to the how you identify the user...
Ron
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Saturday, March 09,
Miklos,
Others may want to correct me, but from what I've observed OPT(4) is only used
for the DUMP command.
COPY will accept OPT(4), but all you seem to get is OPT(3).
Ron
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
On Behalf Of Miklos
Ed,
While it does not directly answer your question, we have a bunch of Flash
Drives (SSD Drives) installed for about two years now that we use for
performance testing.
We don't use them every day, but when we do use them we beat the begeezus
out of them with both reads and writes. Our Open
Get an EMC or HDS engineer to do it... (G, D, R).
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
On Behalf Of Scott Ford
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 3:28 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] DS6800 3390 quesation
Paul:
That would not really work to well. An additional parameter on the DD
statement would not allow for dynamic allocation and it would
endlessly make dynamic allocate a PITA especially when you have to re-
invent the input scanning for each utility.
Where it *MIGHT* work would be
Ron,
Thanks...
Between the Red Book and your reply helped me out.
Ed
On Mar 9, 2013, at 6:40 PM, Ron Hawkins wrote:
Ed,
While it does not directly answer your question, we have a bunch of
Flash
Drives (SSD Drives) installed for about two years now that we use for
performance testing.
We
16 matches
Mail list logo
