In 007f01d0935a$fdc4feb0$f94efc10$@mcn.org, on 05/20/2015
at 05:13 PM, Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org said:
Thanks all for your suggestions. In the hope of helping a future
Googler, here is How to Use GTTERM from an AMODE 31 Program.
Why the complexity? As long a there's no RMODE24
In
sn1pr0101mb1520bae39916b66f20e5190cce...@sn1pr0101mb1520.prod.exchangelabs.com,
on 05/20/2015
at 01:14 PM, J O Skip Robinson jo.skip.robin...@sce.com said:
Shmuel, when was the last time you needed to process data LIFO?
The last time that I used REXX stack abilities. If anything, I use
In 5452005464765533.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu, on
05/15/2015
at 02:56 PM, Paul Gilmartin
000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu said:
I always thought of Latin 1 as ISO8859-1
It is, but Don presumably meant that IBM-1047 was the EBCDIC
equivalent to ISO-8859-1.
--
In 6407793781448887.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu, on
05/20/2015
at 10:25 AM, Paul Gilmartin
000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu said:
CMS/TSO Pipelines embodies a similar absurdity:
It's not absurd if it doe what it was designed for. Now, if there
isn't a command similar
In 5559c7e4.7000...@gmail.com, on 05/18/2015
at 07:07 PM, David Crayford dcrayf...@gmail.com said:
For non-Vista users
What about those not runing any flavor or windoze? What are the best
TN3270 clients for eCS and Linux?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO
In 555ca11e.4000...@tombrennansoftware.com, on 05/20/2015
at 07:58 AM, Tom Brennan t...@tombrennansoftware.com said:
J O Skip Robinson wrote:
Coding subcommands in reverse order just to save one letter in each REXX
command would be absurd.
Completely you with agree I, Skip.
Is there a
In 555bd985.2020...@vse2pdf.com, on 05/19/2015
at 08:47 PM, Tony Thigpen t...@vse2pdf.com said:
Yep, they don't pay me for my spelling skills,
Thst's why I use spill Czech.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see
In 555c9bbd.4030...@acm.org, on 05/20/2015
at 09:35 AM, Joel Ewing jcew...@acm.org said:
My recollection is that the immediate bailout from the CLIST and
from batch TSO on a non-zero TSO command processor RC only
occurred for commands running directly under the batch TMP TCB
That's a
Hello all, I know this is late on Friday before a three day weekend, however,
I'm stumped by a problem. We have some vsam files that have a primary
allocation of 398 cyls and a secondary of 398 cyls. The primary extent that is
displayed with in a listcat says that it is 11940 wihich is double
SMS consolidated the primary with secondary because they were allocated back to
back
Doug
.
On May 22, 2015, at 17:10, Ward, Mike S mw...@ssfcu.org wrote:
Hello all, I know this is late on Friday before a three day weekend, however,
I'm stumped by a problem. We have some vsam files that have
Just out of curiosity, how do you know what the primary allocation was at
the time the dataset was allocated?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Ward, Mike S
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 2:11 PM
To:
Reread your post, I don't know if listcat should do that, just that if
space is available for a second extent right behind , vsam will put the
together as one
.
On May 22, 2015, at 17:13, Doug dsh...@bellsouth.net wrote:
SMS consolidated the primary with secondary because they were
z/OS 1.5 introduced extent consolidation. The following is from z/OS DFSMS
Using Data Sets SC23-6855-00:
VSAM Extent Consolidation
The system consolidates adjacent extents for VSAM data sets when extending on
the same volume. VSAM extent consolidation is automatic and requires no action
On 05/21/2015 09:46 AM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
In 555c9bbd.4030...@acm.org, on 05/20/2015
at 09:35 AM, Joel Ewing jcew...@acm.org said:
My recollection is that the immediate bailout from the CLIST and
from batch TSO on a non-zero TSO command processor RC only
occurred for
Hi
Can we still backup a zfs dataset even if they are mounted with R/W. Is
there a way to tolerate the ZFS enqueues?
z/OS:2.1
Peter
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 8:41 PM, Russell Witt res09...@verizon.net wrote:
Wow, you sure got a lot of answers and very quickly.
snip/
And as others have stated, if you are looking for something more in terms
of
batch processing I would always recommend CA Earl first and then TMSGRW
Well, it seemed safer. As I said, I do not claim this is optimal. Someone
else suggested offline that they thought it would work AMODE 31 just so long
as the actual operands were below the line. I don't need to have this blow
up at a customer's. The additional cost of doing it this way rather than
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 8:07 AM, Russell Witt res09...@verizon.net wrote:
Ok, that brings up some follow-up questions. First of course is why do you
want an XML formatted copy of the TMC records? And second is do other
clients want to see an XML formatted copy of TMC records?
Actually, I
Ok, that brings up some follow-up questions. First of course is why do you want
an XML formatted copy of the TMC records? And second is do other clients want
to see an XML formatted copy of TMC records?
Russell Witt
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Shmuel, that innovation, spill Czech, has saved me many a time while receiving
PTFs.
Sometimes I miss being in Washington DC, then I come to my senses. I hope you
are doing well.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of
What machine are you planning on plugging this 3x74 into? IIRC, the 3274s were
strictly bus and tag, and there were some 3174s that were ESCON-capable. I
have no experience with the 9074 machines, but IBM doesn't support ESCON on
anything more current than the z196/z114, do they? So you're
Lizette,
If you get a listing of the migrated datasets on ML2 and sort by ML2 tape
#, then issue the recall by ML2 volume, HSM seems to handle the dsn
sequences on the tape and do the recall(s) very fast. I had to recall
18,000 dsn's one time for Tivoli ouput mgr (TOM) and they were on 8 ML2
Not even remotely? Okay, I'll bite. What point were you trying to make by
your comment PUSH is one letter shorter.
Thanks,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
Try this. I get an email from them every so often and I know they have
3174's for sale
Global Hardware Suppliers, Inc.
7595 Mariner Point North, Suite 101
Maple Grove, MN 55311
E-mail: mailto:donob...@comcast.netdonob...@comcast.net
mailto:donob...@comcast.net
Direct Phone: (763) 494-3559
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Elardus Engelbrecht
elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za wrote:
snip/
Groete / Greetings
Elardus Engelbrecht
Worst pick-up line:
Boy trying to impress his new girlfriend: On a scale from 1 to America,
how free are you tonight?
Girlfriend: I'm North Korea.
http://www.argecy.com/index.php?pfile=3274
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Steve Thompson
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 7:16 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Question on 3270 Devices
Does anyone know of
Does anyone know of any real 3270 devices that are available from
IBM or a third party that are still being serviced and/or
actively marketed?
I'm thinking that IBM stopped support for all 3270 devices
(including controllers) somewhere in the '90s.
And I believe all the third party
How about this?
http://www.visara.com/maindocs/DSheet/dsUCT_7_29_2009.pdf
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Steve Thompson
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 10:16 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Question on 3270
Sorry, make that 2074, not 9074 - getting my numbers messed up
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Pommier, Rex
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 10:25 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Question on 3270
revision date 12/26/2003 ???
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Mike Schwab
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 8:35 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Question on 3270 Devices
On Fri, 22 May 2015 09:56:13 -0500, John McKown wrote:
My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells down by the
seashore.
I miss Mel Blanc.
-- gil
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
Thanks for the replies.
I doubt that any of those devices are in use with the possible
exception of the control room where they have Master Consoles.
The rest of us are required to use TN3270 emulation under Windows.
Now, think of time-out and auditors.
Regards,
Steve Thompson
http://www.c-reset.com/terminal.html#IBM
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 9:16 AM, Steve Thompson ste...@copper.net wrote:
Does anyone know of any real 3270 devices that are available from IBM or a
third party that are still being serviced and/or actively marketed?
I'm thinking that IBM stopped
Jay Maynard bought a 3174 with a Token Ring and Ethernet to plug into
a PC running Hercules.
He already had an Apple ][ with a Token Ring, so he plugged it in and
used it as a console.
Not that Apple ][s are cheap and readily available.
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Pommier, Rex
On Wed, 20 May 2015 15:08:44 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
CMS/TSO Pipelines embodies a similar absurdity:
It's not absurd if it doe what it was designed for. Now, if there
isn't a command similar to literal but putting STDIN firt, *(that*
would be absurd.
There is. The APPEND
Have a look at the Visara devices - they have some.
Jerry Whitteridge
Lead Systems Engineer
Safeway Inc.
925 738 9443
Corporate Tieline - 89443
If you feel in control
you just aren't going fast enough.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Probably the last time they sold one. :-)
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Charles Mills
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 10:44 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Question on 3270 Devices
revision date
Trying to get back a virt printer w/o a IPL
When they start the printer on VSE is seems to go looking for a real device
Tried a few different things but to no avail
Any help appreciated
Thanks,
Augie
VM directory entry:
SPOOL 00F 4245 Z
* cp q v 00f
AR 0015 PRT 000F CL A NOCONT NOHOLD COPY 001
http://www.defmacro.org/ramblings/lisp.html
This article is mainly about the eureka! moment when a regular
programmer finally got it about LISP. But it not just about LISP, and
contains some very interesting thoughts. Well, at least to me. Especially
his approaching LISP programs from an XML
If you are looking for a current modern technology device that supports
ESCON and FICON SecureAgent makes a 9074 IDG.
http://www.secureagent.com/IDG9074-index.htm
Thanks,
*Chris Mason ▪ Mainframe Systems Engineer ▪ Technical Services Group** ▪ *
*Sungard Availability Services*
401 North
Should be seeing this
F1 0001 1R48I RDR,00C,A,
F1 0001 1R48I RDR,02C,Z,
F1 0001 1R48I PUN,01D,Z,VM,, INACTIVE,
F1 0001 1R48I LST,00F,Z,1,VM,, INACTIVE,
From: VSE-L [mailto:vse-l-bounces+august.carideo=avon@lists.lehigh.edu] On
Behalf Of August Carideo/RYE/US
Sent: Friday,
* CP READY 00F
Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.
From: VSE-L
[mailto:vse-l-bounces+framaekers=ailife@lists.lehigh.edu] On Behalf
Of August Carideo/RYE/US
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 11:55 AM
To: VSE Discussion List; IBM Mainframe DiscussionList
Subject: help w/ a virt printer
Trying to get
On 20 May 2015 at 15:32, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net wrote:
I always thought of Latin 1 as ISO8859-1
It is, but Don presumably meant that IBM-1047 was the EBCDIC
equivalent to ISO-8859-1.
Apples and oranges. Latin-1 is what IBM calls a Character Set, and ISO
et al
43 matches
Mail list logo
