IBM Mainframe Discussion List wrote on
11/20/2015 07:22:44 AM:
> From: "Hardee, Chuck"
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Date: 11/20/2015 07:23 AM
> Subject: SMF/RMF Reporting question
> Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
I have access and knowledge of SysView and SDSF.
What our system programmers have I do not know.
I'm thinking no, because their first attempt at giving me what I need was to
use SysView.
Charles (Chuck) Hardee
Senior Systems Engineer/Database Administration
EAS Information Technology
Thermo
Address "ISPEXEC" "LMINIT DATAID(FDTID) DATASET('"dsn"') ENQ(SHRW)"
Address "ISPEXEC" "LMOPEN DATAID("fdtid") OPTION(OUTPUT)"
Address "ISPEXEC" "LMMLIST DATAID("fdtid") MEMBER(MEMNM)"
Do While cc = 0
Address
Staller, Allan wrote:
>Sounds like you need to enable SMF Interval Recording (SYS(...(INTERVAL)) in
>SMFPRMxx. Set the interval as low as needed. Can be enabled/disabled
>dynamically to limit the amount of type 30 (1,2,6) and RMF records written to
>SMF.
Also look at ERBRMFxx for these two:
And if you have not set this up, the RMF Spread Sheet Reporter might be helpful
http://www-03.ibm.com/support/techdocs/atsmastr.nsf/WebIndex/TD106241
This recorded demonstration show how to install and setup the RMF Spreadsheet
Reporter and how to run the IO Queueing report to obtain performance
A hip-hop look at mainframe computing and COBOL Programming.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uKG0IEyeZb0=youtu.be
Mark T. Regan, K8MTR
CTO1, USNR-Retired
1969-1991
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
Thanks Bob. I'll see if my system programmers know how to run the report.
Charles (Chuck) Hardee
Senior Systems Engineer/Database Administration
EAS Information Technology
Thermo Fisher Scientific
300 Industry Drive | Pittsburgh, PA 15275
Phone +1 (724) 517-2633 | Mobile +1 (412) 877-2809 |
Sounds like you need to enable SMF Interval Recording (SYS(...(INTERVAL)) in
SMFPRMxx. Set the interval as low as needed.
Can be enabled/disabled dynamically to limit the amount of type 30 (1,2,6) and
RMF records written to SMF.
As another has suggested, RMF III can also provide some good
> Actually ICSF provides both open and secure key encryption services.
Yes - mainly, those were added so that applications would have a way to use
ICSF for clear-key encryption with the CPACF. Those were not originally a part
of CCA, and are not supported in the HSM cards (Crypto Express,
Do you have any tools like SAS/MICS or SAS/MXG?
Any monitoring tools like Tivoli Omegamon, MainView?
Lizette
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Hardee, Chuck
> Sent: Friday, November 20, 2015 5:23 AM
> To:
I will have to look into this.
Thanks!
Charles (Chuck) Hardee
Senior Systems Engineer/Database Administration
EAS Information Technology
Thermo Fisher Scientific
300 Industry Drive | Pittsburgh, PA 15275
Phone +1 (724) 517-2633 | Mobile +1 (412) 877-2809 | FAX: +1 (412) 490-9230
Forgot the initial CC = 0 line some where before line 4
Ren
Ext 1448
-Original Message-
From: Brenton, Ren
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2015 9:37 AM
To: 'IBM Mainframe Discussion List'
Subject: Re: Deleting all members of a pds
Address "ISPEXEC" "LMINIT
>>I looked at that. It builds a list of IDCAMS commands to delete the
members one-by-one.
Well the deletion of all members of a PDS DFSORT trick is written when
IDCAMS did not support the Wild card deletion function on PDS members. So
DFSORT chose the traditional method of deleting the
Peter Hunkeler wrote:
>>(Had you come to SHARE, you might have known that--hint, hint. ;-)
>Re: hint, hint, John, would you find some time to convince our upper level
>management of many companies of the value of SHARE, etc?
Hint, hint - the rarity of money beats the value of SHARE by a full
>(Had you come to SHARE, you might have known that--hint, hint. ;-)
Re: hint, hint, John, would you find some time to convince our upper level
management of many companies of the value of SHARE, etc?
Sorry, could not resist.
--
Peter Hunkeler
For the curious, IDCAMS does indeed use STOW (with I) to delete all the
members of a PDS or PDSE. This is not only fast, but it eliminates any
need to compress a PDS afterward. (Had you come to SHARE, you might have
known that--hint, hint. ;-)
Also, this function has been available since z/OS
Hello Everyone,
I am trying to find, from a historical perspective, that is to say, after an
event has occurred, what units of work were using how much of the available CPU.
Is there an SMF and/or RMF report that allows on to ask,
"During the interval from hh:mm to hh:mm on a particular day, in
On Fri, 20 Nov 2015 08:11:08 -0700, Sri h Kolusu wrote:
>>>I looked at that. It builds a list of IDCAMS commands to delete the
>members one-by-one.
>
>Well the deletion of all members of a PDS DFSORT trick is written when
>IDCAMS did not support the Wild card deletion function on PDS members.
On Fri, 20 Nov 2015 08:11:08 -0700, Sri h Kolusu wrote:
Does it at least sort the list in descending order?
>
>Descending order of what? member names or Size? Why exactly do you need to
>sort the list ? Do you think it would make a difference to the directory
>blocks?
Member names. The
What did I just watch
Did you notice there is not a COBOL programmer listed in the credits?
Ken
-Original Message-
From: Mark Regan
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2015 7:43 AM Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Cobollin'
A hip-hop look at
On Fri, 20 Nov 2015 06:58:42 -0500, John Eells wrote:
>For the curious, IDCAMS does indeed use STOW (with I) to delete all the
>members of a PDS or PDSE. This is not only fast, but it eliminates any
>need to compress a PDS afterward. (Had you come to SHARE, you might have
>known that--hint, hint.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
> Sent: Friday, November 20, 2015 8:58 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Deleting all members of a pds
>
> When better techniques become available,
I think the first principle. A module saves registers on the way in and
restores them on the way out. In other words, it leaves the environment as it
found it (other than whatever chore it was supposed to perform).
I am kind of surprised at the behavior you see. Freeing a DD name takes a
Chuck-
SysView definitely has historical reporting (has for many many years). As
your
SysProgs to show you how to access it. It is very easy to use.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Hardee, Chuck
Sent: Friday, November
thank you!! i track that book down and see what it has to say
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Andy Higgins
Sent: Friday, 20 November, 2015 12:12
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: "tapehlq" parm in
The Seattle Sheraton was breached for a time range that included March of
2015.
http://www.starwoodhotels.com/Media/PDF/Corporate/Hotel_List.pdf
Also the Orlando Dolphin but not while SHARE was there!
Charles
--
For IBM-MAIN
On Thu, 19 Nov 2015 19:24:01 +, Bonno, Tuco wrote:
>can anybody throw some light on the USAGE of the "tapehlq" parm in IGGCATxx?
Tape volume catalogs are described in DFSMS OAM Planning, Installation, and
Storage Administration Guide for Tape Libraries.
>>> Member names. The reason would be that a PDS directory is maintainedin
order,
> and the directory is always kept compressed.
Tom,
Thanks for the info and as mentioned earlier DFSORT has the ability of
sorting the member names in ascending/descending order. Here is a sample
to show just
Why would you think that? Just because they have a fancy title does not
mean they don't play with the code?
Tony Thigpen
Ken Hume IBM wrote on 11/20/2015 10:41 AM:
What did I just watch
Did you notice there is not a COBOL programmer listed in the credits?
Ken
-Original
In a program, I am passed a DDNAME allocated by another program.
I'd like to use it twice, once as IEBGENER SYSUT1 and once as
TSO RECEIVE INDD. Either works by itself. But each utility seems to
FREE its DDNAME before returning (is this documented, or perhaps
common knowledge?), so I can't use
On 20 November 2015 at 13:58, retired mainframer
wrote:
> > In a program, I am passed a DDNAME allocated by another program.
> >
> > I'd like to use it twice, once as IEBGENER SYSUT1 and once as
> > TSO RECEIVE INDD. Either works by itself. But each utility seems to
>
Re:
https://listserv.ua.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind1511=ibm-main=R37953&1=ibm-main&9=A=-3=on=C539315E5DAE4A6734=PaulGBoulder%40AIM.COM=No+Match%3BMatch%3BMatches=4
On Fri, 20 Nov 2015 10:51:04 -0800, retired mainframer wrote:
>
>
>> When better techniques become available, perhaps the inferior ones
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
> Sent: Friday, November 20, 2015 9:15 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Should utilities FREE DDNAMEs?
>
> In a program, I am passed a DDNAME allocated by
IIRC, Sysview will only have historical data if "History Datasets" (or
whatever they are called) are allocated, which might or might not be your
case.
Anyway, it's worth a try!
I have a yearning for a S/360 box to keep my garage/workshop warm in
Winter. I already have some mods to MVS 3.8J under Hercules, to make it
feel more like home :-)
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
Maybe someone should raise a requirement that the SHARE Hotels credit
card system should be secure.
Ed
On Nov 20, 2015, at 12:36 PM, Charles Mills wrote:
The Seattle Sheraton was breached for a time range that included
March of
2015.
On Thu, 19 Nov 2015 12:47:40 +0100, Leopold Strauss wrote:
>Hi, all
>
>I simply wanted to automize the receiving of a lot of XMIT-files in
>zOS-unix-shell ( not TSO)
>
>Last but not least my problem could be broken down to following
>terminal-input-problem with the RECEIVE-command:
>
With a lot
We have both a consulting and a software side, on the consulting side the
oldest machines we have are:
4 z/800's running os/390 2.10, z/os 1.4, 1.7 and 1.13
2 9672's both running OS/390
1 4381 running MVS/XA
All of these are production systems, and for some very special reasons they are
at
On 20 November 2015 at 14:41, Paul Gilmartin <
000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> >You're sure your caller didn't allocate with FREE=CLOSE ?
> >
> No, I'm not sure.
>
> I shouldn't have implied "caller" The DDNAME was "passed" in a reply
> from the SDSF API. So I wish
Didn’t John Lennon write a song about this??
All we are saying .. is give FREEs a chance .?
Chris Hoelscher
Technology Architect, Database Infrastructure Services
Technology Solution Services
: humana.com
123 East Main Street
Louisville, KY 40202
Humana.com
(502) 714-8615, (502) 476-2538
MVS would not run on a 360, requires 370 with Virtual Storage.
MFT would have a good chance.
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Rupert Reynolds wrote:
> I have a yearning for a S/360 box to keep my garage/workshop warm in
> Winter. I already have some mods to MVS 3.8J under
As long as you don't need more MIPS, keep chugging along.
Which is why IBM cuts off the upgrades.
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Brian Westerman
wrote:
> We have both a consulting and a software side, on the consulting side the
> oldest machines we have are:
>
>
Or, more recent versions of IDCAMS.
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: J O Skip Robinson
Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2015 19:07
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: (External):Re: Deleting all members of a pds
Can also be accomplished with PDS[85]
On Fri, 20 Nov 2015 16:23:28 -0500, Tony Harminc wrote:
>
>Dynalloc concatenate a DD DUMMY to it...? The JCL book says:
>
> *FREE=CLOSE* is ignored when:
>
> - The data set is a member of a concatenated group
>
>Not clear if concatenating after a dynalloc with FREE=CLOSE will inhibit
>it. Seems
Background: HMC software version 2.11.1 connected to a z10.
The HMC is connected to two networks. The first is a small private
network with just the laptops in the z10 and the HMC. No other HMCs or
other CPUs. The second network is a local network with several items on
it, including other
ERBRMFPP
Comes free.
See the RMF USER'S GUIDE
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: Lizette Koehler
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2015 08:50
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: SMF/RMF Reporting question
Do you have any tools like
46 matches
Mail list logo