Re: SMPE Filter PTF list option based on date

Thanks kolusu On Jul 13, 2017 10:55 PM, "Sri h Kolusu" wrote: > If you just want to extract the messages GIM22701I, then here is job to > extract the messages and format them > > //STEP0100 EXEC PGM=GIMSMP > //SMPCSIDD DISP=SHR,DSN=your CSI Dataset > //SMPHOLD DD

Re: Request for Enhancement for DD JCL statement for "new" data sets

Many thanks to the 12 other people who have voted for this already. Much more positive response than my other RFEs! Frank From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Frank Swarbrick Sent: Wednesday,

AW: Re: AW: Re: Question regarding system symbols

> As a style nitpick, I would recommend relative paths in symlinks, e.g. Not nitpick. Absolutely valid correction. Thanks for pointing out. -- Peter Hunkeler -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,

Re: Hiding cross LPAR capacity information

In the Customize Image Profile on the HMC, under Security Tab, there's a checkbox for 'Global Performance Data Control'. That sounds like what you want to un-check for the 'curious' customer. Dana On Thu, 13 Jul 2017 14:45:28 -0500, Avram Friedman wrote: >

Re: multiple RSA public keys for the same host

The known_hosts file is a z/OS OpenSSH file, not a Co:Z SFTP file. Server public keys are automatically added to the user-level known_hosts file if you have the SSH "StrictHostKeyChecking=no" option set AND this is the first time you have connected to this host (the same name and ip address). I

CA-TLMS information

Thanks a lot It is exactly what I´m looking for. Carlos Bodra IBM System Certified System z São Paulo - Brazil -Mensagem original- De: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] Em nome de Bob Van Horn Enviada em: quinta-feira, 13 de julho de 2017 13:27 Para:

Hiding cross LPAR capacity information

We run a machine with 5 LPAR defined. Most of the LPARS are shared by all our clients but 2 are dedicated to a single client. We are receiving complaints from the dedicated client that we are not giving them sufficient CPU They are obtaining data for there complaint from RMF III CPC Capacity

Re: Is there a SORT day-of-week function?

:'NEXTDATE',/, 10:'',20:'') The output from this is CURRDATE NEXTDATE PETER20170713 20170717 If you need to go back to previous days then also it is quite simple. Simply

Re: Is there a SORT day-of-week function?

Thanks Elardus. I did not search KC, I was browsing and searching downloaded PDF's. I do think I have that "Smart Tricks" PDF on my hard drive, just have to go find it. Gracias. Peter -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf

multiple RSA public keys for the same host

We have been using Co:z SFTP with Coz: Batch for a few years. We are always connecting as an ssh client as we are not using sshd server at this time. For every connection to every server I noticed that the RSA cert is added to the known hosts file. So there are many, many of the same RSA certs

Re: COPYING DFDSS TAPE TO DASD USING COPYDUMP - ADR331E

John, My point was that you can't do it with the tape you already have. The original tape would have to have been created with the smaller block size, instead of the 256K block it was created at. You can't decrease the block size on a DSS dump dataset. Rex -Original Message- From:

Re: COPYING DFDSS TAPE TO DASD USING COPYDUMP - ADR331E

Without knowing the OP's real requirements, would it be possible to terse the backup tape to a disk dataset? Dana On Thu, 13 Jul 2017 09:54:28 -0700, Lizette Koehler wrote: >@JohnD > >I think the problem is the LBI. The DUMP tape was create with a HUGE Blksize.

Re: SMPE Filter PTF list option based on date

If you just want to extract the messages GIM22701I, then here is job to extract the messages and format them //STEP0100 EXEC PGM=GIMSMP //SMPCSIDD DISP=SHR,DSN=your CSI Dataset //SMPHOLD DD SYSOUT=* //SMPLIST DD DSN=&,DISP=(,PASS),SPACE=(CYL,(25,25),RLSE) //SMPCNTL DD * SET

Re: SMPE Filter PTF list option based on date

Hi Thanks Any rexx exec if someone has to filter out that records ? On Jul 13, 2017 10:24 PM, "Allan Staller" wrote: > Check the SMPLOG* datasets. > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of

Re: COPYING DFDSS TAPE TO DASD USING COPYDUMP - ADR331E

@JohnD I think the problem is the LBI. The DUMP tape was create with a HUGE Blksize. You cannot copy that to DASD. Maybe you can change the way the DUMP tape is created to use a BLKSIZE like 32760. Then you can probably use COPYDUMP to copy it to DISK. >From what I can tell, you could

Re: SMPE Filter PTF list option based on date

Check the SMPLOG* datasets. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Longabaugh, Robert E Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 11:49 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: SMPE Filter PTF list option based on date LIST PTFS

Re: SMPE Filter PTF list option based on date

LIST PTFS does not filter for the date. The date is in the output, but several lines down from the PTF number, so you would have to save two lines per PTF, and the dates may fall outside the range. As an alternative, you could use LIST LOG. The post processing would be simpler. //SMPCSI

Re: COPYING DFDSS TAPE TO DASD USING COPYDUMP - ADR331E

Seems like this exact same question was posted a couple of weeks ago. Anyway, y'all should start lobbying IBM to fix DSS. I can't see how it should be all that difficult for DSS to re-block the backup file when copying it, seeing as how it can and does handle different block sizes in the first

Re: COPYING DFDSS TAPE TO DASD USING COPYDUMP - ADR331E

Rex, I tried your suggestion.  I tried copying the tape to another tape using  DCB=BLKSIZE=27998.  However I got the same result :ADR331E (001)-CPYD (01), OUTPUT BLKSIZE 27998 FOR DATA SET ON DDNAME COPY1 IS SMALER THAN INPUT BLKSIZE 262144. From: "Pommier, Rex"

Re: AW: Re: Question regarding system symbols

On Thu, 13 Jul 2017 15:09:39 +0200, Peter Hunkeler (p...@gmx.ch) wrote about "AW: Re: Question regarding system symbols" (in ): [snip] > For path /abc/xyzA1 this would be the commands > > cd /abc > ln -s /abc/xyza1 xyzA1 As a style nitpick, I would recommend

Re: CA-TLMS information

You can download the TLMS megabyte report via the following link: https://www.ca.com/us/services-support/ca-support/ca-support-online/knowledge-base-articles.TEC1366823.html * This is an EARL program that will list out the information you are looking for. Let me know if you need any help with

SMPE Filter PTF list option based on date

Hello Group Apologies if this is a repetitive question. I am trying to understand if we can list the number PTF applied based on specific date range ? We are at zOS 1.13 Regards Jake -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /

Re: COPYING DFDSS TAPE TO DASD USING COPYDUMP - ADR331E

John, Based on error ADR331E, it appears that the only way you could do this would be if you had created the original tape backup using a block size of 32K - or 27998. That message explicitly states that you cannot copy a dump dataset to something with a smaller block size. Rex

Re: Is there a SORT day-of-week function?

',/, 10:'',20:'') The output from this is CURRDATE NEXTDATE PETER20170713 20170717 If you need to go back to previous days then also it is quite simple. Simply change the NEXTDday

COPYING DFDSS TAPE TO DASD USING COPYDUMP - ADR331E

I am trying to copy a volume backup (which was created by DFDSS)  to disk, using DFDSS. However I am encountering problems doing so.I tried using  DCB=BLKSIZE=32760 to no avail.  I tried running the job without the DCB and it returned the same result (ADR324E).  According to the

Re: CA-TLMS information

A couple of other options. Since you have TLMS you can download and install at no charge the GMI (Graphical Manager Interface) or SRM-lite. It has a very nice Gui interface for a lot of functions. This will include tape. This makes this type of analysis easier. You could also open a case with

Re: CA-TLMS information

You might want to join the Ca communities for TLMS. They will be able to help you To join, if you have not done so, go to communities.ca.com you will need a ca support ID to join You can also download the IBM tape tools and use it to analyze your tapes. Since it is only looking at SMF

CA-TLMS information

Hello I´m not confident with CA-TLMS software, but I need to know about volser usage (MB written) and percentage of volser used. I checked CA-TLMS reports and found no one that can give me this information. Anyone knows how to get this info. I need to estimate amount of data that

Re: Question regarding system symbols

On Thu, 13 Jul 2017 03:50:31 -0500, Juergen Kehr wrote: > >you're absolutely right. It's not a problem to use uppercase characters in >path names, but that's not the question here. I used path names here only as >an example for needing the 'lowercase version' of an existing system symbol

AW: Re: Question regarding system symbols

Ooops... formatting mess again. Sorry If the number of pathnames is (more or less) constant, I would define symbolic links containing the upper case system id letters, pointing to the all lower case pathnames. For path /abc/xyzA1 this would be the commands cd /abc ln -s /abc/xyza1 xyzA1 The

Re: Question regarding system symbols

Hello Kees, what I found out, as an easiest solution is, to define a second system symbol, which contains the lowercase value: the existing setting was RZ=A1 and there I add RZLC = a1 . In the procedure I use RZLC instead of RZ . Because at the moment this symbol is the only one, where we

Re: Question regarding system symbols

The most flexible solution is to write a task with SYMUPD that takes selected symbols, converts them to lowercase and adds them under their lowercase names. Kees. > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of Peter Hunkeler >

Re: Question regarding system symbols

If the number of pathnames is (more or less) constant, I would define symbolic links containing the upper case system id letters, pointing to the all lower case pathnames. For path /abc/xyzA1 this would be the commands cd /abcln -s /abc/xyza1 xyzA1 The STC will access the path via link. Other

Re: Question regarding system symbols

Yes, lower case values are possible: IEA007I STATIC SYSTEM SYMBOL VALUES = "Prod" Kees. > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of Juergen Kehr > Sent: 13 July, 2017 10:01 > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >

Re: Question regarding system symbols

Hi Denis, you're absolutely right. It's not a problem to use uppercase characters in path names, but that's not the question here. I used path names here only as an example for needing the 'lowercase version' of an existing system symbol within some JCL. BTW: Using uppercase characters in

Re: Question regarding system symbols

Hi Juergen, I have seen customers using uppercase unix paths. Is there a specific requirement that you cannot use uppercase paths or path parts in your shop? Denis. -Original Message- From: Juergen Kehr To: IBM-MAIN Sent: Thu, Jul

Question regarding system symbols

Hello, in qur installation we use the system symbol for the system name. It has values like A1,B2,C3 (all letters are uppercase) Now we have to build the JCL for an STC where we would like to use this symbol, but our problem is that we need it in lowercase characters, because the value would

Re: Is there a SORT day-of-week function?

Farley, Peter x23353 wrote: >Is there any way in SORT control cards (either DFSORT or SYNCSORT) to test for >a certain day of the week? Something like this, assuming '3' represents the >DOW value for Wednesday: Yes, there is. At least for DFSORT. >OUTREC IFTHEN=(WHEN=(DOW(),EQ,3), >

Re: SMFLIMxx sample?

Hi Jim, I have been digging into replacing IEFUSI by SMFLIMxx and have a few questions: - How broad has REGIONX been implemented? It is available in JCL and IEFUSI and SMFLIMxx can set both values, but I don't see them in SMF, SMF30RGN still has one value, and IEFUSI WORD5/SUBWORD2 also has