On 07/05/2018 10:14 AM, R.S. wrote:
> W dniu 2018-07-05 o 09:36, Jake Anderson pisze:
>> Hi
>>
>> I understand that the operating system timing takes from HMC.
>>
>> Still we find a few seconds of difference in Operating system.
>>
>> Does it takes time to percolate and get in sync ?
>
> Your assum
Hi
We are looking up for a solution where we need a LPAR to have a hot standby
in other LPAR running in a different machine .
As we are trying to create a sysplex relationship between two LPARS running
in a different machines .
Apology for my ignorance and is it possible ?
Peter
--
[Default] On 5 Jul 2018 13:37:11 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
wayn...@gmail.com (Wayne Bickerdike) wrote:
>DEC completely forgotten?
>
>I once read that HP was a printer company masquerading as a computer
>company.
The Tandem series successors are now on Intel Xeon or Itanium chips
depending o
That's because if the original attempt was tape, there's definitely no NVR.
Sorry, when I mentioned IEHPROGM earlier, I was actually thinking of the CATLG
command, as in CATLG DSNAME=dataset,VOL=3390=whocares (disk doesn't matter,
because you just want an entry you can actually delete). I thoug
Right. And I don't believe "JCL" does. I think think the scheduling component
of JESx or something similar either waits or polls.
Anyway, you are reading about SVC 99. I meant a separate module to do the ENQs.
I would guess that SVC 99 does a RET=HAVE so there would be no harm in a
pre-ENQ.
Ch
We IPLed a new system today with 2.3. My SDSF menu is in 'hide mode'. All of
the following options are displayed, but none of them works.
PROC Proclib data setsJES
SSI Subsystem informationSystem
CFC CF Connections Sysplex
CFS CF Structures
We tried. :(
DELETE PTP.DP.TRMS.ARCH999.X3.G0308V00 FILE(VOL2) NVR
IDC3014I CATALOG ERROR
IDC3009I ** VSAM CATALOG RETURN CODE IS 50 - REASON CODE IS IGG0CLE3-92
IDC0551I ** ENTRY PTP.DP.TRMS.ARCH999.X3.G0308V00 NOT DELETED
IDC0001I FUNCTION COMPLETED, HIGHEST CONDITION CODE WAS 8
Judit
I created one and it allocated it and cataloged, but did not get rolled into
the GDG base. Tried in batch and manually.
I also tried to run:
//STEP005 EXEC PGM=IEBGENER
//SYSUT1 DD DISP=SHR,DSN=PTP.DP.TRMS.ARCH999.X3.G0308V00
//SYSUT2 DD DSN=PTP.DP.TRMS.ARCH999.X3.G0308V01,
// D
On Thu, 5 Jul 2018 13:29:01 -0700, Charles Mills wrote:
>I have not really thought it through but I just cannot picture how building
>some combination of Rexx or whatever + assembler one could not do 'n'
>simultaneous ENQs. The facilities are there in MVS for the asking:
>
>"ENQ assigns control
I am answering for Brad.
The entry has no disk volume associated with it, since it was created to tape.
So there is no disk, no dates, no tape information, no MVS catalog connection;
only an entry under the gdg base.
If you go into 3.4 and display it – you have to type the whole dataset name
DEC completely forgotten?
I once read that HP was a printer company masquerading as a computer
company.
At least IBM have stuck with the mainframe. HP have buried their
technological history.
On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 3:41 AM, Seymour J Metz wrote:
> In the beginning was Compaq, and HP was know f
I have not really thought it through but I just cannot picture how building
some combination of Rexx or whatever + assembler one could not do 'n'
simultaneous ENQs. The facilities are there in MVS for the asking:
"ENQ assigns control of one or more serially reusable resources to a task. If
any
Most everything is menu driven, about the closest thing on IBM i are CL
programs (Control Language). Think Clists but they require compilation. An
optional IBM licensed program product, Advanced Job Scheduler, has a way to
schedule a series of commands, but there is no conditional processing
On Thu, 5 Jul 2018 16:28:10 -0300, Clark Morris wrote:
>[Default] On 5 Jul 2018 07:47:19 -0700, (Dana Mitchell) wrote:
>
>For batch processes how does the i series command language compare to
>JCL. How are competing requests for file access handled?
>
If, as John says, the filesystem paradigm is
[Default] On 5 Jul 2018 07:47:19 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
mitchd...@gmail.com (Dana Mitchell) wrote:
>I spend more time now days supporting a handful of IBM i LPARs than our z/OS
>systems. There are definitely some frustrating facets of the IBM i world.
>For instance, the 5250 emulati
On Thu, 5 Jul 2018 14:23:35 -0400, Hobart Spitz wrote:
>I think a more encompassing approach would be for JOL to be a function,
>command or environment which could be invoked from REXX.
>
I wonder how JOL addresses theneed for "parallel ENQs". S99WTDSN requires
APF authorization. Does JOL submi
It is probably just my own FUD that is making me doubt it.
Rob Schramm
On Thu, Jul 5, 2018, 1:59 PM Mike Hochee wrote:
> I have not used it for that specifically, but I don't see why not. The
> policy based rules allow for job/task names and support wildcards, and you
> might not even need tho
I think a more encompassing approach would be for JOL to be a function,
command or environment which could be invoked from REXX. That way, you
don't have to reinvent or do without all the things that REXX brings to the
table, both as a language and as something that interfaces with many parts
of z
What does the PGM= do as coded?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Elardus Engelbrecht
Sent: Thursday, July 5, 2018 10:37 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Linklist and APF
Radoslaw Skorupka wrote:
>I have job
DYNALLOC certainly does not require AMODE 24, or RMODE 24. The coding
technique used in Bill Ogden's and Eileen's examples do. Bill Godfrey's
works in either 24 or 31 modes. He also identified the main problem.
FWIW, there's no need to write code that looks like it was extracted from a
dump. W
I have not used it for that specifically, but I don't see why not. The policy
based rules allow for job/task names and support wildcards, and you might not
even need those if you can filter based on a unique port range. I've been
impressed with AT-TLS, as it offers a lot of customization optio
In the beginning was Compaq, and HP was know for its excellent printers. Then
the printers went downhill and there was Hewlett PacPaq, although not by that
name. Wheile HP borged EDS, Dell borged Perot Systems. Oh, and TI was somewhere
in that saga. And oscilloscopes.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Me
I believe turning off "write to programmer" messages with TSO PROFILE
NOWTPMSG will hide the ICH408I but you might miss something else you want
to see.
Cheers,
Mick.
On 4 July 2018 at 09:47, Barbara Nitz wrote:
> Something has changed with SDSFAUX between z/OS 2.1 and z/OS 2.3.
>
> Under z/OS 2
FYI, follow-up from IBM. This PTF is going PE, but only because the hold data
was incorrectly stating that an IPL with CLPA is required. That will be
changed to a LLA refresh is required, followed by a F DEVMAN,RESTART.
_
Dave J
AFAIK only DAIR requires AMODE(24), not DYNALLOC.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Barkow, Eileen
Sent: Thursday, July 5, 2018 11:42 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Subject: Re: DY
This might be a weird one. I have used Policy Agent AT-TLS in the past to
secure JDBC communication with a UDB data base. Can I use Policy agent to
secure an existing HTTP GET process (assembler program), by doing a similar
process? Has anyone else done this?
Thanks,
Rob Schramm
--
Rob Schra
On Thu, 5 Jul 2018 17:18:24 +0200, R.S. wrote:
>I have job with the following steplib:
>
>//STEPLIB DD DISP=SHR,DSN=HLQ.LNKLST.LIB1
>// DD DISP=SHR,DSN=HLQ.LNKLST.LIB2
>// DD DISP=SHR,DSN=HLQ.NONLNK.LIB3
>
>LIB1, and LIB2 reside in LNKLST, but not on APF.
>LIB3 is not on LNKLST, but is APF-author
Are you running with AMODE=24?
I think that you still need to, from looking at my old DYNALLOC pgms.
DS 0F
DYNBLKS EQU *
RBPOINT DC A(RBS) ADR REQ BLOCK PASSED IN R1
ORG RBPOINT S99RBP DSECT
DCX'80' HI ORDER BIT MUST BE ON
DS0F
RBS EQU
Hi Peter,
The documentation for GETE warns: "Note: Processing of the ESD records returned
by a GETE call should not make assumptions about the order of the returned ESD
records..." The expectation was that there would never be a very large number
of classes, so that a simple class lookup (as i
Radoslaw Skorupka wrote:
>I have job with the following steplib:
>//STEPLIB DD DISP=SHR,DSN=HLQ.LNKLST.LIB1
>//DD DISP=SHR,DSN=HLQ.LNKLST.LIB2
>//DD DISP=SHR,DSN=HLQ.NONLNK.LIB3
>LIB1, and LIB2 reside in LNKLST, but not on APF.
>LIB3 is not on LNKLST, but is APF-
On Thu, 5 Jul 2018 08:14:35 -0700, Charles Mills wrote:
>Should not be a S0C4 but don't you want pointers to ALL of the text units?
>
He doesn't have pointers to any of his text units. X'0055',X'0001' is likely
not a valid address.
--
Tom Marchant
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: IBM Main
On Thu, 5 Jul 2018 17:18:24 +0200, R.S. wrote:
>I have job with the following steplib:
>
>//STEPLIB DD DISP=SHR,DSN=HLQ.LNKLST.LIB1
>// DD DISP=SHR,DSN=HLQ.LNKLST.LIB2
>// DD DISP=SHR,DSN=HLQ.NONLNK.LIB3
>
>LIB1, and LIB2 reside in LNKLST, but not on APF.
>LIB3 is not on LNKLST,
Try to create a GDS with the name of
PTP.DP.TRMS.ARCH999.X3.G0308V01 << NOTE the VERSION number
You can fill this data set with the desired contents, or you can
make it a null data set (1 track and empty).
This might get you around the problem until those entries roll
out of the GDG base.
I have job with the following steplib:
//STEPLIB DD DISP=SHR,DSN=HLQ.LNKLST.LIB1
// DD DISP=SHR,DSN=HLQ.LNKLST.LIB2
// DD DISP=SHR,DSN=HLQ.NONLNK.LIB3
LIB1, and LIB2 reside in LNKLST, but not on APF.
LIB3 is not on LNKLST, but is APF-authorized.
The job works when
If you had just said tape...
And things are kinda different with VTS -- but, I hope you are
using checkpointing so that a restart doesn't require starting
from scratch. All of that will be handled under the covers.
A certain company was running C:D 5.0 and their partner was
running the lates
W dniu 2018-07-05 o 09:36, Jake Anderson pisze:
Hi
I understand that the operating system timing takes from HMC.
Still we find a few seconds of difference in Operating system.
Does it takes time to percolate and get in sync ?
Your assumption is not true.
If you don't have STP, your time is j
Should not be a S0C4 but don't you want pointers to ALL of the text units?
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Bill Godfrey
Sent: Thursday, July 5, 2018 7:48 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: DYNALLOC
Classification: Public
Not that I've ever played with them, but there are commands / options to ROLLIN
and ROLLOFF GDS members of GDGs - could they help? Looks like IEHPROGM might be
able to rebuild indexes too. Chapter 29 of Using Data Sets looks like the place
to go.
Never played with any of
On Thu, 5 Jul 2018 09:27:07 -0500, Brad Wissink wrote:
>We need to remove a GDG entry from a GDG base, but the catalog
>entry doesn't exist. What happened was that during the creation of
>the GDG (PTP.DP.TRMS.ARCH999.X3.G0308V00) the user catalog filled
>up and could not extend.
I suspect tha
Did you try IEHPROGM?
What happens if you create a different dataset and rename it to the messed up
GDS?
First Tennessee Bank
Mainframe Technical Support
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Wissink, Brad
Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2018 10:51 AM
To: IBM-MA
On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 9:47 AM Dana Mitchell wrote:
> I spend more time now days supporting a handful of IBM i LPARs than our
> z/OS systems. There are definitely some frustrating facets of the IBM i
> world. For instance, the 5250 emulation is almost all 24x80, with just
> a few panels that
Trying to delete the GDG entry results in;
DELETE PTP.DP.TRMS.ARCH999.X3.G0308V00 NONVSAM NOSCRATCH PURGE
IDC3901I ERROR QUALIFYING PTP.DP.TRMS.ARCH999.X3.G0308V00
IDC3902I ** DEFAULT SERVICE ROUTINE ERROR CODE 20, LOCATE ERROR CODE 8
IDC0014I LASTCC=8
On Thu, 5 Jul 2018 10:29:22 -0400, Bill Ogden wrote:
>It has been a few decades since I used DYNALLOC and I am now doing
>something stupid that results in an 0C4 somewhere in never-never land. Can
>someone give me a clue without going to much trouble? (DRB and DRBPTR are
>on full word boundar
I spend more time now days supporting a handful of IBM i LPARs than our z/OS
systems. There are definitely some frustrating facets of the IBM i world.
For instance, the 5250 emulation is almost all 24x80, with just a few panels
that actually utilize 27x132, and thats it! Many new function
Create a dummy by specific number then delete?
On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 9:27 AM Brad Wissink wrote:
>
> We need to remove a GDG entry from a GDG base, but the catalog entry doesn't
> exist. What happened was that during the creation of the GDG
> (PTP.DP.TRMS.ARCH999.X3.G0308V00) the user catalog
DEL entryname NSCR?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Brad Wissink
Sent: Thursday, July 5, 2018 9:27 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: remove bad GDG entry from GDG base
We need to remove a GDG entry from a GDG ba
It has been a few decades since I used DYNALLOC and I am now doing
something stupid that results in an 0C4 somewhere in never-never land. Can
someone give me a clue without going to much trouble? (DRB and DRBPTR are
on full word boundaries.)
LA1,DRBPTR
DYNALLOC
...
...
We need to remove a GDG entry from a GDG base, but the catalog entry doesn't
exist. What happened was that during the creation of the GDG
(PTP.DP.TRMS.ARCH999.X3.G0308V00) the user catalog filled up and could not
extend. We received IEC331I 020-000. error message on this. We corrected
t
Martin Packer wrote:
>"Meh" is "meh". :-) If I say "hardly worth looking up" I think you'll get the
>joke. :-)
Hahahaha! LOL! Yes, Martin I got the joke! You're a zChampion of course! ;-D
Thanks!
Groete / Greetings
Elardus Engelbrecht
-
mikael.nyst...@seb.se wrote:
>Det här är ett test
Dit is 'n toets(In Afrikaans!)
And your Swedish test is working.
I (and rest of IBM-MAIN) got your test under grave danger! ;-)
Groete / Greetings
Elardus Engelbrecht
"Meh" is "meh". :-) If I say "hardly worth looking up" I think you'll get
the joke. :-)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm
Many moons ago we ported a product from z/OS to the AS/400 and were similarly
impressed with the sorts of things you mention. The OS was solid as a rock.
There is a major learning curve -- the darned thing is unlike any other
computer. And many APIs are locked up and not available without some s
On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 1:56 PM Jack J. Woehr wrote:
> On 7/4/2018 11:00 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
> > JCL has numerous restrictions and inconsistencies due to antiquity,
>
> IBM i supports Cobol. Come on down :)
>
A few years ago, the IBMi was under consideration to replace our, very
old, IBMz.
Det här är ett test
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Rob Scott wrote:
>By default, commands that you do not have access to via ISFCMD or group
>authority will not appear on the SDSF main menu.
Indeed! Please see (watch the wrrap!) this URL:
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.3.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r3.isfa500/rescmds.htm
...
Sankaranarayanan, Vignesh wrote:
>Any thoughts on this folks?
What you're asking is somewhat ambiguous.
What do you mean with 'hot' and 'cold'?
Also you said: "active/meh/cold VOLSER/tape volume."
What is "meh"?
>What are the kind of reports and fields that are worth reporting on.
Do you h
The use we need to to xfer a tape with multiple files on it (label=1,2,3,)
and thus need the vol=ref.
The working syntax after a suggestion from ibm is VOL=(,RETAIN,REF=dsn)
And since we are using GDG's it must be VOL=(,RETAIN,REF='dsn')
-
Any thoughts on this folks?
- Vignesh
Mainframe Infrastructure
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Sankaranarayanan, Vignesh
Sent: 03 July 2018 15:17
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Storage hot/cold analys
Skip
By default, commands that you do not have access to via ISFCMD or group
authority will not appear on the SDSF main menu.
You can issue the "SET MENU ALL" to show all commands and unauthorised commands
will have the "Status" of "Command not authorized".
You can issue "SET MENU HIDE" to rev
Barbara,
Rocket Software partnered with IBM to enhance SDSF a couple of years ago - the
initial result of this work was the SDSFAUX server and the new commands in SPEs
for 2.1 and 2.2.
SDSF users should only see menu options enabled for commands that they have
ISFCMD SAF authority to, this has
Hi
I understand that the operating system timing takes from HMC.
Still we find a few seconds of difference in Operating system.
Does it takes time to percolate and get in sync ?
Jake
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archi
61 matches
Mail list logo
