Cherry Picker seems inappropriate. Noodle picker, yes.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Seymour J Metz
Sent: Sunday, October 31, 2021 6:26 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Reliable source for slang
Thanks. Cherry picker is a name I never heard, only noodle.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Charles Mills [charl...@mcn.org]
Sent: Sunday, October 31,
copy con: file.txt
Ctrl-Z
1 file(s) copied.
On Mon, 1 Nov 2021 at 10:48, Paul Gilmartin <
000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Oct 2021 16:20:10 -0700, Tom Brennan wrote:
> >
> >Vista puts nothing but straight text with CRLF's into the clipboard.
> >It's
On Sun, 31 Oct 2021 16:20:10 -0700, Tom Brennan wrote:
>
>Vista puts nothing but straight text with CRLF's into the clipboard.
>It's up to the email client to decide what to do with it.
>
Thanks.
Is there a Windows command make a file from the clipboard content
without any editor's possible
https://en-academic.com/dic.nsf/enwiki/18042 Scroll down to Disk and Drum
Storage
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t=j==s=web==2ahUKEwjf
_Pin6fXzAhWNGTQIHTPrAOwQFnoECB8QAQ=https%3A%2F%2Fshare.confex.com%2Fshar
e%2F117%2Fwebprogram%2FHandout%2FSession9958%2FSystem%2520z%2520and%2520Stor
On 10/31/2021 3:34 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
Looks good on both mail client and LISTSERV web. Apparently you
know better than Tom how to deal with Vista.
Vista puts nothing but straight text with CRLF's into the clipboard.
It's up to the email client to decide what to do with it.
Paul At this point I'll try anything as I am still getting an 806 after
using LSEARCH=YES Need to post my code and output By looking at the outlook
option if I compose a new e-mail from scratch I can choose my format I would
typically use RTF and for the code use courier new I believe if I start a
On Sun, 31 Oct 2021 16:19:58 -0400, David Spiegel wrote:
>
>If all else fails, maybe you should make a PDF document out of your
>MS-Word document and send it as an attachment?
>
Nope. Have you tried it? Maybe HTML.
Did he say it was MS-Word? That would be his first mistake.
Basic cut and paste from Vista to Outlook seems to work pretty well:
=== == ==
=== == === ===
=== === == ==
=== ==== ===
I was more thinking about fooling the SE code into believing it is
talking to a mainframe. It doesn't actually need to control anything,
just keep track of various settings and respond as needed. And you
would have to give the simulator your email and phone number so it can
complain if you
Yes, it is bunch of bits recorded on tape. And it seems there is no need
to support "mainframe CCW language", because it is VTS who writes on
(real) tape, not z/OS or any mainframe OS using VTS.
However the above is true now and it was true 5, 10, 15 or 20 years ago.
But VTS always had been
Perhaps it's worth remembering that even a zPDT only emulates an LPAR.
There is no emulation of the whole z machine.
Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw
https://rsclweb.com
‘Dance like no one is watching. Encrypt like everyone is.’
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Thanks now that I think about it all my responses came from iPhone whatever
the default mail client is Just today when I was showing my code I went back
to outlook -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
Behalf Of David Spiegel Sent: Sunday, October 31, 2021 4:20 PM To:
Hi Joe,
If all else fails, maybe you should make a PDF document out of your
MS-Word document and send it as an attachment?
Regards,
David
On 2021-10-31 16:15, Joseph Reichman wrote:
Before I send it looks okay I have outlook I went to file -> options -> mail
it has options for compose
Before I send it looks okay I have outlook I went to file -> options -> mail
it has options for compose However when I did a google for "reply to" for
outlook the response I got back Was that if you are replying and the message
you replying is in one format say RTF or HTML outlook cann't change
Here's a screen I just copy/pasted into the Thunderbird email client.
Before sending I see each line separated correctly, however the longer
lines wrap around. That could be just local and they may not wrap after
emailing. Let's see...
Log/List Function keys Colors Environ Identifier
On Sun, 31 Oct 2021 14:07:25 -0400, Joseph Reichman wrote:
>Have a visita 3270
>
"visita"? "Vista"? Whatever.
Are there Vista option(s) which control formatting on Copy? Which have
you specified? (You'll probably get many suggestions here; Vista is
popular.)
>When I originally responded
I am going to try what Seymour suggested entering a blank no RTF Then should
break the line I think I have been responding from my iphone however to show my
code I went back to outlook This should be line 3 Regarding CSV 806 / BLDL
going try LSEARCH=YES in my LINK this time spaced out the
I am going to try what Seymour suggested entering a blank no RTF Then should
break the line I think I have been responding from my iphone however to show my
code I went back to outlook This should be line 3 Regarding CSV 806 / BLDL
going try LSEARCH=YES in my LINK thanks -Original
On 10/31/21 9:32 AM, Tom Brennan wrote:
But speaking of the real world, I wonder if IBM has ever thought
about a way to run their HMC/SE x86 code for home training.
I've heard of people running a virtualized HMC. I see no reason why an
SE couldn't be virtualized as long as it has the
IBM-MAIN works with plain text, no RTF and certainly not HTML
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Joseph Reichman
> Sent: Sunday, October 31, 2021 11:07 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: formatting help
>
> Have a visita 3270
>
>
Have a visita 3270
When I originally responded to Peter Relson
I noticed in outlook sent it was a big jumble
I then cut then entire response and just hit to break the lines
When done I did a sent it
But then I noticed once again it was jumbled
This time I did the same from outlook
On Sun, 31 Oct 2021 11:58:04 -0400, Joseph Reichman wrote:
>I think it ways that Binyamin and Peter Relson asked to see what I was doing
>so I cut and pasted my code from Sysprint
>
"cut and pasted my code from Sysprint " leaves a lot unsaid. How did you "cut"
and
how did you "paste"? What
You gave me an IDEA going to try LSEARCH=YES as the default is LSEARCH=NO
Thanks -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
Behalf Of Peter Relson Sent: Sunday, October 31, 2021 8:55 AM To:
IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Load Module Search Libs Joe R wrote I
added two
I think it ways that Binyamin and Peter Relson asked to see what I was doing so
I cut and pasted my code from Sysprint
I use outlook and the format text didn’t have RTF
Thanks
> On Oct 31, 2021, at 11:50 AM, Joseph Reichman wrote:
>
> Thanks
>
>
>> On Oct 31, 2021, at 11:44 AM,
Thanks
> On Oct 31, 2021, at 11:44 AM, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>
> For widest coverage, don't use RTF or HTML; write straight text, with blank
> lines between paragraphs. Also, use spaces rather than tabs. If you use
> anything beyond ASCII, set the character set to UTF-8 unless you are
For widest coverage, don't use RTF or HTML; write straight text, with blank
lines between paragraphs. Also, use spaces rather than tabs. If you use
anything beyond ASCII, set the character set to UTF-8 unless you are using
software that doesn't generate appropriate CT and CTE header fields. Use
Maybe copy your rich text to notepad, then copy again from notepad to
email. Assuming Windows.
On 10/31/2021 8:31 AM, Joseph Reichman wrote:
Hi
I just tried responding to a response I got trying to help me solve my
problem and when I looked at my sent folder the lines didn't have the
Hey Joe,
Maybe it's just me, but your post looks like this to me:
http://www.mildredbrennan.com/mvs/wrapping.png
If there were any CRLF's or LF's they seem to have gotten lost along the
way.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
It would sure be an education that gets someone ready for the real
world. Or me... I've never setup a parallel sysplex.
But speaking of the real world, I wonder if IBM has ever thought about a
way to run their HMC/SE x86 code for home training. I'd say that work
is as important to practice
Hi
I just tried responding to a response I got trying to help me solve my
problem and when I looked at my sent folder the lines didn't have the same
break.
I tried this response using both rich text and without rich text and the
lines still looked jumbled. Does IBMMAIN ignore rich text
I tried formatting the text in rich text before and it looked all jumbled
when I looked in my sent folder in outlook so this time I broke up the lines
for clarity and didn't format it 1) I am still debugging my code what I mean
to say by that is that my errors were incurred running under TESTAUTH
I'm sorry for responding to the wrong post ☹ Thanks for getting back 1) I am
still debugging my code what I mean to say by that is that my errors were
incurred running under TESTAUTH (which really shouldn't matter its just that I
am sharing my findings under TEST) 2) I have 2 load modules that
I also heard the term noodle stuffer at SHARE.
Clark Morris
On Sunday 31/10/2021 at 12:33 am, Seymour J Metz wrote:
I never met anybody who talked about the 2321 and didn't use the
terms.
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on
behalf of Bill
Joe R wrote
I added two load modules successfully using CSVDYLPA and later got a BLDL
FAILED for that module DCB NOT OPEN when trying to link to that module
I thought once added to LPA its in the system search path
Once again you have failed to provide the details that would let someone
I don’t have a DCB parameter on the Link macro
I’ll post the code and error message shortly
Thanks
> On Oct 31, 2021, at 4:14 AM, Binyamin Dissen
> wrote:
>
> The error would indicate that you are directing your BLDL. I suggest that you
> look at the description of BLDL DCB
>
> As always,
The error would indicate that you are directing your BLDL. I suggest that you
look at the description of BLDL DCB
As always, show your super sekrit code.
On Sat, 30 Oct 2021 23:56:17 -0400 Joseph Reichman
wrote:
:>Hi
:>
:>
:>
:>I added two load modules successfully using CSVDYLPA and later
For z/OS 2.4, I found the documentation at this link:
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zdt/13.2.0?topic=reference-adcd-zos-v2r4-december-edition-2020#z/os
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email
There's even a parallel SysPlex version but that might not be in the
personal edition. But just how cool is that if you could play with parallel
sysplex?
On Sun, Oct 31, 2021, 4:29 PM Seymour J Metz wrote:
> It may not be everything I want, but IMHO it's a major improvement. It's
> much more
39 matches
Mail list logo
