on . Thank
you Kees ...
Roger Steyn
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
the proclib
irrespective of DISP=SHR ?
TIA
Roger Steyn
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
a JCL having multiple steps . But the
job which had a DISP=OLD in my system had only one step and it was hanging
because someone had opened the logon proc in edit mode and forgot to come out
of the session .
TIA
Roger Steyn
John ,
This talks about the _BPX_SHAREAS environment
variable. This environment variable is not mentioned anywhere in the
documentation of tcsh.
Your are right . BPX_SHAREAS cannot be used for tcsh . It is documented in USS
planning guide .
_BPX_SHAREAS
Specifies whether the spawned
Hello David ,
DB2 support also says set dump services to allow for 16Gb SVC dumps to
accommodate DB2
Since you say 16 GB for SVC dumps , you should atleast have a minimum of 48 GB
local page space to start with (that is 1:3 ratio ) When we had to increase
MAXSPACE limit to 16 GB couple of
Hello Jake ,
This actually means The system could not add the specified path to a path
group.
Is the cable connected properly ? That's the first thing to be checked .
Also look at logrec data Sounds to me like a no resources condition over the
control unit . Try these commands
a) DS
This is pretty old ... Have seen this several times in the past .
And of course...There are bigger fishes to fry :)
On Wednesday, October 30, 2013 6:57 PM, Lizette Koehler
stars...@mindspring.com wrote:
If you have not done so, you can join the RACF newsgroup with this URL
Thanks gentleman ..That was it . A standalone REORG needs space to hold the new
index and CA suggested us to do ASYNCH REORG . Thank you !
On Wednesday, October 23, 2013 8:07 AM, Roger Steyn roger.st...@yahoo.com
wrote:
Greetings ,
Recently , we had a problem during the REORG
Greetings ,
Recently , we had a problem during the REORG of SAR index file . It was
observed that the index file utilization increases abnormally while the REORG
job runs and comes down once the job completes. In the mean while , if the
utilization crosses 100 % , the job fails and SAR
Hello,
Was CLPA specified in IEASYSxx when you IPL'd first time ? .If not , that could
lead to a wait 064
If not , I am wondering how you got a wait 064 for syntax error in LPALSTxx .
On Monday, October 21, 2013 3:25 PM, saurabh khandelwal
sourabhkhandelwal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Baby ,
I thought you are on z/os 1.11 . If that's the case , i dont think you can do
indirect cataloging on VSAM datasets .
Lizette , please correct me if am wrong .
From: Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent:
Greetings ,
We are currently using syncsort 1.3.2 and would like to upgrade it to new
version 1.4 . In the new release v1.4 , it no longer supports tape sorting .
Hence it becomes necessary that i have to identify all the jobs which are
currently using this feature and have them converted
That's correct Martin . It is the tape sort work datasets that are not
supported . Syncsort support says that they have a new function called MAXSORT
in the new release which has replaced the tape sort feature due to poor
performance .
Ravi ,
You wouldn't be having SYNCTAPE load library
Yes . That would work fine in the case of scheduled jobs . But in our
shop,there is one more challenge that we have a lot of Auto-sched jobs (jobs
that are trigerred externally from an MQ server ). And i do not know how many
of them use tape sorting . This makes the task more difficult .
Yes...I was referring to MFX 1.4 ...
From: Blaicher, Christopher Y. cblaic...@syncsort.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Wednesday, September 4, 2013 4:37 AM
Subject: Re: Syncsort v1.4 doesn't support Tape sorting - Need help !
The current Syncsort
Take a look at the APAR OA22623 . This is pretty old one , but worth reading
Thank you,
Roger
From: Vernooij, CP - SPLXM kees.verno...@klm.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 6:38 PM
Subject: Re: MAXSPACE and central storage
I
'
...
SRCHFOR 'whatever string #n'
//*
Cheers, Chris Poncelet
Roger Steyn wrote:
Hello Lizette ,
Thanks for quick response . I had already tried that , but it didn't show up
.(It says member not found ) . I suspect that something is missing from my
Greetings ,
I know this is a silly question . Unfortunately I am not good at ISPF and needs
some help to fix a problem .
I have a problem with SRCHFOR command in ISPF . Normally , when a srchfor
command is issued by passing a string in 3.4 , it returns a response 'String(s)
found or not
See where it turns up
Lizette
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Roger Steyn
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 3:10 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: SRCHFOR command
Greetings ,
I know this is a silly question
As someone said , java is a pretty simple install . the program directory has
everything documented . you really don't need a senior systems programmer's
expertise to do this . you can read through and complete the install yourself .
But if you need any suggestions , we are always here to help
That's a nice article . Thanks Chris !
From: Chris Brooker cbro...@us.ibm.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 7:04 PM
Subject: Re: XCF / GRS
Hi Augie,
You may already now about this, but the GRS team wrote a Hot Topics Article
21 matches
Mail list logo
