Subject: Re: A New Perfromance Model ?
I think this nailed it! Clueless is also correct. It did start back in the
90's with disk space is cheap, then it went to memory is cheap'
and now it's MIPS is a commodity, so is the manpower to maintain all that
stuff.
It's all in the CLOUD now anyway - who
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: A New Perfromance Model ?
I think this nailed it! Clueless is also correct. It did start back in the 90's with
disk space is cheap, then it went to memory is cheap'
and now it's MIPS is a commodity, so is the manpower to maintain all that stuff.
It's all in the CLOUD now anyway
List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Roger W. Suhr (GMail)
Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2015 2:30 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: A New Perfromance Model ?
I think this nailed it! Clueless is also correct. It did start back in the
90's with disk space is cheap
:30 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: A New Perfromance Model ?
I think this nailed it! Clueless is also correct. It did start
back in the 90's with disk space is cheap, then it went to
memory is cheap'
and now it's MIPS is a commodity, so is the manpower to maintain
all
:12 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: A New Perfromance Model ?
.
Can someone explain and rationalize for this new paradyne ?
.
cheaper to Upgrade the mainfame than to have the application programmers
review their code for performance oppurtunities.
.
Im clueless
On Wed, 8 Apr 2015 16:15:44 -0700, Lizette Koehler wrote:
A friend of mine that does contract work, was engaged to tweak a CICS
transaction. He could only shave .1 second off of the time. 1/10 sec
However, the transaction was called millions of times, saved the company from
upgrading their
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: A New Perfromance Model ?
Hi
Im not a performance analyst, Im a CICS MQ Sys-Prog.
I dont understand this new paradyne.
Some Back ground
March 1 Our Development Team introducd some new functionality.
The following week we were plagued with multiple 0C4 and 0C7 - ASRA
:12 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: A New Perfromance Model ?
Hi
Im not a performance analyst, Im a CICS MQ Sys-Prog.
I dont understand this new paradyne.
Some Back ground
March 1 Our Development Team introducd some new functionality.
The following week we were plagued with multiple 0C4
On 04/04/2015 04:11 PM, esst...@juno.com wrote:
Hi
Im not a performance analyst, Im a CICS MQ Sys-Prog.
I dont understand this new paradyne.
SNIPPAGE
Did I miss a performance lecture at SHARE ?
.
Can someone explain and rationalize for this new paradyne ?
.
cheaper to Upgrade the mainfame
3:12 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: A New Perfromance Model ?
Hi
Im not a performance analyst, Im a CICS MQ Sys-Prog.
I dont understand this new paradyne.
Some Back ground
March 1 Our Development Team introducd some new functionality.
The following week we were plagued with multiple
: Re: A New Perfromance Model ?
On 4/4/2015 3:11 PM, esst...@juno.com wrote:
Hi
Im not a performance analyst, Im a CICS MQ Sys-Prog.
I dont understand this new paradyne.
Some Back ground
March 1 Our Development Team introducd some new functionality.
The following week we were plagued
Hi
Im not a performance analyst, Im a CICS MQ Sys-Prog.
I dont understand this new paradyne.
Some Back ground
March 1 Our Development Team introducd some new functionality.
The following week we were plagued with multiple 0C4 and 0C7 - ASRA Abends,
Storage Violations, and one CICS Task abended
essteam at juno.com wrote:
Im not a performance analyst, Im a CICS MQ Sys-Prog. I dont understand this
new paradyne.
Neither me.
March 1 Our Development Team introducd some new functionality.
Have them remove those 'new functionality' until they fix the source of those
abends on a sandbox.
, 2015 4:46 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: A New Perfromance Model ?
On 4/4/2015 3:11 PM, esst...@juno.com wrote:
Hi
Im not a performance analyst, Im a CICS MQ Sys-Prog.
I dont understand this new paradyne.
Some Back ground
March 1 Our Development Team introducd some new
On 4/4/2015 3:11 PM, esst...@juno.com wrote:
Hi
Im not a performance analyst, Im a CICS MQ Sys-Prog.
I dont understand this new paradyne.
Some Back ground
March 1 Our Development Team introducd some new functionality.
The following week we were plagued with multiple 0C4 and 0C7 - ASRA Abends,
15 matches
Mail list logo
