Morning all,
We have noticed an intermittent OMVS shutdown problem, possibly since going to
z/OS 2.1, though I'm not willing to bet on that. The general scenario is that
almost all of the system is down, and we're into stopping OMVS. Systems
automation then issues a stop to OMVS:
F OMVS,SHUT
Styles, Andy wrote:
>*BPXI056E OMVS SHUTDOWN REQUEST HAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY
> (why is that an 'E' level message?)
Good catch!
> ... Obviously the thing to do here is take a dump and open a PMR, but we
> haven't yet seen the issue since we decided to do that. I just wondered
> whether
wn' and nothing more. Very frustrating.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Elardus Engelbrecht
Sent: 06 May 2016 09:06
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: OMVS hang at system shutdown
-- This email has rea
Styles, Andy wrote:
>Any D OMVS command appears to simply result in OMVS saying 'I told you, I'm
>shutting down' and nothing more. Very frustrating.
Indeed. But to wait 20 min is way too long [0] if you have a fast and furious
machine.
Ask the automation to issue all those D OMVS,... [1] and
On 5/6/2016 3:42 AM, Styles, Andy , SD EP zPlatform wrote:
Morning all,
We have noticed an intermittent OMVS shutdown problem, possibly since going to
z/OS 2.1, though I'm not willing to bet on that. The general scenario is that
almost all of the system is down, and we're into stopping OMVS.
On Fri 06/05/2016 at 13:14, Tom Conley wrote:
>> *BPXI056E OMVS SHUTDOWN REQUEST HAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY
>>
>> (why is that an 'E' level message?)
>>
>
> "E" here is not "ERROR", it's "Eventual Action", which is the "F
> OMVS,RESTART" command.
Ah! Of course - I'd forgotten IBM use the same su
I have seen this occur:
1) waiting to transfer ownership of the file system to the "surviving'
(LPAR(s)). You might check the automove status of your file systems.
2) health checker is usually very slow in shutting down
3) HIS
You might try adding f omvs,stoppfs=zfs(? on the syntax) earlier in
On 5/6/2016 8:47 AM, Styles, Andy , SD EP zPlatform wrote:
On Fri 06/05/2016 at 13:14, Tom Conley wrote:
*BPXI056E OMVS SHUTDOWN REQUEST HAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY
(why is that an 'E' level message?)
"E" here is not "ERROR", it's "Eventual Action", which is the "F OMVS,RESTART"
command.
-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: OMVS hang at system shutdown
On 5/6/2016 8:47 AM, Styles, Andy , SD EP zPlatform wrote:
> On Fri 06/05/2016 at 13:14, Tom Conley wrote:
>
>>> *BPXI056E OMVS SHUTDOWN REQUEST HAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY
>>>
>>> (why is that an '
-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: OMVS hang at system shutdown
On 5/6/2016 8:47 AM, Styles, Andy , SD EP zPlatform wrote:
On Fri 06/05/2016 at 13:14, Tom Conley wrote:
*BPXI056E OMVS SHUTDOWN REQUEST HAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY
(why is that an 'E' level message?)
"E" here is no
er
323-715-0595 Mobile
626-302-7535 Office
robin...@sce.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Tom Brennan
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 10:38 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: OMVS hang at system shutd
My automation product allows me to define products separately from each other
so that you can completely change the state of one and then use that to
influence the state of other products. For special cases like OMVS/JES2 it
allows you to define a script that will completely resolve the state of
Sent: Monday, May 30, 2016 12:53 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: OMVS hang at system shutdown
My automation product allows me to define products separately from each other
so that you can completely change the state of one and then use that to
influence the state of other pro
M
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: OMVS hang at system shutdown
My automation product allows me to define products separately from each other
so that you can completely change the state of one and then use that to
influence the state of other products. For special cases like OMVS/
Just hilite a portion to give a hint as to what we're talking about.
In a message dated 5/31/2016 5:28:17 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
zhem...@gmail.com writes:
Is there a better way to reply to a thread than to copy the entire
message?
ginal Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Edward Finnell
Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 8:45 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: OMVS hang at system shutdown
Just hilite a portion to give a hint as to what we're talk
On 31 May 2016 at 13:13, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote:
> I just noticed that OP is using Gmail. I have a Gmail account that I use
> almost exclusively from my phone. I likewise assumed that Reply, which I
> rarely use, included the sender's text, but preliminary testing shows that
> not to be true. N
I am interacting through the listserv web page. It shows a reply icon at the
top right. When I click on that I get a blank message, so I have had to
highlight the text, copy that then paste it into the response before I start.
But I will get the hang of it.
--
Just hi
Zahir Hemini wrote:
>I am interacting through the listserv web page. It shows a reply icon at the
>top right. When I click on that I get a blank message, so I have had to
>highlight the text, copy that then paste it into the response before I start.
Good, now you just click on the two green qu
I also use the web interface.
On the bottom right of the message, you should see a "quote" mark in green,
next to the check box to send a copy of the message to your e-mail. I use that
to insert the original message, as seen below.
Matthew
On Tue, 31 May 2016 13:18:42 -0500, Zahir Hemini wrot
nt: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 10:29 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: OMVS hang at system shutdown
On 31 May 2016 at 13:13, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote:
> I just noticed that OP is using Gmail. I have a Gmail account that I use
> almost exclusively from my phone. I likew
21 matches
Mail list logo
