contribution to the project.
Two of us were assigned as technical team leaders for the intended
product development. We were staffing our teams when the project was
killed.
re:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2012o.html#34 Regarding Time Sharing
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2012o.html#37 Regarding Time
Look for a manual called MVS/XA Overview
(http://www.prycroft6.com.au/misc/download/GC28-1348-0_MVSXAoverview_Mar
84OCR.pdf).
It is much thinner than any of the redbooks mentioned and it
concentrates mainly on MVS. The redbooks cover all components of
today's z/OS.
It still is an excellent short
*Hi Shmuel and everybody on the list -*
*
*
I would like to address any matter at
http://www.mainframes360.com/2012/11/tso-and-ispf.html which requires *
correction*. *If any of the other gentlemen, would like to give me some
feedback, criticisms, data, I welcome him with my arms wide open.*
*
*
*Peter -*
*
*
I shall definitely make it a point to go through this. I gave it a cursory
glance, and found it easy to digest. Thank you very much.
I hope you've liked my blog.
- Quasar
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Hunkeler Peter (KIUP 4)
peter.hunke...@credit-suisse.com wrote:
Look for
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 08:12:05 -0500, Mike Myers wrote:
... I quit to become a consultant, due to my dissatisfaction with the project
as a whole. That
was in 1984.
Some of us have been disillusioned with this business for only slightly less
time g,d,r
Shane ...
In
CA+Myz1UtXC6V0JafV+knTiN8wi1uMNSDF5sb6SHk=bfbclb...@mail.gmail.com,
on 11/19/2012
at 03:58 PM, Quasar Chunawala quasar.chunawa...@gmail.com said:
1. Weren't SSS, MSS and MPS later known as PCP, MFT and MVT?
There was significant redesign and a name change[1] between the
original MPS and
In 50aa3025.40...@mentor-services.com, on 11/19/2012
at 08:12 AM, Mike Myers m...@mentor-services.com said:
I guess I always thought that Sequential Scheduling System (SSS or
S-cubed) and PCP were synonymous.
Look at ENQ for an example of changes that affected all three.
Somewhere along the
settled by
economic, rather than technical reasons.
re:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2012o.html#30 Regarding Time Sharing
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2012o.html#31 Regarding Time Sharing
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2012o.html#34 Regarding Time Sharing
I had sponsored an internal advanced technology
it was dropped. I don't know whether VM/XB was
based on that work or was done from scratch.
re:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2012o.html#30 Regarding Time Sharing
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2012o.html#31 Regarding Time Sharing
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2012o.html#34 Regarding Time Sharing
http
l...@garlic.com(Lynn Wheeler) writes:
As consequence of not being able to fix TSO /or MVS, POK had a project
to port CMS to MVS ... as a way of providing interactive services, but
as mentioned previously MVS has some fundamental flaws for providing
interactive service ... and the implementation
contribution to the project.
Two of us were assigned as technical team leaders for the intended
product development. We were staffing our teams when the project was
killed.
re:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2012o.html#30 Regarding Time Sharing
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2012o.html#31 Regarding
In
CA+Myz1UtXC6V0JafV+knTiN8wi1uMNSDF5sb6SHk=bfbclb...@mail.gmail.com,
on 11/19/2012
at 03:58 PM, Quasar Chunawala quasar.chunawa...@gmail.com said:
7. I shall correct the references section.
FYI, several relevant manuals are available at
Hi Quasar,
Suggest you to get aquainted with ABC of system programming and Z/os
architecture. Otherwise many question would get spawned without a basic
idea.
Peter
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Quasar Chunawala
quasar.chunawa...@gmail.com wrote:
*Hi Mike and everyone else on the list - *
Quasar:
To begin, MFT is pretty ancient (although I was a sysprog for its
predecessor, SSS - OS/360 release 2). Much has changed since MFT,
although much remains the same. In MFT, there were no ASCBs, as there
were no address spaces, which didn't appear until MVS, where every job,
TSO user
In
CA+Myz1X=YFsEu43JaGc7W5Nss2Rfhs_ovr=swfe2cww0j6e...@mail.gmail.com,
on 11/18/2012
at 01:36 PM, Quasar Chunawala quasar.chunawa...@gmail.com said:
I have done some reading from the MFT manual.
1. Which MFT manual?
2. TSO started as an OS/360 option for MVT, not for MFT.
1. Every
*Hi Mike and Schmuel - *
*
*
Thank you very much for the clarification, and things are quite clear to me
now. I will try and find my way into MVS control blocks, and maybe read a
bit of the redbooks too, as you have recommended. Oh and by the ways
Schmuel, the MFT manual I was referring to is *
re:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2012o.html#30 Regarding Time Sharing
oh, old presentation at fall atlantic share meeting in 1968
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/94.html#18
on MFT14 CP67. CP67 had been installed in the univ last week of
Jan68. Univ. continued to run OS/360 (in 360/65 mode on 360/67
In
CA+Myz1Udc_9ddoR=6LpXkA=9jak+xap2fya9hccvpwkmzk0...@mail.gmail.com,
on 11/18/2012
at 11:18 PM, Quasar Chunawala quasar.chunawa...@gmail.com said:
*Hi Mike and Schmuel - *
That's Shmuel!
GC27-6939-10_MFT_Guide_R21.7_Mar72
IBM System/3S0 Operating System MVT Guide OS Release 21,
Hi everybody,
I hope this finds you in the pink of health. I am Quasar, and I hail from
Mumbai, India. I own a blog on the internet, parked at
http://www.mainframes360.com. I am an application developer by profession.
I intend to write an article on TSO/E on my blog. I have been reading
matter
On 11/17/2012 2:30 AM, Quasar Chunawala wrote:
... why should
a time-slot be given to a TSO user, who hasn't pressed an AID key(like
Enter)? Maybe, he's just staring at a dataset. Isn't this a waste of
processor-time? Or am I missing out something.
No CPU time slice is provided to any unit of
Hi Quasar:
Back in the very beginning (OS/360 MVT in 1971), TSO was introduced. At
that time, it consisted of a monitor program which used time-slicing
to distribute the CPU time it was given among the TSO users that were
logged on.
With the introduction of the System Resource Manager (SRM)
Hi Mike -
Thank you very much for your reply. I have just another questions. I have
put them inline, in the body of your e-mail in *red *color.
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 9:52 PM, Mike Myers m...@mentor-services.comwrote:
Hi Quasar:
Back in the very beginning (OS/360 MVT in 1971), TSO was
Quasar:
The status of an address space is maintained in an address space related
control block (probably the ASCB, if you want to look it up). The status
includes the swap state and the ready state is also represented by the
presence of the address space on the ready queue (it is removed from
On 11/17/2012 11:59 AM, Quasar Chunawala wrote:
Hi Mike -
Thank you very much for your reply. I have just another questions. I have
put them inline, in the body of your e-mail in *red *color.
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 9:52 PM, Mike Myers m...@mentor-services.comwrote:
Hi Quasar:
Back in the
From: Quasar Chunawala quasar.chunawa...@gmail.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU,
Date: 11/17/2012 02:30 AM
Subject:Regarding Time Sharing
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Hi everybody,
I hope this finds you in the pink of health. I am
In -21782995201426460@unknownmsgid, on 11/17/2012
at 10:30 AM, Quasar Chunawala quasar.chunawa...@gmail.com said:
I hope this finds you in the pink of health. I am Quasar, and I hail
from Mumbai, India. I own a blog on the internet, parked at
http://www.mainframes360.com. I am an application
In 50a7b9c0.6050...@mentor-services.com, on 11/17/2012
at 11:22 AM, Mike Myers m...@mentor-services.com said:
Back in the very beginning (OS/360 MVT in 1971), TSO was
introduced. At that time, it consisted of a monitor program
which used time-slicing to distribute the CPU time it was given
In
CA+Myz1VcB0i2LMr7R=1uc1t5sdc5kna-o+dmtxezd2hoovz...@mail.gmail.com,
on 11/17/2012
at 11:29 PM, Quasar Chunawala quasar.chunawa...@gmail.com said:
Thank you very much for your reply. I have just another questions. I
have put them inline, in the body of your e-mail in *red *color.
No you
28 matches
Mail list logo
