> Does gimapi has access to this data?
No.
Kurt Quackenbush
IBM | z/OS SMP/E and z/OSMF Software Management | ku...@us.ibm.com
Chuck Norris never uses CHECK when he applies PTFs.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
**: ItschakMugzach **|* *Web**: www.Securiteam.co.il **|*
בתאריך יום ד׳, 17 בינו׳ 2024 ב-22:36 מאת Kurt Quackenbush :
> > How can I check the date of HOLDDATA in my SMPE CSI?
>
> Examining the SMPLOG as already mentioned is one option.
>
> Another: SMP/E does maintain the date eac
> How can I check the date of HOLDDATA in my SMPE CSI?
Examining the SMPLOG as already mentioned is one option.
Another: SMP/E does maintain the date each ++HOLD statement was received, but
it does not expose it, not even in the CSI Query API. However, z/OSMF Software
Management has
Look at your SMPLOG for the most recent RECEIVE HOLDDATA.
Once you find it, look at that line in hex. The first few bytes is the date and
time in packed decimal.
--
Tom Marchant
On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 17:47:33 +0100, Radoslaw Skorupka
wrote:
>How can I check the date of HOLDDATA in my SMPE
How can I check the date of HOLDDATA in my SMPE CSI?
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
W dniu 15.09.2023 o 09:23, Timothy Sipples pisze:
I’ve seen some good suggestions. Also, there are several no additional license
charge products available from IBM for z/OS than you can order. Here are some
examples:
5655-UA1IBM Semuru Runtime Certified Edition for z/OS
5655-PYT
I’ve seen some good suggestions. Also, there are several no additional license
charge products available from IBM for z/OS than you can order. Here are some
examples:
5655-UA1IBM Semuru Runtime Certified Edition for z/OS
5655-PYT IBM Open Enterprise Python for z/OS
Best bet is to ask the IBM expert who is the SMP/E manager. Kurt Quackenbush.
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Thursday, September 14, 2023, 3:36 PM, Jake Anderson
wrote:
Hello
Good morning
Is there any freeware product which can be installed using SMP/e.
Any pointers are appreciated
How about Rocket’s Ported Tools in SMPE format? I thought it’s free with
no support. I can’t remember if you need to be licensed for one of their
other products first or not.
On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 6:36 PM Farley, Peter <
031df298a9da-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
Mike, it seems to me that BUILDING an SMPE package (no matter how simple) and
INSTALLING an SMPE package that someone else built are two different skill
levels. I think Tom was asking to practice the latter, the INSTALL skills, not
the BUILD skills.
Peter
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
On Thu, 14 Sep 2023 14:51:38 -0500, Tom Marchant wrote:
>...
>Or you could build your own product. You don't need much. Just a load module,
>maybe a source to generate it. The result doesn't even have to do anything.
>But if you create a function sysmod (FMID) and apply it, you will learn a
My misread your question I read it as freeware packaged in smp/e format
Matt Hogstrom
PGP key 0F143BC1
> On Sep 14, 2023, at 15:36, Jake Anderson wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> Good morning
>
> Is there any freeware product which can be installed using SMP/e.
>
> Any pointers are appreciated
>
>
ZoweHttps://zowe.org
They offer a pax and an smp/e install Not sure if they pswis or not
Matt Hogstrom
PGP key 0F143BC1
> On Sep 14, 2023, at 15:36, Jake Anderson wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> Good morning
>
> Is there any freeware product which can be installed using SMP/e.
>
> Any pointers
Not in smpe format, but a simple application you could package.
https://github.com/mainframed/DOGECICS
On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 2:51 PM Tom Marchant
<000a2a8c2020-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> I don't know of any. Maybe someone else does.
>
> You could use any
I don't know of any. Maybe someone else does.
You could use any product that your installation runs and install it into your
own data sets. That will get you practice applying, accepting, restoring,
rejecting, etc. And if you get stuck, you can blow it all away and start over.
Or you could
Hello
Good morning
Is there any freeware product which can be installed using SMP/e.
Any pointers are appreciated
Jake
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu
On Wed, 29 Mar 2023 03:40:03 -0500, Bill Giannelli
wrote:
>Hi Mark,
>thanks for your response.
>One of the things of my posts that might be confusing, is that I am
>specifically working with DB2 installations and it's tools. I do not work on
>or change the z/OS system it's self. I am a Db2
J. Quackenbush
wrote:
>> What is the best or recommended way to copy or clone a SMPe Global CSI,
>> Target and Dlib with all the underlying datasets?
>> I want to create a new HLQ and clone under that.
>
>If you don't already have a process or set of jobs def
.LINKLIB.
thanks
Bill
On Tue, 28 Mar 2023 11:24:36 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote:
>On Tue, 28 Mar 2023 04:08:13 -0500, Bill Giannelli
>wrote:
>
>>What is the best or recommended way to copy or clone a SMPe Global CSI,
>>Target and Dlib with all the underlying datasets?
>>
On Tue, 28 Mar 2023 04:08:13 -0500, Bill Giannelli
wrote:
>What is the best or recommended way to copy or clone a SMPe Global CSI, Target
>and Dlib with all the underlying datasets?
>I want to create a new HLQ and clone under that.
>thanks
>Bill
A new HLQ for the zones? Y
> What is the best or recommended way to copy or clone a SMPe Global CSI,
> Target and Dlib with all the underlying datasets?
There's also the "native" BUILDMCS command, but then you have to figure out the
best way to do the updates that Kurt mentioned z/OSMF doing on your
> What is the best or recommended way to copy or clone a SMPe Global CSI,
> Target and Dlib with all the underlying datasets?
> I want to create a new HLQ and clone under that.
If you don't already have a process or set of jobs defined to clone your SMP/E
environment, I suggest you
> I've found that GIMSMP opens the datasets in UPDATE mode, so the user will
> still need UPDATE or higher access. READ access fails when the program
> starts.
That is not true for all SMP/E commands. LIST for example, or the REPORT
commands, and the ISPF Query dialog, definitely open the
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Bill Giannelli [billgianne...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2023 5:38 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Cloning SMPe Global, Target and DLIB
Hi Wayne,
Thanks for the response!
So, my current CSI, zones and underlying datasets are all within one storage
3 at 8:08 PM Bill Giannelli
>wrote:
>
>> What is the best or recommended way to copy or clone a SMPe Global CSI,
>> Target and Dlib with all the underlying datasets?
>> I want to create a new HLQ and
ADRDSSU . DUMP and RESTORE with HLQ rename. After that, you'll need to
modify DDDEFs to reflect the newly created underlying datasets.
On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 8:08 PM Bill Giannelli
wrote:
> What is the best or recommended way to copy or clone a SMPe Global CSI,
> Target and Dlib wi
What is the best or recommended way to copy or clone a SMPe Global CSI, Target
and Dlib with all the underlying datasets?
I want to create a new HLQ and clone under that.
thanks
Bill
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 27, 2023 5:43 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: separate SMPe environments
Another stupid SMPe question.
Currently, we have one CSI with one target and one dlib. (I inherited this). I
want to setup at least another target and dlib zones for a "b
On Mon, 27 Mar 2023 16:43:46 -0500, Bill Giannelli
wrote:
>Another stupid SMPe question.
>Currently, we have one CSI with one target and one dlib. (I inherited this). I
>want to setup at least another target and dlib zones for a "before"
>maintenance level.
>Might y
; I want to create another TARGET and DLIB zone for another level of
> > > maintenance.
> > > I am currently, showing "newbie" offshore folks our SMPe environment.
> > > Is there a way to "secure" the newly created TARGET and DLIB zones so
> > > t
the volumes and my SMP/E
environment comes back automagically with the system.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Bill Giannelli
Sent: Monday, March 27, 2023 4:44 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [EXTERNAL] separate SMPe environments
Another stupid
Another stupid SMPe question.
Currently, we have one CSI with one target and one dlib. (I inherited this). I
want to setup at least another target and dlib zones for a "before" maintenance
level.
Might you ever consider creating a whole new csi for that or just as normal
have diffe
l.ch/pks/lookup?op=get=markjac...@protonmail.com
>
>
>--- Original Message ---
>On Monday, March 27th, 2023 at 9:46 AM, Bill Giannelli
> wrote:
>
>
>> I want to create another TARGET and DLIB zone for another level of
>> maintenance.
>> I am currently, sh
---
On Monday, March 27th, 2023 at 9:46 AM, Bill Giannelli
wrote:
> I want to create another TARGET and DLIB zone for another level of
> maintenance.
> I am currently, showing "newbie" offshore folks our SMPe environment.
> Is there a way to "secure" the newly
Why not give them read-only access?
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Bill Giannelli
Sent: Monday, March 27, 2023 9:46 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: SMPe securing zones
I want to create another TARGET and DLIB zone for another
I want to create another TARGET and DLIB zone for another level of maintenance.
I am currently, showing "newbie" offshore folks our SMPe environment.
Is there a way to "secure" the newly created TARGET and DLIB zones so they are
not inadvertently
On 17/03/2023 9:20 am, Jeremy Nicoll wrote:
But doesn't the vendor already have to understand whether or not
separate changes they've made to their product affect each other?
In theory yes, in practice you rely a lot on the compiler to verify
calls between modules etc. It's much easier to do
On Wed, 15 Mar 2023, at 23:10, Andrew Rowley wrote:
> Not everyone loves chasing pre-req chains in SMP/E. Plus the
> vendor needs to track it all somehow and build those chains.
But doesn't the vendor already have to understand whether or not
separate changes they've made to their product
Thanks
On Wednesday, March 15, 2023 at 09:15:59 PM EDT, Andrew Rowley
wrote:
On 16/03/2023 12:01 pm, Warren Brown wrote:
> Andrew, I have been out for a while. Is there a replacement for SMPE ?
> Warren
There have always been ways to deliver software without using SMP
On 16/03/2023 12:01 pm, Warren Brown wrote:
Andrew, I have been out for a while. Is there a replacement for SMPE ?
Warren
There have always been ways to deliver software without using SMP/E e.g.
datasets dumped to tape. As people have noted, you can also deliver what
is effectively a full
Andrew, I have been out for a while. Is there a replacement for SMPE ?
Warren
On Wednesday, March 15, 2023 at 06:15:29 PM EDT, Andrew Rowley
wrote:
On 15/03/2023 8:33 am, Jay Maynard wrote:
> That's because SMP/E and its power are only truly present in the z/OS and
> predec
On 16/03/2023 9:33 am, Ed Jaffe wrote:
Not true. It simply means if you change the (non-fixed) interface, you
must re-issue all affected components.
OK yes... I did say that you could change the interface with
corresponding pre and co-reqs. And if you just want to change one of the
On 3/15/2023 3:15 PM, Andrew Rowley wrote:
The problem with individual fixes rather than full replacement is that
it means the interface for every individually replaceable component is
fixed.
Not true. It simply means if you change the (non-fixed) interface, you
must re-issue all affected
On 15/03/2023 8:33 am, Jay Maynard wrote:
That's because SMP/E and its power are only truly present in the z/OS and
predecessors world. Everyone else thinks of applying maintenance as a
matter of replacing the entire product, instead of individual fixes that
are automatically maintained and
On Wed, 15 Mar 2023 09:30:33 -0700, Michael Stein wrote:
>...
>Then a SMP build process would build or rebuild the targets needing
>changes from the current configuration to the new desired configuration.
>So any PTF could be removed, at least as long as the pile of MODs still
>contained the
commenting on previous merged emails:
> Yes, there are indeed Linux package managers. They don't get beyond the
> "replace the entire package" level. THey have no concept of individual
> fixes and their interactions.
> Are they as powerful as SMP? No, but they fill a similar niche.
They are more
On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 20:49:24 -0500, Jay Maynard wrote:
>Yes, there are indeed Linux package managers. They don't get beyond the
>"replace the entire package" level. THey have no concept of individual
>fixes and their interactions.
>
There's a hazard. Customers come to fear possible collateral
[jaymayn...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2023 9:49 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: not using SMPe
Yes, there are indeed Linux package managers. They don't get beyond the
"replace the entire package" level. THey have no concept of individual
fixes and their interaction
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Jay
Maynard [jaymayn...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2023 9:49 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: not using SMPe
Yes, there are indeed Linux package managers. They don't get beyond the
"re
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
David Spiegel [0468385049d1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2023 10:05 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: not using SMPe
Hi Ed,
Thank you for the compliment!
(Yeshiva training really
Hi Ed,
Thank you for the compliment!
(Yeshiva training really pays off for arguing logically.)
Now that I'm telling bank stories (this should really be a separate
thread) ...
At the same bank ...
One day (1990), a colleague comes over and asks for help with his batch
job failing.
I looked at
n List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf
> of Jay Maynard [jaymayn...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2023 5:33 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: not using SMPe
>
> That's because SMP/E and its power are only truly present in the z/OS and
> predecessors w
On 3/14/2023 6:05 PM, David Spiegel wrote:
Hi Ed,
I knew that there were means of ensuring integrity and that's why I
asked the question.
It was a brilliant question!
His ignorance about why he should trust tape was the same reason he
distrusted the communication line.
--
Phoenix
Hi Ed,
I knew that there were means of ensuring integrity and that's why I
asked the question.
Regards,
David
On 2023-03-14 18:52, Ed Jaffe wrote:
On 3/14/2023 3:07 PM, David Spiegel wrote:
I went over to the 2nd in command VM guy and asked why I would have
to wait a week for delivery of a
Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Jay
Maynard [jaymayn...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2023 5:33 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: not using SMPe
That's because SMP/E and its power are only truly present in the z/OS and
predecessors world. Everyone else
On 3/14/2023 3:07 PM, David Spiegel wrote:
I went over to the 2nd in command VM guy and asked why I would have to
wait a week for delivery of a tape when it could he delivered
electronically in under an hour.
He had this irrational xenophobia against it and since he was the
gatekeeper, his
Hi Gil,
This reminds me of a story ... I say that a lot, just ask my kids.
Way back in the late late '80s, I worked at a national Canadian bank.
They had been used to getting tapes from IBM when they ordered
maintenance (for both VM and MVS) and would not even consider VNET
compressed
On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 14:21:34 -0700, Ed Jaffe wrote:
>...
>For such products, the value-add SMP/E provides is often just RECEIVE
>ORDER, but even that is dependent upon the software vendor standing up a
>RECEIVE ORDER server back at the "Ranch."
>
Our sheriff deemed the MVS "Ranch" an outlaws'
That's because SMP/E and its power are only truly present in the z/OS and
predecessors world. Everyone else thinks of applying maintenance as a
matter of replacing the entire product, instead of individual fixes that
are automatically maintained and managed.
On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 4:22 PM Ed
On 3/14/2023 5:40 AM, Bill Giannelli wrote:
Just curious, is it possible and do some companies NOT use SMPe for z/OS
software updates?
thanks
Bill
The z/OSMF Portable Software Instance format does not require SMP/E.
Websphere uses Installation Manager.
SMP/E use for products like Java
On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 12:46:59 -0700, Tom Brennan wrote:
>...
>So I went back to my desk determined to map/dump the tape contents and
>do the install without knowing what SMP was. About 10 minutes later I
>gave up and looked for someone else to help :)
>
Sounds like the Good Old Days when
du/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Bill Giannelli [billgianne...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2023 8:40 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: not using SMPe
Just curious, is it possible and do some companies NOT use SMPe for z/OS
softwa
-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: not using SMPe
Just curious, is it possible and do some companies NOT use SMPe for z/OS
software updates?
thanks
Bill
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email
Hi Steve,
Thanks for your answer!
Also, more specifically, for IBM software itself.
Is it possible? Or is it an IBM requirement? Just curious, as it was asked of
me. Not planning on doing it without SMPe!
To use IEBUPDTE IEBCOPY.you end up doing manually what SMPe does
automatically
On 3/14/2023 8:40 AM, Bill Giannelli wrote:
Just curious, is it possible and do some companies NOT use SMPe for z/OS
software updates?
thanks
Bill
I take it from your question that you have software provided by
third parties and do not see an associated CSI for them?
Yes, there are some
Hi Bill,
If there are companies that do this, they're certifiably insane.
Imagine opening a case with IBM. The IBM person asks: "Is PTF AB12345
APPLYd?"
Regards,
David
On 2023-03-14 08:40, Bill Giannelli wrote:
Just curious, is it possible and do some companies NOT use SMP
Just curious, is it possible and do some companies NOT use SMPe for z/OS
software updates?
thanks
Bill
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message
@Tom Marchant
Cloning is even better as it enables ease of rollback.
Dejan Stamatovic
CROZ D.O.O.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message:
One way of effectively providing a backup is to clone the target zone before
applying maintenance. Then apply to the clone.
--
Tom Marchant
On Wed, 4 Jan 2023 09:16:58 -0600, Dejan Stamatovic
wrote:
>I agree totally. Only backups provide a sure way out of problems during
>applying
maintenance. SMPE might not be able to recreate a target library or it
might take too much effort to use SMPE to do that.
Dejan Stamatovic
CROZ D.O.O.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email
I haven't
> tried it.
>
> >> So I know all the information is in SMPE. I'm looking for if there's
> >> an easy way to do this.. The target library got smashed actually It's
> >> a ZFS file and none of the backups are available, but the distribution
> >
And start making backups! I always make backups of target and dlibs, SMPE
libs, ZFSs, SYSRES, and DLIB volumes too. All right before applying
maintenance.
On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 4:00 AM Lizette Koehler
wrote:
> You might want to open a case with IBM SMP/e on this issue
>
> No
on the product(s) you might be better off re-installing from
scratch... its safer.
> Look at the GENERATE command. It should do what you want, but I haven't
> tried it.
>> So I know all the information is in SMPE. I'm looking for if there's
>> an easy way to do this.. The
Look at the GENERATE command. It should do what you want, but I haven't
tried it.
sas
On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 4:07 PM Rob Schramm wrote:
> So I know all the information is in SMPE. I'm looking for if there's an
> easy way to do this.. The target library got smashed actually It's a ZFS
you might see if they can
> help.
>
> Some of the ZONE* commands may work. But I am not sure.
>
>
> Lizette
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf
> Of Rob Schramm
> Sent: Tuesday, January 3, 2023 2:07 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LIST
Sent: Tuesday, January 3, 2023 2:07 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: SMPE recreate a target library... Possible?
So I know all the information is in SMPE. I'm looking for if there's an easy
way to do this.. The target library got smashed actually It's a ZFS file and
none of the backups
BUILDMCS. takes 5 seconds to type in the command, many hours to execute
:) Re-install of the product might be the best alternative.
On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 8:07 AM Rob Schramm wrote:
> So I know all the information is in SMPE. I'm looking for if there's an
> easy way to do this.. The
So I know all the information is in SMPE. I'm looking for if there's an
easy way to do this.. The target library got smashed actually It's a ZFS
file and none of the backups are available, but the distribution libraries
are all intact.. I'm looking for an easy way to repopulate from
On 10/6/2022 6:14 AM, Usher, Darrold wrote:
That makes sense. Also, if you need to keep JES3 around, need to look at a
support model with Phoenix Software.
We have been providing significant enhancements as well as support.
JES3plus V1R2 just went out the door last month:
Hi Keith,
z/OS V2.5 is the last release that IBM will deliver JES3. That may also
be related to the separate Target Zone.
Regards,
David
On 2022-10-06 09:11, Keith Gooding wrote:
Thanks Paul.
We still need to have JES3 because as an ISV we do have to do some testing on a
JES3 system. It
: JES3 SMPE zone in Serverpac
Thanks Paul.
We still need to have JES3 because as an ISV we do have to do some testing on a
JES3 system. It would probably be safer to change our cloning jobs rather than
ZONEMERGE the zones just in case an element with the same name as a JES3
element is added to z
Thanks Paul.
We still need to have JES3 because as an ISV we do have to do some testing on a
JES3 system. It would probably be safer to change our cloning jobs rather than
ZONEMERGE the zones just in case an element with the same name as a JES3
element is added to z/OS.
Keith
> On 6 Oct
I found a partial explanation for the changes to Serverpac in “z/os v2.5:
Planning for Installation” - SDSF and JES2 are now delivered in the BCP zone
but JES3 is delivered only if ordered. It makes sense that the SDSF/JES2/JES3
merge feature may not have been included in the z/OSMF version but
JES3 is no longer being maintained by IBM product. Phoenix Software
International - https://phoenixsoftware.com/jes3plus.htm - is licensed to
maintain and enhance JES3. This is probably the reason for the SMP/E split.
Note also that z/VSE is in a similar situation. As of June 1, 2021, 21st
I installed z/os 2.5 using z/OSMF in October last year and noticed that the
installation placed JES3 in a target zone separate from the rest of z/os. I do
not recall being given the option to put JES2 and JES3 in the same
zone but I may have skipped over it . I know that there was such an
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Title of book -- Naming Convention thing for SMPE
On Wed, 14 Sep 2022 20:36:14 -0500, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>On Wed, 14 Sep 2022 17:33:13 -0700, Retired Mainframer wrote:
>
>>It is in chapter 10 of "Standard Packaging Rules for z/OS-Based
On Wed, 14 Sep 2022 20:36:14 -0500, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>On Wed, 14 Sep 2022 17:33:13 -0700, Retired Mainframer wrote:
>
>>It is in chapter 10 of "Standard Packaging Rules for z/OS-Based Products,"
>>SC23-3695-10.
>>
>A search for that gets many hits; mostly containing rotten links.
>
>Several
On Wed, 14 Sep 2022 17:33:13 -0700, Retired Mainframer
wrote:
>It is in chapter 10 of "Standard Packaging Rules for z/OS-Based Products,"
>SC23-3695-10.
>
A search for that gets many hits; mostly containing rotten links. IBM could do
better.
Several are HTTP links, for which Firefox reports
ssion List On Behalf Of
Steve Thompson
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2022 4:28 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Title of book -- Naming Convention thing for SMPE
Once upon a time I had a copy of a book that gave the naming
convention for naming elements for SMPE so that one would not
conflic
-- Naming Convention thing for SMPE
Once upon a time I had a copy of a book that gave the naming
convention for naming elements for SMPE so that one would not
conflict with IBM either in LPA, or LNKLST, etc. And one could
even share a common CSI.
I know it has to have been updated by now (my copy was
Once upon a time I had a copy of a book that gave the naming
convention for naming elements for SMPE so that one would not
conflict with IBM either in LPA, or LNKLST, etc. And one could
even share a common CSI.
I know it has to have been updated by now (my copy was from back
about 1997
> Can you dl a shopz order smpe receive order? I’ve tried to get information
> but the links ibm sends are not working. I already have receive order
> processing set up for fixes etc.
The Shopz download page for your order should contain links to sample SMP/E
jobs to download the or
Thank you sir.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
)/* <=== NOTE 4 */
/* TRANSFERONLY */ /* <=== NOTE 3 */
).
And:
wrote:
>Can you dl a shopz order smpe receive order? I’ve tried to get information
>but the links ibm sends are not working. I already
Can you dl a shopz order smpe receive order? I’ve tried to get information but
the links ibm sends are not working. I already have receive order processing
set up for fixes etc.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
> Is it possible to get a SMPe report in order of the date the sysmods were
> applied?
The SMP/E LIST and UNLOAD commands outputs do not sort the currently installed
SYSMODs by APPLY date. You'll have to roll your own by either manipulating and
sorting LIST or UNLOAD output, or
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of CM
Poncelet [03e99a92061c-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]
Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2022 11:31 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SMPe ACCEPT process
In the 1980's, IMS
In the 1980's, IMS SYSMODs (CBIPO/CBPDO etc.) had to be accepted before
they could be applied. It might have had to do with the macros needing
to be accepted before the rest of it could be applied.
Not sure how it is done now. The last IMS *native SMP/E* CBIPO I did was
in 2000 - probably an
Smplog has all the info. Unless it was dummy'd out.
Rob
On Sat, Jun 18, 2022, 09:41 Bill Giannelli wrote:
> Is it possible to get a SMPe report in order of the date the sysmods were
> applied?
> thanks
> Bill
>
> --
Is it possible to get a SMPe report in order of the date the sysmods were
applied?
thanks
Bill
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM
1 - 100 of 690 matches
Mail list logo
