Not familiar with USS, so I have a dumb question. What is the normal setup for
USS? Is the norm to have the LPARs under the root? How do you setup your USS
environment?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access ins
All,
How do i find the volume where '/usr/local/' lives ?
I think it might be ZFS , but how can i tell ..and how do i increase the
filesystem where it lives ?
Scott
Idmworks
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
Rather than asking you questions about your environment, you probably want to
take a look at UNIX System Services Planning (GA22-7800), Chapter 7. Sharing
file systems in a sysplex, Illustrating file systems in single system and
sysplex environments. It's about 5 pages with illustration
Under Linux I use the strace command to trace system calls to see, for example,
what files are trying to be opened. Is there an equivalent method under Unix
System Services?
Neale
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
How are most shops handling USS management and migration?
For many years, there has been a strong sentiment in my shop against
utilizing USS (security and scalability were always cited as the primary
reasons) and we were only allowed to utilize USS with IBM and ISV software
installs. Things are ch
I'm trying to find a reason to use automount facility.
Is it better than static mount of all needed filesystems?
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
---
Treść tej wiadomości może zawierać informacje prawnie chronione Banku
przeznaczone wyłącznie do użytku służbowego adresata. Odbiorcą może
Check out the zfsadm command for info on the volume. It's likely a mount point
at /usr.
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/#!/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.ioea700/ioea7zcmd1008032.htm
Chad
> On Mar 21, 2016, at 4:41 PM, Scott Ford wrote:
>
> All,
>
> How do i find the volume whe
Assuming it is an aggregate...
Browse parmlib or issue D OMVS,F and search for it, etc. If you have access,
UNIX System Services shell command df would be quicker--df -v /usr/local.
Check for secondary extents, if applicable, then take a look at zfsadm grow.
Example, grow your aggregate one
, Grand Rapids, MI 49546 MD RSCB2H
p 616.653.8429
f 616.653.2717
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Scott Ford
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 5:41 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Unix System Services question
All
616.653.8429
f 616.653.2717
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Jousma, David
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 7:47 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Unix System Services question
More specifically the command: df -vk
-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of R.S.
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 5:24 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: (External):Unix System Services question
W dniu 2016-03-21 o 22:59, Jesse 1 Robinson pisze:
> What I did.
>
> 1. Get in
UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of R.S.
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 5:24 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: (External):Unix System Services question
W dniu 2016-03-21 o 22:59, Jesse 1 Robinson pisze:
What I did.
1. Get into ishell from Opt 6
2. Type /usr/local/
3. In my case, I apparently have nothi
there an equivalent method
> under Unix System Services?
>
> Neale
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with
I found the bpxtrace command but while its output is full of FCN… fcntl and
FCN… write they are almost the only functions generating trace records. The app
is opening quite a lot of files but I see no evidence in the trace.
--
F
Detailed OMVS tracing is described here
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.5.0?topic=trace-sysomvs-component
It is low-level, and will require either external writer or SVC dump of
OMVS+dataspaces to capture. Options SYSCALL and FILE will capture file
activity.
Be aware when filtering sysomvs
Thanks! I’ll take a read.
Detailed OMVS tracing is described here
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.5.0?topic=trace-sysomvs-component
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@l
I was able to run a trace:
TRACE CT,ON,COMP=SYSOMVS
*05 ITT006A SPECIFY OPERAND(S) FOR TRACE CT COMMAND.
R 5,OPTIONS=(SYSCALL,FILE),END
IEE600I REPLY TO 05 IS;OPTIONS=(SYSCALL,FILE),END
ITT038I ALL OF THE TRANSACTIONS REQUESTED VIA THE TRACE CT COMMAND WERE
SUCCESSFULLY EXECUTED.
Ran the comm
The sysomvs ctrace data is written to OMVS dataspaces (z/OS 2.4 and below) or
to 64-bit storage (above the bar) at z/OS 2.5 OR to dataset(s) defined for an
external writer.
If not using an external writer, you must capture an SVC dump of
OMVS+dataspaces.
In either case - SVC dump or dataset f
See "Chapter 7. Sharing file systems in a sysplex" in z/OS 2.5 UNIX System
Services Planning, GA32-0884-50.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf
took me some time to get this setup and managed
the way we needed but it works well.
the IBM doc
Unix system services planning is where I found all the sample processes
I needed to setup the shared filesystem and the best practice for
parmlib and system setup
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos
that's a better reference - I have a PDF saved on my work PC somewhere,
but this looks about the same
Carmen
On 9/29/2022 8:05 AM, Seymour J Metz wrote:
See "Chapter 7. Sharing file systems in a sysplex" in z/OS 2.5 UNIX System
Services Planning, GA32-0884-50.
--
Shmuel (S
t; On 9/29/2022 8:05 AM, Seymour J Metz wrote:
> > See "Chapter 7. Sharing file systems in a sysplex" in z/OS 2.5 UNIX
> System Services Planning, GA32-0884-50.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
> > http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
> >
> &
Cześć Radosław,
In my shop's case we have over 1000 user-filesystems, so we use automount
to only mount the filesystem when the user logons.
It would be impractical for us to keep that huge amount of mount statements
in BPXPRMxx and to keep it up-to-date with new users.
I've also worked on a smal
W dniu 2017-02-24 o 16:37, Lucas Rosalen pisze:
Cześć Radosław,
In my shop's case we have over 1000 user-filesystems, so we use automount
to only mount the filesystem when the user logons.
It would be impractical for us to keep that huge amount of mount statements
in BPXPRMxx and to keep it up-t
2017-02-24 9:19 GMT-06:00 R.S. :
> I'm trying to find a reason to use automount facility.
> Is it better than static mount of all needed filesystems?
>
Personally, I use it for "ease of administration". I can make a single
control file, /etc/auto.master which "controls" a set of directories. In
Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of R.S.
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2017 10:19 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Unix System Services Automount - why?
I'm trying to find a reason to use automount facility.
Is it better than static mount of all needed filesy
On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 16:50:23 +0100, R.S. wrote:
>W dniu 2017-02-24 o 16:37, Lucas Rosalen pisze:
>
> I've also worked on a smaller shop where all users' directories were
> defined in one single filesystem. In this case, we didn't use automount.
That's my setup: single (not so big) filesystem for
Hi Tom,
Last bit of your answer is exactly what this thread led me to think: Why
not using automount to get service filesystems mounted when applying
maintenance, for example?
Currently we have these mounts hard coded in one "service-only" BPXPRMxx
that we call before applying anything.
I'm think
On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 16:15:42 +, Jousma, David wrote:
>I static mount permanent filesystems. User filesystems (i.e. their home
>directory) are automounted with a relatively short life before being
>unmounted. We also run NFS Client on the mainframe to open systems servers,
>and all of th
21, 2016 2:41 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Unix System Services question
All,
How do i find the volume where '/usr/local/' lives ?
I think it might be ZFS , but how can i tell ..and how do i increase the
filesystem wh
W dniu 2016-03-21 o 22:59, Jesse 1 Robinson pisze:
What I did.
1. Get into ishell from Opt 6
2. Type /usr/local/
3. In my case, I apparently have nothing mounted there, so I see only
Type Perm Changed-PST8PDT --Size Filename
_ Dir 755 2013-05-24 22:568192 .
Guys,
I just did a df -v /usr/local and found the Vsam dataset name..this is great
Scott
On Tuesday, March 22, 2016, R.S. wrote:
> W dniu 2016-03-21 o 22:59, Jesse 1 Robinson pisze:
>
>> What I did.
>>
>> 1. Get into ishell from Opt 6
>> 2. Type /usr/local/
>> 3. In my case, I apparently have
n AIX,
FDR Upstream Unix,
CA Disk Backup and Restore for Unix System Services,
Others?
--
Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA
Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive a
I am building a static version of ncurses (don’t ask) and there are a couple of
problems I note:
1. The xlc include search order defaults to -I/usr/include as the 1st place
to search (despite what the man page for c89 says) whereas other *IX systems
search the user specification first then
and Restore for Unix System Services,
Others?
After IBM stabilized TSM for z/OS at the 5.5 level, we deployed a
hipersocket-connected RHEL Linux for z image where we currently run TSM
6.2. What's nice is that we can still use TSM clients on z/OS for both
backup and administrative purpose
while the application is running?
TSM on AIX,
FDR Upstream Unix,
CA Disk Backup and Restore for Unix System Services,
Others?
We backup all of our zFS file systems with ADRDSSU logical backups and
have never had any problems. Can you post a sample DFDSS job step (with
control cards) for peop
Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Mike Schwab
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 12:58 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: z/OS Unix System Services Backups
z/TSM has been obsolete, is going out of support, and may or may not
work on z/OS 2.1.
We backup the root system on
>>> On 5/23/2013 at 01:17 PM, Ed Jaffe wrote:
> After IBM stabilized TSM for z/OS at the 5.5 level, we deployed a
> hipersocket-connected RHEL Linux for z image where we currently run TSM
> 6.2. What's nice is that we can still use TSM clients on z/OS for both
> backup and administrative purp
IBM has a stripped down version of TSM that executes on zOS that does
the actual tape I/O. TSM on another platform connects to the TSM running
on zOS. According to IBM, TSM on zOS is a no-charge version as long as
you're licensed for TSM elsewhere.
Mark Jacobs
On 05/23/13 13:43, Mark Post wr
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Mark Jacobs wrote:
>
> We backup all of our zFS file systems with ADRDSSU logical backups and have
> never had any problems. Can you post a sample DFDSS job step (with control
> cards) for people to look at?
>
> --
> Mark Jacobs
-SPRX054 STEP02 04 4905
On 5/23/2013 10:43 AM, Mark Post wrote:
After IBM stabilized TSM for z/OS at the 5.5 level, we deployed a
hipersocket-connected RHEL Linux for z image where we currently run TSM
6.2. What's nice is that we can still use TSM clients on z/OS for both
backup and administrative purposes and TSM still
On 5/23/2013 10:46 AM, Mark Jacobs wrote:
IBM has a stripped down version of TSM that executes on zOS that does
the actual tape I/O. TSM on another platform connects to the TSM
running on zOS.
Order number?
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
831 Parkview Drive North
El Segu
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OS Unix System Services Backups
On 5/23/2013 10:46 AM, Mark Jacobs wrote:
> IBM has a stripped down version of TSM that executes on zOS that does
> the actual tape I/O. TSM on another platform connects to the TSM
> running on zOS.
Order number?
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix
work while the application is running?
TSM on AIX,
FDR Upstream Unix,
CA Disk Backup and Restore for Unix System Services,
Others?
Harbor Backup aka Betasystems aka Tantia
pax
BTW: IMHO the real problem is ADRDSSU operates at filesystem level, so
lacks granularity at file/directory level. You
Hi,
(Posting on behalf of a colleague)
The initial question about include files, that depends on what was used for the
#include in the source. If it was something like #include “abc.h” then it
should take the current directory first (see the LSEARCH option defaults). Only
if they used the #inc
The initial question about include files, that depends on what was used for the
#include in the source. If it was something like #include “abc.h” then it
should take the current directory first (see the LSEARCH option defaults). Only
if they used the #include form in the source would they get t
022 7:54 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: EXTERNAL: Unix System Services migration
How are most shops handling USS management and migration?
For many years, there has been a strong sentiment in my shop against utilizing
USS (security and scalability were always cited as the primary
reasons
I've gotten use to using ISHELL which displays the contents of a directory
ignoring case sensitivity. ISPF can't do it that way ... you have to look
through all the lower case names before getting to the upper case names. IBM
ISPF recommended submitting an rfe in developerworks. Here is the link
By setting attribute +l onto .so files (and dlls) you can load them into
common shared storage. So once it has been loaded, it is available to
everyone.
I can see this would be great for Java .so files at application startup.
I can find little documentation on doing this. Is it recommended? Is
t
On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 11:34:11 -0500, David Magee wrote:
>I've gotten use to using ISHELL which displays the contents of a directory
>ignoring case sensitivity. ISPF can't do it that way ... you have to look
>through all the lower case names before getting to the upper case names. IBM
>ISPF reco
I was leaving the implementation up to IBM. The current ISPF file listing is
done using ISPF DM tables which does not provide any collating sequence options
that the user can tweak.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
I've got a C++ program -- trying to use GSK for the first time, FWIW -- that
is running POSIX(ON) in z/OS batch and is receiving the above error on the
first GSK call.
I've read the manual description of the message but I don't quite understand
what they are trying to tell me. I'm not the guy res
Dear Listers,
I have 55 users (mostly for deamons, but not all) having UID=0. When I do a
ls -l
on any directory, I see the files belonging to root (owner uid = 0) are
attributed to belong to one user ID out of that list of 55. I know the UID is
what is holding the single truth about ownership,
Is there more than one main() program? If so and they run in the same
enclave, then they need to use the same C RTL.
How are you setting POSIX(ON)? At run time?
We generally set this option in each compile unit, via a #pragma:
#pragma runopts(POSIX(ON))
Kirk Wolf
Dovetailed Technologies
http:/
A.EDU] On
Behalf Of Kirk Wolf
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2012 11:56 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: EDC5167I Access to the UNIX System Services version of the C
RTL is denied
Is there more than one main() program? If so and they run in the same
enclave, then they need to use the same C RT
t; Behalf Of Kirk Wolf
> Sent: Monday, October 01, 2012 11:56 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: EDC5167I Access to the UNIX System Services version of the C
> RTL is denied
>
> Is there more than one main() program? If so and they run in the same
> enclave, the
th RPTOPTS and my C library
call are working.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Kirk Wolf
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2012 2:31 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: EDC5167I Access to the UNIX System Servic
On Wed, 3 May 2017 04:54:41 -0500, Jantje. wrote:
>
>I have 55 users (mostly for deamons, but not all) having UID=0. When I do a
>ls -l
>on any directory, I see the files belonging to root (owner uid = 0) are
>attributed to belong to one user ID out of that list of 55. I know the UID is
>what i
On Wed, 3 May 2017 08:38:23 -0500, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>On Wed, 3 May 2017 04:54:41 -0500, Jantje. wrote:
>>
>>I have 55 users (mostly for deamons, but not all) having UID=0. When I do a
>>ls -l
>>on any directory, I see the files belonging to root (owner uid = 0) are
>>attributed to belong
On Thu, 4 May 2017 07:44:48 -0500, Bruce Wells wrote:
>On Wed, 3 May 2017 08:38:23 -0500, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>>It should improve in z/OS 2.3:
>>
>> http://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/ShowDoc.wss?docURL=/common/ssi/rep_ca/5/897/ENUS217-085/index.html&request_locale=en
I will definitely like
60 matches
Mail list logo
