I sometimes also use odd sizes (particularly
43x133) in the way that Kris describes but there are a few applications
(Ditto, VM:Operator) that do not like this and refuse to play.
Colin Allinson
Amadeus Data Processing
Kris Buelens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I sometimes use odd screen-sizes from
62x140; same with VM:Operator not liking it, VMYCON155E userid screen size
exceeds 43-line/80-column maximum. but VM:Backup resizes it to 24x80...
How's that done or could it be done from REXX?
Gregg
No plan survives execution
Richard Troth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station-wagon.
(or of airliner, or of an Amish buggy, or of the QE2, or of a Camry, ...)
Yeah, we had a customer who wanted to move 100TB from Japan to New Jersey; my
recommendation was Crate the Shark and fly it
Hi,
We are currently running z/VM 5.1 with the RMS (Removable Media Services)
feature of DFSMS. We are using the default system SFS (Shared File System)
that comes with the base system. (VMSERVR, S, U). I want to install DFSMS in
my local SFS however Chapter 2 of the install instructions says that
Gregg Reed wrote:
62x140; same with VM:Operator not liking it, VMYCON155E userid screen size
exceeds 43-line/80-column maximum. but VM:Backup resizes it to 24x80...
How's that done or could it be done from REXX?
Gregg
resizing to 24 by 80 is done by the application using the write vs
write
IBM announced today support for the server Time Protocol (STP) in the
zSeries hardware.
Availability of Server Time Protocol can:
* Help improve time synchronization for z9 EC, z9 BC, z990, and z890
* Support a multisite sysplex distance up to 100 km
* Synchronize servers and
Title: Trapping output of VTAM Commands from a GCS Routine
I know that this can be done in a NETVIEW NCCFLST but I would like to do this as a VM/VTAM GCS routine.
Can EXECIO or PIPE, or some other function, be run in a GCS routine in VMVTAM to trap the output of a command such as:
d
On: Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 05:35:50AM -0400,Phil Smith III Wrote:
} Yeah, we had a customer who wanted to move 100TB from Japan to New Jersey; my
recommendation was Crate the Shark and fly it there. I calculated that if it
took 24 hours door-to-door, that was about 1GB/second throughput.
Yeah, and the connectivity to that data while in transit was pretty bad,
too. ;-)
DJ
Phil Smith III wrote:
Richard Troth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station-wagon.
(or of airliner, or of an Amish buggy, or of the QE2, or of a Camry, ...)
Yeah, we had a
Other than PNET or RJE, I can't imagine anyone ever shipping a dump
prior to the '90s. It is only since I had high speed Internet
connections that I have ever shipped a dump online. It seems like only
4-5 years ago, I was still shipping tapes.
If we were ever in a real hurry, where FEDEX was
On: Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 07:27:26AM -0700,Don Russell Wrote:
} Gregg Reed wrote:
} 62x140; same with VM:Operator not liking it, VMYCON155E userid screen size
} exceeds 43-line/80-column maximum. but VM:Backup resizes it to 24x80...
} How's that done or could it be done from REXX?
} Gregg
}
If you just want to be able to grab the output rather than if you really
need it in GCS, I run an exec that does that. Normally I run with VTAM
secusered to the OPERATOR id. My exec temporarily changes the secuser
id to the issuer, issues the command and waits for the output. When the
At 10:28 AM 10/11/2006, you wrote:
If we were ever in a real hurry, where FEDEX was too slow, we would
take the tape to Lambert International Airport (St. Louis), and put it
on the next flight out to where ever it needed to go.
So I guess the question I'm wondering...
How many others have
In the OS/360 days, shipping a tape was about the only option we had. It was
(1) try to work with someone at the support center in an attempt to diagnose
the problem and identify the fix via phone, and (2) when that failed, send the
dump. This still held true in the early years of VM/370. We
Any issues with VM 5.1 or 5.2 and XRC? My storage guy said to check on
timestamping i/o? or something like that - and make sure we have all the
PTF's on for that. I wasn't quite sure what to search on in IBMLink.
Marcy Cortes
This message may contain confidential and/or privileged
Schuh, Richard wrote:
Yeah, but 3090 memory was not ferrite core, was it? IIRC, it was much
cheaper and more reliable. I wasn't privy to the bean-counting
specifics, but the rumored cost of the LCS storage on our 360 class
machines was in the neighborhood or $2.5-3M per 2MB unit. And they were
Cores DO migrate.
--begin quote
Now, it turns out that core memories are fairly fussy about their
temperature. So in order to control the temperature, the early core memories
were in an oil bath in a big tank, through which oil was circulated to maintain
the temperature of the things. This
What are some good ways of making this type of change?
Best way I can think of is a session manager like NVAS or Tubes, where
you could make the LU pool connecting to the application specific to a
particular app, and always ask for EDS from the real device.
As some of you might know, IBM and Fundamental Software have
not been able to agree on renewing the PWD access to the zArchitecture-capable
version of Flex-ES. While I understand that IBM has made this decision on what
they believe to be a valid business case, several of my customers who
--- Stracka, James (GTI) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I know that this can be done in a NETVIEW NCCFLST
but I would like to do
this as a VM/VTAM GCS routine.
Can EXECIO or PIPE, or some other function, be run
in a GCS routine in
VMVTAM to trap the output of a command such as:
d
David Boyes wrote:
As some of you might know, IBM and Fundamental Software have not been able
to agree on renewing the PWD
access to the zArchitecture-capable version of Flex-ES. While I understand
that IBM has made this
decision on what they believe to be a valid business case, several of
That's a good suggestion, Tony. Here is a bit more of the details of the
meeting:
Please join IBM System z for the System z Fall 2006 Technical Disclosure
Meeting (TDM) to be held Monday, November 13, 2006, through Thursday,
November 16, 2006, in Poughkeepsie, NY.
Attending the meeting is free,
In the early 1990's we consolidated a data center from Sydney into
Philadelphia. We used SYBACK to do a full dump of specific (most) minidisks
to tape and shipped the tapes. We then performed daily incrementals to
disk, and sent the incrementals via RSCS, via a 9600 baud line at most. I
Dave Jones wrote:
Please join IBM System z for the System z Fall 2006 Technical
Disclosure Meeting (TDM) to be held Monday, November 13, 2006, through
Thursday,
November 16, 2006, in Poughkeepsie, NY.
Attending the meeting is free, as in no-charge. However, you
have to pay for your
On Wednesday, 10/11/2006 at 11:02 AST, Stracka, James (GTI)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know that this can be done in a NETVIEW NCCFLST but I would like to do
this
as a VM/VTAM GCS routine.
Can EXECIO or PIPE, or some other function, be run in a GCS routine in
VMVTAM
to trap the output
Hello!
As I am happen to be a member of PWD, I suspect that since I haven't been
able to negotiate a proper connection to their activities regarding Flex, I
suspect that's why what you've got there, did not arrive here.
I am interested naturally, but, ah, I suspect the representatives from Flex
Wouldn't it take a hour to send 3.5 MB at 9600 baud? On the surface it
would seem that your site didn't modify much in any one day. But then,
most of us may be supprised by how little is actually updated.
Back in the '70s there was an PNET/RJE function called RTPSEND and
RTPRECV in which you
Rich Greenberg wrote:
On: Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 07:27:26AM -0700,Don Russell Wrote:
} Gregg Reed wrote:
} 62x140; same with VM:Operator not liking it, VMYCON155E userid screen size
} exceeds 43-line/80-column maximum. but VM:Backup resizes it to 24x80...
} How's that done or could it be done
From the Flex listserv
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 16:19:41 -0400
Reply-To: FLEX-ES S/390 Emulator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: FLEX-ES S/390 Emulator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Bob Henry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: A Letter To The FLEX-ES Community
In-Reply-To:
Hi,
We have historically used the VMSES/E SERVICE EXEC to install RSU and COR
service to the Starter System during our initial z/VM installations.
Shortly after the Starter System has reached our desired level of
maintenance, we implement CP usermods in support of CA's VM:Secure Rules
facility.
On Oct 11, 2006, at 8:28 AM, Tom Duerbusch wrote:
How many others have shipped dumps, online, back before high speed
Internet connections?
Hell, I've done it with DVDs in the last year.
Adam
There is a bypass (I think). Store
a UCOMDIR NAMES file on the A-disk of DFSMS servers. In this file,
you aasign a nickname to a filepool:
:nick.VMSYS :tpn.MYPOOL
Note: to activate this, the easiest
way it to IPL CMS
Kris,
IBM Belgium, VM customer support
The IBM z/VM Operating System
32 matches
Mail list logo
