Re: RSCS LPR Printer Name w/spaces

2006-12-14 Thread Fran Hensler
Fran Hensler wrote: I enclosed the printer name in single quotes but I get a NAK when I try to print to it. PRINTER='eX- Printer on https://xxx.xx-.us/printers/default' Does anyone know how I could either rename this printer to remove spaces or how to make RSCS print to printer

Re: RSCS LPR Printer Name w/spaces

2006-12-14 Thread Alan Altmark
On Thursday, 12/14/2006 at 08:36 EST, Fran Hensler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Your solution worked great when testing on a local network printer but when I tried to share the IPP printer I got this message Sharing is not supported for this type of printer I tried creating a short cut but that

Re: Sysprof Exec in z/vm 4.4

2006-12-14 Thread Mary Zervos
Thanks to everyone for their help on Sysprof. I used Mike's suggestion below and it worked like a charm. The new z/vm 4.4 system dust is starting to settle. Anyone game for another question... Yesterday on our new 4.4 system, I was deleting some old users on random packs using Dirmaint

Re: Sysprof Exec in z/vm 4.4

2006-12-14 Thread George Haddad
Any chance that a minidisk covering cyl 0 was defined, them deleted? Mary Zervos wrote: Thanks to everyone for their help on Sysprof. I used Mike's suggestion below and it worked like a charm. The new z/vm 4.4 system dust is starting to settle. Anyone game for another question...

Re: Sysprof Exec in z/vm 4.4

2006-12-14 Thread Thomas Kern
Did you bay any chance use DIRMAINT to delete a minidisk that covered cylinder zero of volume 230RES? When DIRMAINT deletes a minidisk, it usua lly has its worker DATAMOVE format the minidisk before deallocating it to prevent the next user from getting data from it. /Tom Kern On Thu, 14 Dec

COMMAND vs. CMS

2006-12-14 Thread Schuh, Richard
I have a file containing records that look like this: DELETE USER JOEUSER fpid (TYPE NOCONFIRM This file is read by a pipe and the commands passed to a stage for execution. I have seen and heard the arguments for using COMMAND vs. CMS stages, so I passed the records to COMMAND (as in

Re: COMMAND vs. CMS

2006-12-14 Thread Marty Zimelis
Richard, What environment is this pipe running in? Clearly, DELETE USER is not a native CMS command. Marty _ From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Schuh, Richard Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 4:09 PM To:

Re: COMMAND vs. CMS

2006-12-14 Thread Kris Buelens
Are you sre the command is written in uppercase? Do you know that you can code CMDCALL before a command so that it generates error messages e.g. PIPE COMMAND ERASE NO FILE A!CONS is silent while PIPE COMMAND CMDCALL ERASE NO FILE A!CONS displays file not found The CMDCALL prefix is especially

Re: COMMAND vs. CMS

2006-12-14 Thread Schuh, Richard
DELETE USER is an SFS Administrator command. From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marty Zimelis Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 1:14 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: COMMAND vs. CMS Richard, What

Re: COMMAND vs. CMS

2006-12-14 Thread Schuh, Richard
DELETE USER is not an EXEC, it is an SFS administrator command. -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Nielsen Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 1:22 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: COMMAND vs. CMS The COMMAND

Re: COMMAND vs. CMS

2006-12-14 Thread Schuh, Richard
HELP SFSADMIN DELETE From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marty Zimelis Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 1:32 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: FW: COMMAND vs. CMS From:

Re: COMMAND vs. CMS

2006-12-14 Thread Mike Walter
Shot_in_the_dark: ON Not sure of this, because we do not do a lot with SFS here, but could the SFS commands somehow be treated as CP commands? From PIPE HELP COMMAND (in part): ---snip--- The response from the CMS commands is not written to the terminal. The response from each command is

Re: COMMAND vs. CMS

2006-12-14 Thread Alan Altmark
On Thursday, 12/14/2006 at 02:49 PST, Schuh, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Irrelevant in this case. Translation is a by-product, not the main thrust, of the command environment. In any event, the commands entered were all upper case. The problem is that either CMS does not recognize SFS

Re: Sysprof Exec in z/vm 4.4

2006-12-14 Thread Ronald van der Laan
There is a CYL0_BLK0_CLEANUP setting, and if you set it to YES, it will scratch mdisks that start at cyl 0 too. Or if you have, like we once suffered from, an admin guy who found it more secure to use the option CLEAN on the PURGE or DMDISK commands, overriding the default dirmaint settings,

Re: COMMAND vs. CMS

2006-12-14 Thread Rick Troth
Do you have a COMMAND REXX in the mix intercepting the built-in? -- R;