On 6/14/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I opened an incident with Velocity this morning and still haven't heard back
from them.
Please look for those critters eating out of your inbasket... ;-)
I know we responded to this a few hours after you opened the issue,
asking you to
SFS has an option to log who accessed a file (not which program): you'd need
to turn auditing ON (what requires an SFS restart). We ran a while with
this auditing active (maybe at the initial SFS days when a DLOR was not yet
maintained by SFS).
The only way I know to read a file without
Hello,
I want to know whether any logger is present on VM like we have in DB2 to
track all the activities performed by a User ID. Thanks in advance for any
help on this.
Warm Regards,
Chaitra
**
Chaitra Narayanaswamy
IBM India Pvt Ltd
#99,Prestige
What you do inside a virtual machine is not logged by some CP service.
2007/6/15, Chaitra Narayanaswamy [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
I want to know whether any logger is present on VM like we have in DB2 to
track all the activities performed by a User ID. Thanks in advance for any
help on this.
On Thursday, 06/14/2007 at 09:04 EST, Mike Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Now, if only SFS had an option to log who, and. what accessed a file we
could
really clean house. But that breaks the last 10% rule: the last 10%
takes
90% of the effort and cost, making it a poor ROI.
Look at
There is also TRACK recently updated by Jim Vincent
I like the history of commands entered, myself.
this should be on the IBM VM down load page.
Bill Munson
IT Specialist
VM System Programmer
Office of Information Technology
State of New Jersey
(609) 984-4065
President MVMUA
Are you saying that a user who uses SFS should have their machine set to
XC? For example, we set up a lot of users to use SFS as their A disk; IPL
CMS from VMSYSU, stuff like that.
Thanks,
Steve G.
Kris Buelens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
XC mode is for those users that need to access SFS files from dataspaces. XC
mode lets DAT off users reach out to a dataspace, which is actually a virtual
storage system. SFSes that exploit dataspaces are for dircontrol directories.
David
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating
On Friday, 06/15/2007 at 04:41ZE5B, Chaitra Narayanaswamy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to know whether any logger is present on VM like we have in DB2
to track
all the activities performed by a User ID. Thanks in advance for any
help on
this.
It depends on what you mean by
Chaitra Narayanaswamy [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wrote:-
I want to know whether any logger is present on VM like we have in DB2
to track all the activities performed by a User ID. Thanks in advance for
any help on this.
I think I can talk about this because it was discussed at the z/expo
recently.
What (exactly) is it that you would want logged? All commands executed
by the user and/or all sub-commands that they may call? If so, SOME of
that is captured in the console spooling, but not all (and console
spooling can be easily changed by the user - for example #CP SPOOL
CONSOLE STOP PURGE
There's also the CMAP/XA product from Macro4. If you have enough DASD
space for everything it can log (you choose what you want logged), and
enough CPU horsepower to support monitoring everything it can monitor,
then you can monitor and awful lot of what any CMS user does.
See:
On Friday, 06/15/2007 at 10:37 AST, David Kreuter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
XC mode is for those users that need to access SFS files from
dataspaces. XC
mode lets DAT off users reach out to a dataspace, which is actually a
virtual
storage system. SFSes that exploit dataspaces are for
And in the amdahl CMS Internals class we wrote a Nucleus Extension to
see the MODE 0 files as an exercise.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Schuh, Richard
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 7:00 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
On Friday, 06/15/2007 at 10:31 AST, Bill Munson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is also TRACK recently updated by Jim Vincent
I like the history of commands entered, myself.
this should be on the IBM VM down load page.
If memory serves, TRACK is showing you the RETRIEVE buffer contents for
Alan,
Just looking at the USER DIRECT on the z/VM 5.2.0 distributed 2CC disk
has MACHINE ESA, XA and XC all over the place.
Jim
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Alan Altmark
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2007 11:11 AM
To:
While I thought having the SFS SVM itself XC, you are saying general CMS
users should be XC too?
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David Kreuter
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2007 10:37 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Slight
We need to know
(a) what is meant by track (securely audit? all types of guests?)
(b) what is meant by all (highly unlikely as it isn't practical)
(c) what is meant by activities
I'm comfortable that we have a handle on the. :-)
Alan Altmark
z/VM Development
IBM Endicott
LOL!
Perhaps
On Friday, 06/15/2007 at 10:38 ZE2, Rob van der Heij
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At some z/VM level I believe
VSWITCH was also in this, but I am told it currently should be charged
to the VSWITCH controller userid.
In z/VM 5.3, data movement between the guest and CP's shadow queues is
charged
Re CMAP: CMAP is great, used it myself many times. Only good for CMS commands
and doesn't handle RDBUF/WRBUF. Doesn't trap diagnose codes or CP READ or #CP.
Of course if this is for linux vm's CMAP won't help much.
David
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System on
Hi, James.
Yes, as a general rule, I suggest to all of my z/VM clients that they
run their CMS-based servers in XC mode.
Have a good weekend.
Stracka, James (GTI) wrote:
While I thought having the SFS SVM itself XC, you are saying general CMS
users should be XC too?
-Original
I'm porting a z/OS application to CMS that uses multiple pthreads within
an LE enclave. It successfully uses the RESMGR macro to clean up after a
pthread ABENDs (on the basis that a pthread is a task).
RESMGR doesn't exist in CMS, so I was wondering if someone can tell me
if it's possible to
If you are ONLY looking to see what the user entered from the console
(and keep in mind, you won't see anything issued from full-screen write
environments like XEDIT/filelist/rdrlist, etc.) this does indeed get
around the problems associated with a user mucking with console
spooling.
I guess it
Do 'q rec' and check for a large amount of queued records. Maybe something
stopped collecting? That could eat up your storage too, making things even
worse for not so obvious a reason. Just a stab in the dark...
FOR
Alan Altmark
z/VM Development
IBM Endicott
I am looking for you WAVV presentation, but I guess I am looking in all
the wrong places.
Where would I find it?
Jan Canavan
__
This email may contain confidential and privileged
Hi, Jan.
Alan often posts his presentations on his VM web site at:
http://www.vm.ibm.com/devpages/ALTMARKA/present.html
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FOR
Alan Altmark z/VM Development IBM Endicott
I am looking for you WAVV presentation, but I guess I am looking in
all the wrong places.
Where
CMS-based servers in XC mode
The word server above can still lead to confusion: there is no reason to
give any CMS user anything else than MACHINE XC.
We never had any problem since we defined all virtual machines as XC. One
exception: when running a secondlevel VM, you need MACHINE ESA (or its
Some of the IBM sessions are here:
http://www.wavv.org/wavv2007/presentations/index.htm
Dave Jones wrote:
Hi, Jan.
Alan often posts his presentations on his VM web site at:
http://www.vm.ibm.com/devpages/ALTMARKA/present.html
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FOR
Alan Altmark z/VM Development IBM
28 matches
Mail list logo