I will be out of the office starting 01/02/2008 and will not return until
01/07/2008.
I will be out of the office on Thu. 1/3 & Fri. 1/4, returning on Mon. 1/8.
I will have no access to voice mail or Email during this time.
If you need assistance while I am out, please contact John Hoffler
([EMA
And because of the pricing of z/OS cycles, some managers are beginning
to forget their blue tattoos and switch to brand X backup/restore
products when they see that the zlinux TSM is still not as fully
featured as MAINFRAME software should be.
Tape management and shared drives have been such a
On Wednesday, 01/02/2008 at 09:36 EST, Thomas Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> So TSM needs to change to become a real full-fledged MAINFRAME product.
I understand the point, but the z/OS version of TSM is the "mainframe"
version of the product. The Linux version of TSM is designed for
distri
So TSM needs to change to become a real full-fledged MAINFRAME product.
It's about time.
/Tom Kern
Alan Altmark wrote:
snipped ...
Further, TSM would have to change to integrate tape management with
mainframe tape management systems. That is, it would need to use
something like the new
The first quarter meeting of the Chicago Area VM (and Linux)
Enthusiasts will be held on Thursday, January 24, 2008.
The Final Agenda is included below.
--
Meeting Location:
This quarter's meeting will be held at the Hewitt Associates 'East
Campus' located at 100 Half Day Road, in L
Dowling Group recently dropped the product which is unfortunate but
understandable since the client base is very small and no one has been
asking for it. It is fairly stable and unless major changes are done in the
z/OS catalog (which is entirely possible at any given release) it should
continue to
> Would be nice. Otherwise, I guess it's left as an exercise to the user
to emulate something that TSM _does_ understand.
Such as license fees? 8-{~
IMHO regarding the Tivoli products that run on or interface to z/VM and
Linux for System z:
"Tivoli - an IBM unholy-owned company." Not a typo.
> Further, TSM would have to change
You could have stopped here... 8-(.
> to integrate tape management with
> mainframe tape management systems. That is, it would need to use
> something like the new eRMM APIs that can talk to z/OS tape managers.
Would be nice. Otherwise, I guess it's left as
> Now on to Kerberos
> Is anyone Out There actively building CMS Kerberos apps or who is
> depending on the z/VM Kerberos daemon for outboard Kerberos apps?
I still support several Kerberized CMS apps, although with the known
compromises in Kerberos 4, I've been getting a lot of pressure to e
Hello, all. A Happy New Year to everyone. I hope that 2008 brings you
peace and prosperity.
Every now and then we re-evaluate the services z/VM provides. In case you
didn't notice, z/VM 5.3 dropped support for ROUTED, leaving MPROUTE as
the only supported dynamic routing daemon. We also dr
FYI,
We did get in touch with the vendor and they were able to provide the info
that we needed.
Thanks,
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mike Walter
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 9:22 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
On Monday, 12/31/2007 at 12:07 EST, "Schuh, Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Then I guess FT it will be. I cannot really climb into either, as source
> is distruibuted with neither. I would be asking IBM to do all of the
> climbing.
Eh? Source to most of TCP/IP is available, including the F
On Wednesday, 01/02/2008 at 10:44 EST, Aria Bamdad
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But I am not using FICON attached tape. I use an ESCON attached 3590
> that is in reality a SCSI drive but connected to a ESCON attached
> controller.
Whether ESCON or FICON, it doesn't matter. IBM likes to invent n
Chuckie must have really been busy spreading doubt and confusion in the
Support Center. They are having trouble verifying the we are entitled to
support for that:
Operating System named TCP/IP
Product named TCP/IP
Communication Server named TCP/IP
Etc., etc. etc.
I have
Ed,
When Jeff asked, I looked in my "ISV" favorites; but the one for
"Unlimited Software Resources (a Dowling Group Company)" now ends up at
"Unlimited Software.com" which has no mainframe products. How "Unlimited"
is that!!?
Google was not much help.
I don't have a need for their CMS/MVS To
>>> On Wed, Jan 2, 2008 at 10:41 AM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Aria Bamdad
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-snip-
> But I am not using FICON attached tape. I use an ESCON attached 3590
> that is in reality a SCSI drive but connected to a ESCON attached
> controller.
Same difference. The channe
Hello Jeff,
I sent the info you need to Unlimited Software Resources.
They are friends of mine (and old company).
Great product and does wonderful stuff from z/VM for the OS
systems.
Ed Martin
330-588-4723
ext 40441
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating Syste
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:06:47 -0700 Mark Post said:
On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 2:21 PM, in message
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Aria Bamdad
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:=20
>-snip-
>> Why is it that z/Linux can talk to a channel attached 3590 but TSM
>> can't?
>
>According to one of my contacts, it's beca
Does anyone have the CMS/MVS Toolkit product from Unlimited Software
Resources?
We need to apply a new product key but have no documentation and cannot
figure out how to do it.
TIA
Jefferson Davis
19 matches
Mail list logo
