Over the weekend a LAN problem resulted in TCPIP getting hung up on 3 of
our systems and a recycle of TCPIP was necessary to resolve the issue.
On 2 of the systems we had no issue but, on a 3rd, we had a subsequent
issue with NAMESRV needing a separate manual recycle of that server.
When I
I thought it/TCPIP did do a FORCE when it finds a server already logged
on when it tries to StartANewLife?
JR (Steven) Imler
CA
Senior Sustaining Engineer
Tel: +1 703 708 3479
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL
Hi Folks - Having laid off VM for 18 years, I would put myself back into the
ranks of a newbie. So, please bear with me.
Am trying to load z/VM 5.3 - loading from DVD pointing to g:/530vm.ins.
After a status=SUCCESS is achieved, the Integrated 3270 Console remains
blank with
a green cursor
Is TCPIP properly authorized to force its friends? That is a class A
command.
Regards,
Richard Schuh
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Imler, Steven J
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 5:15 AM
Should it really be Noli nothis permittere te terere
Ed Martin
Aultman Health Foundation
330-588-4723
ext 40441
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Schuh, Richard
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2008 2:24 PM
To:
If TCPIP were not authorized, he wouldn't have gotten: HCPLGA054E
Already logged on disconnected.
Maybe the server was being watched (and restarted) by some other
service machine. I.e. TCPIP forces it, the other watcher restarts it
before TCPIP does. Check the system console.
2008/8/25 Schuh,
That has nothing to do with FORCE, it is a response to the XAUTOLOG
command. XAUTOLOG can be class A, B, or G, or it can be controlled by
the ESM.
Regards,
Richard Schuh
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kris Buelens
*http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illegitimi_non_carborundum*
Edward M. Martin wrote:
Should it really be /Noli nothis permittere te terere/
Ed Martin
Aultman Health Foundation
330-588-4723
ext 40441
*From:* The IBM
Depends on whether you are trying to be correct and not understood, or
just understood, by the masses who do not speak Latin. Who among those
of us who do not speak Latin would ever be able to decipher, Noli
nothis permittere te terere?
Wasn't Illegitimi non Carborundum originally intended
Who among those of us who do not speak Latin
Bloody barbarians. They don't speak Greek either! 8-)
So before you go on about the bloody Romans, don't you forget...
you're one of 'em!
-- Not the Messiah, He's a Very Naughty Boy!
Assumptions:
0. A VM server machine
1. A cluster of client virtual machines (possibly thousands)
2. n buffers are allocated for each client virtual machine
3. Each buffer contains table elements that require
(a) Element ageing
(b) Element deletion when invalidated by:
1. lack
It still is... (meant to be humorous)
Dave Wade G4UGM
Illegitimi Non Carborundum
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Schuh, Richard
Sent: 25 August 2008 17:20
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Where Do I Go From
In fact it is not even real Latin, it is pseudo Latin.
Regards,
Richard Schuh
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Wade
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 10:49 AM
To:
High school latin 3 decades agao notwithsatanding, what the heck does that
mean? None of those words translate or even transliterate inside my head.?
Most like a failure inside my head... :)?
-Paul
?
-Original Message-
From: Schuh, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August
Illegitimi non Carborundum
Loosely translated: Don't let the b*st*rds grind you down
On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 18:12:16 +, Paul Raulerson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
High school latin 3 decades agao notwithsatanding, what the heck does th
at
mean? None of those words translate or even
Shuddering as I reply to this thread, but this is starting to closely
resemble an IBM-MAIN list thread, not a good thing!
Wayne Driscoll
Product Developer
NOTE: All opinions are strictly my own.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Paul,
Thanks for asking the question that most of would like to know the
answer to
Loren Charnley, Jr.
IT Systems Engineer
FAMILY DOLLAR
(704) 847-6961 Ext. 3327
(704) 814-3327
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
Was I the only one who followed the link in Phil Tully's message of about
three hours ago?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illegitimi_non_carborundum
Marty
Martin Zimelis
Principal
maz/Consultancy
_
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
Dearest friends and colleagues,
By my (very likely imprecise) count, the last ten posts in this thread
have added little by way of technical content to the original topic.
I offer this comment as a gentle reminder that most - perhaps all - of
the 881 current subscribers to our little
A little while ago, an orange 'find bar' started appearing just below
every window on our HMC. We tried clicking on the 'X' on the left to
make it go away, and this works, once, on the first window we try it on.
But the find bar keeps coming back, and we can't get it to go away. It
is a major
The answer is z/VM 5.4 :-)
Regards,
Richard Schuh
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan Ackerman
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 5:05 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Restart of TCPIP function servers when
Sounds like there is a need for decent performance monitoring.
dave wrote:
Hi, Gary.
Well, there is no such thing as a free lunch, so
establishing *large* numbers of IUCV connections between
virtual machines does cost something. Control blocks must be
allocated, must be managed by CP,
That advice goes without saying...any effort to develop a
sophisticated VM application demands a good monitor to help
the developers tune that application to meet performance
goals.
DJ
- Original Message -
From: Barton Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re:
The 5000 clients hopefully do not all do a TIME IS 00:00:00 message or
some kind of coordinated event with a signal coming from a common
external source (CP), do they? Something like that could overrun a lot
of buffers.
Jim
dave wrote:
Hi, Gary.
Well, there is no such thing as a free
Since you indicate low traffic volume, maintaining a permanent connection
between the server and each client seems to me to be excessive.
Alternatively, I would propose a somewhat different approach.
The server should have configuration parameters specifying the maximum
number of concurrent
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 16:49:49 -0500, Karl Severson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ON.COM wrote:
Of my options, which would be the most efficient? The latest zVM with a
VM/ESA guest? The latest zOS with a VM/ESA guest? Some other combination
?
Karl Severson
IBM VM System Administrator
Raytheon Company
El
On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 12:23:49 -0500, Gary M. Dennis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
com wrote:
Assumptions:
0. A VM server machine
1. A cluster of client virtual machines (possibly thousands)
2. n buffers are allocated for each client virtual machine
3. Each buffer contains table elements that require
On Monday, 08/25/2008 at 10:11 EDT, dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, there is no such thing as a free lunch, so
establishing *large* numbers of IUCV connections between
virtual machines does cost something. Control blocks must be
allocated, must be managed by CP, interrupts fielded, etc.
28 matches
Mail list logo