On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:04:40 -0400 David Boyes said:
>> > times earlier, if you want JAVA support "on VM", you should install
>a
>> > Linux guest and use the up-to-date levels on there.
>> Java itself is a virtual machine. Maybe a z/Java guest someday?
>Would be a clever way to actually make the zA
> I don't know much about CP's multiple virtual engine support or about
> CMS multi-tasking, but could an adjunct engine controlled by CMS
> multi-tasking be a path to using zAAPs for JAVA under VM?
Given how UP-oriented and master-processor oriented a lot of CMS-MT is,
and the fact you'd still ha
On Oct 22, 2008, at 3:04 PM, David Boyes wrote:
times earlier, if you want JAVA support "on VM", you should install
a
Linux guest and use the up-to-date levels on there.
Java itself is a virtual machine. Maybe a z/Java guest someday?
Would be a clever way to actually make the zAAP specialty
I don't know much about CP's multiple virtual engine support or about
CMS multi-tasking, but could an adjunct engine controlled by CMS
multi-tasking be a path to using zAAPs for JAVA under VM?
/Tom Kern
David Boyes wrote:
>>> times earlier, if you want JAVA support "on VM", you should install
> a
> > times earlier, if you want JAVA support "on VM", you should install
a
> > Linux guest and use the up-to-date levels on there.
> Java itself is a virtual machine. Maybe a z/Java guest someday?
Would be a clever way to actually make the zAAP specialty engine useful
to a z/VM system. Someone woul
Thanks to Rick Barlow, Dave Jones and Peter Webb for sending me their
RXSSL VMARC and SSL VMARC.
I assume that they are the latest avaioable because the latest dated
file in each VMARC was RXSSL MODULE (2000-04-21 and 2000-04-24).
The RXSSL MODULE compared equal in the two VMARC files.
I have put
Michael Donovan wrote:
As was mentioned several
times earlier, if you want JAVA support "on VM", you should install a
Linux guest and use the up-to-date levels on there.
Java itself is a virtual machine. Maybe a z/Java guest someday?
--
Jack J. Woehr# "Self-delusion is
http://www.
Wow, thanks Mike. That's more dates than a topless woman in a nascar infield
can get!
MA
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Mike Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> I realize that this was not asked for, but I keep a "DATETIPS EXEC" on my
> disk with the following for quick, tested cut/pastes into
I realize that this was not asked for, but I keep a "DATETIPS EXEC" on my
disk with the following for quick, tested cut/pastes into new execs.
Maybe it will help someone else in the future:
--
/* DATETIPS EXEC*/ address command
trace ?i
retpd=7
tmp=date('B')+retpd
exdte=left(date
Thanks all.
David Dean
Information Systems
*bcbstauthorized*
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Davis, Larry
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 11:27 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Migration from 5
Oops -- REXX DATE doesn't allow 'Julian' to be converted .. although you
can convert 'from' Julian.. New code:
Daybase = date('B')
D30ago = date('S',Daybase-30,'B')
.
.
.
xlastacc = date('S',xyr||xday,'J')
If xlastacc < D30ago then do
.
.
.
Scott Rohling
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 8:09 AM, Sco
Yes Thanks
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Schuh, Richard
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 11:24 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Migration from 5.2 to 5.4
And just to be safe, link to it RR
Regards,
Ric
And just to be safe, link to it RR
Regards,
Richard Schuh
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Davis, Larry
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 6:48 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subj
z/VM 4.4.0 was the last release where JAVA was available for VM. We
actually got to a roughly JDK 1.1.6 level before discontinuing support.
If you still have a z/VM 4.4.0 system and you want to attempt moving the
JAVA code from there to a more recent z/VM 5.x system, the code should
contin
VSWG isn't the name of the test vswitch; it's the production one...
(could've just yelled this over the cube wall, but this was more fun. ;-) )
--
Robert P. Nix Mayo Foundation.~.
RO-OE-5-55 200 First Street SW/V\
507-284-0844 Rochester, MN 55905 /( )
I think you're going to have some issues during January using Julian ;-)
2009001-30 = 2008971 ... so you'll likely end up revoking everybody...
I would use date('B') -- and then convert to date('J') after:
Daybase = DATE('B')
D30ago = Date('J',Daybase-30,'B')
Scott Rohling
On Wed, Oct 22,
Well, you don't want him there.
Try 'set srm storbuf 300 300 300'
But others have already said too many levels - which is true too.
Marcy
"This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If
you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the
addressee, y
Put a Link statement in the first level ID as 151D or any other free
DASD address.
On your 2nd level system do QUERY DASD and you will see a free volume at
address 151D
ATTACH this to MAINT and ACCESS it at a free file mode then you can run
the MIGR51D tool
Larry Davis
__
This is my first complete migration. I have created a second level 5.4
instance, and have run the RSU service and put2prod. Everything has
gone well. I am using the Guide for Automated Installation and Service
for 5.4.
I know this is a rookie question; I promise I have searched the
archive
We IPL our VM natively in an LPAR instead of using the DR vendor's VM
"floor system". Depending on one's full volume backup/restore product,
you have a number of choices. If you're a z/OS shop too, you have that
entire infrastructure to work with. I've used HiDRO, Dynam-B and
Syback, both IPL'ed
Understood. But we went from 5.2 to 5.4, so for us it happened on 5.4. :)
MA
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 8:46 AM, Bruce Hayden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The supported memory in z/VM 5.4 did not change from 5.3. The maximum
> recommended size of both releases is 256 GB. For reference, see
> http:
The supported memory in z/VM 5.4 did not change from 5.3. The maximum
recommended size of both releases is 256 GB. For reference, see
http://www.vm.ibm.com/perf/reports/zvm/html/530stor.html
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 7:20 AM, Mary Anne Matyaz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It sounds dumb, but the bi
So here's the quick and dirty version for those interested.
/* Rexx */
erase racf data a
GLOBALV SELECT $RACGRP SET $RAC_APN Y
GLOBALV SELECT $RACGRP SET $RAC_ISPF Y
'RAC LU MATYAZ'
GLOBALV SELECT $RACGRP SET $RAC_APN N
GLOBALV SELECT $RACGRP SET $RAC_ISPF N
Daybase = date('Julian')
D30ago = Dayba
Absolutely forget 2nd level for anything Linux wise beyond testing.
David Dean
Information Systems
BCBST Tennessee
*bcbstauthorized*
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Steve Mitchell
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 8:22
We had the 'exact' problem at our DR test in 07. After much research and
discussion it was determined 'virtualization' beyond the 2nd level is not
going to preform well. I believe thats what Rob is explaining. This year
we ran our linux guest on their VM system. Ran GREAT! I believe there was
Thanks Kris,
the path parameter is synonym with chpid. You were right, when I entered
the command in the sequence below it worked
cp def cu B000 type * unitadd 00-8e cuadd 01 path b0 C0 D0 E0
Control unit configuration change completed successfully
Ready; T=0.01/0.01 13:46:4
Mary Anne Matyaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:-
> It sounds dumb, but the biggest thing for us with 5.4 is the ability
> to add memory without an IPL. Also the
> increase in memory supported from 128 to 256.
I doesn't sound dumb at all - it is quite important if that is what you
need.
I think the
The erro looks simply like a syntax error.
- The online help (z/VM 5.3) doesn't describe a PATH parameter
- Maybe CUADD needs to be specified before PATH?
2008/10/22 [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi listers,
>
> I want to define dynamically DS8000 DASDs to my zvm 5.2. I have used the
>
I am also using Charlotte 2.1.0 fix level 177 built 2002-10-16
and I'm having the same problems with RXSSL support.
The RXSSL support for Charlotte is a separate package of updates. I
have lost the original VMARC of RXSSL but I would try to recreate it
if there is any demand for it. My RXSSL Mo
Howard Rifkind wrote:
>We are testing at our D/R site.
>We are running our z/VM under the D/R sites z/VM.
>yet when we bring up one Linux guest it is very very slow and nothing is
>showing up in any of the monitoring tools.
This doesn't help solve your problem, BUT ObAnecdote:
Back at Linuxcar
Hi listers,
I want to define dynamically DS8000 DASDs to my zvm 5.2. I have used the
following command and got the response that the cuadd is invalid
cp def cu B100 type * unitadd 00-8e path b0 C0 D0 E0 cuadd 01
HCPZPM002E Invalid operand - CUADD
Ready(2); T=0.01/0.01 13:18:40
The first c
It sounds dumb, but the biggest thing for us with 5.4 is the ability
to add memory without an IPL. Also the
increase in memory supported from 128 to 256.
MA
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 11:58 AM, Colin Allinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This is just my own observation.
>
> We have been very early
Colin,
Inactivity timeout is a system wide setting. The only workaround I
could come up with is this:
If your system is like mine, it is a lot of linux guests, a few
batchlike system userids, and a few system programmers. See if they
will allow you to change the interval to the maximum, 254, and NO
yes
--- On Tue, 10/21/08, Marcy Cortes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: Marcy Cortes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Very Slow Linux Running Second Level z/VM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Date: Tuesday, October 21, 2008, 9:04 PM
Is he on the eligible list? (ind queues)?
Marcy
"This mess
34 matches
Mail list logo
