On Thursday, 04/02/2009 at 08:30 EDT, Rob van der Heij rvdh...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hmm... could it be that the RSU also made a databufferpoolsize from
TCPIP disappear?
Screens much larger than deity created them in the beginning may
result in transfers that don't fit in the default buffer size.
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Alan Altmark alan_altm...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Too bad the telnet server doesn't send an error message back to the client
and wait 5 seconds before killing the connection.
I thought there was PTF UM090401 published for TCP/IP VM last
Wednesday for this?
It will in
soapbox
Is this yet another reason that IBM should not distribute such files as
compiled REXX, so the user could diagnose similar problems?
/soapbox
When the VM lab was about to put only compiled EXECs on the S-disk I
explicitely asked to have the old (non-compiled) version too for
We (I) did the front/back end a bit differently.
Since I want to supply a profile for ALL users, not
only those who set a new default, I named my frontend
PROF (not only for peek), and renamed IBM's to
PIBM. It works just like you say:
-PROFPEEK XEDIT A
-Commands to customize.
-'MACRO
Hi,
Occasionally we have had a request to add an authorised operator for
RSCS. We usually change the RSCS CONFIG and wait till the next VM IPL
(the only time we re-cycle RSCS). Is there a way to dynamically add an
authorised operator for RSCS?
Thanks,
Mike Horlick
CGI Montreal
Thanks Barton. I will check that out. Thank-you also to everyone who
contributed.
The reason I asked in the first place was that we have had a situation
where a monitor product running in Linux will get in a bind and start
eating alot of cpu and we then have to adjust the billing. I have
the spool close for my object machine appears to process w.out issue.
however where am I to find the result? The command suggests the cons
will be sent back to the user defined byyour_id however I can discover
nothing in my rdr q. Any thoughts ?
James Stracka (DHL US)
I believe it was in VM 5.3 that the use of RSCSAUTH started. It reroutes
commands through to RSCS so you can change the authorizations without having to
bounce it. Never used it myself, just read some about it. Bouncing RSCS isn't
that big a deal for as few times as I have done it. I just pick
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 4:17 PM, joseph.bei...@frit.frb.org wrote:
the spool close for my object machine appears to process w.out issue.
however where am I to find the result? The command suggests the cons will
be sent back to the user defined byyour_id however I can discover nothing
in my
Hello Bob,
We are at z/VM 5.2. We have a pretty busy RSCS system during the day. I
was hoping without a bounce.
Thanks,
Mike
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Bob Bates
Sent: April 3, 2009 10:18 AM
The console spooling may not be started, or it may be spooled to someone
else.
You probably need to put a SPOOL CON START in the PROFILE EXEC of the
virtual machine. Virtual machine output after the START will go into
the spooled console.
Rob
Yes, that was correct and now corrected.
On Friday, 04/03/2009 at 09:38 EDT, Horlick, Michael
michael.horl...@cgi.com wrote:
Occasionally we have had a request to add an authorised operator for
RSCS. We
usually change the RSCS CONFIG and wait till the next VM IPL (the only
time we
re-cycle RSCS). Is there a way to dynamically
On Friday, 04/03/2009 at 10:21 EDT, Rob van der Heij rvdh...@gmail.com
wrote:
You probably need to put a SPOOL CON START in the PROFILE EXEC of the
virtual machine. Virtual machine output after the START will go into
the spooled console.
Or
COMMAND SPOOL CONS TO whomever START
in the
are there currently any CMS options for performing Secure FTP transfers?
Larry Davis
The Nielsen Company
As far as I know, RSCS authorizations is the only thing one cannot
dynamically change, and I think DIRMAINT's can either.
I guess security reasons make such a feature is not implemented.
2009/4/3 Horlick, Michael michael.horl...@cgi.com
Hi,
Occasionally we have had a request to add an
On 4/3/09 10:35 AM, Horlick, Michael michael.horl...@cgi.com wrote:
We are at z/VM 5.2. We have a pretty busy RSCS system during the day. I was
hoping without a bounce.
Create a DVM running PROP, and authorize the DVM in the RSCS config file.
You can then change the auth file for the PROP DVM
PGP Encrypt
FTP - Sendfile - MAILIT etc
PGP Decrypt
/Tom Kern
Davis, Larry wrote:
are there currently any CMS options for performing Secure FTP transfers?
Larry Davis
The Nielsen Company
Ok, let's go through this one at a time. See inserted comments.
Alan Ackerman wrote:
Creating new thread.
1. The folks that receive the data at my shop are z/OS folks. Historicall
the capture ratio of MVS was really poor. The notion was that you should
use SMF data and never RMF data. I
On Friday, 04/03/2009 at 10:38 EDT, Davis, Larry
larry.davis.consult...@nielsen.com wrote:
are there currently any CMS options for performing Secure FTP transfers?
The z/VM 5.4 FTP client and server support SSL, if that meets your needs.
(Prior releases have only FTP server-side support for
Barton said:
Transaction records are cut at logon/logoff, that is how we get 100.00%
capture ratio. Nothing is lost.
Question:
Is there a interval record to capture the data should the system go south
unexpectedly and/or the user is forced off (or is the logoff record cut at
force) ?
Greetings,
My z/VM 5.3 FTP client also supports the (secure options for SSL/TLS.
Larry Scollard
University of Tennessee, Knoxville
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 11:19:40 -0400 you said-
On Friday, 04/03/2009 at 10:38 EDT, Davis, Larry
larry.davis.consult...@nielsen.com wrote:
are there currently any
logoff record happens when the virtual machine leaves the building,
forced or voluntarily.
Lionel B. Dyck wrote:
Barton said:
Transaction records are cut at logon/logoff, that is how we get 100.00%
capture ratio. Nothing is lost.
Question:
Is there a interval record to capture the data
But not if the lpar (z/vm) leaves the building without saying goodbye
Lionel B. Dyck, Consultant/Specialist
Enterprise Platform Services, Mainframe Engineering
KP-IT Enterprise Engineering
925-926-5332 (8-473-5332) | E-Mail: lionel.b.d...@kp.org
AIM: lbdyck | Yahoo IM: lbdyck
Kaiser Service
And accounting data would not be lost under the same circumstances?
Regards,
Richard Schuh
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Lionel B. Dyck
Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 8:52 AM
If the LPAR leaves the building, then the data that is captured is valid
for the previous hour. The data for the current hour contains data each
minute for the top 10 consumers - so for the current partial hour,
capture ratio might only be 95%, and would have to be recovered from the
Gary M. Dennis wrote:
1. How does OpenSolaris zfs utilize the storage tier on System z? Are the
disks allocated to zfs pool(s) simply reserved CMS formatted disks?
Exactly that: minidisks used by OpenSolaris on z port (sirius for short)
are CMS-formatted and RESERVE-d minidisks. That way
Actually that works fine. I told the helpdesk user that they can issue
the command through VM:Operator.
Thanks,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of David Boyes
Sent: April 3, 2009 10:59 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
On Friday, 04/03/2009 at 11:42 EDT, Larry Scollard pa8...@utkvm1.utk.edu
wrote:
My z/VM 5.3 FTP client also supports the (secure options for SSL/TLS.
You're right, of course. It was a tupo. Thanks for catching it!
z/VM 5.3 and 5.4 have SSL/TLS support in both the FTP client and the
server.
On Friday, 04/03/2009 at 12:01 EDT, Schuh, Richard rsc...@visa.com
wrote:
And accounting data would not be lost under the same circumstances?
Under those circumstances (pull the plug) all unread accounting data is
lost. On a SHUTDOWN or abend, unread accounting data is written to the
Dear Chuckie,
I must apologize for upsetting you so. It too was shocked, as in shocked and
awe which escalated to shock and ah, S**T!!! What was I thinking? Upon
encountering a problem when using the PEEK function from within a RDRLIST
display, I should have immediately thought of my TCP/IP
On Apr 3, 2009, at 1:50 PM, Raymond Noal wrote:
I would like to thank all of you who responded. I was really
surprised at how the majority of you made the leap from using PEEK
to TCPIP data buffers.
Well, it's highly intuitive, after all.
Adam
I had to do this last week. This is what I did.
1) Inserted the tape in the tape library I/O station. The tape had no
barcode, so the robot detected it, but could not identify it, so the
robot left it in the I/O station.
2) Went to the tape library web interface as an administrator:
a) Clicked
On Friday, 04/03/2009 at 02:50 EDT, Raymond Noal raymond.n...@hds.com
wrote:
I would like to thank all of you who responded. I was really surprised
at how
the majority of you made the leap from using PEEK to TCPIP data buffers.
Rule #239: When you hear hoofbeats, think zebras.
Since zebra
As is said by Admiral Rickover
It is obvious to the most casual observer
To which we muttered under our breath 'yea, right'
Ed Martin
Aultman Health Foundation
330-363-5050
ext 35050
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of
Jeff,
What I was trying to determine if there was a way to use ZFS on OpenSolaris
System z as a high speed space management vehicle while bypassing
conventional transport layers? For example, let¹s say there existed a way
to push data to the IO appliance cross-memory (guest to ZFZ, ZFS to
Can anyone comment on the overhead (or lack thereof) relating to use of
this diagnose.
Thanks
--. .- .-. -.--
Gary Dennis
0 ... living between the zeroes... 0
Well, since it's just a move of data from one address space to another,
I would suspect (but I have no numbers to back this up) that the
overhead would be minimal.
Gary M. Dennis wrote:
Can anyone comment on the overhead (or lack thereof) relating to use of
this diagnose.
Thanks
--. .-
Is it just this location or do others have this problem?
I issue PEEK to look at a file in the READER.
At the bottom of the screen is:
1= Help 2= Add line 3= Quit 4= Tab 5= Clocate6=
?/Change
7= Backward 8= Forward 9= Receive 10= Rgtleft 11= Spltjoin 12=
Cursor
I
That's a modified PROFPEEK XEDIT, or a DEFAULTS command that changed
the fname of PEEK's Profile (issue DEFAULTS LIST PEEK to find out)..
Seting a PFkey to discard something is bad habit, and then not even
update the PF description line is even worse.
I really wanting a PFkey to delete something,
Hello Jim,
I have
Hello Jim,
From FullScreen CMS, I do a PF9 to get to the RDRLIST.
Pick one and Peek.
Did a Q PF
PF1 BEFORE MACRO HELP CMS PEEK
PF2 BEFORE SOS LINEADD
PF3 ONLYCOMMAND QUIT
PF4 BEFORE TABKEY
On Friday, 04/03/2009 at 03:55 EDT, Dave Jones d...@vsoft-software.com
wrote:
Well, since it's just a move of data from one address space to another,
I would suspect (but I have no numbers to back this up) that the
overhead would be minimal.
Since it is a DIAGNOSE, you will automatically be
Would you consider a mechanism like IUCV or shared data address spaces
as acceptable methods to send data back and forth between z/VOS guests
and a file server of some sort?
Gary M. Dennis wrote:
Jeff,
What I was trying to determine if there was a way to use ZFS on OpenSolaris
System z as a
Ed and Kris,
I am told this is a vanilla z/VM 5.2.0 system. The only thing changed
is DMSNGP and ACF2/VM. And from what I have seen, it is vanilla. And
from what I have seen, that is it.
The original installer is out today, on Monday we shall have a chat.
And, yes, I did check DEFAULTS LIST
I agree with both Ed and Kris - an unmodified profile does indeed set
PF4 to TABKEY. Quit shooting yourself in the foot. :-)
Regards,
Richard Schuh
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Edward M Martin
Sent: Friday,
It might be my foot, but it is not my bow and arrow.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Schuh, Richard
Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 2:15 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Problem with PEEK Command - update
I
Either would work, but a shared address space would seem to be the most
lightweight approach.
On 4/3/09 3:57 PM, Dave Jones d...@vsoft-software.com wrote:
Would you consider a mechanism like IUCV or shared data address spaces
as acceptable methods to send data back and forth between z/VOS
On Friday, 04/03/2009 at 03:38 EDT, Gary M. Dennis
gary.den...@mantissa.com wrote:
What I was trying to determine if there was a way to use ZFS on
OpenSolaris
System z as a high speed space management vehicle while bypassing
conventional
transport layers? For example, let?s say there
Something along these lines
Guests pull on read
Servers pull on write
Async only
--. .- .-. -.--
Gary Dennis
Mantissa
0 ... living between the zeroes ... 0
On 4/3/09 4:26 PM, Alan Altmark alan_altm...@us.ibm.com wrote:
On Friday, 04/03/2009 at 03:38 EDT, Gary M. Dennis
I'm trying to find the z/VM 5.4 Performance Toolkit references.
I've only been successful in finding the one for 5.3.
Are they in a special place?
Thanks,
Alyce
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Rich Smrcina
Sent:
As it is written. Guests pull from the server on read requests and servers
pull from the guests on write requests.
We seem to be missing an interrupt sequence don¹t we?
Gary
On 4/3/09 6:15 PM, Jeff Savit jsa...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you mean 'pull' or 'poll' on read, or 'push' on write? :-)
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 18:32:10 -0500, Gary M. Dennis gary.den...@mantissa.c
om
wrote:
As it is written. Guests pull from the server on read requests and ser
vers
pull from the guests on write requests.
We seem to be missing an interrupt sequence don't we?
Gary
Okay, got it. Ultra-traditional
No, Alyce. They're in the usual place for IBM VM publications:
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/Shelves/hcsh
Have a good one.
Austin, Alyce (CIV) wrote:
I'm trying to find the z/VM 5.4 Performance Toolkit references.
I've only been successful in finding the one for 5.3.
I will be out of the office starting 04/04/2009 and will not return until
20/04/2009.
I will respond to your message when I return.
Please consider the environment before deciding to print this email.
This email and any attachments are confidential and may be legally privileged
or protected
53 matches
Mail list logo
