thanks Kris, Iam review the manual for details.
Thanks again...for the moment
ATTE
Victor Hugo
BBVA CCR America
2009/8/24 Kris Buelens
> You install the new VM release, can be done under your existing VM.
> Then you take over your own stuff from your old VM and integrate it in the
> new VM.
TCPIP works really nicely using a VSWITCH... at my current location, we've
reduced TCPIP's role to the VM stack only -- and share the VSWITCH with
Linux guests. We can bounce TCPIP without affecting anyone but the VM
sysprogs telnetting in..
I'm a fan of letting the vswitch controllers manage t
On Monday, 08/24/2009 at 02:19 EDT, "Dean, David (I/S)"
wrote:
> We had a situation where one of our OSA links died, but failover did not
> occur. It appeared to us that the zVM was not aware that the card was
actually
> ?down?. This seemed similar to what you were referencing. I could be
I took a slightly different approach to reach a slightly different end,
rather than rely on VMSES/E (and perhaps have to refit locally developed
processes if VMSES/E changes in the future). Over the years a locally
written "COPY2 EXEC" was enhanced to copy local files to the Y-disk, our
T-disk
We had a situation where one of our OSA links died, but failover did not occur.
It appeared to us that the zVM was not aware that the card was actually
"down". This seemed similar to what you were referencing. I could be
wrong.
From: The IBM z/VM Operatin
IFCONFIG doesn't display information about VSWITCHes or their
controllers...so I'm not sure what you're referring to. Could you clarify?
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM Development
> "Dean, David (I/S)"
>
> Yep, and if you have two controllers for failover to two OSA’s this
> is a problem … am I u
Yep, and if you have two controllers for failover to two OSA's this is a
problem ... am I up or am I down?
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of Miguel Delapaz
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 11:33 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.U
Shimon,
Stop the interface with IFCONFIG VSECM DOWN first. It turns out that
IFCONFIG doesn't use the actual device status to decide whether an
interface is UP or DOWN...it considers a device UP if it has usable routes
(i.e. it can actually send traffic). We should probably change that :-)
Reg
On Friday, 08/21/2009 at 12:58 EDT, Jim Bohnsack
wrote:
> I am trying to put on the latest RSU for VM, 0902, and was using
> SERVICE. It complained that there is a PTF for a modified part of RACF
> that needs to be installed and stopped, leaving a SERVICE RESTART file.
> The PTF is VM64247 again
You install the new VM release, can be done under your existing VM.
Then you take over your own stuff from your old VM and integrate it in the
new VM. If you use VM only as host for guests (like Linux), most of this
work is taking over the CP directory definitions of the guests.
The installation
I have a question
.
What is the procedure to follow for update environments z/vm 5.3 to 5.4.
Exists some manual or some RSU for this purpose?
Thanks to all
ATTE
Victor Hugo Ochoa Avila
11 matches
Mail list logo
