On the Linux side, using openssl to generate a x509 server certificate in
/etc/ssl/private/. On the VM side, I get the certificate section, copy to bfs,
and import via the gskkyman utility using an upper-case label for SSLSERV.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
I am out of the office until 21/06/2010.
I am currently out of the office.
If it is urgent then please contact Andy Rowarth for all ITS DiP
questions/activities; Rachel Hill for all ITS Server Managed Services ; Dan
Murphy of the ITS SDCoE for related matters.
Note: This is an automated
On Friday, 06/18/2010 at 09:50 EDT, Mrohs, Ray ray.mr...@usdoj.gov
wrote:
On the Linux side, using openssl to generate a x509 server certificate
in
/etc/ssl/private/. On the VM side, I get the certificate section, copy
to bfs,
and import via the gskkyman utility using an upper-case label
When I Show certificate information it displays Trusted: Yes. The client has
been working in TLS mode, at least for the control channel in pure-ftpd 1.0.21.
But not at all in vsftpd 2.0.7. They are both on the SuSE distribution. I'm
wondering if there is a list of ftp daemons that the VM client
Are there different terms for a minidisk that is defined from 1-END as
opposed to 0-END ?I keep having to clarify which I mean every time I use
the phrase 'full pack minidisk'.
Is there a more succinct way to refer to them separately so I don't have to
parenthetically explain what I mean?
I usually use the following terms, but they are by no means standardized.
0-END is full pack. 1-END is Entire usable disk
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of Scott Rohling
Sent: Friday, June 18, 2010 5:06 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: what
1-end is a minidisk.
0-end is a full pack minidisk.
Jim Hughes
603-271-5586
It is fun to do the impossible.
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Scott Rohling
Sent: Friday, June 18, 2010
On Friday, 06/18/2010 at 05:07 EDT, Scott Rohling
scott.rohl...@gmail.com wrote:
Are there different terms for a minidisk that is defined from 1-END as
opposed
to 0-END ?I keep having to clarify which I mean every time I use the
phrase
'full pack minidisk'.
A fullpack minidisk is
Ok -- darn it. a 1 to END minidisk just doesn't have the same ring to
it as 'full pack'. And it's another syllable to mumble.. ;-)
For Linux guests - my typical recommendation is to use '1 to END minidisks'
rather than get into dividing things any smaller - unless there is a really
On Friday, 06/18/2010 at 03:16 EDT, Mrohs, Ray ray.mr...@usdoj.gov
wrote:
When I Show certificate information it displays Trusted: Yes. The client
has
been working in TLS mode, at least for the control channel in pure-ftpd
1.0.21.
But not at all in vsftpd 2.0.7. They are both on the SuSE
There are some people who use full-pack to refer to either, which is not
really correct or good. (I have been trying for 12+ years to convince the
people here that what they are running is not VPARS. but TPF. It is difficult
to change a culture.) If there is some ingrained term at your site,
Your original question included the phrase:
every time I use the phrase 'full pack minidisk'.
Now you're whining that:
1 to END minidisk just doesn't have the same ring to it as 'full
pack'. And it's another syllable to mumble.. ;-)
Granted, it does take one whole extra syllable, but :
1
right - or late for dinner ;-)
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Schuh, Richard rsc...@visa.com wrote:
There are some people who use full-pack to refer to either, which is
not really correct or good. (I have been trying for 12+ years to convince
the people here that what they are running is
Sense of humors are fussy things, aren't they? ;-)This would be
better with a beer in hand and some peanuts in the shell..
I officially dub it: 12end minidisk and save a few more bytes. Those
non-mainframe muggles will pronounce it 'twelve end minidisk' and we can all
smirk.
Have a
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 11:26 PM, Scott Rohling scott.rohl...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok -- darn it. a 1 to END minidisk just doesn't have the same ring to
it as 'full pack'. And it's another syllable to mumble.. ;-)
Care for my pseudo full-pack terminology maybe? (sounds more
official than
I like that - it does imply 'almost'.. but now I'm going for '12end'.
We'll see if it lasts through the weekend ;-) Tot ziens!
Scott Rohling
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Rob van der Heij rvdh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 11:26 PM, Scott Rohling scott.rohl...@gmail.com
How about: virtual full-pack
Les
Rob van der Heij wrote:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 11:26 PM, Scott Rohling scott.rohl...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok -- darn it. a 1 to END minidisk just doesn't have the same ring to
it as 'full pack'. And it's another syllable to mumble.. ;-)
Care for my pseudo
Others
great big
big honking
near full pack
not full pack
well-nigh full pack
shaved full pack
Regards,
Richard Schuh
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Les
one off full pack ?
Scott Rohling
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Schuh, Richard rsc...@visa.com wrote:
Others
great big
big honking
near full pack
not full pack
well-nigh full pack
shaved full pack
Regards,
Richard Schuh
-Original
Most-pack.
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Scott Rohling scott.rohl...@gmail.comwrote:
one off full pack ?
Scott Rohling
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Schuh, Richard rsc...@visa.com wrote:
Others
great big
big honking
near full pack
not full pack
20 matches
Mail list logo
