Goodbye, Richard, and good luck!
I see I haven't read the IBMVM list since sometime in June. Sorry about t
he belated response to
your retirement.
On Thu, 7 Jul 2011 16:00:43 -0700, Schuh, Richard rsc...@visa.com wrote
:
In just a few minutes, I will be checking out of the Visa hotel (or perh
Hi Wayne, I've used PIPEDDR in 10GB MDISK and work fine, no problem.
Download the new version of here
http://www.vm.ibm.com/download/packages/
It is a great tool of Bruce Hayden.
Regards
ATTE
Victor Hugo Ochoa Avila
BBVA America
Mexico D.F
2011/7/11 Scott Rohling scott.rohl...@gmail.com
I believe I've found a solution to my problem. I've defined 4 small
MDISK overlays on the 17G MDISK; each section can be CMSDDRed. I assume
I was running into some type of CMS file size restriction. I don't
really need to know what the restriction is/was. I can accomplish my
task by splitting
This is what the 6.1 CMS Admin and Planning says:
A single CMS file can contain up to approximately (231-1)-132,000 disk
blocks of data, grouped into as many as 231-1 logical records, all of which
must be on the same minidisk
2**31 = 2147483648So: (2147483648-1) - 132,000 = 2,147,351,647
I'd definitely give PIPEDDR a try! Splitting up a minidisk sounds like
extra steps you don't need to go through... If this is just a one time
thing - I guess do whatever works. PIPEDDR is a lot more flexible though..
Scott Rohling
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 12:13 AM, Victor Ochoa Avila
I installed release 6.1 of z/vm but I don't have enough mod 3's to label as
page packs to match the 5.4 system. Is there any reason that I can't use the
5.4 page packs when I ipl 6.1 on level 1? On z/os, this is what I always do
but on z/vm I usually define new page packs (ie 610pag,
Hi, Anne.
Yes, you can use the old 5.4 page packs when you IPL 6.1 on first level.
Just make usre you add them to 6.1's SYSTEM CONFIG file as cpowned.
DJ
On 07/12/2011 09:38 AM, Crabtree, Anne D wrote:
I installed release 6.1 of z/vm but I don’t have enough mod 3’s to
label as page packs
As long as they're not in use at the same time... no problem at all.
On 07/12/2011 09:38 AM, Crabtree, Anne D wrote:
I installed release 6.1 of z/vm but I don’t have enough mod 3’s to label as page packs
to match the 5.4 system. Is there any reason that I can’t use the 5.4 page packs when
I
On Tuesday, 07/12/2011 at 10:38 EDT, Crabtree, Anne D
anne.d.crabt...@wv.gov wrote:
I installed release 6.1 of z/vm but I don?t have enough mod 3?s to
label as
page packs to match the 5.4 system. Is there any reason that I can?t
use the
5.4 page packs when I ipl 6.1 on level 1? On
Yea, the only thing is that once I add them as CPOWNED on my 6.1 system (which
I'd have to do while up on level 2), I would not be able to ipl it second level
if I had to go back to 5.4. Then what would I do?
Anne D. Crabtree
System Programmer
WV Office of Technology Data Center
1900 Kanawha
How about I bring up 6.1 with the couple of 6.1 page packs I can define and
then add the 5.4 ones on the fly? (attach them to system, define cpowned, etc)
That way they would not be in the system config and I could still bring 6.1 up
on second level if necessary.
Anne D. Crabtree
System
Hi,
This past weekend after an IPL of our z10 to apply RSU 5409 and a VTAM
ptf
I discovered that the reported CPUID in zVM had changed:
CPUID prior to this weedend was : FF01C82620988000
CPUID after IPL was : FF00C82620988000
The difference in the above
Can't you go ahead and put them in your CP OWNED list and as long as they are
not attached to the 2nd level id, you will get an error that they can't be
found but the system will still come up as long as you still have at least one
pack that you are using at 2nd now.
Bob Bates
Off the top of my head isn't that the LPAR identifier? - 00 vs 01 -
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 7:51 AM, James Poirier james.poir...@doit.nh.govwrote:
Hi,
This past weekend after an IPL of our z10 to apply RSU 5409 and a VTAM
ptf
I discovered that the reported CPUID in zVM had changed:
You need to beable to access your 6.1 CF! disk from youe 1st level 5.4
machine to change the SYSTEM CONFIG file back to what you need for the 2nd
level IPL... At least that is what I would do.
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 7:50 AM, Crabtree, Anne D anne.d.crabt...@wv.govwrote:
Yea, the only thing is
That's reasonable. As long as the 5.4 system isn't using them at the same time. That
would be 'bad'.
On 07/12/2011 09:53 AM, Crabtree, Anne D wrote:
How about I bring up 6.1 with the couple of 6.1 page packs I can define and
then add the 5.4 ones on the fly? (attach them to system, define
It appears that it probably is but we made no changes to affect the LPAR
id, also the HMC reports
that the CPUID is 1C8262 and that is what we used to get before this last
IPL.
On 7/12/11 11:02 AM, Tom Huegel tehue...@gmail.com wrote:
Off the top of my head isn't that the LPAR identifier? -
Hi, Anne.
If your second level system is only to maintenance (5.4 or 6.1, no matter)
, you don't need a lot of page packs. Define a virtual machine with 256G
and one mdisk (not full pack) to PAGE, formated with the same volser as
the fullpack.
When IPLed on first level, it can take the full
On Tuesday, 07/12/2011 at 10:56 EDT, James Poirier
james.poir...@doit.nh.gov wrote:
This past weekend after an IPL of our z10 to apply RSU 5409 and a VTAM
ptf
I discovered that the reported CPUID in zVM had changed:
CPUID prior to this weedend was : FF01C82620988000
CPUID
On Tuesday, 07/12/2011 at 11:10 EDT, James Poirier
james.poir...@doit.nh.gov wrote:
It appears that it probably is but we made no changes to affect the
LPAR id,
also the HMC reports
that the CPUID is 1C8262 and that is what we used to get before this
last IPL.
Then you need to contact the
James,
FF01C82620988000
the 01 tells me that your LPAR configuration has this as LPAR 1
FF00C82620988000
the 00 tells me that after you changed the LPAR MODE it was not provided
a number
q cpu
CPUID = FF00B0AF20948000
Munson at zVM2a; T=0.01/0.01 11:08:04
q cpu
CPUID = FF06B0AF20948000
Ok, I think I'll go that route... and as someone else suggested, I can always
access my 6.1 system config from my 5.4 system if I needed to change it...
Anne D. Crabtree
System Programmer
WV Office of Technology Data Center
1900 Kanawha Blvd East
Charleston, WV 25305
(304)558-5914 ext 58292
We just got dinged for apparently having our SMTP server configured for mail
forwarding. We only use it to send email from Performance Monitor to our email
ids. I've looked at the manual and don't see any way to do this. Any
suggestions?
Thanks
Bobby Bauer
Center for Information Technology
Duh, somehow I missed FORWARDMAIL. I'll try this.
Bobby Bauer
Center for Information Technology
National Institutes of Health
Bethesda, MD 20892-5628
301-594-7474
-Original Message-
From: Bauer, Bobby (NIH/CIT) [E]
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 12:10 PM
To: 'The IBM z/VM Operating
As CP can page in SPOOL space, your secondlevel system may even start
without any page pack attached to it. It just depends on how much (and hwo
large) guests you'd start in the secondlevel test system.
2011/7/12 Crabtree, Anne D anne.d.crabt...@wv.gov
Ok, I think I'll go that route... and as
Hum. I'd never noticed that. THANKS.
-- db
DISKACNT profile exec is the same for EREP and OPERSYMP. These 3 machines uses
the same copy, by default ...
Regards,
__
Clovis
26 matches
Mail list logo
