Re: Hi everybody

2010-02-11 Thread Mike Walter
quot; Sent by: "The IBM z/VM Operating System" 02/06/2010 03:13 AM Please respond to "The IBM z/VM Operating System" To IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU cc Subject Re: Hi everybody Long ago (long enough that communication with service machines was via punch files), a

Re: Hi everybody

2010-02-08 Thread Paul Nieman
ating System > [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Scott Rohling > Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 12:07 PM > To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > Subject: Re: Hi everybody > > > > Yes - as you parentheticall

Re: Hi everybody

2010-02-06 Thread David L. Craig
I must be getting old, as I can't remember a single time I accidently told a production system to close up the shop. Maybe it was starting out as an operator in a commercial data center with many paying customers using RJE around the clock, then TSO was added to the mix. But I learned UNIX well b

Re: Hi everybody

2010-02-06 Thread Fran Hensler
No one has yet mentioned the origianl TCPIP package which included sample DIRECT statements for each machine and these samples included CLASS A for each machine. The command to end SMTP is CP SM SMTP SHUTDOWN. I was logged onto the SMTP machine for debugging and I entered the SHUTDOWN command inc

Re: Hi everybody

2010-02-06 Thread Gabe Goldberg
Long ago (long enough that communication with service machines was via punch files), a site had a similar SVM for executing privileged commands on behalf of suitably authorized users. Just for grins, when he needed to shut down the system, one of them did it via command to the SVM. Problem was,

Re: Hi everybody

2010-02-06 Thread Colin Allinson
"James A. Bohnsack" wrote :- > I've accidentally shutdown the main production system "once", > as has every systems programmer with whom I worked or who > worked for me has done. Yes - mine was quite a silly one (although I did not actually press the key). A very many years ago I walked into

Re: Hi everybody

2010-02-05 Thread James A. Bohnsack
ystem [ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Schuh, Richard [rsc...@visa.com] Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 11:38 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: Hi everybody Does anyone give RSCS class A privileges? If so, the probably have to seek = re-employment frequently :) Regards,=20 Ri

Re: Hi everybody

2010-02-05 Thread Schuh, Richard
Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 8:17 AM > To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > Subject: Re: Hi everybody > > On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Phil Smith III > wrote: > > > Anyway, I was doing some maintenance to PRIV. I logged on > and was in a CP READ. Since I didn't wa

Re: Hi everybody

2010-02-05 Thread Schuh, Richard
February 05, 2010 7:46 AM > To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > Subject: Re: Hi everybody > > I've accidentally shutdown the main production system "once", > as has every systems programmer with whom I worked or who > worked for me has done. Only once tho. There are or

Re: Hi everybody

2010-02-05 Thread Rob van der Heij
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Phil Smith III wrote: > Anyway, I was doing some maintenance to PRIV. I logged on and was in a CP > READ. Since I didn't want to take it down mid-command, I had the brilliant > idea of doing an "SMSG * SHUTDOWN" (it was single-threaded, of course). And > then I

Re: Hi everybody

2010-02-05 Thread Phil Smith III
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 10:46 AM, James A. Bohnsack wrote: >I've accidentally shutdown the main production system "once", as has every >systems programmer with whom I worked or who worked for me has done. Only >once tho. Indeed. A very, very long time ago, back at UofW, we had a machine called

Re: Hi everybody

2010-02-05 Thread Scott Rohling
ed to do that". > > Jim > > > From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of > Rich Greenberg [ric...@panix.com] > Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 4:59 PM > To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > Subject: Re: H

Re: Hi everybody

2010-02-05 Thread James A. Bohnsack
ou if you "really wanted to do that". Jim From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Rich Greenberg [ric...@panix.com] Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 4:59 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: Hi everyb

Re: Hi everybody

2010-02-04 Thread Schuh, Richard
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > Subject: Re: Hi everybody > > On: Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 10:34:08AM -0800,Howard Rifkind Wrote: > > } Just curious about you comment in this post about not > liking } to even have user maint have an ?A? class privilege. > > Just 40 year

Re: Hi everybody

2010-02-04 Thread Mike Walter
enberg" Sent by: "The IBM z/VM Operating System" 02/04/2010 03:55 PM Please respond to "The IBM z/VM Operating System" To IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU cc Subject Re: Hi everybody On: Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 10:34:08AM -0800,Howard Rifkind Wrote: } Just curious about you

Re: Hi everybody

2010-02-04 Thread Rich Greenberg
On: Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 10:44:34AM -0800,Schuh, Richard Wrote: } It isn't a matter of trust, it is a matter of minimizing the risk of an accidental SHUTDOWN. Here MAINT does not have class A; however it does have class C. That allows it to use the SET PRIV * +A in order to issue class A comman

Re: Hi everybody

2010-02-04 Thread Ivan Warren
Rich Greenberg wrote: (Yes, there are other commands that are class A only, but can you even name them much less ever used them?) FORCE ? --Ivan

Re: Hi everybody

2010-02-04 Thread Rich Greenberg
On: Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 10:34:08AM -0800,Howard Rifkind Wrote: } Just curious about you comment in this post about not liking } to even have user maint have an ?A? class privilege. Just 40 years of sysprogging with the occasional "O SHIT" happening. About the only thing you lose without clas

Re: Hi everybody

2010-02-04 Thread Schuh, Richard
ne must be very cautious about granting that privilege class. Regards, Richard Schuh From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Scott Rohling Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 12:07 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subje

Re: Hi everybody

2010-02-04 Thread Ivan Warren
Scott Rohling wrote: Yes - as you parenthetically alluded to - allowing SET PRIVCLAS is a feature you have to enable.. some customers see a command like SET PRIVCLAS as a security breaker.. It depends on how strict and how much 'separation of duty' is built into their security policies.

Re: Hi everybody

2010-02-04 Thread Scott Rohling
Yes - as you parenthetically alluded to - allowing SET PRIVCLAS is a feature you have to enable.. some customers see a command like SET PRIVCLAS as a security breaker.. It depends on how strict and how much 'separation of duty' is built into their security policies. Anyone with class C and S

Re: Hi everybody

2010-02-04 Thread zMan
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Schuh, Richard wrote: > It isn't a matter of trust, it is a matter of minimizing the risk of an > accidental SHUTDOWN. Here MAINT does not have class A; however it does have > class C. That allows it to use the SET PRIV * +A in order to issue class A > commands su

Re: Hi everybody

2010-02-04 Thread Marcy Cortes
Yes, that is a very good thing (the SYSTEM operand) We just take Shutdown out of class A and put it in X. The use the set privclass when we actually have to use it (and that's rare since GDPS does our shutting down). Marcy

Re: Hi everybody

2010-02-04 Thread Scott Rohling
- > *From:* The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] *On > Behalf Of *Howard Rifkind > *Sent:* Thursday, February 04, 2010 10:34 AM > > *To:* IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > *Subject:* Re: Hi everybody > >Rich, > > Just curious abou

Re: Hi everybody

2010-02-04 Thread RPN01
The other route you could take, if protection from a shutdown is the goal, change the class of the shutdown to Z or S, and don¹t give this priv to anyone. Use the Set Priv * +Z as part of the shutdown process. -- Robert P. Nix Mayo Foundation.~. RO-OE-5-55 200 First S

Re: Hi everybody

2010-02-04 Thread Schuh, Richard
f Of Howard Rifkind Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 10:34 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: Hi everybody Rich, Just curious about you comment in this post about not liking to even have user maint have an 'A' class privilege. Who then would you suggest having a class A privile

Re: Hi everybody

2010-02-04 Thread Howard Rifkind
all the available privileges as only the z/VM sysprogs use Maint and if you can’t trust them then who? --- On Thu, 2/4/10, Rich Greenberg wrote: From: Rich Greenberg Subject: Re: Hi everybody To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Date: Thursday, February 4, 2010, 12:20 PM On: Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 06:00

Re: Hi everybody

2010-02-04 Thread zMan
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Dave Jones wrote: > Mario, that's an old version of VM you have running there now (as I am sure > you already know...). I don't think it supports the CP SEND CP FTPGEST0 > CLOSE CONS command that Scott has suggested. > It does, but it may not support you-can-alwa

Re: Hi everybody

2010-02-04 Thread Miguel Delapaz
If FTPGEST0 is a z/VM FTP server and your user ID is in the TCP/IP server's OBEY list, you could issue: SMSG FTPGEST0 CLOSECON to close the console. Regards, Miguel Delapaz z/VM Development The IBM z/VM Operating System wrote on 02/04/2010 09:21:25 AM: > The IBM z/VM Operating System > > M

Re: Hi everybody

2010-02-04 Thread Dave Jones
u] En nombre de Dave Jones Enviado el: jueves, 04 de febrero de 2010 18:05 Para: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Asunto: Re: Hi everybody Hi, Mario. First, welcome the the group. This list is an excellent source of information for people new to the z/VM world. What version/level of VM are you running the

Re: Hi everybody

2010-02-04 Thread Rich Greenberg
On: Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 06:00:37PM +0100,Mario Izaguirre Wrote: } I'm login with my user-id (maiz) } send ftpgest0 close cons } } HCPSEC068E SEND command failed; receiver has not authorized sender } } Ready(00068); T=0.01/0.01 17:58:43 You need to add the proper VM privledge class to your ID.

Re: Hi everybody

2010-02-04 Thread Scott Rohling
receiver has not authorized > sender > > Ready(00068); T=0.01/0.01 > 17:58:51 > > > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > > > *Mario Izaguirre* > > Mainframe System Programmer > > Barcelona, Spain > > > > *De:* The IBM z/VM Oper

Re: Hi everybody

2010-02-04 Thread Mario Izaguirre
Enviado el: jueves, 04 de febrero de 2010 18:05 Para: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Asunto: Re: Hi everybody Hi, Mario. First, welcome the the group. This list is an excellent source of information for people new to the z/VM world. What version/level of VM are you running there now? You can very easily

Re: Hi everybody

2010-02-04 Thread Dave Jones
ystem Programmer Barcelona, Spain De: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] En nombre de Scott Rohling Enviado el: jueves, 04 de febrero de 2010 17:53 Para: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Asunto: Re: Hi everybody It's the current console log... and what you see is normal. If l

Re: Hi everybody

2010-02-04 Thread Mario Izaguirre
frame System Programmer Barcelona, Spain De: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] En nombre de Scott Rohling Enviado el: jueves, 04 de febrero de 2010 17:53 Para: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Asunto: Re: Hi everybody It's the current console log... and what you see

Re: Hi everybody

2010-02-04 Thread Scott Rohling
It's the current console log... and what you see is normal. If logged onto it: CLOSE CONS and then TRANSFER PRT ALL TO * If this is another userid: CP SEND CP FTPGEST0 CLOSE CONS CP TRANSFER FTPGETS0 PRT ALL TO * Scott On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Mario Izaguirre wrote: > > > Hi, I’m

Hi everybody

2010-02-04 Thread Mario Izaguirre
Hi, I'm new in this forum, and new in VM/ESA,, I have a question: 1. I see the user-id rdr with command: q prt ftpgest0 all ORIGINID FILE CLASS RECORDS CPY HOLD DATE TIME NAME TYPE DIST FTPGEST0 3115 Q CON 00196180 001 NONE OPEN- 0009 FTPCONSO Ready; T=