pipe question.
I am trying to replace a WAKEUP (IUCVMSG routine with a PIPE STARMSG.
I have the following snippet that seems to work fine except for
capturing the return code from the cp/cms command (XCMD).
Is there a simple fix to this? - Thanks
/* */
trace o
cp set msg iucv
arg xcmd
Tom, if the xcmd stage has a secondary output stream defined,
Pipelines will write the return code from the cp/cms command there.
Does that help?
DJ
On 02/07/2011 02:09 PM, Tom Huegel wrote:
I am trying to replace a WAKEUP (IUCVMSG routine with a PIPE STARMSG.
I have the following snippet
Thanks David, I thought that was the flow, but I didn't get it to work..
Maybe I was just tired. Between shoveling snow and watching the Super Bowl
I'm ready for a vacation.
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 5:53 AM, Dave Jones d...@vsoft-software.com wrote:
Tom, if the xcmd stage has a secondary output
xcmd is no stage, it just is a command that STARMSG will issue just after
its start.
I've got an idea, I don't know if it is easily implemented: pass a command
to STARMSG with a known response. when that response arrives, send it to
some other stream where you uses SPECS to replace it by the
[mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf
Of Tom Huegel
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2011 6:39 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: A little pipe question.
Thanks David, I thought that was the flow, but I didn't get it to work.. Maybe
I was just tired. Between shoveling snow and watching
Schuh, Richard would like to recall the message, A little pipe question..
Oh.I see I completely misread the pipeline specification, Kris. xcmd
was indeed an argument to the starmsg stage.
Have a good one.
DJ
On 02/08/2011 10:23 AM, Kris Buelens wrote:
xcmd is no stage, it just is a command that STARMSG will issue just
after its start.
I've got an idea, I
I am trying to replace a WAKEUP (IUCVMSG routine with a PIPE STARMSG.
I have the following snippet that seems to work fine except for capturing
the return code from the cp/cms command (XCMD).
Is there a simple fix to this? - Thanks
/*
*/
trace
o
cp set msg
iucv
arg
xcmd
'pipe (endchar
?)',
.
_
Jim Hughes
x5586
It is fun to do the impossible. Quote from Walt Disney
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System on behalf of Rob van der Heij
Sent: Sat 8/7/2010 8:48 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: pipe question
It is fun to do the impossible. Quote from Walt Disney
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System on behalf of Rob van der Heij
Sent: Sat 8/7/2010 8:48 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: pipe question
: Sat 8/7/2010 8:48 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: pipe question?
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Hughes, Jim jim.hug...@doit.nh.gov
wrote:
pipe (endchar ?) ,
? guests list a ,
| bld: take 1,
| guests list a ,
? bld: ,
your process follows
You meant
Operating System on behalf of Rob van der Heij
Sent: Sat 8/7/2010 8:48 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: pipe question?
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Hughes, Jim
jim.hug...@doit.nh.gov mailto:jim.hug...@doit.nh.gov wrote:
pipe
: The IBM z/VM Operating System on behalf of Rob van der Heij
Sent: Sat 8/7/2010 8:48 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: pipe question?
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Hughes, Jim jim.hug...@doit.nh.gov
wrote:
pipe (endchar ?) ,
? guests list a ,
| bld: take 1
of
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Victor_Hugo_Ochoa?=
Sent: Fri 8/6/2010 10:31 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: pipe question?
Please somebody can orient to me???
I have the next list in my file guests list A
CMDACNTL
CMDAUTO1
CMDCAL03
I want to take one x one the elements from the list and after it process
AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: pipe question?
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Hughes, Jim jim.hug...@doit.nh.gov wrote:
pipe (endchar ?) ,
? guests list a ,
| bld: take 1,
| guests list a ,
? bld: ,
your process follows
You meant to drop rather than take to leave
Please somebody can orient to me???
I have the next list in my file guests list A
CMDACNTL
CMDAUTO1
CMDCAL03
I want to take one x one the elements from the list and after it process,
I
want to erase it of the list
for example
Take CMDACNTL process this element
and my new list (guests
It really depends on where you are going with all this...
Taking your question literally:
'PIPE FILE GUESTS LIST A | DROP FIRST | GUESTS LIST A'
If your 'process' is within the PIPE then the answer will involve things
like secondary streams, etc. The above simply removes the first line of a
I'm trying to rewrite an old exec into a pipe. While testing I had the pipe
write the output to the console and it's working as expected. I replaced
| console with
| TEMP DATA A1
and it does not create the file. change it to console and it works again.
Am I missing something obvious?
Do i
On Friday, 07/09/2010 at 09:25 EDT, Mark Pace mpac...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to rewrite an old exec into a pipe. While testing I had the
pipe
write the output to the console and it's working as expected. I
replaced
| console with
| TEMP DATA A1
and it does not create the
Thanks, Alan -
That was it.
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Alan Altmark alan_altm...@us.ibm.comwrote:
On Friday, 07/09/2010 at 09:25 EDT, Mark Pace mpac...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to rewrite an old exec into a pipe. While testing I had the
pipe
write the output to the console and
...@gmail.com
Subject: Pipe question
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
I'm trying to rewrite an old exec into a pipe. While testing I had the pipe
write the output to the console and it's working as expected. I replaced
| console with
| TEMP DATA A1
and it does not create the file. change
Mark,
Try using instead of
Sent from my blackberry
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Sent: Fri Jul 09 09:25:25 2010
Subject: Pipe question
I'm trying to rewrite an old exec
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Mark Pace mpac...@gmail.com wrote:
and it does not create the file. change it to console and it works again.
Am I missing something obvious?
As Alan points out, you need to append rather than replace the file.
But since it is Friday, you might learn a bit of
Thanks, Rob -
After years and years of ignoring Pipes, I decided this week I was going to
learn how to use them. I found some excellent documentation, thanks to you
and others, and have dived head first into the pool. But even with the
Authors Edition, and Pipelines Visualized, I'm still
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 5:06 PM, Mark Pace mpac...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks, Rob -
After years and years of ignoring Pipes, I decided this week I was going to
learn how to use them. I found some excellent documentation, thanks to you
and others, and have dived head first into the pool. But
I signed up for CMSPIP-L yesterday. Haven't seen any traffic on it yet.
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Rob van der Heij rvdh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 5:06 PM, Mark Pace mpac...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks, Rob -
After years and years of ignoring Pipes, I decided this week I
You might have a look at our TCVM2 selfstudy course for an easy start
http://www.vm.ibm.com/download/packages/descript.cgi?TCVM2
2010/7/9 Mark Pace mpac...@gmail.com
Thanks, Rob -
After years and years of ignoring Pipes, I decided this week I was going to
learn how to use them. I found some
!)
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU wrote on 07/09/2010
09:34:23 AM:
From: Mark Pace mpac...@gmail.com
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Date: 07/09/2010 09:34 AM
Subject: Re: Pipe question
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
I signed up for CMSPIP-L
All,
I am not familiar with pipes...and would like some information on the
following:
'PIPE (stagesep | endchar ?) ',
' ' MrxFile ' |',
'NLOCATE 14-15 /02/ |', /* In columns 14 15 locate 02
*/
'CHANGE 14-15 /03/02/ |',/* In columns 14 15 change 03/02
*/
'
On Friday, 12/11/2009 at 02:25 EST, Tracy, David
david.tr...@nielsen.com wrote:
All,
I am not familiar with pipes...and would like some information on the
following:
'PIPE (stagesep | endchar ?) ',
' ' MrxFile ' |',
'NLOCATE 14-15 /02/ |', /* In columns 14 15 locate 02
*/
'
Subject: Re: Pipe Question
Yes -- anything with 02 in cols 14-15 is tossed out (NLOCATE) --
everything else falls thru to the subsequent changes. Looks like it's
decrementing the field for values 03-06.
Scott
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Tracy, David david.tr...@nielsen.com
wrote:
All
Is it possible to test the return code for EACH CP command as partially
shown above :
PIPE LITERAL C000 c001 c002 c003 ! split ! specs /vary off/ 1 W1 NW ! CP
!
LITERAL RC ! CONSOLE
and if a RC/=0 straight to execute a PIPMOD STOP to live the PIPE ?
I have the default PIPE environment.
Alain
: 11/04/2009 02:15 PM
Subject:PIPE question about RC
Sent by:The IBM
: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Alain Benveniste
Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2009 11:15 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: PIPE question about RC
Is it possible to test the return code for EACH CP command as
partially shown above :
PIPE
/2009
11:27:12 AM:
From: Doug Breneman/Endicott/i...@ibmus
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Date: 11/04/2009 11:28 AM
Subject: Re: PIPE question about RC
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Alain,
You can use another stream and put a label on the CP stage. The
return
I am trying to build a pipe to do the following:
1. copy records from a stem into a file
2. append an existing file after the above file
I don't seem to be having any success with it and would appreciate any
good example or some direction.
Thanks in advance
Lionel B. Dyck,
How about:
'PIPE',
'| STEM x',
'| APPEND FILE NAME A',
'| OUT FILE A'
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU wrote on 04/15/2008
12:43:51 PM:
I am trying to build a pipe to do the following:
1. copy records from a stem
delete this e-mail and
any attachments without reading, forwarding or saving them. Thank you.
From:
Miguel Delapaz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Date:
04/15/2008 12:56 PM
Subject:
Re: pipe question
How about:
'PIPE',
'| STEM x',
'| APPEND FILE NAME A',
'| OUT FILE A'
Regards
Ooo ooo, Mr. Cah-terr!
/* REXX */
'PIPE STEM MYSTEM. | FIRST FILE A | SECOND FILE A'
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 3:43 PM, Lionel B. Dyck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I am trying to build a pipe to do the following:
1. copy records from a stem into a file
2. append an existing file after the
:48 -0400
From: Richard Troth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: pipe question
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Ooo ooo, Mr. Cah-terr!
/* REXX */
'PIPE STEM MYSTEM. | FIRST FILE A | SECOND FILE
A'
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 3:43 PM, Lionel B. Dyck
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Operating System
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Troth
Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2008 1:01 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: pipe question
Ooo ooo, Mr. Cah-terr!
/* REXX */
'PIPE STEM
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:10 PM, Lionel B. Dyck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks - that worked and I learned something new. I wasn't aware of the
APPEND (must have over looked it)
You might also step into multi-stream plumbing with this example:
PIPE (end \)
\ stem x.
| i: fanin
|
My location notwithstanding, English IS my mother tongue,
not a second language. :-)
Shimon
Original message
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:12:28 -0400
From: Richard Troth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: pipe question
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
I should take an English
@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
07/27/2007 11:48 AM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: pipe question
I like it - this pipe 'thingy' has lots of capability and lots for me to
learn.
?The Force is strong in this one.?
Check
PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lionel B. Dyck
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 11:11 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: pipe question
I'm learning pipes in cms and am trying to issue a 'q n' command and
filter it to only display selected names.
I'm trying this with no success - can someone educate me
I found my answer
I had
pipe cms q n | find ESA | console
I should have coded:
pipe cp q n | find ESA | console
Thanks
Lionel B. Dyck, Consultant/Specialist
Enterprise Platform Services, Mainframe Engineering
KP-IT Enterprise Engineering, Client and Platform Engineering Services
(CAPES)
I'm learning pipes in cms and am trying to issue a 'q n' command and
filter it to only display selected names.
I'm trying this with no success - can someone educate me on what I'm doing
wrong:
pipe cms q n | find ESA | console
Thanks
Lionel B. Dyck, Consultant/Specialist
Enterprise Platform
Subject: pipe question
I'm learning pipes in cms and am trying to issue a 'q n' command and
filter it to only display selected names.
I'm trying this with no success - can someone educate me on what I'm
doing wrong:
pipe cms q n | find ESA | console
Thanks
Find searches for things at the beginning of a record. Locate searches
anywhere within a record. Given that you didn¹t do a split to put the
userids on separate lines, I¹d think that ³pipe cms q n | locate /ESA/ |
console² would work better.
Also, q n is a CP command, not a CMS, so actually,
.
RPN01 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
07/27/2007 11:20 AM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: pipe question
Find searches for things at the beginning
Of Lionel B. Dyck
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 2:22 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: pipe question
I like it - this pipe 'thingy' has lots of capability and lots for me to
learn.
Thanks
_
Lionel B. Dyck, Consultant/Specialist
Enterprise Platform Services, Mainframe
I like it - this pipe 'thingy' has lots of capability and lots for me to
learn.
The Force is strong in this one.
Check out Melinda Varian's paper Plumbing the Internet if you want to
see an example of Pipes making *really* killer stuff happen.
AIT Mainframe Technical Support
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(319)-355-7824
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lionel B. Dyck
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 1:22 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: pipe
There's a treasure trove (including that paper) at
http://vm.marist.edu/~pipeline
Marty
_
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lionel B. Dyck
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 4:18 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: pipe
. Thank you.
David Boyes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
07/27/2007 11:48 AM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: pipe question
I like it - this pipe 'thingy
Google Melinda Varian
Regards,
Richard Schuh
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lionel B. Dyck
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 1:18 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: pipe question
Where might one find
http://www.princeton.edu/~melinda
Also contains many useful facts about the square of the hypotenuse, and birds.
-- db
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System on behalf of Lionel B. Dyck
Sent: Fri 7/27/2007 4:17 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: pipe question
If they *really* want to get rid of
the 'DASD cuu DETACHED' message, the
following update to DMSARE will do the
trick. For the most part, I like getting
the message -- it verifies that the
disk was detached.
./ I 0237 $ 02375000 5000
DIAGMSG2 MDC CL24' ' Detach Command
Response Area
Tom Heugel said:
Too much .. thanks to everyone that had something to add.
I think I'll just write up a requirement for IBM to add a QUIET option
to
all commands.. ie REL Z (DET QUIET
While it doesn't address this particular issue (the fact that RELEASE
doesn't trap the CP response to a CP
.
Alan Altmark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
07/12/2006 08:40 AM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: a really little pipe question
Tom Heugel said:
Too
Title: RE: a really little pipe question
Mike,
You hit the nail when you said 'Kind'a nice to have' because it is easy to code around.
It would have been really nice to have had it 35 years ago then I wouldn't have had to code around it for all that time. Another 'nice to have' would
On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 09:05:14 -0500, Mike Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
If Tom really,
REALLY wants a QUIET option, he could always spend some time getting u
p
close and personal with DMSARE ASSEMBLE to build and implement a local
modification.
I'd certainly like to get up close and personal
On Wednesday, 07/12/2006 at 09:05 EST, Mike Walter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
?! ... How would an ADDED option supported by IBM break *existing* apps?
Sorry to confuse. I thought I was saying that considering RELEASE to be
broken and that it needs fixing is a non-starter. Changing RELEASE to
Not to nitpick, but this assumes that the user's IMSG setting was ON
prior to executing the EXEC.
Personally I don't like to make that assumption when coding something
for public use.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about just setting IMSG OFF before the release...
Something like this:
CP SET
little pipe question
Not to nitpick, but this assumes that the user's IMSG setting was ON
prior to executing the EXEC.
Personally I don't like to make that assumption when coding something
for public use.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about just setting IMSG OFF before the release...
Something like
Richard Feldman (WFF)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating
System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
07/11/2006 02:50 PM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: a really little pipe question
Never
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: a really little pipe
question
Never assume:'Pipe CP Q SET | split at ','
On 7/7/06, Kris Buelens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Only for a R/W disk, a RELEASE should better be done before a DETACH, it
gives CMS a chance to write anything it still should.
Before we make people think CMS is doing lazy write just as Linux:
there is not any data still waiting to be written
How about just setting IMSG OFF before
the release...
Something like this:
CP SET IMSG OFF
RELEASE X ( DET
CP SET IMSG ON
Great idea and it was staring us in the face all the time. I've got a RELL
exec, probably similiar to the favorite routine that Marty mentioned
yesterday, that I've used for 20+ years. It's always been a minor irritant
that I'd see DASD cuu DETACHED IMSG.
Jim
At 06:53 AM 7/7/2006, you
Title: a really little pipe question
Is there a PIPE way to issue CMS command 'REL Z (DET' as one command?
I have no problem doing 'CMS REL Z' and then 'CP DET 999'.
But it would be nice to do the REL (DET as one.
__
ella
Title: a really little pipe question
Any CMS
command, REL fm (DET included, can be issued by a Pipe.
Regards,
Richard Schuh
-Original
Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Huegel,
Thomas
Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 9:30
AM
Title: a really little pipe question
pipe literal rel z (det | cms
Should do it.
Regards,John Imholte
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Huegel,
ThomasSent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 12:30 PMTo:
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDUSubject: a really little pipe
pipe cms rel i (det
DASD 0303 DETACHED
Ready; T=0.01/0.01 12:36:14
Jim
At 12:30 PM 7/6/2006, you wrote:
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--_=_NextPart_001_01C6A119.7A6EC8B2
X-EC0D2A8E-5CB7-4969-9C36-46D859D137BE-PartID:
B6ED914A-F8C1-4585-AA4F-78D88A6C0AB9
On Thursday, 07/06/2006 at 11:30 EST, Huegel, Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Is there a PIPE way to issue CMS command 'REL Z (DET' as one command?
I have no problem doing 'CMS REL Z' and then 'CP DET 999'.
But it would be nice to do the REL (DET as one.
A bit confused, am I. The command
Title: RE: a really little pipe question
I guess either I wasn't clear or I hadn't engaged all of the brain cells.
The 'REL Z (DET' of course works fine, the real question is that when doing the REL DET as one command I get the console message ..
DASD 01DB DETACHED
But when doing them
Huegel, Thomas wrote:
I guess either I wasn't clear or I hadn't engaged all of the brain cells.
The 'REL Z (DET' of course works fine, the real question is that when
doing the REL DET as one command I get the console message ..
DASD 01DB DETACHED
But when doing them individually I don't
If you don't want to examine the messages, use HOLE instead of STEM.
Brian Nielsen
On Thu, 6 Jul 2006 12:03:06 -0500, Huegel, Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I guess either I wasn't clear or I hadn't engaged all of the brain cells
.
The 'REL Z (DET' of course works fine, the real question is
PROTECTED]
On
=Behalf Of Brian Nielsen
=Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 1:19 PM
=To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
=Subject: Re: a really little pipe question
=
=If you don't want to examine the messages, use HOLE instead of STEM.
=
=Brian Nielsen
=
=On Thu, 6 Jul 2006 12:03:06 -0500, Huegel, Thomas [EMAIL
=To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
=Subject: Re: a really little pipe question
=
=If you don't want to examine the messages, use HOLE instead of STEM.
=
=Brian Nielsen
=
=On Thu, 6 Jul 2006 12:03:06 -0500, Huegel, Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
=wrote:
=
=I guess either I wasn't clear or I hadn't engaged all
On Thursday, 07/06/2006 at 01:23 AST, Hughes, Jim - OIT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting.
PIPE literal RELEASE X | append literal CP DETACH 120 | command | hole
I still see the cp dasd detach message. If I run the CP DEATCH command
by itself, I do not see the dasd detach message.
On Jul 6, 2006, at 10:58 AM, Alan Altmark wrote:
Now that the requirement has become clear (get rid of pesky
messages), I
say: Try VMLINK instead.
EXEC VMLINK CHUCKIE 123 (PUSH .FM
if rc = 0 then pull . . filemode .
EXEC VMLINK CHUCKIE 123 (POP
VMLINK (PUSH and (POP are *great* for
Most of the time there is not even a need for a HOLE stage.
HOLE is doing work: it is eating records, only the writing is skipped.
When HOLE is ommitted the stage to its right doesn't even try to write
records. Next point: never use the CMS stage, use COMMAND instead if you
want to be sure of
Title: RE: a really little pipe question
Everyone has been very helpfull.
Thanks
And now for the 'BUT..'
'REL x (DET' is so nice because I don't need to know the v-address of the disk I am detaching.
I'll survive though.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kris Buelens
Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 12:45 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: a really little pipe question
Most of the time there is not even a need for a HOLE stage.
HOLE is doing work: it is eating records, only the writing is skipped.
When HOLE
|...
Regards,
Richard Schuh
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Harding, Mike
Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 1:54 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject:Re: a really little pipe question
Coding it as two pipelines
Wouldn't a simple 'PIPE command RELEASE X | hole | append CP DET
120 | hole' be more straightforward? Yes, it has 2 holes vs 1 spec,
but I would guess that they would be faster; however, overhead would
...
Even this pipe this not guarantee the execution order, the only thing you
say here
87 matches
Mail list logo
