Re: REXEC and RXAGENT1

2011-07-21 Thread Kris Buelens
The problem with SET SECUSER is that it changes to who messages are delivered: If you issue SET SECUSER REXECD MAINT messages sent to REXECD are directly delivered to MAINT. REXECD runs a program that intercept messages, but when they are delivered to MAINT When using SET OBSERVER such message

Re: REXEC and RXAGENT1

2011-07-20 Thread Tom Duerbusch
After a restart of TCPIP, yep, I got that. I have too frequent of restarts. 06:00:37 DTCIPI030W STARTANEWLIFE: VICTIM REXECD, REASON RESTARTING YO BEEN RESTARTED 06:00:37 AUTO LOGON *** REXECD USERS = 60BY TCPIP

Re: REXEC and RXAGENT1

2011-07-20 Thread Alan Altmark
On Wednesday, 07/20/2011 at 10:18 EDT, Tom Duerbusch duerbus...@stlouiscity.com wrote: My manuals (z/VM 5.2) do not show a method of recycling REXECD using the OBEYFILE command. It does show it for about a dozen other servers, but not for REXECD. Searching the archives, I found very

Re: REXEC and RXAGENT1

2011-07-20 Thread Tom Duerbusch
Thanks Alan I was somewhat confused with the Planning and Customization manual, with the section: Starting and Stopping TCP/IP Servers It lists many of the servers and how to stop them, usually with SMSG. It didn't list REXECD which was part of my questioning Kris' post. Apparently, I was in

Re: REXEC and RXAGENT1

2011-07-18 Thread Tom Duerbusch
When I reread Step 2 Yep, it does say a list of tags, it's not meant to be a sample entry. Now, I'm getting somewhere... I copied the entries from the IBM DTCPARMS. Now, things are being tried, at least. 15:14:43 AUTO LOGON *** REXECD USERS = 62BY TCPMAINT

Re: REXEC and RXAGENT1

2011-07-18 Thread Tom Duerbusch
OK, that makes sense to what I'm seeing now. I never got into using OBEYFILE. Back in the early '90s when VM first got IP, everytime I used OBEYFILE, I wiped out things that I didn't intend to. Never went back to it again. I never caught on to which groups of statements were considered packets

Re: REXEC and RXAGENT1

2011-07-15 Thread Alan Altmark
On Friday, 07/15/2011 at 03:43 EDT, Tom Duerbusch duerbus...@stlouiscity.com wrote: I'm having a brain check. I've enabled REXEC which is working well. And I thing I enabled the server machines RXAGENT1 and RXAGENT2. How I read the documentation, both these agent machines should fire up

Re: REXEC and RXAGENT1

2011-07-15 Thread Scott Rohling
Only RXAGENT1 is supplied .. which makes me then wonder if these agents are built as they should be -- doing a LINK REXECD 191 191 RR for their A disk, etc? Did you model RXAGENT2 on 1? What you show seems correct.. so searching for clues :) Does the REXECD console show it is attempting

Re: REXEC and RXAGENT1

2011-07-15 Thread Tom Duerbusch
I duplicated the RXAGENT1 to make the RXAGENT2 in the directory and added the info in the DTCPARMS. They do have the LINK REXECD 191 191 RR in the directory. When I force REXECD, TCPIP automatically brings it back up. No attempt is made to bring up the agents. The only problem I have with

Re: REXEC and RXAGENT1

2011-07-15 Thread Alan Altmark
On Friday, 07/15/2011 at 04:42 EDT, Tom Duerbusch duerbus...@stlouiscity.com wrote: This is what I get with debug on: rexec -d -l guest -p guest 205.235.227.74 cp ind REXEC Level 520, Internal version id MT04091 parms is -d -l guest -p guest 205.235.227.74 ind Not seeing TCPRUN output

Re: REXEC and RXAGENT1

2011-07-15 Thread Scott Rohling
re: using particular user .. yes - it would be much more efficient to do the list of commands in a REXX script on the host rather than issuing 'rexec' for each, if that's all the client is doing. Ideally - a single command (pass parms to effect behavior) is all you want to issue with the

Re: REXEC and RXAGENT1

2011-07-15 Thread Tom Duerbusch
OK, got it. For REXECD: 'Access 198 D' 'Access 591 E' 'Access 592 F' QUEUE EXEC TCPRUN (DEBUG TCPRUN DEBUG: TCPRUN Level = 520 TIME IS 15:55:07 CDT FRIDAY 07/15/11

Re: REXEC and RXAGENT1

2011-07-15 Thread Scott Rohling
Which DTCPARMS are you updating?Is a 'lower level' one perhaps overriding?The order is userid, nodeid, SYSTEM, and lastly IBM DTCPARMS which should not be touched. Scott Rohling On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Tom Duerbusch duerbus...@stlouiscity.comwrote: OK, got it. For REXECD:

Re: REXEC and RXAGENT1

2011-07-15 Thread Tom Duerbusch
I only have two of them, SYSTEM and IBM. I'm updating SYSTEM. It is on the D drive for user REXECD which is above the E drive where the IBM is. But that got me looking at the IBM on. That set of parms are different then what is on the SYSTEM on. The subset of the IBM one is: :nick.REXECD

Re: REXEC and RXAGENT1

2011-07-15 Thread Scott Rohling
Hmmph.. we didn't have REXECD enabled on my test system -- so I did so .. and added the :nick.REXECD tag with Anonymous.YES to SYSTEM DTCPARMS. What I see on a debug is much like yours - but also with this: +++ Lookup_Details.OUT $ParmFile_Serve = IBM DTCPARMS E1 $ParmFile_Class = IBM

Re: REXEC and RXAGENT1

2011-07-15 Thread Mike Walter
: REXEC and RXAGENT1 I'm having a brain check. I've enabled REXEC which is working well. And I thing I enabled the server machines RXAGENT1 and RXAGENT2. How I read the documentation, both these agent machines should fire up when the REXECD server is started. My agent machines don't automatically