On Tuesday, 10/30/2007 at 09:16 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Alan... We do have TSA and do have GDPS set up but the mirrored
volume
is 140 miles away via XRC. Would this still work?
Sorry, no. TSA does not support the XRC connections managed by GDPS - it
only deals with PPRC
Andy,
That's probably going to depend upon what lives on 9DA1. If it's a root
filesystem or (gasp) a swap disk, then it's probably fair to say Linux
may throw in the towel. But the z/VM messages don't tell the whole
story, /var/log/messages may have more info. But as I say, if it's the
Rich -
Thanks for replying, In zLinux is there away to build tolerance
like any setting to say try 'x' amount of times before taking the error or
is that all under the covers?
Thanks
Andy
Internet: Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU wrote
So I take it the systems come bace(recovery) until another hit is taken?
Mace
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 2:17 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: zLinux
Actually with a hardware error like that, the z/VM messages tell most of
the story (I misspoke) and z/VM is your best bet at recovery. It should
handle the error condition better than Linux will (assuming you are
using minidisks).
Fixing your IFCC problem is the quickest route to a cure.
itself hasn't complained of any problems has it??
Mace
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 2:17 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: zLinux question
Rich
Note also that erep may have information that would be useful in diagnosing
the problem. Get into the erep manual and figure out how to get the
information its hoarding; give it to your systems or hardware people...
--
.~.Robert P. Nix Mayo Foundation
/V\RO-OE-5-55
Larry -
Im missing something we dont share these packs/dasd with any MVS
system so what log am I checking?
Thanks
Andy
Internet: Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU wrote on
10/30/2007 02:32:25 PM:
Dumb question , I assuming the packs can
Thanks Robert But we already went down this route as I explained we know
it was a hardware hit to a brocade device. That really wasnt my question
we were told within a few minutes the chip'ds came back VM stayed up. But
zLinux crashed on the VM system. Those of course involved with the chip'd
Is this an FCP device? I wonder if this is an MIH problem.
To the group: Are there special MIH settings required for FCP devices?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Robert But we already went down this route as I explained we know
it was a hardware hit to a brocade device. That really wasnt my
Rich -
Sorry what is an FCP device? They are DASD IBM DS8300 or DS8000
type device in XRC mode. We have MIH set for 2:30 for them and was
confirmed to be correct with our hardware person.
Andy
Internet: Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 7:15 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Robert But we already went down this route as I explained we know
it was a hardware hit to a brocade device. That really wasnt my question
we were told within a few minutes the chip'ds came back
So are the devices being accessed in 3390 mode? If so then they are not
FCP devices.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rich -
Sorry what is an FCP device? They are DASD IBM DS8300 or DS8000
type device in XRC mode. We have MIH set for 2:30 for them and was
confirmed to be correct with our
Rich - yes in 3390-3 emulation.
Andy
Internet: Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU wrote on
10/30/2007 08:02:38 PM:
So are the devices being accessed in 3390 mode? If so then they are not
FCP devices.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rich -
Thanks Alan... We do have TSA and do have GDPS set up but the mirrored
volume is 140 miles away via XRC. Would this still work?
Andy
Internet: Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU wrote on
10/30/2007 08:58:54 PM:
On Tuesday, 10/30/2007 at 07:16 EDT,
On Tuesday, 10/30/2007 at 07:16 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Robert But we already went down this route as I explained we know
it was a hardware hit to a brocade device. That really wasnt my question
we were told within a few minutes the chip'ds came back VM stayed up.
But
zLinux
16 matches
Mail list logo