) by the responses sent to other systems.
Regards,
Richard Schuh
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of Tom Huegel
Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 7:04 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: SFS and CP
: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 6:48 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: SFS and CP Question
On Wednesday, 11/11/2009 at 05:54 EST, Schuh, Richard
rsc...@visa.com
wrote:
Might not work - FOR is a legitimate abbreviation of the CP FOrward
command.
Not any more it isn't. When
On Thursday, 11/12/2009 at 12:07 EST, Schuh, Richard rsc...@visa.com
wrote:
So it depends on the release of VM. Anyone running a release older than
5.3
will have a problem. So much for backward compatibility.
As to the RSCS CRI, do you mean that your programs using the CRI didn't
spell out
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: SFS and CP Question
On Thursday, 11/12/2009 at 12:07 EST, Schuh, Richard rsc...@visa.com
wrote:
So it depends on the release of VM. Anyone running a release older than
5.3
will have a problem. So much for backward compatibility.
As to the RSCS
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Alan Altmark
Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 10:08 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: SFS and CP Question
On Thursday, 11/12/2009 at 12:07 EST, Schuh, Richard
rsc
No, I mean that when sending a command to a different node, the RSCS CRI
acts exactly like the FOR command. Instead of capturing the response and
returning it with the CRI headings, it gives the user an immediate rc=0
and allows the responses to be returned as asynchronous messages from
the other
)
Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 12:29 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: SFS and CP Question
No, I mean that when sending a command to a different node, the RSCS
CRI acts exactly like the FOR command. Instead of capturing the
response and returning it with the CRI headings
Anybody know of a way to send a DETACH command to a disconnected guest such as
VMSERVR or OSASF. They have an erroneous LINK, no access, that I would like to
detach without logging onto to them or cycling them.
Thank you,
Scott R Wandschneider
Senior Systems Programmer|| Infocrossing, a Wipro
.
-- C.S. Lewis
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of Wandschneider, Scott
Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 14:19
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: [IBMVM] SFS and CP Question
Anybody know of a way to send a DETACH
Subject: [IBMVM] SFS and CP Question
Anybody know of a way to send a DETACH command to a disconnected guest such
as VMSERVR or OSASF. They have an erroneous LINK, no access, that I would
like to detach without logging onto to them or cycling them.
Thank you,
Scott R Wandschneider
Senior Systems
@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: SFS and CP Question
CP SEND CP VMSERVR DETACH xxx. You need to be the secondary user or have
privilege class C.
Dennis
Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its
@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: SFS and CP Question
or CP FOR VMSERVER CMD DET
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 4:25 PM, O'Brien, Dennis L
dennis.l.o'br...@bankofamerica.commailto:dennis.l.o%27br...@bankofamerica.com
wrote:
CP SEND CP VMSERVR DETACH xxx. You need to be the secondary user or have
privilege
Hi, Scott.
Do the following:
1) set yourself up as a secondary user of VMSERVR and/or OSASF:
SET SECUSER VMSERVR MAINT (if your logged in as MAINT)
2) tell the guest to do the detach:
SEND CP VMSERVR DETACH xxx
DJ
On 11/11/2009 04:19 PM, Wandschneider, Scott wrote:
Anybody know of
On Wednesday, 11/11/2009 at 05:54 EST, Schuh, Richard rsc...@visa.com
wrote:
Might not work - FOR is a legitimate abbreviation of the CP FOrward
command.
Not any more it isn't. When FOR was introduced, the minimum abbreviation
for FORWARD had to change to 'FORW'. (This is an example of why
__FOR__userid__ __ __
__CMD__text__ |
| |_PATH__ _pathid_ _| |_TOKEN__token_value_|
|
| |_*__|
15 matches
Mail list logo
