Yup, that's what I am using.
Regards,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Alan Altmark
Sent: December 11, 2008 5:33 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: TRANS13 , IND$FILE and CA-TPX
On Thursday, 12/11/2008
On Friday, 12/12/2008 at 09:04 EST, Horlick, Michael
michael.horl...@cgi.com wrote:
D4B3290
Yup, that's what I am using.
That's the best logmode there is. But it assumes that the VTAM app
(CA-TPX) is actually going to obey it. I don't think you're going to
resolve this until the question
On Friday, 12/12/2008 at 10:13 EST, Horlick, Michael
michael.horl...@cgi.com wrote:
Actually , it has nothing to do with TPX.
For one virtual terminal (4D0) I changed the Logappl to VM:
Try D4A3290 (it is an SNA logmode, D4B is non-SNA).
It still doesn't work for the client. I am thinking
: December 12, 2008 12:42 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: TRANS13 , IND$FILE and CA-TPX
On Friday, 12/12/2008 at 10:13 EST, Horlick, Michael
michael.horl...@cgi.com wrote:
Actually , it has nothing to do with TPX.
For one virtual terminal (4D0) I changed the Logappl to VM:
Try
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Horlick, Michael
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 2:05 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: TRANS13 , IND$FILE and CA-TPX
D4A3290, no go, gives me:
13:54:44 VTAM: IST663I BIND
for my emulator).
Regards,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Alan Altmark
Sent: December 9, 2008 1:56 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: TRANS13 , IND$FILE and CA-TPX
On Monday, 12/08/2008 at 02:11 EST
On Thursday, 12/11/2008 at 02:31 EST, Horlick, Michael
michael.horl...@cgi.com wrote:
The client is supposed to be getting a new version of their software and
I have been looking at all the DLOGMOD's that I can use for a dialled
terminal. So far, nothing in the IBM ISTINCLM modetab works for
On Monday, 12/08/2008 at 02:11 EST, Horlick, Michael
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For my emulator (myExtra!) it works fine but fails for their emulator.
However,
under SNA it works.
And so I state again for the record: You must gather diagnostic data from
CA-TPX to see the difference in the
PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Horlick, Michael
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 3:18 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: TRANS13 , IND$FILE and CA-TPX
Hello Alan et all,
Just a little update. I created a 24 record file with 1234567890
repeated for 80 characters and asked the client to test
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: TRANS13 , IND$FILE and CA-TPX
Mike,
I just hopped on to TPX (I normally don't go through TPX to access z/VM
... only things that run on z/OS under CICS) and tried a file transfer
here ... it worked without any problem.
My emulator sessions is set
Hello Alan et all,
Just a little update. I created a 24 record file with 1234567890
repeated for 80 characters and asked the client to test.
This time he says the file transfer doesn't issue messages but also
doesn't upload the file to the host. It completes but the CMS file is
not
System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Horlick, Michael
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 2:18 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: TRANS13 , IND$FILE and CA-TPX
Hello Alan et all,
Just a little update. I created a 24 record file with 1234567890 repeated for
80 characters and asked
On Friday, 12/05/2008 at 03:20 EST, Horlick, Michael
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think I have tried different DLOGMOD's (NSX32705) and even asked them
to
configure as a Model 2 but still no go.
I would use D4A3290 to talk to an emulator in an SNA network, but that's
just me. The days of
PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Horlick, Michael
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 3:18 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: TRANS13 , IND$FILE and CA-TPX
Hello Alan et all,
Just a little update. I created a 24 record file with 1234567890
repeated for 80 characters and asked the client to test
05, 2008 03:18 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: TRANS13 , IND$FILE and CA-TPX
Hello Alan et all,
Just a little update. I created a 24 record file with 1234567890
repeated for 80 characters and asked the client to test.
This time he says the file transfer doesn't issue
On Thursday, 12/04/2008 at 02:40 EST, Horlick, Michael
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The client has asked me about TN3270E and claims that the Cisco Router
7505
that he uses for SNA connectivity to the mainframe has TN3270E
installed. I
explained that I don?t think that is an issue (he pointed
, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
12/04/2008 01:40 PM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
TRANS13 , IND$FILE and CA-TPX
Greetings,
My client is still having
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Alan Altmark
Sent: December 4, 2008 3:05 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: TRANS13 , IND$FILE and CA-TPX
On Thursday, 12/04/2008 at 02:40 EST, Horlick, Michael
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The client has asked me about TN3270E and claims
Of Mike Walter
Sent: December 4, 2008 3:15 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: TRANS13 , IND$FILE and CA-TPX
Google turned up:
--snip---
TRANS13 Error Writing File to Host: File Transfer Canceled
Explanation: Host program has detected an error in the data file during
the Send operation.
User
Note that CUT and DFT only matter for real coax. Not applicable to IP
connections.
Do you know the previous LOGMOD entry he was using on SNA? I think you
needed to have extended data streams turned on for IND$FILE to work (and I
think the IP stuff always provides that bit in response to a RSF).
On Thursday, 12/04/2008 at 03:18 EST, Horlick, Michael
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Alan,
Thanks for the info. I do have NOTN3270E specified
Then the problem is not in VM's TN3270E support! :-)
MTU sizes? I have '1500' specified in my PROFILE TCPIP. I'll check with
the client. Is there
21 matches
Mail list logo
