Re: [ilugd] Microsoft Claims Vista Is More Secure Than Linux

2007-07-01 Thread Anand Shankar
I think the discussion would add value by debating on yet another dimension: I think we have had ENOUGH of this vs that OS wars. Migration / adoption of this or that Operating System question is shortly going to be irrelevant at many a places for a variety of valid reasons. However, what is going

Re: [ilugd] Microsoft Claims Vista Is More Secure Than Linux

2007-06-26 Thread Shakthi Kannan
Hi, On 6/26/07, Surjo Das [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you happen to visit any middle class home who have a PC for their entertainment purpose, invariably you will find it loaded with Windows in at least 95% of the cases. Original, authentic, licensed? If they really knew the amount they had

Re: [ilugd] Microsoft Claims Vista Is More Secure Than Linux

2007-06-26 Thread Surjo Das
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rahul Upakare Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 10:21 AM To: The Linux-Delhi mailing list Subject: Re: [ilugd] Microsoft Claims Vista Is More Secure Than Linux Also, if you are familiar with Windows you

Re: [ilugd] Microsoft Claims Vista Is More Secure Than Linux

2007-06-26 Thread Rahul Upakare
On 6/26/07, Surjo Das [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Its not a question of addiction. It's a matter of habit. Gabbar Singh equates to Amjad Khan and not to Amitabh Bachchan what Ram Gopal Varma is trying to do. He's fighting a losing battle. I went OT here. But this is the best example I could

Re: [ilugd] Microsoft Claims Vista Is More Secure Than Linux

2007-06-26 Thread Parthan S R
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Surjo Das wrote: Its not a question of addiction. It's a matter of habit. Gabbar Singh equates to Amjad Khan and not to Amitabh Bachchan what Ram Gopal Varma is trying to do. He's fighting a losing battle. I went OT here. But this is the best

Re: [ilugd] Microsoft Claims Vista Is More Secure Than Linux

2007-06-26 Thread Shakthi Kannan
Hi, On 6/26/07, Surjo Das [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All PC's that are coming out from factories have Vista on them or with a Vista ready sticker. When was the last-time you visited a kitchen in a 5-star hotel in India? My advice is please don't. You will never again eat in 5-star hotels. The

Re: [ilugd] Microsoft Claims Vista Is More Secure Than Linux

2007-06-26 Thread Roshan
--- Shakthi Kannan wrote: When was the last-time you visited a kitchen in a 5-star hotel in India? My advice is please don't. You will never again eat in 5-star hotels. The ambience/cleanliness you see in the restaurant, is not the same in the kitchen. When I visited Delhi for a day, I

Re: [ilugd] Microsoft Claims Vista Is More Secure Than Linux

2007-06-26 Thread Sandip Bhattacharya
Surjo Das wrote: It is just a matter of time. Time changes everything. How much time are we talking of here. Microsoft released Windows 95 in 1995. They predicted that all PC's will be manufactured with pre-loaded Windows. Now we are in 2007. Red Hat came out with their 6.2 version in

Re: [ilugd] Microsoft Claims Vista Is More Secure Than Linux

2007-06-26 Thread Shakthi Kannan
Hi, On 6/26/07, Roshan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: However, there are authorities, that are there to watch-over the 5-star hotels? But, are they doing their job? You will never know. I never knew until I went for a friends' reception at Taj, in Chennai, and saw a 'waiter' licking the ice-cream

Re: [ilugd] Microsoft Claims Vista Is More Secure Than Linux

2007-06-26 Thread das
On Tue, 2007-06-26 at 16:39 +0530, Sandip Bhattacharya wrote: Our aim is not to fight Microsoft. Yeah, that is the point. Don't make a bad father out of MS, and don't make a crybaby out of GNU-Linux (actually, the genealogy of GNU-Linux posits its lineage much before the birth of this bad

Re: [ilugd] Microsoft Claims Vista Is More Secure Than Linux

2007-06-26 Thread Naresh Narang
--- Surjo Das [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have never come across any mission critical applications running on Windows servers. Its mostly UNIX or Linux. Do you have some data from some research or is this because you feel it that way? Regards, --Naresh

Re: [ilugd] Microsoft Claims Vista Is More Secure Than Linux

2007-06-26 Thread Kenneth Gonsalves
On 26-Jun-07, at 7:47 AM, Surjo Das wrote: so you recommend we all shift to vista? I never recommended that we all shift to Vista. It is a matter of choice of every individual user. I am using Vista at home because my wife is familiar only with Windows. I didn't try to convert her

Re: [ilugd] Microsoft Claims Vista Is More Secure Than Linux

2007-06-26 Thread Kenneth Gonsalves
On 26-Jun-07, at 9:13 AM, Surjo Das wrote: community, I feel it's up to companies like Red Hat and Novell to promote the Linux desktop. And there too, they are targeting corporate and not the home segment. IMHO, its up to Red Hat and Novell to promote Linux on the desktop and not

Re: [ilugd] Microsoft Claims Vista Is More Secure Than Linux

2007-06-26 Thread Surjo Das
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Naresh Narang Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 8:46 PM To: The Linux-Delhi mailing list Subject: Re: [ilugd] Microsoft Claims Vista Is More Secure Than Linux I have never come across any mission

Re: [ilugd] Microsoft Claims Vista Is More Secure Than Linux

2007-06-26 Thread Surjo Das
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kenneth Gonsalves Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 9:52 PM To: The Linux-Delhi mailing list Subject: Re: [ilugd] Microsoft Claims Vista Is More Secure Than Linux On 26-Jun-07, at 9:13 AM, Surjo Das

Re: [ilugd] Microsoft Claims Vista Is More Secure Than Linux

2007-06-26 Thread Vikram Ranade
My Father and mother use Linux (FC6) on our home PC with no issues at all. Infact they did not even feel a change from XP. They edit pictures,do mail, internet. I did not have to hand hold them at all. On the other hand several of our managers at work complain endlessly about how it used to work

[ilugd] Microsoft Claims Vista Is More Secure Than Linux

2007-06-25 Thread Lokesh Bhog
During Windows Vista's first six months on the market, Microsoft released four security updates to address 12 total vulnerabilities. In the National Vulnerability Database, the National Institute of Standards (NIST) rated 10 0f these issues as high severity, one as medium, and one as low.

Re: [ilugd] Microsoft Claims Vista Is More Secure Than Linux

2007-06-25 Thread Shakthi Kannan
Hi, On 6/25/07, Lokesh Bhog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: During Windows Vista's first six months on the market, Microsoft released four security updates to address 12 total vulnerabilities ... out of how many undisclosed vulnerabilities? SK -- Shakthi Kannan http://www.shakthimaan.com

Re: [ilugd] Microsoft Claims Vista Is More Secure Than Linux

2007-06-25 Thread Surjo Das
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lokesh Bhog Sent: Monday, June 25, 2007 5:44 PM To: The Linux-Delhi mailing list Subject: [ilugd] Microsoft Claims Vista Is More Secure Than Linux http://news.yahoo.com/s/nf/20070622/bs_nf/53263

Re: [ilugd] Microsoft Claims Vista Is More Secure Than Linux

2007-06-25 Thread Kenneth Gonsalves
On 25-Jun-07, at 8:56 PM, Surjo Das wrote: So what can we conclude from this report ? I have been using Windows Vista Ultimate for the last 4 months and I send my mails from Outlook. I have never faced any issues. I do agree that Linux is an excellent OS but it holds good only

Re: [ilugd] Microsoft Claims Vista Is More Secure Than Linux

2007-06-25 Thread mehul
On 6/25/07, Lokesh Bhog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On the basis of these numbers, Jones concluded that Vista was more secure than its open-source counterpart. http://news.yahoo.com/s/nf/20070622/bs_nf/53263 Besides the point made by Shakti Kannan, how many applications does Vista have and how

Re: [ilugd] Microsoft Claims Vista Is More Secure Than Linux

2007-06-25 Thread Surjo Das
-Original Message- [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kenneth Gonsalves Sent: Monday, June 25, 2007 9:01 PM To: The Linux-Delhi mailing list Subject: Re: [ilugd] Microsoft Claims Vista Is More Secure Than Linux so you recommend we all shift to vista? I never recommended

Re: [ilugd] Microsoft Claims Vista Is More Secure Than Linux

2007-06-25 Thread Parthan S R
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Surjo Das wrote: It is a matter of choice of every individual user. Agreed! :) I am using Vista at home because my wife is familiar only with Windows. I didn't try to convert her to Linux as she has never heard of it. She heard it for the

Re: [ilugd] Microsoft Claims Vista Is More Secure Than Linux

2007-06-25 Thread Surjo Das
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Parthan S R Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 8:42 AM To: The Linux-Delhi mailing list Subject: Re: [ilugd] Microsoft Claims Vista Is More Secure Than Linux I won't accept that people think GNU/Linux

Re: [ilugd] Microsoft Claims Vista Is More Secure Than Linux

2007-06-25 Thread Rahul Upakare
On 6/26/07, Surjo Das [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I never recommended that we all shift to Vista. It is a matter of choice of every individual user. I am using Vista at home because my wife is familiar only with Windows. I didn't try to convert her to Linux as she has never heard of it. She