On Thursday 20 November 2003 23:20, you wrote:
the entire discussion is quite stimulating. two clarifications:
1) one email suggests 128MB or more RAM for the pentium I or 486
clients.
2) another email suggest 128MB ram for *each* client on the server.
(gulp!).
Are you sure? You'll be
the entire discussion is quite stimulating. two clarifications:
1) one email suggests 128MB or more RAM for the pentium I or 486
clients.
2) another email suggest 128MB ram for *each* client on the server.
(gulp!).
other conclusions
1) all agree that bandwidth of the LAN surprisingly not an
hi everybody
We are using LTSP running a setup of more than 100
thin clients.It works fine. We are using mozilla mail
as a mail client.Whenever there is any big attachement
(say ~1 MB) system logged out(This happens with only
the slower machines like P-75 486).
I have tried by increasing VRAM
On Thu, 2003-11-20 at 23:20, LinuxLingam wrote:
the entire discussion is quite stimulating. two clarifications:
1) one email suggests 128MB or more RAM for the pentium I or 486
clients.
32 - 64 MB RAM is suffcient
2) another email suggest 128MB ram for *each* client on the server.
On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 11:11, supreet wrote:
I would love to use thin client terminals made out of pc104 boards.
It would come out smaller than size of a cdrom drive.
Then again it would be chaeper to buy via c3 nano boards or mini-itx
then searching for those mythical pentium 1 and 486's.
On Thu, 2003-11-20 at 23:20, LinuxLingam wrote:
the entire discussion is quite stimulating. two clarifications:
1) one email suggests 128MB or more RAM for the pentium I or 486
clients.
2) another email suggest 128MB ram for *each* client on the server.
(gulp!).
Maybe a wrong sense is
thanks all for your inputs on the LTSP configurations and minimum
specifications. will keep you posted on how it goes.
thanks
:-)
LL
___
ilugd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 11:41, Sudev Barar wrote:
IAC for such server a beefy memory (about
128MB per client is good idea)
per client??? !!!
I have run one 386 machine also but just for curiosity. If you want to
see demo...come over.
sure. where is this? when will be convenient?
:-)
LL
--- Sudev Barar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In fact I was also under this impression but in
actuality it turned out
that using IceWM or KDE made only slight difference
in memory used but
hardly noticeable slowdown. IAC for such server a
beefy memory (about
128MB per client is good idea)
486 runs but can I call that running with full X interface? Would be
interested in getting low down of configurations if some one steps
forward. Got more than few of those machines running as of date on
Netware /DOS.
Regarding 486 running linux. I worked on 486 from 1996-1998 with
On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 20:20, supreet wrote:
Regarding 486 running linux. I worked on 486 from 1996-1998 with
linux/X-windows.
This thing works.
Following Config I used to run:
Intel 486-dx2 66Mhz
8 Mb Ram
Realtek vga card with 256k memory 16 color
With little effort this can
On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 23:53, LinuxLingam wrote:
so the question is, if such a 486 pc, or a pentium I, is connected via
ltsp to an amd athlonxp with redhat8 or 9, with a graphics card that
supports 800x600 24-bit, would it still be able to handle gnome or
kde...? and running openoffice? all
--- LinuxLingam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On
Tue, 2003-11-18 at 20:20, supreet wrote:
Regarding 486 running linux. I worked on 486 from
1996-1998 with
linux/X-windows.
This thing works.
Following Config I used to run:
Intel 486-dx2 66Mhz
8 Mb Ram
Realtek vga card with
On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 10:48, Narsingh Sahu wrote:
When you are thinking of thin client or LTSP kind of
network solution, I would not go for Gnome/KDE at the
client end. Both are heavy and you don't want to run
all the kind of software which come with these two
desktop environment, do you? Yes
On Mon, 2003-11-17 at 09:11, Sudev Barar wrote:
On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 01:36, LinuxLingam wrote:
anyone here on the mailing list with thin-clients [snip]
Did I mention all are old Pii motherboards from nehru place???
old! hello, hello, i use an 'old' pII for my work as well, loaded with
On Mon, 2003-11-17 at 16:12, LinuxLingam wrote:
On Mon, 2003-11-17 at 09:11, Sudev Barar wrote:
On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 01:36, LinuxLingam wrote:
anyone here on the mailing list with thin-clients [snip]
Did I mention all are old Pii motherboards from nehru place???
old! hello,
On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 01:36, LinuxLingam wrote:
dear all,
this is exciting. which thin-client implementation do you recommend, if
you have some experience with any of these:
1) ltsp
2) diet-pc
3) netstation
4) pxes
5) [others]
on a redhat8 acting as the main server.
LTSp
been
dear all,
this is exciting. which thin-client implementation do you recommend, if
you have some experience with any of these:
1) ltsp
2) diet-pc
3) netstation
4) pxes
5) [others]
on a redhat8 acting as the main server.
i recall amitabh and i saw the deployment of ltsp on mandrake(?) at
pune,
18 matches
Mail list logo
