On Thursday 05 Mar 2009, shirish wrote:
> [snip]
> @ Raj Mathur . Its your prerogative to do whatever suing you want to
> for as you my 'persistent combative, militant licensing'
>
> If it was an attempt to intimidate me or an attempt at humor then
> both are unfortunately lost for neither makes se
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Shakthi Kannan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> --- On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:15 PM, shirish wrote:
> | Let's take a very real as well as hypothetical scenario.
> \--
>
> Just out of curiosity, may I ask what license do you use for your
> day-to-day phone/in-person conversation?
E
Hi,
--- On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:15 PM, shirish wrote:
| Let's take a very real as well as hypothetical scenario.
\--
Just out of curiosity, may I ask what license do you use for your
day-to-day phone/in-person conversation?
SK
--
Shakthi Kannan
http://www.shakthimaan.com
___
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:15 PM, shirish wrote:
> Also from what little I understand, these matters are still evolving.
> As Mr. Duggal of Supreme Court says it
>
> "The same case presented the same way to 5 different judges may lead
> to 5 different decisions"
>
> I have my own take in the manner
Reply in-line :-
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 12:17, Raj Mathur wrote:
Hi all,
Apologies for a long long mail well in advance. I usually take
24-48 hours before responding to mails like Raj and Sudhanwa wrote.
Sometimes we do respond in haste :-
> While on the subject, your mail licensing weir
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Raj Mathur wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 Mar 2009, Anupam Jain wrote:
>> The way I see it, foss is all about being "reasonable", and having an
>> appropriate level of respect of other peoples time and effort. The
>> free/cc licenses are meant to allow civilised people to
On Wednesday 04 Mar 2009, Anupam Jain wrote:
> The way I see it, foss is all about being "reasonable", and having an
> appropriate level of respect of other peoples time and effort. The
> free/cc licenses are meant to allow civilised people to use other
> people's content within the boundaries of t
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 1:57 AM, Sudhanwa Jogalekar
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Talking about copyrighted material but a little OT.
>
> On one of the ISO 27001 related mailing lists I am subscribed to,
> where most of the people are auditors, copyrights are given very high
> respect/priority.
>
> If someone s
Hi,
Talking about copyrighted material but a little OT.
On one of the ISO 27001 related mailing lists I am subscribed to,
where most of the people are auditors, copyrights are given very high
respect/priority.
If someone sends some copyrighted material without any proper
permissions from the aut
Reply in-line :-
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 23:51, Linux Lingam wrote:
> Dear shirish,
Dear Linuxlingam
> no need to generate code. Just add static text.
> Like you see in the credits of a movie or tv documentary, a magazine
> colophon, a calendar, and anywhere else where authored works need
> cred
On Sunday 01 Mar 2009, shirish wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 14:18, Linux Lingam
wrote:
> > yes, you do need to mention the three things under each authored
> > work. This is how it works, irrespective of copyright or copyleft
> > or CC. It is tedious, but correct.
> > Your other choice, is to
Dear shirish,
no need to generate code. Just add static text.
Like you see in the credits of a movie or tv documentary, a magazine
colophon, a calendar, and anywhere else where authored works need
credit, copyright, and licensed text.
it's my pleasure to accept your thanks in advance for explaini
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 14:18, Linux Lingam wrote:
> Dear shirish,
>
> yes, you do need to mention the three things under each authored work.
> This is how it works, irrespective of copyright or copyleft or CC.
> It is tedious, but correct.
> Your other choice, is to only use Images in the public-d
Reply in-line :-
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 14:18, Linux Lingam wrote:
> Dear shirish,
Dear Niyam,
> yes, you do need to mention the three things under each authored work.
> This is how it works, irrespective of copyright or copyleft or CC.
> It is tedious, but correct.
> Your other choice, is to on
Dear shirish,
yes, you do need to mention the three things under each authored work.
This is how it works, irrespective of copyright or copyleft or CC.
It is tedious, but correct.
Your other choice, is to only use Images in the public-domain, where
no such restrictions apply, or to seek written pe
Even if you don't want to talk about the license you can at least give
credit to the person(with the name being linked to the flickr photo
page) who has uploaded the photographs, something like "Uploaded by:
XYZ" or "Photo credit: XYZ". Of course, if you were using your own
photos then this discuss
Here's another Day 1 blog post:
http://kbhargava.com/general/freedin-2009.html
Only Day 1, since Kabir was only able to attend Day 1.
Cheers...Kishore
--
party, n.:
A gathering where you meet people who drink
so much you can't even remember their names.
Reply in-line :-
On 28/02/2009, Linux Lingam wrote:
> how to use cc-licensed works:
>
> under the photo or hte authored work, mention three things:
>
> 1. author (who owns the copyright). with the copytight symbol or word,
> used before this.
> 2. the year, date, of the copyright (feb 2009)
> 3.
Hi i could not understand cc-license. Can you explain it?
On 2/28/09, Linux Lingam wrote:
>
> how to use cc-licensed works:
>
> under the photo or hte authored work, mention three things:
>
> 1. author (who owns the copyright). with the copytight symbol or word,
> used before this.
> 2. the year,
how to use cc-licensed works:
under the photo or hte authored work, mention three things:
1. author (who owns the copyright). with the copytight symbol or word,
used before this.
2. the year, date, of the copyright (feb 2009)
3. the cc-license being used, in this case, cc-by-3.0 or whatever. a
br
Reply in-line :-
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 01:20, Linux Lingam wrote:
> dear shirish,
dear Linux Lingam,
> looking at some of those photos and been wondering, how difficult is
> it for an intelligent and experienced foss-professional such as you,
> to adhere to the terms of the most liberal creat
dear shirish,
looking at some of those photos and been wondering, how difficult is
it for an intelligent and experienced foss-professional such as you,
to adhere to the terms of the most liberal creative-commons license,
as detailed here:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/deed.en
as the
Hi all,
I also updated the post a bit.
--
Regards,
Shirish Agarwal
My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com
065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17
_
Hi all,
Kishore said 'Fedora Foundation' but don't want it to be bogged down
by technicalities. He acknowledged the contribution from FSF India as
well as Fedora Project and that was my point.
I actually wanted to write about Shantanu Choudhary's Offline
wikipedia as well but as I don't remember
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Kishore Bhargava
> I didn't actually point to any URL at all, I just clearly mentioned the
> Fedora Project as a supporter of the community and specifically a
> supporter of freed.in/2009.
Wonderful. You made our day :)
--
http://www.gutenberg.net - Fine liter
Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 1:19 PM, shirish wrote:
>
>> http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com/2009/02/25/freedin-day-1/
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Foundation is for historical purposes
> only. I hope Kishore did not actually point out this specific URL.
>
I
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 1:19 PM, shirish wrote:
> http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com/2009/02/25/freedin-day-1/
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Foundation is for historical purposes
only. I hope Kishore did not actually point out this specific URL.
--
http://www.gutenberg.net - Fine literatur
27 matches
Mail list logo
