Not really. My primary desktop system is an iMac G4 17 1.25Ghz, and my most
powerful is a MBP intel i7 Mid-2010 15, yet i use my iMac more than my MBP.
Using PowerPC is never over... And it will never will be. I am keeping all
of my PowerPC machines, and intels too. I am waiting for Apple to go
On Oct 30, 12:48 am, Mystic Prowler coolmar...@gmail.com wrote:
Does anyone have use for really old macs these days? I do. I know this is
off of topic, but oh well.
Maybe to read old, old files and screen shots from the '90s that
modern software cannot convert or even to see and read.
Al
On 2010/10/29 16:06, Mystic Prowler so eloquently wrote:
I understand keeping production of faster and faster processors could be
tough, but look at IBM today! The world's first processor running at
4.6Ghz without being overclocked! And it has 32-cores.
The video and BOINC communities can only
On 29/10/10 22:47PDT, Steven wrote:
And, of course, PowerPC computers had much better names. MacBook sounds like
what a Dell hacked to run OS X should be called, and Mac Pro is even more uninspired.
PowerBook was one of the best product names of all time and I still can't believe that
Apple
hahahaha! I can imagine what will Apple have to say to that! XD
This is a glitch not real. I can imagine what else is going on my
iMac could be a hologram, my iMac could be a remake of the G4 iMAc from the
future with 16million TB of RAM, who knows? not me... XD
--
You received this
Intelbook? I would keep all of the original names. But really, the new names
sound horrible. I really like all of the old names.
To think of it, the box scheme makes no sense anymore.
the Macbook and the Macbook pro should stay there. The air has to be the new
Macbook or iBook or it has to go.
On 30/10/10 09:39PDT, Mystic Prowler wrote:
Intelbook? I would keep all of the original names. But really, the new
names sound horrible. I really like all of the old names.
Like the Power(pc)Book?
To think of it, the box scheme makes no sense anymore.
the Macbook and the Macbook pro should
I mean if Apple moves away from intel and makes it's own processors, this
would cause an uproar in the Windows-intel world. Apple should go to AMD or
make it's own processors.
--
You received this message because you are a member of the iMac Group, a group
for those using Apple iMacs and eMacs.
A quick check with Mactracker says that it's not PCI. The 6100 has either a PDS
slot, or a NuBus slot. Neither of which are compatible with PCI cards. I doubt
that there ever were any wireless cards made for PDS or Nubus.
-Elliott
On Oct 29, 2010, at 9:48 PM, Mystic Prowler wrote:
On 10/30/10 7:07 PM, Mystic Prowler wrote:
I mean if Apple moves away from intel and makes it's own processors,
this would cause an uproar in the Windows-intel world. Apple should go
to AMD or make it's own processors. --
Yeah correct, for instance i bought my amd duron pc in 2000 and it's
On 30/10/10 10:39PDT, Steven wrote:
On Oct 30, 2010, at 12:01 PM, Dennis B. Swaney wrote:
On 30/10/10 09:39PDT, Mystic Prowler wrote:
Intelbook? I would keep all of the original names. But really, the new
names sound horrible. I really like all of the old names.
Like the Power(pc)Book?
On Oct 30, 12:48 am, Mystic Prowler coolmar...@gmail.com wrote:
Does anyone have use for really old macs these days? I do. I know this is
off of topic, but oh well.
My oldest Mac is a PDQ Wallstreet. It's over 12 years old, yet it can
run Tiger (I mostly run OS 9 on it, though). And it's
My oldest machine can't even run Jaguar. My oldest machine is the Powerbook
540c. It has a 33Mhz 68k Motorola 680LC40 processor. This is my VERY fisr
mac with a non-PowerPC processor. Last summer was when I received my first
non- G3-5 based PowerPC 603e machine.
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 2:44 PM,
Let's hope that happens. To be honest, I only want intel to crash and burn
to stop Microsoft in it's tracks.
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Elliott Price callmemrp...@gmail.comwrote:
I've read it's because they wanted to have mac in all the names. It makes
SOME sort of sense, but, I mean,
On Oct 30, 2010, at 1:44 PM, Ashgrove wrote:
My oldest Mac is a PDQ Wallstreet. It's over 12 years old, yet it can
run Tiger (I mostly run OS 9 on it, though). And it's amazingly,
completely usable. You can surf the Web (kudos to Cameron's Classilla
here), send emails, work, watch movies,
On Oct 30, 2010, at 2:49 PM, Mystic Prowler wrote:
Let's hope that happens. To be honest, I only want intel to crash and burn to
stop Microsoft in it's tracks.
Based on Apple's history, that could easily happen. Back in the Motorola days
IBM was Apple's biggest competitor, and after
I agree with steven. I also believe in older computers, and sometimes I
bring in my PB 5300cs for reminders, notes, phone numbers, and song names.
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Steven macintosh.awes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Oct 30, 2010, at 1:44 PM, Ashgrove wrote:
My oldest Mac is a PDQ
On Oct 30, 4:13 pm, Steven macintosh.awes...@gmail.com wrote:
I recently got a PDQ (although for me it is the newest in my old mac
collection) and I was amazed at how useful it is. All of my old Mac laptops
are usable for certain things, and my PowerBook 3400c almost approaches being
useful
Launch the app from the finder, then right-click the icon in the dock and under
Options, select Keep In Dock.
-Elliott
On Oct 30, 2010, at 12:58 PM, Walter Sheluk wrote:
In SnowLeopard is there an more elegant way of placing an application in the
Dock other then dragging it to
Oh, was it? Because that's not how I remember it.
I knew someone would say that.
--
Malcolm
800MHz 17 flat panel iMac running Leopard (1GB RAM, 500GB HD)
--
You received this message because you are a member of the iMac Group, a group
for those using Apple iMacs and eMacs.
The list FAQ is at
Mystic Prowler coolmar...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a feeling of something. Apple is as bad as it was before steve came
back. They have too many product lines, minimizing it's chances of getting
in the cash. One new CEO will rise up and re-innovate the company and remove
the company's many
21 matches
Mail list logo
