I just have a general question regarding patch inclusions. When a
patch is submitted is there a formal review and testing of the patch
prior to inclusion? From what I have been following from this list is
that the process is patches get applied to new/existing bug/feature
requests, bug fixes are pr
Hi Laruence,
I'll try to demonstrate the problem I tried to describe with a script.
The following script is still fails on trunk.
So your fix is not enough.
It make no sense to play with refcounts of zvals allocated on stack.
Probably, the temporary zval needs to be allocated on heap.
Tahnks.
Hi Dmitry,
ah, I see, thanks very much.
in this case, the 5.3 branch should failed too since it also use a
stack zval.
I will make a improved fix soon.. :)
thanks.
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 8:19 PM, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> Hi Laruence,
>
> I'll try to demonstrate the problem I tried to d
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Damien Tournoud wrote:
> Also see https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=55226
>
> Same idea, but for the PDO_sqlite implementation.
>
> Damien
>
Thanks.
I submitted my patch, and commented on both, referring each to the other.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Developme
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/24/2012 10:21 AM, Derick Rethans wrote:
> Hi,
>
> could something be done about the commit spam subjects? It was
> mightly useful to have the paths and the commit messages in there.
The problem here is that you can push multiple changesets at o
On 01/24/2012 03:36 AM, Jason Gerfen wrote:
I just have a general question regarding patch inclusions. When a
patch is submitted is there a formal review and testing of the patch
prior to inclusion? From what I have been following from this list is
that the process is patches get applied to new
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Christopher Jones
wrote:
>
>
> On 01/24/2012 03:36 AM, Jason Gerfen wrote:
>>
>> I just have a general question regarding patch inclusions. When a
>> patch is submitted is there a formal review and testing of the patch
>> prior to inclusion? From what I have been f
Hello,
With some frequency, I find bugs which are not "bogus", so much as they
are reported based on a misunderstanding. Usually this happens for
documentation problems, where someone has misunderstood what the
documentation says, or hasn't read the documentation thoroughly enough.
I'd like
On 01/24/2012 03:11 PM, Justin Martin wrote:
Hello,
With some frequency, I find bugs which are not "bogus", so much as they are
reported based on a misunderstanding. Usually this happens for documentation problems,
where someone has misunderstood what the documentation says, or hasn't read t
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Christopher Jones
wrote:
>
>
> On 01/24/2012 03:11 PM, Justin Martin wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> With some frequency, I find bugs which are not "bogus", so much as they
>> are reported based on a misunderstanding. Usually this happens for
>> documentation problems,
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Paul Dragoonis wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Christopher Jones
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 01/24/2012 03:11 PM, Justin Martin wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> With some frequency, I find bugs which are not "bogus", so much as they
>>> are reported based on a mi
It'd also be nice to see a more receptive approach to bug reports. It's
concerning that so many legitimate bug reports get labelled as bogus for
whatever reason.
On Wednesday, 25 January 2012 at 10:20 AM, Matthew Fonda wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Paul Dragoonis (mailto:dragoo...
On 01/24/2012 03:21 PM, Charlie Somerville wrote:
It'd also be nice to see a more receptive approach to bug
reports. It's concerning that so many legitimate bug reports get
labelled as bogus for whatever reason.
To be 100% clear, this is just a proposed wording change. The bugs
you mention w
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 12:11 AM, Justin Martin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> With some frequency, I find bugs which are not "bogus", so much as they
> are reported based on a misunderstanding. Usually this happens for
> documentation problems, where someone has misunderstood what the
> documentation says,
On Jan 24, 2012, at 3:47 PM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 12:11 AM, Justin Martin wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> With some frequency, I find bugs which are not "bogus", so much as they
>> are reported based on a misunderstanding. Usually this happens for
>> documentation problems,
15 matches
Mail list logo
