On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:33 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
>> But I strongly believe in a threaded base solution for windows. That's
>> the only way to get anywhere close to the performance we can see on
>> other platforms (read: posix).
>
> My experience is that performance differnces between Window
Hi Pierre:
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 08:43:40PM +0100, Pierre Joye wrote:
>
> It does not matter what is the latest VC version. What matters is that
> VC6 is a dead cow and we won't support it anymore, even for the
> current stable, 5.3. And to be honest I don't really care about
> Apache.org's use
Hi!
The filesystem issues are mostly due to what we do in TS mode, way too
much pointless operations, even if the real cache helps a little bit
here (take this comment with a bit of salt: as in delta with the cache
between TS and NTS).
What we do in TS mode with filesystem that could explain t
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> The filesystem issues are mostly due to what we do in TS mode, way too
>> much pointless operations, even if the real cache helps a little bit
>> here (take this comment with a bit of salt: as in delta with the cache
>> between TS and
Hi!
This delta has very little impact on real world apps except those
doing exclusively such ops.
The benchmarks I did suggest otherwise. Real world apps do huge number
of file ops like file_exists(). And while many apps aggressively cache
DB calls and such, filesystem calls are still there.
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Though, of course, maybe I'm wrong - what would you suggest is the problem
> then? I saw similar slowdowns on 1-process benchmarks as on multi-process
> server benchmarks - so I have hard time believing it has anything to do with
> threading
On Tue, 2011-02-01 at 01:04 +0100, Pierre Joye wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:33 PM, Stas Malyshev
> wrote:
>
> >> But I strongly believe in a threaded base solution for windows. That's
> >> the only way to get anywhere close to the performance we can see on
> >> other platforms (read: posi
2011/6/5 Sebastian Bergmann
> Am 05.06.2011 10:59, schrieb Stanislav Malyshev:
> > stas Sun, 05 Jun 2011 08:59:24 +
> >
> > Revision: http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revision&revision=311824
> >
> > Log:
> > This method doesn't seem to be very useful without
Hi!
It is still useful for array | class/interface name. Or?
Not really, since it returned only "array" or "object", while real class
is returned by getClass() and isArray() returns if it's an array. We
could have method that returns class name or "array" if it's an array,
but that'd be d
On 07/19/2011 07:09 PM, Pierre Joye wrote:
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 1:50 AM, Scott MacVicar wrote:
OpenSSL has been FIPS certified, your change has changed this contract and it's
calling back into a Windows API. Has it been reviewed for correctness?
And by the way, the CryptoAPI for the window
On 7/19/2011 5:09 PM, Pierre Joye wrote:
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 1:50 AM, Scott MacVicar wrote:
OpenSSL has been FIPS certified, your change has changed this contract and it's
calling back into a Windows API. Has it been reviewed for correctness?
And by the way, the CryptoAPI for the windows
Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
Add JSON_Serializable interface
Objects implementing JSON_Serializable will have
their ->jsonSerialize() method called
Similar to serialize() and __sleep()
Why should we have special mechanism for JSON? I.e., now we have one for
serialize(), separate one for json, th
hi,
Great thing :)
I wonder if we could not rename then sapi_* and document which SAPI
supports them, instead of using apache_* for fastcgi & co.
Cheers,
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> dmitry Fri, 27 Aug 2010 08:34:44 +
>
> Revis
REMOVE
- Original Message -
From: William A. Rowe Jr. [mailto:wr...@rowe-clan.net]
To: internals@lists.php.net
Sent: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:28:19 -0600
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] svn: /php/php-src/
branches/PHP_5_3/ext/date/php_date.ctrunk/ext/date/php_date.c
On 1/30/2011 10:36
Dmitry:
you might want to review this fix.
let me explain why crash before this fix.
when doing parse_parameter, then convert the object to string by
calling the ce->cast_object,
and passed the same pointer(although there was a separation), to
the cast_object..
then if __toStrin
Hi Laruence,
The attached patch looks wired. The patch on top of it (r323563) makes
it better. However, in my opinion it fixes a common problem just in a
single place. Each call to __toString() that makes "side effects" may
cause the similar problem. It would be great to make a "right" fix in
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> Hi Laruence,
>
> The attached patch looks wired. The patch on top of it (r323563) makes it
> better. However, in my opinion it fixes a common problem just in a single
> place. Each call to __toString() that makes "side effects" may cause the
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Laruence wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
>> Hi Laruence,
>>
>> The attached patch looks wired. The patch on top of it (r323563) makes it
>> better. However, in my opinion it fixes a common problem just in a single
>> place. Each call
On 02/27/2012 12:37 PM, Laruence wrote:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Laruence wrote:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
Hi Laruence,
The attached patch looks wired. The patch on top of it (r323563) makes it
better. However, in my opinion it fixes a common problem just
On Mon, 27 Feb 2012, Laruence wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Laruence wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> >>
> >> The attached patch looks wired. The patch on top of it (r323563) makes it
> >> better. However, in my opinion it fixes a common problem just
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Derick Rethans wrote:
> You can't break extension APIs between 5.4.0 and 5.4.1 either, API
> changes can only into trunk.
And ABI neither.
--
Pierre
@pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mai
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Hannes Magnusson
wrote:
> On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 00:48, Sara Golemon wrote:
>> pollita Wed, 05 May 2010 22:48:14 +
>>
>> Revision: http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revision&revision=299037
>>
>> Log:
>> Add JSON_Serializable inte
Hi!
Add JSON_Serializable interface
Objects implementing JSON_Serializable will have
their ->jsonSerialize() method called
Similar to serialize() and __sleep()
Why should we have special mechanism for JSON? I.e., now we have one for
serialize(), separate one for json, then we'd have separate
Hi!
Initially, this prevents popen_ex from failing when the actual
executable doesn't exist, since "cmd.exe /c c:\foo\bar\xxx.exe" will
*always* successfully start a process. This can be seen in bug
#43327.
Second, is that by having the intermediate process, I'm pretty sure
there's some extra-b
On 09/06/2011 10:45 AM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
Hi!
On 9/6/11 1:24 AM, Andrey Hristov wrote:
no, it's about consistency, which you want. mysqlnd should behave like
libmysql, and it is a test that can test it. What libmysql returns in
filtered in mysqli, mysqli_num_rows() is a direct wrapper around
Hi!
Have you actually checked what libmysql returns??!?
If _you_ just have tried to do it, you might actually find that
libmysql does what mysqlnd did long ago, but mysqli was hiding it.
Here is output from what libmysql does, after removing the following
check from mysqli_api.c:
I checked wh
Hi!
so I think, maybe it's okey for a temporary fix :)
what I mean temporary is, apply this fix to 5.3 and 5.4
Don't apply anything to 5.4 now, please.
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/
(408)454-6900 ext. 227
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Deve
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
>>> so I think, maybe it's okey for a temporary fix :)
>>
>> what I mean temporary is, apply this fix to 5.3 and 5.4
>
>
> Don't apply anything to 5.4 now, please.
Sure, won't do it without your permission. :)
thanks
>
> --
> Stan
On 02/27/2012 12:53 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
Hi!
so I think, maybe it's okey for a temporary fix :)
what I mean temporary is, apply this fix to 5.3 and 5.4
Don't apply anything to 5.4 now, please.
No, we are thinking about the trunk, and "temporary" fix for 5.4 is
delayed.
Thanks. Dmitr
On Mon, February 27, 2012 2:31 am, Laruence wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Dmitry Stogov
> wrote:
>> Hi Laruence,
>>
>> The attached patch looks wired. The patch on top of it (r323563)
>> makes it
>> better. However, in my opinion it fixes a common problem just in a
>> single
>> place.
Out of curiosity, why are you changing it to copy the object for the
result of the cast operation? cast_object should init the result
zval, so why go through the step of copying the starting object to it?
Wouldn't it be easier just to do:
if (Z_OBJ_HANDLER_PP(arg, cast_object)) {
Sent from my iPad
在 2012-2-28，0:10，Anthony Ferrara 写道：
> Out of curiosity, why are you changing it to copy the object for the
> result of the cast operation? cast_object should init the result
> zval, so why go through the step of copying the starting object to
plz look at the final fix： r32356
I initially looked at the final fix when I discovered the issue.
Follow me out on this. This is the current code as-implemented in
r323563:
265 zval *obj;
266 MAKE_STD_ZVAL(obj);
267 if (Z_OBJ_HANDLER_P(*arg, cast_object)(*arg, obj, type
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 1:10 AM, Anthony Ferrara wrote:
> I initially looked at the final fix when I discovered the issue.
> Follow me out on this. This is the current code as-implemented in
> r323563:
>
> 265 zval *obj;
> 266 MAKE_STD_ZVAL(obj);
> 267
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Xinchen Hui wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 1:10 AM, Anthony Ferrara wrote:
>> I initially looked at the final fix when I discovered the issue.
>> Follow me out on this. This is the current code as-implemented in
>> r323563:
>>
>> 265 zval *o
Hi guys,
I'd like to thank you for this implementation.
@Pierre: There is a RFC I wrote: http://wiki.php.net/rfc/jsonable
I'd suggest to rather be JSONSerializable or be Jsonable.
JSON is an acronym, the same as PDO. We don't have interface for Pdo,
but for PDO.
So we should keep consistency.
PS: Argh, sorry... pressed the send button without finishing to write the email.
Consistency that matches with Serializable interface when dealing with
(un)serialize(). So if we have to vote, I'd go for Jsonable.
The method should be renamed to _toJSON (I can even accept __toJson
here), using the
hi,
I like the feature, it is a nice and useful one.
However nobody ever posted anything on internals about it. The
differences between the implementation and the RFC as well as the
questions raised by this addition show that it would be better to
discuss prior to commit.
But as it is in trunk,
However nobody ever posted anything on internals about it. The
differences between the implementation and the RFC as well as the
questions raised by this addition show that it would be better to
discuss prior to commit.
But as it is in trunk, that's less a problem, that's why trunk exists:
a deve
However nobody ever posted anything on internals about it. The
differences between the implementation and the RFC as well as the
questions raised by this addition show that it would be better to
discuss prior to commit.
But as it is in trunk, that's less a problem, that's why trunk exists:
a deve
On 12 May 2010 06:01, Sara Golemon wrote:
> On method naming, I was following the pattern of __*() for "always on" magic
> methods (__get(), __set(), etc...) versus interface-induced magic methods
> (offsetGet(), offsetSet(), etc...).
Agreed. I don't have any real preference on the interface name
hi!
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 4:25 AM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> Add JSON_Serializable interface
>> Objects implementing JSON_Serializable will have
>> their ->jsonSerialize() method called
>>
>> Similar to serialize() and __sleep()
>
> Why should we have special mechanism for JSON? I.e.
> -Original Message-
> From: Pierre Joye [mailto:pierre@gmail.com]
> Sent: 12 May 2010 11:33
> To: Stanislav Malyshev
> Cc: Sara Golemon; PHP Internals
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] svn: /php/php-src/trunk/
> NEWS ext/json/json.c ext/json/php_
On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 20:27 +0100, Jared Williams wrote:
> Hi,
> Keep thinking with what is in php.next that interfaces seem
> overkill?
>
> Doesn't
>
> trait JSON
> {
> function toJSONString()
> {
> return json_encode(get_object_vars($this));
> }
> }
> clas
> -Original Message-
> From: Johannes Schlüter [mailto:johan...@schlueters.de]
> Sent: 13 May 2010 20:47
> To: Jared Williams
> Cc: 'Pierre Joye'; 'Stanislav Malyshev'; 'Sara Golemon'; 'PHP
> Internals'
> Subject: RE: [PHP
wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Johannes Schlüter [mailto:johan...@schlueters.de]
>> Sent: 13 May 2010 20:47
>> To: Jared Williams
>> Cc: 'Pierre Joye'; 'Stanislav Malyshev'; 'Sara Golemon'; 'PHP
>> Internals'
>&g
hi,
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 12:54 AM, Davey Shafik wrote:
> The point is that json_encode will automatically call and use the return of
> jsonSerialize()
> no matter WHERE you serialize the object.
RIght, however Json is also not about serialize (as in php's
serialize), the naming could create
2010/5/14 Jared Williams :
> $a = new A();
> echo $a->toJSONString(), "\n";
> $b = new B();
> echo $b->toJSONString(), "\n";
>
$array = array(new A,new B,);
// Does not use your toJSONString method
echo json_encode($array);
-Hannes
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Dev
> -Original Message-
> From: Hannes Magnusson [mailto:hannes.magnus...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 15 May 2010 13:25
> To: Jared Williams
> Cc: Johannes Schlüter; Pierre Joye; Stanislav Malyshev; Sara
> Golemon; PHP Internals
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] sv
Hi,
On Sat, 2010-05-15 at 15:33 +0100, Jared Williams wrote:
> With using traits, don't have to provide an implementation
> of jsonSerialize() unless want to customise the behaviour,
> but the current implementation will require having to
> implement JSONSerializable.
No. The default behavior wil
2009/8/19 Stanislav Malyshev :
> Hi!
>
>> Initially, this prevents popen_ex from failing when the actual
>> executable doesn't exist, since "cmd.exe /c c:\foo\bar\xxx.exe" will
>> *always* successfully start a process. This can be seen in bug
>> #43327.
>>
>> Second, is that by having the intermedi
G
-Original Message-
From: Stanislav Malyshev [mailto:s...@zend.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 2:40 PM
To: Garrett Serack; Pierre
Cc: 'PHP Internals'
Subject: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] svn: /php/php-src/ branches/PHP_5_3/NEWS
branches/PHP_5_3/TSRM/tsrm_win32.c trunk/TSRM/t
ert that patch, and I'll write a new separate routine
> that doesn't use cmd.exe as a gateway.
>
> My Apologies.
>
> G
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Stanislav Malyshev [mailto:s...@zend.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 2:40 PM
> To: Garrett Serack; P
-
> From: Garrett Serack [mailto:garre...@microsoft.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 7:24 AM
> To: Stas Malyshev; Pierre
> Cc: 'PHP Internals'
> Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] svn: /php/php-src/
branches/PHP_5_3/NEWS
> branches/PHP_5_3/TSRM/tsrm_win32.c trunk/T
Hi:
Added SERVER[SERVER_SOFTWARE],
http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revision&revision=315300
but server_addr is a litte diffcult since there is no a ready value
for that, needs a litte more works, I think we'd better not do that
much changes for this, at least need the author to review, :)
thank
On 09/06/2011 11:16 AM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
Hi!
Have you actually checked what libmysql returns??!?
If _you_ just have tried to do it, you might actually find that
libmysql does what mysqlnd did long ago, but mysqli was hiding it.
Here is output from what libmysql does, after removing the foll
Hi!
On 9/6/11 2:46 AM, Andrey Hristov wrote:
I've looked into
mysqli_result_is_unbuffered_and_not_everything_is_fetched() and it looks
like for libmysql it checks this:
(((r)->handle&& (r)->handle->status == MYSQL_STATUS_USE_RESULT) ||
((r)->data == NULL))
When I step through your code, r->data
Stas,
On 09/06/2011 06:55 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
Hi!
On 9/6/11 2:46 AM, Andrey Hristov wrote:
I've looked into
mysqli_result_is_unbuffered_and_not_everything_is_fetched() and it looks
like for libmysql it checks this:
(((r)->handle&& (r)->handle->status == MYSQL_STATUS_USE_RESULT) ||
((r)->da
Hi!
On 9/6/11 11:05 AM, Andrey Hristov wrote:
I've looked into
mysqli_result_is_unbuffered_and_not_everything_is_fetched() and it looks
like for libmysql it checks this:
(((r)->handle&& (r)->handle->status == MYSQL_STATUS_USE_RESULT) ||
((r)->data == NULL))
When I step through your code, r->dat
On 09/06/2011 09:08 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
Hi!
On 9/6/11 11:05 AM, Andrey Hristov wrote:
I've looked into
mysqli_result_is_unbuffered_and_not_everything_is_fetched() and it
looks
like for libmysql it checks this:
(((r)->handle&& (r)->handle->status == MYSQL_STATUS_USE_RESULT) ||
((r)->data ==
On 09/06/2011 09:54 PM, Andrey Hristov wrote:
On 09/06/2011 09:08 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
Hi!
On 9/6/11 11:05 AM, Andrey Hristov wrote:
I've looked into
mysqli_result_is_unbuffered_and_not_everything_is_fetched() and it
looks
like for libmysql it checks this:
(((r)->handle&& (r)->handle->stat
>
> Good point, are you proposing to change code and make libmysql 5.0+ a
> requirement? If so, several changes should be made to ext/mysql, ext/mysqli
> and PDO_MySQL.
>
I think that it is your call, but yes, I think it would reasonable,
and it would make our/your work much easier if we would hav
On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 12:25 +0200, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
> >
> > Good point, are you proposing to change code and make libmysql 5.0+ a
> > requirement? If so, several changes should be made to ext/mysql, ext/mysqli
> > and PDO_MySQL.
> >
>
> I think that it is your call, but yes, I think it would r
2011/9/19 Johannes Schlüter :
> On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 12:25 +0200, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>> >
>> > Good point, are you proposing to change code and make libmysql 5.0+ a
>> > requirement? If so, several changes should be made to ext/mysql, ext/mysqli
>> > and PDO_MySQL.
>> >
>>
>> I think that it is
On 24/10/10 16:01, Gustavo André dos Santos Lopes wrote:
cataphract Sun, 24 Oct 2010 15:01:02 +
Revision: http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revision&revision=304705
Log:
> […]
- For html_entity_decode(), only valid numerical and named entities (as defined
abo
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:34:44 +0100, Geoffrey Sneddon
wrote:
On 24/10/10 16:01, Gustavo André dos Santos Lopes wrote:
cataphract Sun, 24 Oct 2010 15:01:02 +
Revision: http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revision&revision=304705
Log:
> […]
- For html_entity_dec
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 07:39:43 +0100, Stas Malyshev
wrote:
Hi!
On 8/30/11 11:32 PM, Gustavo André dos Santos Lopes wrote:
cataphract Wed, 31 Aug 2011 06:32:05 +
Revision: http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revision&revision=315851
Log:
- Fixed test htmlentities
Hi
2010/11/15 Gustavo André dos Santos Lopes :
> cataphract Mon, 15 Nov 2010 03:05:32 +
>
> Revision: http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revision&revision=305346
>
> Log:
> - Added leak_variable() function.
Why do we need a leak_variable() function in a regular build
Derick, could you look into this?
I think that the easter_days should take the date.timezone account
when calculating a timestamp
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:59 PM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
> tyrael Thu, 22 Sep 2011 20:59:10 +
>
> Revision: http://svn.php.net/view
ext/intl/tests/dateformat_parse.phpt
seems also affected by this:
http://news.php.net/php.cvs/66617
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 11:06 PM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
> Derick, could you look into this?
> I think that the easter_days should take the date.timezone account
> when calculating a timestamp
>
> On
Em 15 de novembro de 2010 14:49, Gustavo Lopes escreveu:
> On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 08:25:44 +0100, Kalle Sommer Nielsen
> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > 2010/11/15 Gustavo André dos Santos Lopes :
> >> cataphract Mon, 15 Nov 2010 03:05:32
> +
> >>
> >> Revision: http://svn.ph
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 08:25:44 +0100, Kalle Sommer Nielsen
wrote:
2010/11/15 Gustavo André dos Santos Lopes :
cataphract Mon, 15 Nov 2010 03:05:32 +
Revision: http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revision&revision=305346
Log:
- Added leak_variable() function.
Why
Hi,
On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 19:15 +, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
> iliaaWed, 30 Dec 2009 19:15:11 +
>
> Revision: http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revision&revision=292823
>
> Log:
> Fixed bug #44827 (define() allows :: in constant names).
>
> Bug: http://bu
The change is specific to :: since that is used for classes and causes
confusion as people may think foo::bar will allow definition or
re-definition of a class constant which it does not.
On 09-12-30 2:42 PM, Johannes Schlüter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 19:15 +, Ilia Alshanetsky w
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>>
>> care to comment?
>
> It looks like neither me nor others (inluding gcov machine) are getting that
> message.
>
AFAIK you shoud get it(as I did on my debian machines), as both
display_startup_errors and error_reporting is force enab
Hi!
On 9/11/11 8:44 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
AFAIK you shoud get it(as I did on my debian machines), as both
display_startup_errors and error_reporting is force enabled for the
tests:
http://svn.php.net/viewvc/php/php-src/trunk/run-tests.php?view=markup#l232
http://svn.php.net/viewvc/php/php-src
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 11:04 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 9/11/11 8:44 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>>
>> AFAIK you shoud get it(as I did on my debian machines), as both
>> display_startup_errors and error_reporting is force enabled for the
>> tests:
>> http://svn.php.net/viewvc/php/php-src/
Hello, these tests fail for me too, ubuntu 11.04 x86, both trunk and
5.4 branches.
2011/9/12 Ferenc Kovacs :
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 11:04 PM, Stas Malyshev
> wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> On 9/11/11 8:44 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>>>
>>> AFAIK you shoud get it(as I did on my debian machines), as both
>>
I forget to reply-all to the list :/
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 9/12/11 3:14 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>>
>> you should pass both -n and -c as the make test pass those to the
>> run-tests.php AFAIK, see:
>
> That's not what I see happening.
>
>> as I mention
Just wanted to say, that I managed to reproduce your results for
./PHP_5_4/ext/session/tests/rfc1867_invalid_settings.phpt by adding
date.timezone=UTC
error_log=file
settings into --INI-- section, this way test passes. I.e. logged
message should go into the file and do not mess the output which is
After a discussion on irc, I was thinking about something similar:
adding my patch back, but adding -error-log to the --INI--
Stas, I still don't know why do have a custom php.ini, and why is it used.
The make test should create tmp-php.ini for you (and copy your
additional ini files there if you p
Hi!
On 9/13/11 7:49 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
Stas, I still don't know why do have a custom php.ini, and why is it used.
The make test should create tmp-php.ini for you (and copy your
Everybody has custom php.ini, what do you mean "why"? Nobody uses just
defaults. It is used because -n -c is n
hi,
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 9/13/11 7:49 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>>
>> Stas, I still don't know why do have a custom php.ini, and why is it used.
>> The make test should create tmp-php.ini for you (and copy your
>
> Everybody has custom php.ini, what do
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 9/13/11 7:49 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>>
>> Stas, I still don't know why do have a custom php.ini, and why is it used.
>> The make test should create tmp-php.ini for you (and copy your
>
> Everybody has custom php.ini, what do you
Hi!
On 9/13/11 11:04 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
as I mentioned before, make test (at least it should) passes the -n -c
argument to run-tests.php
see http://svn.php.net/viewvc/php/php-src/trunk/Makefile.global?view=markup#l104
which means if you run make test that can produce different result,
than
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 8:23 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 9/13/11 11:04 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>>
>> as I mentioned before, make test (at least it should) passes the -n -c
>> argument to run-tests.php
>> see
>> http://svn.php.net/viewvc/php/php-src/trunk/Makefile.global?view=markup#l104
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 8:23 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 9/13/11 11:04 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>>
>> as I mentioned before, make test (at least it should) passes the -n -c
>> argument to run-tests.php
>> see
>> http://svn.php.net/viewvc/php/php-src/trunk/Makefile.global?view=markup#l104
Hi!
On 9/13/11 1:11 PM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
Stas, I commited my patch again with the addition --INI-- setting:
http://news.php.net/php.cvs/66511
could you test it?
Passes for me.
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/
(408)454-6900 ext. 227
--
PHP Intern
2011/9/13 Ferenc Kovacs :
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> On 9/13/11 7:49 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>>>
>>> Stas, I still don't know why do have a custom php.ini, and why is it used.
>>> The make test should create tmp-php.ini for you (and copy your
>>
>> Everyb
>
> Why do we even have this tmp-php.ini? Why not just make test without
> any .ini files, i.e. just with -n option?
[20:44:09] Tyrael: tmp-php.ini is built from the system ini
[20:44:45] Tyrael: if he builds php with
--with-config-file-scan-dir=/where/ever/he/has/another/php.ini, then
it will u
2011/9/14 Ferenc Kovacs :
>>
>> Why do we even have this tmp-php.ini? Why not just make test without
>> any .ini files, i.e. just with -n option?
>
> [20:44:09] Tyrael: tmp-php.ini is built from the system ini
> [20:44:45] Tyrael: if he builds php with
> --with-config-file-scan-dir=/where/ever/he
On 13 September 2011 17:27, Pierre Joye wrote:
> hi,
>
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> On 9/13/11 7:49 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>>>
>>> Stas, I still don't know why do have a custom php.ini, and why is it used.
>>> The make test should create tmp-php.ini for y
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 12:36, Alexey Shein wrote:
> 2011/9/14 Ferenc Kovacs :
>>>
>>> Why do we even have this tmp-php.ini? Why not just make test without
>>> any .ini files, i.e. just with -n option?
>>
>> [20:44:09] Tyrael: tmp-php.ini is built from the system ini
>> [20:44:45] Tyrael: if he
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Hannes Magnusson
wrote:
> Running tests exclusively in an environment known to work doesn't help us.
It indeed does, and much more than random failures in random environments.
However it is not about one or the other, it is about both and about
having as much t
2011/9/15 Hannes Magnusson :
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 12:36, Alexey Shein wrote:
>> 2011/9/14 Ferenc Kovacs :
Why do we even have this tmp-php.ini? Why not just make test without
any .ini files, i.e. just with -n option?
>>>
>>> [20:44:09] Tyrael: tmp-php.ini is built from the sys
I've just noticed that we had a related bugreport, I thought that I
should mention it:
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=55479
--
Ferenc Kovács
@Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Le 26/12/2011 09:29, Stanislav Malyshev a écrit :
> stas Mon, 26 Dec 2011 08:29:11 +
>
> Revision: http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revision&revision=321406
ZTS build is broken (snapshot 201112261030)
Please see trivial attached patch
Regards,
Remi.
diff -
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 08:25:44 +0100, Kalle Sommer Nielsen
wrote:
> Hi
>
> 2010/11/15 Gustavo André dos Santos Lopes :
>> cataphract Mon, 15 Nov 2010 03:05:32
+
>>
>> Revision: http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revision&revision=305346
>>
>> Log:
>> - Added leak_varia
Hi
I still have this. even after re-running buildconf (and deleting
configure before)
On OS X and x86_64 Linux
chregu
On 14.09.11 05:31, Laruence wrote:
> Hi:
> after I re-run buildconf, error has gone
>
> sorry for mis-report.
>
> thanks
>
> 2011/9/14 Laruence :
>> Hi:
>>trunk build
Hi,
FYI, you might should delete the autom4te.cache folder too :-)
thanks
2011/9/14 Christian Stocker :
> Hi
>
> I still have this. even after re-running buildconf (and deleting
> configure before)
>
> On OS X and x86_64 Linux
>
> chregu
>
> On 14.09.11 05:31, Laruence wrote:
>> Hi:
>> after
101 - 200 of 294 matches
Mail list logo
