> | It all depend on the definition of "rapid".
> | If rapid means every "hours" or every "day", I find it very unlikely.
>You're actually talking about the frequency of renumbering there, rather
>than how quickly a renumbering can be accomplished. Clearly the frequency
>can't be more than once
>Since you need two signatures per address (one on , one on PTR),
>figure on being able to re-sign 1500 addresses per minute per GHz of
>cpu. Renumbering a million-address network would take a bit over 11
>GHz-hours of cpu time just for the dnssec signatures alone.
the signing cost c
> | Can we qualify them with a "frequency indicator," e.g. once
> | in a life-time, once a year, once a month, once a day?
>
> Given that #5 needs to be N times a day (twice as stated), if we can
> handle that one, then we should be able to handle all the others up to
> at least once a day fr
Appropriate release to get IPv6 support is Cisco IOS 12.2(2)T now
available on CCO
(www.cisco.com) software center. Note that 12.2(2)T was previously referred
as 12.2(1)T.
Regards
Patrick
At 08:32 AM 12-06-01 -0700, Dollinger, MatthewX wrote:
>I know that the Cisco router needs IOS ve
Date:Tue, 12 Jun 2001 08:56:29 -0700
From:"Christian Huitema" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| But first, let's agree on the scenarios. Do we believe that they are
| realistic?
They look reasonable to me.
| Can we qualify them with a "fre
> > I for one believe that we should assume rapid renumbering as a
feature
> > of IPv6.
>
> great! how does it work? not broad desires, but the devilish details
> please.
This is a perfectly reasonable request. I believe that the correct
answer is "draft the scenarios, plan the technology, dem
I know that the Cisco router needs IOS version 12.2 to handle Ipv6 traffic
properly. 12.03 may not give you the results you want, or weird results in
general.
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122newft/122
t/122t2/ipv6/index.htm
"You know, sometimes it is the arti
> the bottom line is that you cannot renumber more frequently than
> (DNS TTL * 2), so if you set DNS TTL to 1 day, you can only renumber
> every other day.
And this is true no matter what sort of records you are storing your
addresses in.
However, consider a large site using t
Christian,
Excellent point sir. In fact the rate of deployment is increasing right
now. The curve is at at initial slope which is TBD but the market will
not wait for us to discuss this for two years and deploy .
/jim
On Mon, 11 Jun 2001, Christian Huitema wrote:
> I for one believe that
Rob,
Can you give us an idea of when the report will be out?
p.s. is deployed too fyi.
thanks
/jim
On Sun, 10 Jun 2001, Rob Austein wrote:
> The basic problem is that neither the IPv6 community nor the DNS
> community has reached a clear consensus on whether the extra features
> of A6 o
Hi!
I'm using a cisco 1600 router and a windows 2000 PC where I'm trying to configure a
6to4 router so its something like:
[IPv6 network][Cisco 1600 - 12.03T][PC 6to4 router - Tech Preview]--[IPv4
network]
So when I configure the two routers I was expecting that the two routers would
>>I for one believe that we should assume rapid renumbering as a feature
>>of IPv6. The argument for that is the classic "fire escape" analogy. If
>>you don't practice frequent exercises, you find one the day of the
>>actual fire that a clutter of boxes blocks the escape. If we want to be
>>able t
Date:Mon, 11 Jun 2001 19:58:16 -0700
From:Alain Durand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.0.20010611193607.02281c38@jurassic>
| It all depend on the definition of "rapid".
| If rapid means every "hours" or every "day", I find it very unlikely.
You're actua
13 matches
Mail list logo
