Thus spake "Mark Andrews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > At a minimum, being present in the global DNS should be at the option
> > of the allocatee. Until a viable solution is found for non-registered
> > prefixes, this might be given as an advantage of using a registered
prefix.
>
> Well non-registered
> Thus spake "Christian Huitema" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > In her review of "draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-03.txt", Margaret
> > raises an excellent point:
> >
> > > (1) This draft doesn't mention the reverse DNS tree. Is it expected
> > > that whatever registry assigns these values will
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
> Thoughts?
Been there, done that, gotten flamed about it :-).
draft-savola-multi6-asn-pi-01.txt
(Well, I don't like that proposition either..)
p.s. the correct forum may be multi6.
--
Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet
Thus spake "Christian Huitema" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> In her review of "draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-03.txt", Margaret
> raises an excellent point:
>
> > (1) This draft doesn't mention the reverse DNS tree. Is it expected
> > that whatever registry assigns these values will also populate
I'm starting here with the posit that the global routing table will contain
at least one prefix (/48 or shorter in the case of IPv6) from each ASN.
Obviously if this doesn't hold, the following discussion isn't valid...
Leaf ASes in the IPv6 world are expected to get a /48 prefix allocation
(from
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Soliman Hesham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: mercredi 17 mars 2004 09:38
> To: Pascal Thubert (pthubert); Jari Arkko
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Multiple DRs on a link
>
>
> > => There are many different reasons. I sent a verly long
> > emai
> > => There are many different reasons. I sent a verly long
> > email about this to nemo (monet back then). One simple
> > scenario is that you might be walking around with a PAN
> > that happens to have 2 MRs on a single link (e.g. a laptop
> > and a mobile phone). The two MRs could share t
MRs on different links?
>
> => There are many different reasons. I sent a verly long
> email about this to nemo (monet back then). One simple
> scenario is that you might be walking around with a PAN
> that happens to have 2 MRs on a single link (e.g. a laptop
> and a mobile phone). The two MRs c
Hi Fred,
> Also, what about other non-DNS naming services that can be deployed
> within a site/organization? E.g., the Sun Yellow Pages (I guess it's called
> NIS now?)
We don't confess it in public, and we block all RPC requests at our border
routers, but some of us do.
> and the naming service
Hi Hesham:
In case that helps, we've found practical in some experimentations to
allow a MR to autoconf addresses on its ingress interfaces, and install
the associated connected routes. Note that if a MR listens to itself
from a different interface, it will not install the prefix.
Anyway, once th
10 matches
Mail list logo
