RJ == RJ Atkinson rja.li...@gmail.com writes:
RJ I oppose Eliot's proposed edits on grounds that they would
RJ reduce the clarity of the specification and also would reduce
RJ IETF and WG consensus about this specification.
Ran, I just checked, and you don't seem to be a 6man
Lars == Lars Eggert lars.egg...@nokia.com writes:
Lars Hi, yes, because RFC2460 says MUST use always and the
Lars intent here is to loosen that restriction for LISP and AMT.
Lars (And I'm sure Noel will again call this red-tape legalese,
Lars but the fact is that this change
Noel == Noel Chiappa j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu writes:
From: Francis Dupont francis.dup...@fdupont.fr the O UDP
checksum proposal obsoletes all the today deployed nodes which
check them (so all hosts I know and perhaps a lot of routers
too)
Noel OK, so what are the other
Joel Given that LISP ITRs work by intercepting packets that are
Joel not addressed to them, a host implementation would need to
Joel be able to intercept packets in the stack. That is going
Joel to need some ability to modify kernel behavior.
I'm trying to figure out how an ITR
Dino == Dino Farinacci d...@cisco.com writes:
Dino We call LISP tunnels as dynamic encapsulating tunnels
Dino where an implementation must not implement the tunnel as a
Dino logical interface. The implementation cannot scale if it
Dino does this. You get the level of indirection
Shane == Shane Amante sh...@castlepoint.net writes:
Shane Take a look at the following URL:
Shane http://www.sixxs.net/faq/connectivity/?faq=ipv6transit
Shane (Note, I can't vouch for the accuracy of the entire list,
Shane but it's about the best publicly available list I've
Shane == Shane Amante sh...@castlepoint.net writes:
Shane With respect to #2, SP's have been mandating that they only
Shane buy v6- capable HW for the last /several years/ as part of
Shane the normal growth/ replacement cycle of network equipment.
Shane So, yes, this equipment
Joel == Joel M Halpern j...@joelhalpern.com writes:
Joel It has become clear with the passage of time that the
Joel description of the flow label in the original IPv6 specs
Joel served only to convince everyone not to use that field for
Joel anything. Even now, no one is sure
