Where do you get your Lucene/Solr downloads from?
>
> [] ASF Mirrors (linked in our release announcements or via the Lucene
> website)
>
> [X] Maven repository (whether you use Maven, Ant+Ivy, Buildr, etc.)
>
> [] I/we build them from source via an SVN/Git checkout.
>
> [] Other (someone in your c
Karl, I´m aware of IndexReader.getTermFreqVector, with this I can get all
terms of a document, but I want all terms of a document that matched a
query.
Grant,
>Yes, I think I understand. You want to know what terms from your
>query matched in a given document.
Yep, that´s what I want. In the co
lighting
> are you doing that isn't covered by the contrib/highlighter? Perhaps
> you have some suggestions that are generic enough to help improve
> it? Just a thought.
>
> Hope this helps,
> Grant
>
> On Sep 4, 2007, at 5:01 PM, Rafael Rossini wrote:
>
> >
Hi all,
In some custom highlighting, I often write a code like this:
Set matchedTerms = new HashSet();
query.rewrite(reader).extractTerms(matchedTerms);
With this code the Term Set gets populated by the matched query in your
whole index. Is it possible to this with a docume
Hey Jeff, I didn´t had any luck, I don´t think you´re approach is going to
help me, thanks for the reply. I´ll try a solution that does not require
this kind of problem.
[]s
Rossini
On 7/29/07, Jeff French <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Rossini, have you had any luck with this? I don't kno
Actually no,
Because I'd like to retrieve terms that were computed on the same
instance of Field. Taking your example to ilustrate better, I have 2
documents, on documentA I structured one field, Field("fieldA", "termA
termB", customAnalyzer). On documentB I structured 2 fields, Field("fieldA",
I see, thanks.
On 7/26/07, Mike Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 26-Jul-07, at 10:18 AM, Rafael Rossini wrote:
> Yes, I optimized, but in the with SOLR. I don´t know why, but when
> optimize
> an index with SOLR, it leaves you with about 15 files, instead of
> the 3...
Hi guys,
I have a problem that is kind of tricky:
I have a set of documents that I enrich with dynamic metadata. The
metada name is the fieldName in lucene and the value is the text. For
example:
"Rio de Janeiro is a beautiful city." would be indexed in one field called
text, and on ano
Well... thanks for the help, this was really my last solution (rebuild) but
I think I have no other choice... I really can´t tell exactly if this
corruption was caused by bad hardware or not, but do you guys have any
ideia about what might have happend here? Could I have generated this
corruption
Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You know, on second though, a merge shouldn't even try to access a doc >
maxdoc (i think). Have you just tried an optimize?
On 7/25/07, Rafael Rossini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> Is there a way of deleting
Hi guys,
Is there a way of deleting a document that, because of some corruption,
got and docID larger than the maxDoc() ? I´m trying to do this but I get
this Exception:
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: Array
index out of range: 106577
at org.apache.lucen
e a way of fixing my index without having to rebuild it all from the
ground? It takes lots of hours to re-index my whole collection.
On 7/24/07, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/24/07, Rafael Rossini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I did a litle debug and found that in
and got a *
java.io.IOException*: read past EOF.
Any ideias how to fix or delete this document?
On 7/24/07, Rafael Rossini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don´t know the exact date of the build, but it is certainly before July
4, and before the LUCENE-843 patch was committed. My index has 1.119.93
;s possible that this introduced a bug. Is
the build you are using after July 4?
Mike
"Rafael Rossini" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I´m using solr in an app, but I´m getting an error that it might be a
> lucene
> problem. When I perform a simpl
Hello all,
I´m using solr in an app, but I´m getting an error that it might be a lucene
problem. When I perform a simple query like q = brasil I´m getting this
exception:
java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 1226511
at org.apache.lucene.search.TermScorer.score(TermScorer.java:74)
at org
Hi Tanya,
I think one option is to index each log file with 2 fields, the name of
the log file and a line of your log. This way you can do a query like
this: +log_file_name:"log1" +line:"word1" -(+line:"word1" +line"word2")
Hope it helps,
Rossini
On 6/13/07, Tanya Levshina <[EMAIL PROT
Otis()
- Original Message
From: Rafael Rossini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org; Otis Gospodnetic <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 4:23:56 PM
Subject: Re: Indexing large sets of documents?
Oits,
You mentioned the hadoop project. I check it out n
Oits,
You mentioned the hadoop project. I check it out not a long time ago and
I read someting about it did not support the lucene index. Is it possible to
index and then search in a HDFS?
[]s
Rossini
On 7/27/06, Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Michael,
Certainly paralleli
Ok, thanks a lot.
On 7/17/06, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: I´m using lucene 2.0.0 and I would like to generate a BooleanQuery from
a
: QueryParser. The problem is that when I parse a query like this:
"(rafael
: todor rossini)~2" the property of the BooleanQuery ,
: minimumNumber
Hi all,
I´m using lucene 2.0.0 and I would like to generate a BooleanQuery from a
QueryParser. The problem is that when I parse a query like this: "(rafael
todor rossini)~2" the property of the BooleanQuery ,
minimumNumberShouldMatch is not setted properly. Is there a way of doing
that?
thanks i
20 matches
Mail list logo
