Shai,
Looks like this is what I was looking for. Will try out
Thansk a lot!
Rajesh
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Shai Erera wrote:
> Raj,
>
> If I understand your question, you can integrate regular and faceted search
> as follows:
>
> Query q = new TermQuery("f", "word");
> TopDocsCollec
Raj,
If I understand your question, you can integrate regular and faceted search
as follows:
Query q = new TermQuery("f", "word");
TopDocsCollector tdc = TopScoreDocsCollector.create();
FacetsCollector fc = FacetsCollector.create();
searcher.search(q, MultiCollector.wrap(tdc, fc));
TopDocs topDoc
Is it possible to combine normal Lucene search and Facet Search?
I have seperately implemented basic search and also Faceted Search in my
project based on the sample provided. But a bit confused on how to query
the document content which also has associated Facets.
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 11:3
Thanks a lot Shai! That was really quick response.
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Shai Erera wrote:
> Hi Raj,
>
> Unfortunately the userguide is outdated after refactorings made to the
> package. We have an issue open to fix that.
> Until then, you can find an example code here:
>
> https://
Hi Raj,
Unfortunately the userguide is outdated after refactorings made to the
package. We have an issue open to fix that.
Until then, you can find an example code here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/lucene_solr_4_3/lucene/demo/src/java/org/apache/lucene/demo/facet/SimpleFac
Hi,
I was checking on Lucene Faceted search and need some guidance.
http://lucene.apache.org/core/4_3_0/facet/org/apache/lucene/facet/doc-files/userguide.html#facet_indexingmentions
about
DocumentBuilder categoryDocBuilder = new CategoryDocumentBuilder(taxo);
But I am unable to find Document
s[i].reopen();
if (newReader != readers[i]) {
readers[i].close();
}
readers[i] = newReader;
}
multiReader = new MultiReader(readers);
OpenBitSetFacetHitCounter facetHitCounter =
newOpenBitSetFacetHitCounter();
IndexSearcher indexSearcher = new
IndexSearcher(multiReader);
I then us
open(), and then call get() and gather each
>>>>> IndexSearcher instance into a new array. Then, make a new
>>>>> MultiSearcher (opposite of what I said before): while that
>>>>> creates
>>>>> a
>>>>> small amount of ga
Searcher)searchables[i];
readers[i] = indexSearcher.getIndexReader();
IndexReader newReader = readers[i].reopen();
if (newReader != readers[i]) {
readers[i].close();
}
readers[i] = newReader;
}
multiReader = new MultiReader(readers);
OpenBitSetFacetHitCounter facetHitCounter =
newOpenBitSet
utltisearcher when this class is creared by
>>> spring.
>>>
>>>
>>> private synchronized void swapMultiSearcher(MultiSearcher
>>> newMultiSearcher) {
>>>
>>> try {
>>>
>>> release(multiSearcher);
>>>
>>>
exSearcher indexSearcher = new
IndexSearcher(multiReader);
I then use the indexseacher to do the facet stuff. I
end
the
code
with
closing the multireader. This is causing problems in
another
method
where I
do some other search as the indexreaders are closed.
Is
it
ok
to
not
close
the multiindexreade
enBitSetFacetHitCounter();
IndexSearcher indexSearcher = new
IndexSearcher(multiReader);
I then use the indexseacher to do the facet stuff. I
end
the
code
with
closing the multireader. This is causing problems in
another
method
where I
do some other search as the indexreaders are closed.
Is
>>>>>>>>> Query
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> '"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> query.toString() +"'");
>
ing
problems in
another
method
where I
do some other search as the indexreaders are
closed.
Is
it
ok
to
not
close
the multiindexreader or should I do some
additional
checks
in
the
other
method to see if the indexreader is closed?
Cheers
P.S. Hope that made sense...!
On Mon, Feb 23, 20
t;>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> throw new IllegalStateException(e);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>&
g
problems in
another
method
where I
do some other search as the indexreaders are
closed. Is
it
ok
to
not
close
the multiindexreader or should I do some additional
checks
in
the
other
method to see if the indexreader is closed?
Cheers
P.S. Hope that made sense...!
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009
gt;>>>> newMultiSearcher) {
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> try {
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> release(multiSearcher);
>>>>>>>>>>>
>&g
der);
I then use the indexseacher to do the facet stuff.
I end
the
code
with
closing the multireader. This is causing problems in
another
method
where I
do some other search as the indexreaders are
closed. Is it
ok
to
not
close
the multiindexreader or should I do some additional
checks
in
gt;>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> private void warm(MultiSearcher newMultiSeacher) {
thod
where I
do some other search as the indexreaders are closed.
Is it
ok
to
not
close
the multiindexreader or should I do some additional
checks in
the
other
method to see if the indexreader is closed?
Cheers
P.S. Hope that made sense...!
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 7:20 AM, Amin Mohamme
t;>> Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> just a quick point:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> public void maybeReopen() throws IOException { //D
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> long currentVersion
Hi
Thanks just what I needed!
Cheers
Amin
On 22 Feb 2009, at 16:11, Marcelo Ochoa <
marcelo.oc...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi Amin:
Please take a look a this blog post:
http://sujitpal.blogspot.com/2007/04/lucene-search-within-search-with.html
Best regards, Marcelo.
On Sun
gt;>>>>>>>> which GC then must sweep up.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> -- This was something I thought about. I could move it out so
>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>&
Amin:
Please take a look a this blog post:
http://sujitpal.blogspot.com/2007/04/lucene-search-within-search-with.html
Best regards, Marcelo.
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Amin Mohammed-Coleman <
ami...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi
Sorry to re send this email but I was wondering if I
c
>>>> dangerous... eg both (or, more) will wastefully reopen the
>>>>>>>>> readers.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> * You are over-incRef'ing (the reader.incRef inside the loop) -- I
>>>>>>>>> don't
t;>>>>>> IndexReader[] readers = new IndexReader[searchables.length];
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> for (int i =0 ; i < searchables.length;i++) {
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> IndexSearcher ind
om/2007/04/lucene-search-within-search-with.html
Best regards, Marcelo.
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Amin Mohammed-Coleman <
ami...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi
Sorry to re send this email but I was wondering if I
could get
some
advice
on this.
Cheers
Amin
On 16 Feb 2009, at 20:37, Amin
Cheers
Amin
On 16 Feb 2009, at 20:37, Amin Mohammed-Coleman >
wrote:
Hi
I am looking at building a faceted search using Lucene. I
know
that
Solr
comes with this built in, however I would like to try this
by
myself
(something to add to my CV!). I have been looking around
and I
foun
ments. If
>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>> don't
>>>>>>>> reopen i'm concerned that the facet hit counter won't be updated.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Amin Mohammed-Colem
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> IndexReader[] readers = new IndexReader[searchables.length];
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> for (int i =0 ; i < searchables.length;i++) {
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>&g
th.html
Best regards, Marcelo.
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Amin Mohammed-Coleman <
ami...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi
Sorry to re send this email but I was wondering if I could
get some
advice
on this.
Cheers
Amin
On 16 Feb 2009, at 20:37, Amin Mohammed-Coleman >
wrote:
Hi
I am lo
er = new MultiReader(readers);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> OpenBitSetFacetHitCounter facetHitCounter =
>>>>>> newOpenBitSetFacetHitCounter();
>>>>>>
>>>>>> IndexSearcher indexSearcher = new IndexSearcher(multiReader);
exSearcher indexSearcher = new IndexSearcher(multiReader);
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I then use the indexseacher to do the facet stuff. I end the code with
>>>>> closing the multireader. This is causing problems in another method
>>>&g
2009 at 1:18 PM, Amin Mohammed-Coleman <
ami...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi
Sorry to re send this email but I was wondering if I could get
some
advice
on this.
Cheers
Amin
On 16 Feb 2009, at 20:37, Amin Mohammed-Coleman >
wrote:
Hi
I am looking at building a faceted search usi
t;>>
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>>
>>> P.S. Hope that made sense...!
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 7:20 AM, Amin Mohammed-Coleman >> >wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> Thanks just
on this.
Cheers
Amin
On 16 Feb 2009, at 20:37, Amin Mohammed-Coleman
wrote:
Hi
I am looking at building a faceted search using Lucene. I know
that
Solr
comes with this built in, however I would like to try this by
myself
(something to add to my CV!). I have been looking around and I
fo
>>
>>>>>>> question and I was wondering if I could get some help. I have a
>>>>>>>> list of
>>>>>>>> IndexSearchers which are used in a MultiSearcher class. I use the
>>>>>>>> indexsearchers to get e
>>>> readers[i] = indexSearcher.getIndexReader();
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> IndexReader newReader = readers[i].reopen();
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> if (newReader != readers[i]) {
>>>>>>>
>>>&
t;>>>>
>>>>>> OpenBitSetFacetHitCounter facetHitCounter =
>>>>>>
>>>>>> newOpenBitSetFacetHitCounter();
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> IndexSearcher indexSearcher = new IndexSearcher(multiReader);
>>
but I was wondering if I could
get some
advice
on this.
Cheers
Amin
On 16 Feb 2009, at 20:37, Amin Mohammed-Coleman >
wrote:
Hi
I am looking at building a faceted search using Lucene. I
know that
Solr
comes with this built in, however I would like to try this
by myself
(something
the indexreader is closed?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> P.S. Hope that made sense...!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 7:20 AM, Amin Mohammed-Coleman <
>&g
to re send this email but I was wondering if I could get
some
advice
on this.
Cheers
Amin
On 16 Feb 2009, at 20:37, Amin Mohammed-Coleman
wrote:
Hi
I am looking at building a faceted search using Lucene. I
know that
Solr
comes with this built in, however I would like to try this by
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 7:20 AM, Amin Mohammed-Coleman <
> ami...@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi
> > >>
> > >> Thanks just what I needed!
> > >>
> > >> Cheer
gt; >> Cheers
> >> Amin
> >>
> >>
> >> On 22 Feb 2009, at 16:11, Marcelo Ochoa
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Amin:
> >>> Please take a look a this blog post:
> >>>
> >>>
> http://sujitpal.blogspot.co
http://sujitpal.blogspot.com/2007/04/lucene-search-within-search-with.html
>>> Best regards, Marcelo.
>>>
>>> On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Amin Mohammed-Coleman
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> Sorry to re send this email b
could get some
>>> advice
>>> on this.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> Amin
>>>
>>> On 16 Feb 2009, at 20:37, Amin Mohammed-Coleman
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> I am looking at bu
> wrote:
Hi
Sorry to re send this email but I was wondering if I could get some
advice
on this.
Cheers
Amin
On 16 Feb 2009, at 20:37, Amin Mohammed-Coleman
wrote:
Hi
I am looking at building a faceted search using Lucene. I know
that Solr
comes with this built in, however I wo
me advice
> on this.
>
> Cheers
>
> Amin
>
> On 16 Feb 2009, at 20:37, Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> I am looking at building a faceted search using Lucene. I know that Solr
>> comes with this built in, however I would like to try thi
Hi
Sorry to re send this email but I was wondering if I could get some
advice on this.
Cheers
Amin
On 16 Feb 2009, at 20:37, Amin Mohammed-Coleman
wrote:
Hi
I am looking at building a faceted search using Lucene. I know that
Solr comes with this built in, however I would like to
Hi
I am looking at building a faceted search using Lucene. I know that Solr
comes with this built in, however I would like to try this by myself
(something to add to my CV!). I have been looking around and I found that
you can use the IndexReader and use TermVectors. This looks ok but I'
50 matches
Mail list logo
