> Ilike to - then time says - hepp- like - i do have the time to read and
> "grep" the 'thingo' - just wait and someboby will force in ! ...
You meant blue-sky in an elevator?
Whatever
--
"I know Zahid Rahman". 2002.
___
Sorry for the post but Scott's last upload fixed
the problem.
Andy
- Original Message -
From: "Andreas Schaefer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 11:37 PM
Subject: [JBoss-dev] JBoss Testsuites are failing
> Hi Geeks
>
> Did someone else than me
Hi Geeks
To start the entire tool that is my idea:
- we use a special extension for the foe-deployment-units
like "myWLApplication.wljar" etc. for now
then foe-deployer will:
- accept these deployments
- transform the vendor-specific DDs to JBoss specific DDs
by using XSLT
- incorporate th
A checkin of the testsuite/build.xml was missing.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: "Andreas Schaefer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 11:37 PM
Subjec
Hi Geeks
Did someone else than me also notice that the
testsuites are not working anymore. I get around
280 errors and all complain about a missing class:
javax.net.SocketFactory
in the JNDI Initial Context creation ?
Have fun
x
Andreas Schaefer
Senior Consultant
JBoss Group
Bugs item #556644, was opened at 2002-05-16 01:24
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=556644&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bill Burke (patriot1burke)
Assigned
Number of tests run: 757
Successful tests: 734
Errors:21
Failures: 2
[time of test: 16 May 2002 5:39 GMT]
[java.version: 1.4.0]
[java.vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.]
[j
Number of tests run: 524
Successful tests: 225
Errors:299
Failures: 0
[time of test: 16 May 2002 4:23 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1_02]
[java.vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.
|> Love
|> pf
|>
|
|Dude are you on crack?
|
|
|___
|
|Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for mirrors. We supply
I couldn't resist, the sourceforge line (oops pun intended) was just too
good
__
Number of tests run: 524
Successful tests: 225
Errors:299
Failures: 0
[time of test: 16 May 2002 3:37 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1_03]
[java.vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Peter
> Fagerlund
> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 7:31 PM
> To: Sacha Labourey; marc fleury; Jason Dillon; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] HEA
Number of tests run: 524
Successful tests: 225
Errors:299
Failures: 0
[time of test: 16 May 2002 2:42 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vendor: Blackdown Java-Linux Tea
1. Multiple domains could be set up pretty easily if we reversed the
dependency between MainDeployer and SubDeployers. Subdeployers would be
standalone, MainDeployer would have a depends-list of all the subdeployers
it used. At least one complete deployer would have to be in the
non-auto-deploye
If we don't currently support deployment domains with different
policies we need to as converting third partly packages is only
one use case.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: "Andreas Schaefe
Number of tests run: 524
Successful tests: 225
Errors:299
Failures: 0
[time of test: 16 May 2002 1:43 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vendor: Blackdown Java-Linux Tea
Hi Scott
For the sake of stability and easier to use the accept() is not
a good choice.
So I guess the only thing we can do is really to create a second
Main Deployer providing another "domain" of deployment.
Now I can add a Scanner on a different directory (like the Farm)
and use the Foe-Deploy
Bugs item #556567, was opened at 2002-05-15 17:16
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=556567&group_id=22866
Category: JBossSX
Group: v2.4 (stable)
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jeffrey Wescott (binaryfeed)
>Assig
Sir,
I crave your indulgence as I contact you in such a surprising manner. I respectfully
insist that you read this letter carefully, as I am optimistic that it will open doors
for unimaginable financial rewards for both of us.
I am very sorry for not introducing myself first. My name is Mr
Bugs item #556567, was opened at 2002-05-15 17:16
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=556567&group_id=22866
Category: JBossSX
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jeffrey Wescott (binaryfeed)
Assigned to
Number of tests run: 524
Successful tests: 225
Errors:299
Failures: 0
[time of test: 16 May 2002 1:6 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.0]
[java.vendor: IBM Corporation]
[java.vm
Sir,
I crave your indulgence as I contact you in such a surprising manner. I respectfully
insist that you read this letter carefully, as I am optimistic that it will open doors
for unimaginable financial rewards for both of us.
I am very sorry for not introducing myself first. My name is Mr
on 16-05-2 01.18, Scott M Stark at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> because they want a one deployment unit works
> with all servers package.
What can We be part of Invent here ?
___
Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download
Number of tests run: 524
Successful tests: 224
Errors:299
Failures: 1
[time of test: 16 May 2002 0:28 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.0]
[java.vendor: IBM Corporation]
[java.v
on 15-05-2 16.51, Sacha Labourey at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> jason, sacha or dain
>>
>> i need a test case, and in fact it should be in test cvs
>
> Sure. I don't have time now though. Any one else?
Ilike to - then time says - hepp- like - i do have the time to read and
"grep" the 'thingo'
On Wed, 2002-05-15 at 23:55, Andreas Schaefer wrote:
> Hi Scott
>
> > This is not going to work as many users already have stated they
> > create deployment units that contain all app server DDs and even
> > proprietary descriptors for their own use.
>
> I don't think it would cause problems bec
I'm saying that users are including jboss.xml, weblogic.xml,
sun-j2ee-ri.xml, ...
DDs in the deployment build because they want a one deployment unit works
with all servers package.
> > This is not going to work as many users already have stated they
> > create deployment units that contain all a
Hi Scott
> This is not going to work as many users already have stated they
> create deployment units that contain all app server DDs and even
> proprietary descriptors for their own use.
I don't think it would cause problems because I don't check if there
are "foe" DDs but if the archives misse
This is not going to work as many users already have stated they
create deployment units that contain all app server DDs and even
proprietary descriptors for their own use.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Messa
Hi Geeks
Based on an email of Dain I think the easiest
way to start is to use the Deployer's accept()
method and add additional test in the current
deployers there that only JBoss "compliant"
are deployed.
Now the Foe-Deployer can check it if not
"compliant" and then try to convert it to a
JBoss
I would have to look at it again but Ole pretty much convinced me that the
TX stuff is correct, it is in fact a property of the spec that we end up
with this kludgy design and spaghetti code mess.
One day when I really can lay back and work on something new, spec wise, I
will write a new transact
Any plans on moving this forward to extract the JRMP specific bits from User
TX in the near future?
--jason
On Wednesday 15 May 2002 07:26 am, Scott M Stark wrote:
> The discussion that Marc and Ole had previously suggested that
> the Transaction implementation should be serializable and this
I have seen this mostly on SUN's 1.4 on Linux. I have not touched blackdown
since 1.1.7.
--jason
On Wednesday 15 May 2002 07:11 am, Sacha Labourey wrote:
> well, well, well... (what was the JVM BTW?)
>
> Houston, we have a problem.
>
> As I told Marc, maybe we have a problem with our classloa
Maybe something easy could be achieved with some kind of XSL transformation ?
regards.
* * *
View thread online: http://jboss.org/forums/thread.jsp?forum=66&thread=15677
___
Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mir
Almost. Now it's missing org.jboss.util.MuLong.
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Dillon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 3:15 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] missing org.jboss.util.id.GUID from client
> jars?
>
>
>
That looks like the problem seen when an inner classes references
its outer classes log object. I belive this is a bug in the compiler
but have not had time to create a test case. The work around is
to add a reference to the inner class and initialize it to the out
class variable.
xxx
I just did a cvs co...
Now, I'm getting a NoSuchMethodError when I deploy my application. The
weird thing is, the stack trace ends at
org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.LocalTxConnectionManager$LocalConnectio
nEventListener.connectionClosed(LocalTxConnectionManager.java:363).
Here is that lin
Bugs item #542365, was opened at 2002-04-11 02:09
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=542365&group_id=22866
Category: JBossMQ
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
>Priority: 9
Submitted By: Peter Luttrell (objec)
Assigned to:
|Does convertions of not-JBoss-DD's are done by FoeDeployer? We could
|have an abstract converter that will be subclassed by converters for
|different app servers (to look ahead).
here we go, the scourge of new developers the plague of "abtract-itis" to
"look ahead" on first pass. Don't look ahe
Hello Andreas,
Wednesday, May 15, 2002, 7:12:50 PM, you wrote:
AS> This is my design I came up with:
AS> - New deployer (FoeDeployer) which works
AS>like an EJBDeployer
AS> - Main or EJB-Deployer figures out that this
AS>archives isn't off JBoss type and hand it over
AS>to the Foe-De
Hi Geeks
Let's go and kick some ass with our project "kick-ass".
First can everyone (even when you already did) send ME
an email when you are interested in spending some time or
resources towards this project.
This is my design I came up with:
- New deployer (FoeDeployer) which works
like an
This is a patch release to 2.4.5 that rolls back a bug
fix to prepared statement caching that caused problems
with numerous databases.
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=22866
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
xx
> jason, sacha or dain
>
> i need a test case, and in fact it should be in test cvs
Sure. I don't have time now though. Any one else?
Cheers,
Sacha
___
Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for downloa
jason, sacha or dain
i need a test case, and in fact it should be in test cvs
have 20 classes (from Class1 to Class20) with impossible links to each other
like
class1->2, 4, 5 ,8
class8-> loops back to one, 4, 9 etc
and then 20 threads that each loads a class, if you can package in different
Bugs item #556312, was opened at 2002-05-15 06:19
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=556312&group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
>Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Andrew Kerr (ajkerr)
>Assigned to: Scott M Star
On Wed, 15 May 2002, Joseph Olson wrote:
> I would like to incorporate a number of mobile agent, AI systems into JBOSS.
>
> I would like to use these Resource Manager Connection Factory References
>
> java:comp/env/Agent/AIKernel (AI Kernel http://aikernel.sourceforge.net/)
this one is quite an
Bugs item #556312, was opened at 2002-05-15 13:19
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=556312&group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Andrew Kerr (ajkerr)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (
>Are there any current or future restrictions, within JBoss, of what can go
into a J2EE platform?
No.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
___
Have big pipes? Source
I would like to incorporate a number of mobile agent, AI systems into JBOSS.
I would like to use these Resource Manager Connection Factory References
java:comp/env/Agent/Jade (Jade http://sharon.cselt.it/projects/jade/)
java:comp/env/Agent/Aglets (Agelets http://www.trl.ibm.com/aglets/inde
Bugs item #556287, was opened at 2002-05-15 11:38
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=556287&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Rejected
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Stéphane Bidoul (sbidoul)
Bugs item #556262, was opened at 2002-05-15 02:12
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=556262&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Wont Fix
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tim Fox (timfox)
Assigned to
Hello!
New HP-UX test info from 2002/05/15 1.30a.m. CVS version for Branch_3_0.
Have fun!
Duarte "HappyGuy" Loreto
"Don't worry, be happy!"
Number of tests run: 585
Successful tests: 569
Err
Bugs item #556287, was opened at 2002-05-15 03:38
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=556287&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Stéphane Bidoul (sbidoul)
>Assign
Bugs item #556287, was opened at 2002-05-15 03:38
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=556287&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Stéphane Bidoul (sbidoul)
Assigne
Bugs item #556262, was opened at 2002-05-15 09:12
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=556262&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tim Fox (timfox)
Assigned to: Nobody
Bugs item #544437, was opened at 2002-04-15 18:00
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=544437&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: frederik sauer (fredsa)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #544437, was opened at 2002-04-15 18:00
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=544437&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: frederik sauer (fredsa)
Assigned to:
Feature Requests item #556241, was opened at 2002-05-15 09:42
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376688&aid=556241&group_id=22866
Category: Other
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Christian Riege (lqd)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nob
The discussion that Marc and Ole had previously suggested that
the Transaction implementation should be serializable and this is
where externalization would happen rather than through the
TransactionPropagationContextFactory abstraction. These
are what the comments are referring to.
x
58 matches
Mail list logo
