Number of tests run: 609
Successful tests: 560
Errors:47
Failures: 2
[time of test: 26 June 2002 0:35 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vendor: Apple Computer, Inc.]
[j
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version "1.3.0"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edi
On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, Paul Ward wrote:
> I am currently in the process of creating an XMBean descendant and
>PersistenceManager implementation
We don't need an XMBean descendant, just the PM implementation.
> Is there any interest in having this added to the JBoss head?
Yes.
> If so, does an
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version "1.4.0"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edi
Feature Requests item #574016, was opened at 2002-06-26 08:59
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376688&aid=574016&group_id=22866
Category: Other
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Yannick Menager (ymenager)
Assigned to: Nob
Why I had to create an XMBean descendant:
First, XMBean's link to the PM interface is through the instance created in the static
initializer for the ModelMBeanInvoker class. This class is hard coded to use the
NullPersistence class as it's PM. The only flexibility to change this that I've fou
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version "1.3.0"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edi
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version "1.4.0"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edi
On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, Bill Burke wrote:
> ProxyFactory is not an MBean. Just an object right now. Config code,
> creates and attaches ProxyFactorys to each EJB. (Each EJB is an mbean
> though).
Still trying to understand ..
Seems like I don't need an HTTPInvoker. Only an HTTPInvokerProxy and
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Paul Ward wrote:
> Why I had to create an XMBean descendant:
>
> First, XMBean's link to the PM interface is through the instance created in the
>static
> initializer for the ModelMBeanInvoker class. This class is hard coded to use the
>NullPersistence
> class as it's PM.
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version "1.3.0"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edi
First of all, I'm really delighted you are working on this.
You are going to have conflicts with our current usage of **-service.xml
files, since we are abusing them to serve for both telling the server what
mbeans we want and what their initial configuration is, and as our only
form of persisten
Hello,
> Seems like I don't need an HTTPInvoker. Only an HTTPInvokerProxy and a
> InvokerServlet, that forwards invocations to the local invoker. If I
your Invoker should directly forward invocations to the JMX MBeanServer and
not forward it to another local invoker
--
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version "1.4.0"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edi
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version "1.3.0"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edi
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Holger Engels
> Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 6:19 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] http transport
>
>
> On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, Bill Burke wrote:
>
> > ProxyFactory is not an MBe
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Holger Engels
> Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 6:19 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] http transport
>
>
> On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, Bill Burke wrote:
>
> > ProxyFactory is not an MBe
> Yes, a sar is perfect for this since there's really no config for this
> invoker, right?
you now what we need? It is an XML file for config with the JAR *inside the
xml in a CDATA section (as MIME encoded for example)!! ;)
We don't care about the extra-size anyway. So, instead of having an XML
Your ideas both seem promising. I'm still not sure about what we want as
the primary determinant of which mbeans are present in a restarted server.
My impression of your proposals is that they result in the set of mbeans
being determined by the deployed *-service.xml files available at restart,
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, David Jencks wrote:
> This may work fine for packages deployed by a deploymentScanner, but will
> work less well for packages deployed by directly calling
> MainDeployer.deploy. Scanning for packages may not be the most useful
> deployment method... even though right now it
That raises interesting issues. For example: do we really have a single
point of configuration? Currently, (almost) yes: the files in /conf and
/deploy are enough to start jboss but changes are not brought back to these
files.
If we now want to persist any changes to a db (or anything else) to re
|Seems like I don't need an HTTPInvoker. Only an HTTPInvokerProxy and a
|InvokerServlet, that forwards invocations to the local invoker. If I
use the JMX bus directly,
|understand it, the proxy must provide a TransactionPropagationContext
|instance to each Invocation. This has to be "imported" i
Bugs item #573244, was opened at 2002-06-24 13:30
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=573244&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Julien Viet (cooperfbi)
Assign
Hi guys,
what is the best way to deploy waiting deployments?
As I understand it right, the only time when waiting deployments have
a chance to be deployed is when their deployer is started.
That works with existing deployers. But FoeDeployer has dynamic
diployment abilities, i.e. once it is abl
Bugs item #568619, was opened at 2002-06-13 13:19
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=568619&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Works For Me
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dain Sundstrom (dsundst
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc
> fleury
> Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 12:55 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] http transport
>
>
> |Seems like I don't need an HTTPInvoker. Only an HTTPInvokerProxy and a
Patches item #574198, was opened at 2002-06-26 18:21
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376687&aid=574198&group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: CVS HEAD
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Yannick Menager (ymenager)
Assigned to: Nobo
Bugs item #574199, was opened at 2002-06-26 13:23
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=574199&group_id=22866
Category: JBossTX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Paul Adams (padams)
Assigned to: Nob
2 announcements on training:
1- Inaugural introduction to J2EE on JBoss training in Amsterdam, August
26-30. This is the J2EE on JBoss training, brand new. Given by Juha
lindfors and luke taylor. This covers your getting started on JBoss in
depth,
2- advanced training in Palm July 20, there a
Sorry about the typos, sending emails too fast today,
|2- advanced training in Palm July 20, there are still some sits available
Palma de Mallorca is July 22-25,
marcf
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber Inc.
Don't miss the IM ev
Bugs item #574238, was opened at 2002-06-26 14:53
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=574238&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Steve Wolfangel (swolfangel)
Ass
On 2002.06.26 14:11:38 -0400 Bill Burke wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc
> > fleury
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 12:55 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] http transport
> >
> >
> > |
Maybe you should factor out the "try all waiting packages with new
deployer" functionality so it can be triggered by a new deployer or you can
call it directly from the foe deployer.
Or you could change your design a bit and make each converter into a
subdeployer that registers with MainDeployer,
Bugs item #574252, was opened at 2002-06-26 15:22
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=574252&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Steve Wolfangel (swolfangel)
Ass
Bugs item #574257, was opened at 2002-06-26 13:28
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=574257&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCX
Group: v3.1
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bruce Schuchardt (bruceschuchardt)
Assigned to:
Number of tests run: 659
Successful tests: 659
Errors:0
Failures: 0
[time of test: 26 June 2002 14:39 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vendor: Apple Computer, Inc.]
[j
Bugs item #551533, was opened at 2002-05-02 13:40
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=551533&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Alexei Guevara (aguevara)
Assigne
Bugs item #551533, was opened at 2002-05-02 13:40
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=551533&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
>Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Alexei Guevara (aguevara)
Assig
Number of tests run: 815
Successful tests: 799
Errors:8
Failures: 8
[time of test: 27 June 2002 0:45 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.0]
[java.vendor: IBM Corporation]
[java.vm
So I'm testing the new htmladaptor for the upcoming release and some
of the default String representations just look like
crap(MainDeployer.listDeployed()
for example).
So the obvious need is a mechanism for obtaining an xml representation of
any mbean attribute or operation result as the basis f
yes, see the 'presentationString' descriptor field in the spec
that's where I'd put the model, then have your console render the view
-- Juha
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Scott M Stark wrote:
> So I'm testing the new htmladaptor for the upcoming release and some
> of the default String representati
Number of tests run: 804
Successful tests: 786
Errors:9
Failures: 9
[time of test: 27 June 2002 2:36 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1_03]
[java.vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.]
Number of tests run: 812
Successful tests: 794
Errors:8
Failures: 10
[time of test: 27 June 2002 4:0 GMT]
[java.version: 1.4.0_01]
[java.vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.]
Number of tests run: 806
Successful tests: 789
Errors:9
Failures: 8
[time of test: 27 June 2002 5:38 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.0]
[java.vendor: IBM Corporation]
[java.vm
Number of tests run: 812
Successful tests: 796
Errors:8
Failures: 8
[time of test: 27 June 2002 6:53 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vendor: Blackdown Java-Linux Team
Hello David,
thank you for your feedback.
DJ> Maybe you should factor out the "try all waiting packages with new
DJ> deployer" functionality so it can be triggered by a new deployer or you can
DJ> call it directly from the foe deployer.
Factor out?.. What do you mean? In what place?
For now, al
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Bill Burke wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc
> > fleury
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 12:55 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] http transport
> >
> >
> > |Seems l
47 matches
Mail list logo
