[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-872889 ] CMP using audit-updated-by failing to deploy in v3.2.3

2004-01-08 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #872889, was opened at 2004-01-08 16:46 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=872889group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None

[JBoss-dev] JBoss Test Results: 95 % ( 1679 / 1753 ) - nearly there - who is gonna get us to 100%!. JBoss (HEAD/linux1/1.4.1_05) [AUTOMATED]

2004-01-08 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] Compilation Failed! JBoss (Branch_3_2/winxp/1.3.1_09) [AUTOMATED]

2004-01-08 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] JBoss Shutdown Failed! JBoss (HEAD/linux1/1.4.2_01) [AUTOMATED]

2004-01-08 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] Compilation Failed! JBoss (Branch_3_2/winxp/1.3.1_09) [AUTOMATED]

2004-01-08 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] Test Job Failed to Complete Successfully (or we gave up on it...)! JBoss (HEAD/linux1/1.4.2_01) [AUTOMATED]

2004-01-08 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] Compilation Failed! JBoss (Branch_3_2/winxp/1.3.1_09) [AUTOMATED]

2004-01-08 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] JBoss Test Results: % ( / ) - . JBoss (HEAD/linux1/1.4.2_01) [AUTOMATED]

2004-01-08 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-872889 ] CMP using audit-updated-by failing to deploy in v3.2.3

2004-01-08 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #872889, was opened at 2004-01-08 09:46 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by loubyansky You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=872889group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority:

[JBoss-dev] Compilation Failed! JBoss (Branch_3_2/winxp/1.3.1_09) [AUTOMATED]

2004-01-08 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] Compilation Failed! JBoss (Branch_3_2/winxp/1.3.1_09) [AUTOMATED]

2004-01-08 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] Compilation Failed! JBoss (Branch_3_2/winxp/1.3.1_09) [AUTOMATED]

2004-01-08 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] Compilation Failed! JBoss (Branch_3_2/winxp/1.3.1_09) [AUTOMATED]

2004-01-08 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-872946 ] verifier problem with hot redeploy in 3.2.3

2004-01-08 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #872946, was opened at 2004-01-08 10:41 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=872946group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution:

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-872889 ] CMP using audit-updated-by failing to deploy in v3.2.3

2004-01-08 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #872889, was opened at 2004-01-08 09:46 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by loubyansky You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=872889group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-872998 ] Element [code] does not indent correctly

2004-01-08 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #872998, was opened at 2004-01-08 13:15 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=872998group_id=22866 Category: Nukes Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None

RE: [JBoss-dev] SNMP alert notifications

2004-01-08 Thread Dimitris Andreadis
Hi Bill, In deploy/snmp-adaptor.sar there are 3 configuration files: managers.xml - to which SNMP managers to send traps mbeans.xml - which mbeans/JMX Notification types to register for notifications.xml - how to map specific JMX Notification types to SNMP traps To get a simple example running

RE: [JBoss-dev] Webconsole Snapshot Recording of JMX attributes

2004-01-08 Thread Thomas Diesler
Sacha / Bill, at my old company I implemented a HTML tree control that gets it's input from XML. The idea is, that the server assembles the XML data, either of the whole tree or parts of it and the tree control transforms it into HTML. The server does not need to know about the state of the

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-873012 ] Post Reply does not display the message you're answering to

2004-01-08 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #873012, was opened at 2004-01-08 13:44 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=873012group_id=22866 Category: Nukes Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None

Re: [JBoss-dev] Webconsole Snapshot Recording of JMX attributes

2004-01-08 Thread Bill Burke
yes, but web console has pop-menus on tree control. Thomas Diesler wrote: Sacha / Bill, at my old company I implemented a HTML tree control that gets it's input from XML. The idea is, that the server assembles the XML data, either of the whole tree or parts of it and the tree control transforms

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-863113 ] Session Replication Inconsistent

2004-01-08 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #863113, was opened at 2003-12-19 19:33 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by airsquig You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=863113group_id=22866 Category: Clustering Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: Invalid Priority:

Re: [JBoss-dev] Webconsole Snapshot Recording of JMX attributes

2004-01-08 Thread Ivelin Ivanov
I agree with Thomas. Ws use the same technique. The XML routines in JS are different for IE and NS, but it's relatively simple code. The logic is in the back end. The client just refreshes the tree nodes. You can pop-up on righ-click with DHTML. Ivelin --- Bill Burke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: [JBoss-dev] Webconsole Snapshot Recording of JMX attributes

2004-01-08 Thread Bill Burke
Good for you that you agree. I'm unwilling to do the work to a) write yet another new GUI framework b) port all existing functionality to new framework Personally, I'd rather focus on writing new management functionality with the current web-console than rewriting to a new GUI framework and

[JBoss-dev] Greetings

2004-01-08 Thread MISS MIRIAM AHMED.
Dear Friend, With warm heart I offer my friendship, and greetings and I hope this mail meets you in good time. However strange or surprising this contact might seem to you, as we have not met personally nor had any dealings in the past, I humbly ask that you take due consideration of its

Re: [JBoss-dev] Webconsole Snapshot Recording of JMX attributes

2004-01-08 Thread Ivelin Ivanov
I think our comments came across wrong. I don't think it is critical or important whether the web console runs as a Java plug-in or DHTML. It is just a usability observation. The web console will be used by IT professionals, so I am not concerned that they won't be able to install the plug-in.

[JBoss-dev] Mail Services changes....Let the dominos fall

2004-01-08 Thread acoliver
I just committed support for multiple CC's/BCC, mails which have both local and remote users, and some various minor changes. If anyone can give a hand figuring out why Microsoft Entourage/iMail hates us after we deliver its message and say delivered then I'd really appreciate it. I don't

[JBoss-dev] Mail Services changes....Let the dominos fall

2004-01-08 Thread acoliver
I just committed support for multiple CC's/BCC, mails which have both local and remote users, and some various minor changes. If anyone can give a hand figuring out why Microsoft Entourage/iMail hates us after we deliver its message and say delivered then I'd really appreciate it. I don't

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-873012 ] Post Reply does not display the message you're answering to

2004-01-08 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #873012, was opened at 2004-01-08 12:44 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by cooperfbi You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=873012group_id=22866 Category: Nukes Group: None Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-870874 ] Unmatched tags mess up screen layout

2004-01-08 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #870874, was opened at 2004-01-05 13:37 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by cooperfbi You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=870874group_id=22866 Category: Nukes Group: None Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5

[JBoss-dev] Compilation Failed! JBoss (Branch_3_2/winxp/1.3.1_09) [AUTOMATED]

2004-01-08 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] Re: softly but very j ke

2004-01-08 Thread Efrain Bowman
ehiji lzy sjy ofpdxcmc HI,Jboss-development I have been receiving emails saying that I'm contributing to the moral decay of society by selling the Banned C D. That may be, but I feel Strongly that you have a right to benefit from this hard-to-find

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-872998 ] Element [code] does not indent correctly

2004-01-08 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #872998, was opened at 2004-01-08 12:15 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by cooperfbi You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=872998group_id=22866 Category: Nukes Group: None Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority:

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-870541 ] Nukes not evaluting ${config:minAge} correctly

2004-01-08 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #870541, was opened at 2004-01-04 22:46 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by cooperfbi You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=870541group_id=22866 Category: Nukes Group: CVS HEAD Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-870529 ] Nuke not using minPass attribute

2004-01-08 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #870529, was opened at 2004-01-04 22:18 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by cooperfbi You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=870529group_id=22866 Category: Nukes Group: CVS HEAD Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed

[JBoss-dev] Compilation Failed! JBoss (Branch_3_2/winxp/1.3.1_09) [AUTOMATED]

2004-01-08 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] JBoss Test Results: 95 % ( 1498 / 1567 ) - nearly there - who is gonna get us to 100%!. JBoss (HEAD/winxp/1.4.1_05) [AUTOMATED]

2004-01-08 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] JBoss Test Results: 95 % ( 1467 / 1539 ) - nearly there - who is gonna get us to 100%!. JBoss (HEAD/linux1/1.4.1_05) [AUTOMATED]

2004-01-08 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] !

2004-01-08 Thread
Title: /// 1 2 IT 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 020-38742253-80178004 020-38742580:[EMAIL PROTECTED]www.cncfo.com/www.21cnsun.com --- This SF.net email

[JBoss-dev] JBoss Test Results: 95 % ( 1465 / 1538 ) - nearly there - who is gonna get us to 100%!. JBoss (HEAD/linux1/1.4.2_01) [AUTOMATED]

2004-01-08 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===